May 9, 2007, - 6:34 pm

Fort Dix Six Show Us WHY We Need the CLEAR Act

By Debbie Schlussel
We’re very lucky that an alert, courageous Circuit City employee turned in the Fort Dix Six terrorists. They might have killed many at the Army-Navy football game, as they’d once planned. Or they might have shot “as many soldiers as possible” at Fort Dix, because pizza delivery men are let into military installations far too easily.
Or at least three of them might have been deported long ago if the Federal CLEAR Act legislation was passed by Congress and enacted despite the heavy and successful lobbying against it by Arab and Islamist groups. The CLEAR Act would require all state and local law enforcement to ask about and check the immigration status of all parties that they stop. Since they check our arrest records, outstanding warrants, etc. when they stop us, police checking our immigration status would seem just as easy. And it is. If only they had the mechanism to do so.

eljvirandshainduka.jpg

Islamic Terrorists Eljvir & Shain Duka

But the three Duka men who are ethnic Albanians living here illegally were never checked and deported because, as FOX News reports, they operated in “sanctuary cities.” Do you think that’s by accident? Not a chance. Islamic terrorists and illegal aliens know about sanctuary cities, and they purposefully locate themselves there so they can continue their terror plotting unfettered. They laugh at us and the sanctuaryists.
It almost worked for these guys, but for the brave Circuit City tipster. More from FOX News:

Three brothers charged in the alleged Fort Dix terror plot have been living illegally in the U.S. for more than 23 years and were accepted as Americans by neighbors and friends who had no idea they would scheme to attack military bases and slaughter GIs.
A federal law enforcement source confirmed to FOX News that the three ‚Äî Dritan “Anthony” or “Tony” Duka, 28; Shain Duka, 26; and Eljvir “Elvis” Duka, 23 ‚Äî also accumulated 19 traffic citations, but because they operated in “sanctuary cites,” where law enforcement does not routinely report illegal immigrants to homeland security, none of the tickets raised red flags.
The brothers entered the United States near Brownsville, Texas, in 1984, the source said, which would put their ages at 1 to 6 when they crossed the border.
The source said there is no record of them entering by way of a regular border crossing, so they are investigating whether they were smuggled into the country.

So much for the claim–often made by liberals and open borders fans–that terrorists never enter the U.S. through the Southern border.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

25 Responses

Circuit City or Kinko’s? The disinformationists seem to be pulling a Cho on us!
Maybe better that way, wouldn’t want to identify international terrorists….would we?

akak on May 9, 2007 at 6:58 pm

Guess which city is the latest to vote to not asking immigration status, Detroit, hugh suprise.
http://freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070509/NEWS01/70509045

mbwings on May 9, 2007 at 7:27 pm

Looks like the Clintons, in their liberal “all you need is love” mindset may have brought about this latest at Ft. Dix. As Rush noted today (and will no doubt have much more about this tomorrow), Mrs. Clinton had a lot to do with setting up this “refugee” camp for Albanians (read: Muslims) from war-torn Kosovo, shipping in upwards of 20,000 Muslims, unchecked and unvetted, to the camp the “refugees” named “The Village” in honor of Mrs. Bill Clinton’s idiotic book (no doubt ghost-written for her).
So we have the former First Lady, current (alleged) Senator from New York (she’s really only at her latest way-station on the road to the Presidency, of course) and apparent Defeatocrat front-runner for the nomination in ’08 to thank for bringing in untold numbers of terrorists-in-waiting, of whom the Ft. Dix Six only barely scratches the surface. Be ready, folks, for many, many more attacks from these people.
Stunning, as well, isn’t it, that the vaunted FBI essentially had no knowledge that any of this was going on, and had they not be tipped-off by a mere clerk (just a regular American, who the Defeatocrats don’t want keeping a vigilant eye out), in all likelihood these attacks would have gone off as planned, killing unknown scores, maybe hundreds, of our armed service personnel before the attackers (Islamic terrorists; redundant, I know) could be killed. Hard to put much faith in the FBI anymore, ain’t it? At least as it is presently constituted and restricted in doing its job.

theendisnear on May 9, 2007 at 9:55 pm

It takes a village to raise a jihadi . . .

AmericanJewess on May 10, 2007 at 3:28 am

Yes, indeedy! Blame Clinton. Brilliant.
I SUPPOSE IT’S MORE BRILLIANT TO BLAME RICHARD NIXON OR HERBERT HOOVER. BECAUSE THEY–NOT BILL CLINTON–WERE THE ONES WHO CHOSE TO GET INVOLVED IN THE WAR THERE AND TAKE THE SIDE OF THE MUSLIMS AGAINST THE ETHNIC SERBS? CLEARLY, CLINTON IS TO BLAME ON THIS. I’VE RIGHTLY BLAMED HIM FOR TAKING SIDES–WORSE, THE WRONG SIDE!–OF THAT WAR, SINCE THE BEGINNING. I WAS RIGHT THEN, AND I AND MY READERS ARE RIGHT NOW. I JUST LOVE HOW LIBS ARE SAYING WE HAD NO RIGHT TO GET INVOLVED IN IRAQ, BUT YET WE SOMEHOW HAD BUSINESS GETTING INVOLVED BETWEEEN MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS–AND WORSE, SIDING WITH THE MUSLIMS–WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS PREZ. GET A CLUE . . . AND SOME CONSISTENCY, DUDE.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

Richardphx on May 10, 2007 at 3:56 am

Debbie Dearest,
At least with Clinton’s war we had a reasonable plan, and our objectives were met in a manner essentially consistent with the way we were presented with it. We did not go in to protect Moslems, but human beings threatened with mass murder. Evil and awful as Saddam was, there was no parallel situation in Iraq. And I supported the war at first, because I believed the world would be better of with Saddam gone, and that it for humanitarian reasons it was worthwhile. I soon jumped ship as I saw how bungled Bush’s war was, as opposed to Clinton’s. So I did say we had a right to get involved, at least if we did it the right way. But look at what’s transpired. Did we do the right thing, a smart thing? Are we really ay safer now that Saddam is gone, only to have the void filled with far worse monsters? To lose American lives so Iraq could put in power an Iranian-style sharia government? Would you want your child to die for that?
Anyway, let’s blame Clinton. It feels good, like stepping into a pair of warm pajamas your mother just took out of the dryer. Snug and toasty. Only it’s absurd, and we fool only ourselves. Clinton succeeded, Bush failed. Face it, get over it and smell the coffee – we had a glorious window in which we may have succeeded, and we slammed it shut with a series of now famous blunders acknowledged by the nation’s highest ranking military. The war is lost and over and it’s heartbreaking. Direct your outrage where it really belongs, at the little fool who brought us into this mess. Thanks for listening.

Richardphx on May 10, 2007 at 6:56 am

Hi Debbie, if you’re a mom, Happy Mother’s Day! If not, say hi to your mom for me! This “guy” Richardphx epitomizes all of the people whining about Iraq, yadda, yadda, yadda. They all really frustrate me because they just don’t get it. Our troops are fighting (and dying) OVER THERE, so we won’t die over here. This WAR is bigger than Iraq, and IRAQ is really the main beach-head against this enemy. It always was. Give him his due, Bill Clinton is a master politician. However, he’s a terrible leader, especially when the nation was/is under attack. The activities occupying our Congress are ALL politics. There isn’t one second being spent on the business of running or protecting our nation. Ergo, acts bordering on treason and non-support in Congress, a totally distracted White House, total non-enforcement of federal laws, over-prosecution of REAL citizens, no prosecution of illegal invaders. I suspect that nothing will be done until the original reason for the Second Amendment is forced upon all of us…. “To Arms, To Arms!!… THEY are HERE and we must fight them from our OWN homes!!!”

FreeAmerican on May 10, 2007 at 8:03 am

“Our troops are fighting (and dying) OVER THERE, so we won’t die over here.”
Okay, let’s take a look at that, like adults pursuing serious inquiry. So are you saying if we win in Iraq, we win the war on terror? Because when last I heard, Al Qaeda was armed mainly with men from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan and Afghanistan. If we win in Iraq (now a virtual impossibility, but let’s pretend for a moment), will the other Al Qaeda members call it a day and pack up and go home to sell real estate or open a hotel franchise? No, they are still out there, and we really did have them on the run until Iraq. I am all for fighting and exterminating Al Qaeda. Iraq threw us off course. But let’s look even deeper at your argument about fighting them there so we don’t have to fight them here. Let’s say we finally arrive at the day of our inentiable and agonizing defeat. Do you really think Sunni and Sh’ite clans are going to hope into row boats and come to fight us in America? Of course not. These are ancient tribal grudges. There is ony a small smattering of outside career terrorists in Iraq, with many more on the sidelines elsewhere, and they will always hate America and threaten us, no matter what happens in Iraq. But this bizarre notion of the same terrorists we are fighting in Iraq will, upon our sensibly departing, will then come to America to fight us…well, it’s so absurd, I hardly know what to say. How will they get there? What will they threaten us with? It really sounds good, that odd Bush slogang you repeat. Just like, “As the Iraqi Army stands up, we will stand down.” Only, just like the talk of mushroom clouds and aluminum tubes and yellowcake uranium, they are empty and meaningless phrases, unsupported by any reality. Now, I’m willing to listen to an argument about how these primitive terrorists in Iraq can reach America and threaten us, and why you worry that this will happen when we lose in Iraq. What is it based on, this irrational fear, and where did it come from?
If you read the superb book The Loming Tower about the birth and rise of Al Qaeda, you will see plainly that they have zero reason to bring the battle to America. It was always’s OBL’s strategy to lure America into his territory and then slowly bleed us to death. And look what happened. We gave him his wish on a silver platter, tied up with a red bow.
I am watching Tony Blair’s resignation speech right now, and it breaks my heart to see so many good people go down in Bush’s immolation. So unnecessary, so sad and so pointless. But let’s throw more of our boys into the meatgrinder “so we don’t have to fight them here.” Oh Christ, what a deception. What a calamity.

Richardphx on May 10, 2007 at 8:45 am

The federal and local government employees and politicians who enable the sanctuary movement should be indicted and prosecuted. We cannot shirk this fight. We have got to get this generation ready to fight for America and for liberty. “Few there are who will stand in the gap.”

J-Lin on May 10, 2007 at 9:26 am

Let’s look at the facts. How many years since 9/11? And what have we accomplished? And who was president?
Fight them there so we don’t fight them here. What bullshit.
Illegals flooding in with no control. Broken borders, still. Allies disappearing, goodbye Tony B. Military weakened by idiotic war strategy. Crazy muslims all over the U.S., Detroit area in particular.
Resign Bush, you failed. Join Tony and commiserate.
Wake up America. They are coming to a mall near you.
B.O. and Hillary are also bullshit. Get real. Get a real candidate. It is the only last hope.

Happiness Pursuer on May 10, 2007 at 9:52 am

I am curious and uncomfortable about the three illegal alien Fort Dix terrorists, and hopefully someone will find out and release the answer. The article you referenced stated that the three came across across the border from Mexico and into Texas, at the ages from 1 to six. HUH? Did the six year old simply wander across the border while the one year crawled? And, how did they get from Albania to Mexico? OK, maybe one too many questions. I will not apologize for my western sensibilities and the one query I hope that will be answered is, where are the parents? There have to be parents for crying out loud.
If the children are illegal, certainly the parent’s immigration status is questionable, too. How can the children be illegal and not the parents? The authorities prosecuting this case have more homework to do. More arrests to make. And, more deportations to execute.

zyzzyg on May 10, 2007 at 10:04 am

Anyone who believes that the DIX Six acted in isolation is a fool. This was just practice to test and learn and sacrifice these 6 crazies.
Surely you are not going to believe a government that imprisons border guards and immunizes drug runners; that tells you try a surge, you will like it; that spends $500 billion and finds us worse off.
Torture these 6 bastards and then dump them in the dumpster. They forfeited humane treatment; they would have killed as many as they could. They never had constitutional rights. They are illegals. They are here for the sole purpose to help destroy this country.
We are at war, remember, the war on terror. This is not playing in the sand box. If you need to understand war, go watch the history channel.

Happiness Pursuer on May 10, 2007 at 10:39 am

‘Anyway, let’s blame Clinton. It feels good, like stepping into a pair of warm pajamas your mother just took out of the dryer. Snug and toasty. Only it’s absurd, and we fool only ourselves. Clinton succeeded, Bush failed.’
Clinton succeeded at what? Creating another comfy jihadi zone in the Balkans? And the UN wants to create an independent Kosovo for their muslimista friends…. Just what we need – another Euro-muslim state. Crikey!

J-Lin on May 10, 2007 at 11:15 am

Jihadi zone in the Balkans? What exactly are you referring to? Look, we marched into Baghdad to liberate Moslems as well. Do you see that as a noble cause worth dying for? I’m really curious. Looking forward to your sources on Jihad in the Balkans. Funny, how I haven’t seen anything about that.

Richardphx on May 10, 2007 at 11:49 am

Suppose if, G-D Forbid,these would be terrorists plotted to carry out a shooting spree on the ACLU headquaters. How would the good samaritan liberals react to that?

Jew Chick on May 10, 2007 at 1:46 pm

They would never shoot up the ACLU, Jew Chick. It contains far too many useful dhummis.

stevecanuck on May 10, 2007 at 5:28 pm

We should never help these muslims, no matter what the circumstances. Whether it’s helping them win a war they couldn’t do by themselves, or liberating them from a dictator(again, because they couldn’t do it themselves). These people will never acknowledge or pay back any good deed we do for them. So why bother?
Kosovo is to the Serbs what Mecca is to the muslims. How would muslims react if suddenly infidels were in the majority of the population in Mecca and demanding that they get to govern the site? I can guarantee they wouldn’t deal with it nearly as kindly as the Serbs have.
The Serbs have been fighting muslim imperialism for hundreds of years. Suddenly they gain a slight upper hand and we treat them, undeservingly mind you, like new nazis(even though the nazis persecuted them as well).
Clinton was a coward for siding with the jihadists, plain and simple. He bent to pressure from the UN(and plenty of influential politicians who received large amounts of campaign contributions courtesy of Albanian criminals in the US). This is the same UN who was and still is so compassionate to the needs of organizations like hezbollah and hamas. He must’ve also known that the Serbs were easy targets because they wouldn’t resort to cowardly terrorist/guerrilla warfare tactics to get their way. Yeah, what a great “plan” Clinton had.
Blah, I’m done with my rant…

Jose on May 10, 2007 at 5:31 pm

Richardphx, whatever. I wish I could claim this as my own but Dennis Miller gets the credit. Iraq has evolved into a psychotic saltlick. Brings most of them to a central spot where it makes it easier to kill them. The surge will work. Too bad it wasn’t done earlier, but policy was to do the light foot print policy. Didn’t work, oh, well. We’ll be in Iraq as long as we’ve been in Germany, Okinawa, Phillipines, Kosovo and where ever else the hell we’ve been forever. Got it?

John Cunningham on May 11, 2007 at 2:11 am

Interesting. No one answered my simple question about jihad in the Balkans. No one addressed the fact that Al Qaeda’s heaviest concentration is outside of Iraq, and that if the surge is too intense, like Moqtada Al Sadr they will simply hop the border and run elsewhere. This notion that by winning in Iraq we will destroy al Qaeda because a handful of their terrorists are there is ludicrous. Does anyone here really believe it? Also, no one addressed the question of how winning in Iraq means we “won’t have to fight them over here.” As I asked, how will they get here? Most tellingly, no one responded to my simple question: if it was so awful of us to waste American lives and resources protecting Muslims in Bosnia, what makes it something that’s so worthwhile doing in Iraq, where the people we are closely partnered with have indicated a strong interest in turning Iraq into an Iranian-style theocracy? Is it worth giving up your child’s life so Iran can gain a stronger grip on Iraq? Think about it. Just think. You can really do it, if you want to.

Richardphx on May 11, 2007 at 2:32 am

“We did not go in to protect Moslems, but human beings threatened with mass murder”
Serbs were mass murdered too. And by foreign mujahideen units to which the Clinton administration turned a blind eye.
“Jihadi zone in the Balkans? What exactly are you referring to? Look, we marched into Baghdad to liberate Moslems as well. Do you see that as a noble cause worth dying for? I’m really curious. Looking forward to your sources on Jihad in the Balkans. Funny, how I haven’t seen anything about that.”
“Interesting. No one answered my simple question about jihad in the Balkans. ”
No one answered it because it is blatantly ignorant on your part. It shows you don’t know the issue.
These guys came from the jihadi zone which existed right from the beginning of the Post Yugoslav wars, and which Clinton made worse in Balkans. they came from Pristina in Kosovo. Prista, Kosovo, and Sarejevo Bosnia are johad cetners. They along with Tirana Albania are the thre most important centers of illegal weapons, drugs and human trafficing (very young girls from all over into the forced sex trade) of all of Europe.
This funds terrorists, including al queda whose European center is Sarajevo.
Read and learn:
http://counterterror.typepad.com/the_counterterrorism_blog/2005/08/algerian_junior.html
http://jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2370031
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/30/AR2005113002098.html
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/013044.php
For goodness sakes: we ourselves accused Iran of opening a huge smuggling route into Bosnia in 1992.
In 1993 the US government was saying Albanian drug smuggling profits were funding a Muslim arms buildup in Bosnia, Croatia, Kosovo, and Macedonia.
In 1995 we know that that Bosnian fighters are going to Checnya and Chechen and Al Queada fighters are in Bosnia.
Today the situation is a,1000 times worse because we reinforced their BS view of themselves as aggrieved.

FrankLev on May 11, 2007 at 2:07 pm

Interesting. No one answered my simple question about jihad in the Balkans.
Not simple question, simple minded one an ignorant one.
No one answered because you haven’t bothered to pick up any material on the subject yet feel free to simply reverse the truth.
http://counterterror.typepad.com/the_counterterrorism_blog/2005/08/algerian_junior.html
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/10/26/inv.bosnia.arrests/
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/013044.php
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/30/AR2005113002098.html
Our own government in 92 was noting the massive pipeline of arms and revolutionary guards from Iran to Bosnia
In 93 we were noting the black market arms and drug trade out of Bosnia was funding terrorists there, in Afghanistan and elsewhere.
throughout both the Bosnia and Kosovo wars it was clear foreign Mujahaddeen were fighting there and committing some really nasty atrocities. They even killed fellow Moslems who were moderate.
Now according to the press, left right and center they are entrenched in Sarejevo and Prisina more than ever.
Do you realize how silly you are saying this is not a terrorism zone given that four of the six guys arrested in the story on which we are commenting are from there!
Two kinds of reactions to the fact that htese guys are form there:
1) idiots saying — “oh my, we helped them and still they hate us, I dont get it.”
2) people who know that the greatest proportionate victims of Moslem slaughter after the Armenians are the Serbs. Slaughtered, oppressed, forced to convert, enslaved, children taken with the “child tax” over centuries. In modern times after their independence they were murdered in huge numbers (second only to Jews and Roma) by croats AND Moslems who sided with the Nazis. In the 90′s when they fought back and got singled out for punishment in a civil war. We bombed the Serbs, blamed the Serbs and built up in the Moslems there a victim mentality which is a total perversion and which along with the long standing mujahadeen presence has in fact created a terror zone.
We made a cancer there. The Bulgarians, Macedonians, Greeks and Serbs know it. They spent 400 years under an oppressive Islamic occupation and now face this very nasty threat in their midst. We know it. The Balkans are awash in Albanian, Kosovo and Bosnian mafias that use their synergy with the wolrdwide mujahadeen. That mafias nastiest “enforcers” are guys who have gone through chechnya, Bosnia, and Afghanistan.

FrankLev on May 11, 2007 at 2:27 pm

Richardphx, I’ve got videos on my laptop of Ethnic Albanian Muslims burning Orthodox Christian churces in Kosovo. If that isn’t jihad, or “ethnic cleansing”, I’d like to know what is.

steve ventry on May 12, 2007 at 1:35 pm

Okay, let’s say for argument’s sake you’re right, that there is jihad in Bosnia (although anecdotal evidence of a church burning years ago, or whenever, doesn’t quite prove there’s “jihad” there.) Let’s say you’re right. So doesn’t that mean we are running the exact same risk in Iraq, where there was not jihad in the past and Saddam the Butcher at least ran a secular state that kept the Sunnis and Shiites from slaughtering one another? (And I know, Saddam slaughtered plenty himself.) The question is, how can you support our giving our lives to bring liberty and freedom to these people you see as monsters, who have already shown they will use their new freedom to make Iraq a theocracy with incredibly close ties to the arch-enemy Iran? Remember, al Sadr has the blessings of Maliki and got away scot free after the bloodbath in Najaf. Is this what we should fight for?

Richardphx on May 12, 2007 at 10:23 pm

Medieval or even older sources referring to lemons always mean the very aromatic, but juice-free citron..

apelsinik on May 24, 2012 at 2:26 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field