May 31, 2007, - 1:01 pm

Yet Another Oscar Winner Linked with Pro-Palestinian Propaganda

By Debbie Schlussel
In the past, I’ve told you about Oscar winner Angie Voight a/k/a Angelina Jolie’s pro-Palestinian spewing and mentioned other Oscar winning actresses, like Vanessa Redgrave, and their pan-Islamist, anti-Israel spewing.
Now, yet another Oscar Winner is linked with pro-Palestinian propaganda. Oscar winner Helen Mirren (who spent a career bearing her crotch for all the world to see) is being lined up to star in a film set in Gaza, about a woman whose journalist daughter falls in love with a Palestinian and gets killed.

helenmirren.jpg

Helen Mirren:

Queen Elizabeth Imitator Should Stay Out of Mid-East Politics

But don’t you worry, this won’t be a movie against the Palestinians and their own special brand of terrorism. It’s being produced by pro-Palestinian brits, so you can bet it will be very sympathetic to this terrorism-loving people. Bet that the death of the daughter is somehow a Zionist Israeli plot . . . just like Israel is being blamed for the current, real-life kidnapping of a pro-Palestinian BBC “journalist” by Palestinian terrorists.
Oh, and by the way, they had planned to make this movie in Gaza, but because HAMAS and Fatah terrorists are killing each other, they can’t. Don’t bet for that to be depicted in this movie.
But they wouldn’t dare make the movie in “evil Zionist” Israel, either. Instead, they’ll make it in HonorKillingcopia a/k/a Jordan, our “moderate” “ally.”
Hmmm . . . there’s something about aging actresses known for bearing their crotches onscreen. First, Sharon Stone said she and women would bring peace to the Middle East (still waiting for them to actually do it). And now, CrotchWoman #2 gets into the murky mix. (Since she’s also bared her crotch for us, maybe Britney Spears will also now get involved in Middle East diplomacy.)
More from Ha’Aretz:

Oscar-winner Helen Mirren is being lined up to star in a film set in the Gaza Strip, as a woman whose journalist daughter falls in love with a Palestinian and is killed, the company making the film said Thursday.
The film, described by Left Bank Picture head Andy Harries as more human interest than political, is expected to be shot in Jordan because the fighting between rival factions in Gaza. . . .
The film is to be directed by Philip Martin and written by Frank Deasy, who worked with Mirren on the British television series “Prime Suspect.”

Yes, the filmmakers claim it’s not political. Trust me, it will definitely be political. Count on it.
Thanks to reader Romy for the tip.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
Print This Post Print This Post

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses

Not her first terrorist-sympathizing movie. She played the mother of a terrorist Bobby Sands in Some Mother’s Son. Ironically Bobby Sand’s hunger strike and subsequent death cowed the British into calling them criminals as opposed to POWs or more accurately terrorists.

Mark L. Jackson on May 31, 2007 at 5:04 pm

As a child in the 1950’s, through the present, I have been a Texopean, one of those people who spend 40% of their time in Texas, 40% of their time in Europe and 20% of their time waiting for a Lufthansa flight at DFW or an Air France flight at IAH. Even at a very young age, I noticed the differences in attitude among Europeans and Americans with reference to Israel. When I became a bit more politically aware, I assumed for a short time that Americans and the American media were simply so pro-Israel that a more balanced view, that of Europeans and Britons, only seemed radical. That was an immature and incorrect view. Europeans and Britons do have not only a pro-Palestinian/pro-Islamic view, but what might be described as a anti-Israeli view. I cannot account for the attitude, but I am not ahistorical. I realize that virtually all of Europe and Great Britain was rabidly anti-Semitic leading up to the 1930’s, with Germany, oddly, being something of a model of tolerance and assimilation. Obviously, that must not have run too deep. I suppose what I am trying to say here is that Europe and Great Britain are not just pulling for who they perceive to be the underdog, but that the pro-Palestinian attitude is also fed by an anti-Israel/anti-Semitic attitude that is pervasive and deep. Obviously, nothing I can do changes that. Interestingly, however, the anti-Israel/anti-Semitic is not the product of Islamic immigration. Islamic immigration may actually be feeding an attitude change. It will be an interesting phenomenon to watch as it all unfolds.

On The Mark on May 31, 2007 at 5:10 pm

Only the Uniform Code of Military Justice kept me from calling the Europeans on their hypocrisy. As usual, you had to worry about your own gov’t stabbing you in the back for standing up for what’s right. I think we got an excellent view into their arrogant, pompous, two-faced view from Fitz the poster a few weeks ago and his, Ah, therz no 1zz with any brainzz heir, so I go now”. Hey Fritz, you big giant weanie, no one in the Middle East thinks that because you sell them chemicals and tanks you’re their friend. It’s only a matter of time before they blow up Berlin.

code7 on May 31, 2007 at 9:59 pm

I think criticism of Mirren is perhaps a bit premature. Unlike Redgrave and Jolie who’ve made their views known, I don’t think the same can be said of Mirren. Just because she has accepted a role in a movie which may or may not be critical of Israel, she is just an actress looking for a job. An actor need not agree with the politics of the film he’s starring in. I’m not stating that it’s OK for actors to star in hateful propaganda films, or that it’s OK for an American actor to star in a blatantly anti-American film like ‘Valley of the Wolves:Iraq’, but everyone has a story to tell, and if that story can be put on film, it shouldn’t be hampered by politics.

Norman Blitzer on June 1, 2007 at 2:17 am

Oh yeah,
Helen Mirren was really, really hot in ‘Excalibur’.

Norman Blitzer on June 1, 2007 at 2:27 am

Why is it that Hollywood, land of Spielberg, Streisand, Katzenberg, and many other influential Jews, has no problem demonizing Israel? Do they secretly hope for genocide? Did Speilberg not actually make “Shindler’s List” and develop his holocaust video project?
If Steven Speilberg were to come out and say, “enough is enough,” that would put an end to the GROWING trend toward anti-Israel (read anti-Semitic) films.

sonomaca on June 1, 2007 at 9:31 am

Well Normie,
If an actor doesn’t necessarily have to agree with the politics of a film they star in, what’s there to say about their integrity or lack thereof? Oh yea, this is the movie industry…I reckon a dollar will make a whore out of anybody.
Why don’t you go back to smackin’ yer rat and quit clogging up this site with your liberal drivel!

1shot1kill on June 1, 2007 at 10:31 am

Debbie:
The British have had a bug up their collective asses regarding Israel since 1949 when the fledgling IAF (using Czech supplied captured German Messerschmitt’s) shot down 5 R.A.F. Spitfires over the Negev (for no Israeli losses).

Ripper on June 1, 2007 at 11:19 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field