Comments on: More “Religion of Peace” “Peacefulness” on US Soil: Can’t Wear a Cross @ the Mall?!

By: cowboy

cowboy — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:16:12 +0000

ANYONE GOT A KARAN I CAN PISS ON?

By: mtom

mtom — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:58:58 +0000

Hi
Stop muslims from coming to Usa or west.If the hate
cross so much.We need to crush them.

By: Old Gringo

Old Gringo — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:18:12 +0000

The situation is NOT “Catch 22″ if afew of the jurors are knowledgeable regarding jury rights. Informed jurors essentially voided fugitive slave laws through nullification. Inform yourself and others: http://www.fija.org.

By: mike c

mike c — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:09:58 +0000

Ive said it before and i will have to say it again! No musnuts. No problems! And i will have to get a nice piece of jewelry with a star and cross to wear!! Some bling to piss em off!

By: John Hamilton

John Hamilton — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:28:52 +0000

Sentence him to about 5 years in prison in isolation then send the raghead back to the burning sand from whence he came.

By: sorrow01

sorrow01 — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:24:43 +0000

There is a growing realization among the Islamists that the United States will go out of its way to avoid prosecuting Moslems who commit crimes, if they can be related even remotely to a religious motivation. We had the hideous spectacle at Ft. Hood of General Casey pimping “Diversity” while funishing information on the Islamist Major’s deeds. Yes, Islamists’ self-esteem trumps slaughtered military personnel anytime.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:18:42 +0000

This could happen to me very easily. I have a large Christian tattoo on my arm and have worn a cross. I will now be wearing it everyday until I find a more comfortable one to wear. Rounded corners are important. Pleeeeeeeese let this happen to me or around meeeeee.

These guys are out of line and need good citizens to stand up for themselves.

By: sk

sk — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:09:34 +0000

The whole business about retaliation against Muslims for an act by a Muslim is just a nasty attempt to allow Muslims to play the victim.

I was going to say that a concerned Muslim, if he were honest, would admit the problems of his religion and attempt to remedy these problems. But really, how could he? His “religion” is based around the example of a mass murderer, pedophile, racist, liar with probable psychiatric problems and a possible connection to satan. What could a concerned Muslim do except convert to some other religion?

Frankly, perhaps a bit of “retaliation” is a good thing. We should be free to point out that anyone who considers Mohammed to be a decent man (let alone a perfect one) is no different from a passionate admirer of Hitler. Would we be reluctant to caste judgment upon a fan of Hitler? Would we be expected not to say bad things about Hitler so as not to offend such a fan?

By: robfromohio

robfromohio — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:52:18 +0000

my thoughts exactly, but I DO have my carry permit, If this bastard would have done this to me or in front of me he would have been staring down the bussiness end of a Springfield XD40

By: Old Gringo

Old Gringo — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:19:39 +0000

Indeed it IS better to be tried by 12 “fully informed jurors” than carried by six. Help educate your fellow citizens; go to: http://www.fija.org and learn about jury rights.

“It is not only his right but his duty…
to find the verdict according to his own best
understanding, judgement, and conscience, though
in direct opposition to the direction of the
court.”
John Adams 2nd Pres. USA