<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Independent&#8221; Mainstream Media: Advertisers Called Shots on Detroit Free Press Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/11424/independent-mainstream-media-advertisers-called-shots-on-detroit-free-press-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/11424/independent-mainstream-media-advertisers-called-shots-on-detroit-free-press-coverage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:41:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mudbug</title>
		<link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/11424/independent-mainstream-media-advertisers-called-shots-on-detroit-free-press-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-144465</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/?p=11424#comment-144465</guid>
		<description>Guess you didn&#039;t notice that the Wall Street Journal who ran the original story on this, (guess you don&#039;t feel attribution is appropriate), ran a correction that supported the Free Press contention that nobody dictated anything to them.

&lt;strong&gt;M:  Quit lying.  Not only did I attribute, I quoted and linked to the WSJ.  And there was no such correction that &quot;supported the Free Press contention.&quot;  You must be one of the Freep &quot;reporters&quot; on the payroll of the paper&#039;s, um, &quot;business partners.&quot;  DS&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess you didn&#8217;t notice that the Wall Street Journal who ran the original story on this, (guess you don&#8217;t feel attribution is appropriate), ran a correction that supported the Free Press contention that nobody dictated anything to them.</p>
<p><strong>M:  Quit lying.  Not only did I attribute, I quoted and linked to the WSJ.  And there was no such correction that &#8220;supported the Free Press contention.&#8221;  You must be one of the Freep &#8220;reporters&#8221; on the payroll of the paper&#8217;s, um, &#8220;business partners.&#8221;  DS</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/11424/independent-mainstream-media-advertisers-called-shots-on-detroit-free-press-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-126289</link>
		<dc:creator>JF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/?p=11424#comment-126289</guid>
		<description>Maybe of interest: the end of the trail for newspapers, etc.:
there is &quot;newspaper death watch&quot;, dealing with the demise
and closure of newspapers, often providing the essential 
financial data to all that:
http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/

and then there is a site dealing with folding magazines:
http://www.magazinedeathpool.com/

Also of interest might be the fate of a website set up by
journalists of a folded paper, the Rocky Mountain News.
This one is of interest because it gives a proper of the
vanishing readers. There were just 200 subscribers left over
from a once pretty formidable newspaper with a readership
of maybe close to 200 000 (my guess here) years ago.
http://www.businessinsider.com/ex-newspaper-staffers-denver-news-site-to-end-2009-10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe of interest: the end of the trail for newspapers, etc.:<br />
there is &#8220;newspaper death watch&#8221;, dealing with the demise<br />
and closure of newspapers, often providing the essential<br />
financial data to all that:<br />
<a href="http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/</a></p>
<p>and then there is a site dealing with folding magazines:<br />
<a href="http://www.magazinedeathpool.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.magazinedeathpool.com/</a></p>
<p>Also of interest might be the fate of a website set up by<br />
journalists of a folded paper, the Rocky Mountain News.<br />
This one is of interest because it gives a proper of the<br />
vanishing readers. There were just 200 subscribers left over<br />
from a once pretty formidable newspaper with a readership<br />
of maybe close to 200 000 (my guess here) years ago.<br />
<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/ex-newspaper-staffers-denver-news-site-to-end-2009-10" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinsider.com/ex-newspaper-staffers-denver-news-site-to-end-2009-10</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas S.</title>
		<link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/11424/independent-mainstream-media-advertisers-called-shots-on-detroit-free-press-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-125898</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/?p=11424#comment-125898</guid>
		<description>Check out WATCHDOG.COM  The man that runs this website was supposed to be the consumer watchdog for the Hartford Courant which is a Connecticut newspaper.  The only problem was that management gave him a list of advertisers he was not allowed to say anything negative about.  Type &quot;fired from courant&quot; into the watchdog web site search window to find his stories about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out WATCHDOG.COM  The man that runs this website was supposed to be the consumer watchdog for the Hartford Courant which is a Connecticut newspaper.  The only problem was that management gave him a list of advertisers he was not allowed to say anything negative about.  Type &#8220;fired from courant&#8221; into the watchdog web site search window to find his stories about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/11424/independent-mainstream-media-advertisers-called-shots-on-detroit-free-press-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-125889</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/?p=11424#comment-125889</guid>
		<description>Well they got caught. I agree with you, Debbie, but the real story here is that they are so loose about this that the Freep was actually caught.  I don&#039;t which &quot;news&quot; media outlets are not whoring themselves one way or the other--are there any?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they got caught. I agree with you, Debbie, but the real story here is that they are so loose about this that the Freep was actually caught.  I don&#8217;t which &#8220;news&#8221; media outlets are not whoring themselves one way or the other&#8211;are there any?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NormanF</title>
		<link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/11424/independent-mainstream-media-advertisers-called-shots-on-detroit-free-press-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-125835</link>
		<dc:creator>NormanF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/?p=11424#comment-125835</guid>
		<description>Just follow the money... besides their blatant partisanship and ideological bias, today&#039;s newspapers and TV news shows have to make a profit. And that means they have to compromise editorial independence to remain alive. If no one buys it, they&#039;re out of business. We know now there&#039;s a lot more the MSM has been keeping its audience from learning about - then again its the only business that can tell their customers to shove it! They&#039;re still declining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just follow the money&#8230; besides their blatant partisanship and ideological bias, today&#8217;s newspapers and TV news shows have to make a profit. And that means they have to compromise editorial independence to remain alive. If no one buys it, they&#8217;re out of business. We know now there&#8217;s a lot more the MSM has been keeping its audience from learning about &#8211; then again its the only business that can tell their customers to shove it! They&#8217;re still declining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
