Comments on: Would PETA Do This to Islam? Duh, Feathers Come From Animals

By: Rin

Rin — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 07:22:12 +0000

So what you’re saying is that you would take a picture naked in a church with a cross covering your bits because being naked while defacing your own religion is ok when you’re doing it for a national animal rights group that saves the puppies. You know nothing about Christianity….Thats all i got from your post. Maybe you should do some research on your own religion or find a new one.

By: BoKnows

BoKnows — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:11:31 +0000

Actually, the New Testament also describes angels as fearsome. The popular depiction is just that.

By: Pamela

Pamela — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:57:06 +0000

Hello everyone!!!!! If you look closely at the picture, it’s a painting, not a photograph!!!!!! Those are not real feathers. Even if it were “feathers”, there are man-made feathers, fake feathers, just like there is man-made leather, fake leather. I am a member of PETA and you are all idiots to think these are real. As far as killing animals, NO WE DO NOT!!!! PETA does everything in it’s power to speak on behalf of the animals. I’m also a christian and do not find this ad offensive at all. It’s an angel coming from heaven to help the animals. So what if she is naked. The first human’s, Adam and Eve were naked until they were introduced with sin. In the bible, it states we were made in God’s image so that means naked is the norm. Think about it. You are all idiots. Do your home work before you lash out at someone!

By: Miranda Rose Smith

Miranda Rose Smith — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:12:43 +0000

Should be “Andersen.”

By: Noah David Simon

Noah David Simon — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:05:12 +0000

dumb ad… nice mangoes though. do you really think I would of thought about this if you hadn’t pointed it out?

By: Paparazzu Muslim

Paparazzu Muslim — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:46:44 +0000

Why the hell should they use naked/semi-naked people in their campaigns? Any how, she looks like trash!

By: Miranda Rose Smith

Miranda Rose Smith — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:05:42 +0000

Angels in Christian literature, and that includes literature intended for children, can be cruel and terrifying. Look at Hans Christian Anderson’s “The Red Shoes.”

By: Amy

Amy — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:48:58 +0000

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU! My immediate reaction when someone told me about this ad was “They wouldn’t DARE try that with the star and crescent.” (I even explained how it could be done). I will never take this organization seriously. Until they have the balls to use “unsafe” targets, I will continue to laugh at their efforts to drum up support. While I certainly do not advocate cruelty to animals, it disgust me that these people find it okay to mock and defile what others hold dear.

If you thought the Mohammed (or however you spell it) cartoons caused a reaction, just imagine how the “religion of peace” would react to a naked female with the symbol of Islam. The day peta does that is the day I stop eating meat. Guess I’ll continue to enjoy all those burgers and steaks.

And the nitwit who posed for this disgrace calls herself a practicing Catholic.

By: The Canadien

The Canadien — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:36:33 +0000

This is a Greek Cross. Not a crucifix at all.

Certainly, it is an inappropriate use of a Christian cross. And dogs don’t belong inside a church. And why is PeTA leaning on Christian theology to present their linear message?

Sexuality, and the salvific work of Jesus that was done on the cross do not mix.

PeTA has certainly made an enemy out of me. Good enough for you to tend to dogs, that is your lot, while we worship the Eternal One.

As an organization they’re entirely brainless presenting this visual prompt. I’ll be sure to remove their message, in any form, whenever I see it, when I’m out and about. All authentic Christians should do likewise.

By: Perfected democrat

Perfected democrat — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:10:05 +0000

Birds of a feather flock together…