Comments on: Quote of the Day: At Least, She’s Consistent

By: Occam's Tool

Occam's Tool — Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:44:49 +0000

Nak, for someone like you, who wants to see America destroyed, gay marriage makes sense.

By: WHB

WHB — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:41:14 +0000

Excellent, the theme of this bunch of comments is, its not discrimination if its against someone else. So the issue seems to be, you shouldn’t change something because that’s the way its always been done.
I’m wondering if everyone commenting against gay marriage follows the bible to the letter.

By: MedinaDad

MedinaDad — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:36:54 +0000

This whole idea of not allowing two men or two women to get married being discrimination is the most intellectually dishonest thing I’ve heard since listening to the Public unions protest Ohio’s Senate Bill 5. Discrimination is when we allow certain groups or classes to do or have something while others are not permitted to do the same thing. Somehow the liberal media has bought into the Left’s equating gay marrriage and traditional marriage as one of discrimination.

The facts are, that the way marriage has been defined, it allows any willing man to marry any willing woman. The man could be gay and the state would not stop his marriage to a woman. So, if the state treats a gay and a heterosexual man equally and allows either to marry a straight or lesbian woman, where is the discrimination?

Instead, they are forcing the bastardization of marriage by allowing 2 men or two women to marry in what now would make marriage discriminatory. By allowing certain combinations, the bigomists and other fetish oriented people have a cliam to being discriminated against.

By: octoman2010

octoman2010 — Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:39:18 +0000

Hey, if two hairy guys want to savage each other’s rectums every night, it’s only fitting that they do so under the sacred bonds of matrimony. Why would anyone be against that?!

By: Lloyd

Lloyd — Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:58:39 +0000

How about the government get out of the marraige business altogether and just hand out civil unions (contracts) to all binding couple legally as partners much like in business. Then if people want to get married they can go to their local rabbi, priest, minister or athiest(fill in the title). Who acknowledges that marraige becomes unimportant. I don’t acknowledge my government marraige anyway, just my religious one.

By: skzion

skzion — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:49:36 +0000

Oh good grief. I thought the level of discussion was low on the “gays in the military” entry. The top prize for idiocy here (and it is hotly contested), goes to FrenchKiss:

“Two “married” homos are not in the interest of the State.”

Wow! Very persuasive, if one is a fascist.

It’s really not surprising that the Progressives are so effective in this country–look at how feeble and intellectually incoherent their opponents are.

By: ConcernedPatriot

ConcernedPatriot — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:23:06 +0000

It’s not just the various diseases associated with such a “lifestyle”; the way these people live also has an effect on their thought processes, so that everything becomes twisted, distorted and upside-down. Or to put it another way, the way one lives directly affects the way one thinks, and vice versa.

By: CaptainSlappy

CaptainSlappy — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:37:24 +0000

Chlamydia and Syphilis is consistent as well, you know….

As for the rest, they are like your neighbors’ dogs, they only bark to hear their own heads rattle. I do believe I would listen to someone who said something important or God forfend, DO something important……

By: David

David — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:21:59 +0000

I predict that within a year of ending her show, HOprah will get married, probably to her friend Gayle.

By: Bill

Bill — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:25:38 +0000

When will we see people marrying animals? Now animals have “rights” being created where there were none. Sounds unnatural and wierd, but, well, think back….