Comments on: Finally, a Palestinian “Charity” Tells The Truth

By: Johanna {Czech-American}

Johanna {Czech-American} — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:09:09 +0000

Haha holy shit! You steal their land then call them terrorists.

It’s like Hitler and the Nazis with different makeup, you’re committing the same crimes.

A terrorist hardly tells the truth, this includes “Israel.”

Quit defacing Judaism, whore.

By: garrett

garrett — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:55:27 +0000

This is ridiculous, You just openly accuse all charities benefiting the Palestinians as funding terrorist. You’re sick. Do you have any idea what kind of suffering goes on over there constantly? The children that suffer? Also..”Especially Jewish” Israeli’s? What is the matter with you? Israel is openly a racists “jews only” state. Also how could they tell if the soldier wasn’t jewish (which would be rare)? Because the name tag would say Meshaal instead of Goldstein. You’re extremely ignorant and disgusting, as are all supporters of israel, well either ignorant or evil.

By: Ruq

Ruq — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:04:16 +0000

This is a sweeping generalisation, one false organisation does NOT mean that every Islamic/Palestinian charity that dedicates itself to helping the lives of thousands of suffering Palestinians is funding terrorism.
It’s pretty saddening that you would use one fabricated example to encourage people to stop donating money to charities that would better the lives of so many people. Whatever your political views are, I can’t understand why it would be on somebody’s agenda to support the destruction & murder of a nation…

By: BB

BB — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:55:31 +0000

Gotta hand it to the scum for “open disclosure” this time, eh? You wonder if the sequel will include the gauntlet the abductee will be forced to endure?

By: howardroark

howardroark — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:19:00 +0000

hey! once the arab israelis’ have been reptriated with the utopian muslim nation of their choice (or not of their choice; i.e. gaza), the vacant homes will serve as immediately-available settlements!

how can obama object when the palestinians’ themselves created a housing glut?

By: howardroark

howardroark — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:10:08 +0000

i say that isreals’ natural response to attempts at this would be to remove arab israeli’s from the country…

is being escorted across the border to gaza worth $1.4M to them?

By: DK

DK — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:10:57 +0000

Our country is quickly being infested by them. Observant Jews are less likely to support these animals. We eat at kosher restaurants, we don’t frequent these little shopping marts, and we are genuinely determined to not support anything associated with those barbarians. But I can’t figure out what to do about the purchase of gasoline? It nauseates me that there is this dilemma and I already know to stay away from Citgo!

By: Doda McCheesle

Doda McCheesle — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:05:39 +0000

I offer two dollars and sixty four cents (what I have in my pocket) for the head of Usama Kahlout… yeah yeah, I know I would be overpaying, but hey, I’m generous like that.

By: Ginger

Ginger — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:07:45 +0000

Its not often you come across an honest terrorist (benefactors included) lol

By: NormanF

NormanF — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:01:57 +0000

Money is fungible. And when we don’t know where it is going – not necessarily to do good. And it could hurt America – not just the Jews.

The big question is – does our government even care? Not a time when 9/11 is in danger of being forgotten and it is playing nice with Islamists.

Muslim “charity” is a very different animal from what Jews and Christians think of as being charity. We ignore it to our own peril.