May 22, 2006, - 12:40 pm

He Said It: Islamic Leader/Abu M Buddy Denounces English, U.S. Military

By Debbie Schlussel
So much for patriotic American Muslims. If they’re so patriotic and American, why do they pick a leader/spokesman who denounces our language and even our military?
And why do the Justice Dept., FBI, and Homeland Security repeatedly kowtow to someone with such anti-American sentiments?
That’s a question that only they and Imad Hamad can answer. Hamad–”former” Islamic terrorist, FBI award revokee, and Midwest Regional Director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee–has some interesting views on English, as spewed against a Detroit suburb’s new law mandating English translations for all foreign language signs, in today’s Detroit Spews:

imadhamadafat.jpg

Imad Hamad: Fed Panderers’ Best John

(Hamadafat artwork courtesy of Preston Taylor Holmes of Six Meat Buffet)


“I can’t swallow any effort that moves in the direction of forcing a person or entity to utilize English,” said Imad Hamad, regional director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.


The law is quite tame. It doesn’t require the signs to be in English, only that they feature a translation. In cases of emergencies, that could be very helpful for the rest of us, who actually speak English.
Worse than his views on English are Hamad’s views on Muslims and Arabs serving in the U.S. military. Here’s what he told Reuters:

“A lot of policies seemed to focus on Arab-Americans after 9/11 so people asked: ‘Why should I be part of an entity that is inflicting injustices or a selective approach on my own community?’” said Imad Hamad, head of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee’s Dearborn office.


With friends like that, who needs enemies?
And yet Imad Hamad is kowtowed to by all of our local and federal law enforcement chieftains, including FBI Director Robert Mueller, Dept. of Homeland Security official Daniel Sutherland, U.S. Attorney Stephen Murphy III, FBI Special Agent in Charge Daniel Roberts, and ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) Special Agent in Charge Brian Moskowitz a/k/a “Abu Moskowitz.”

sutherlandhamadalkhatib.jpgabumoskhamad.gif

Imad Hamad With DHS’ Dan Sutherland, Brian Moskowitz

Your tax dollars at work . . . for the enemy.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses

Debbie,
As much as it sickens me to read how stupid some of the people in government are kowtowing to these loons, thanks for exposing these people. We Americans just need constant reminders that these types of people are dangerous and are not coming here to blend into this country and enjoy our freedoms. Hopefully it will not take a 9/11 repeat for us to stay vigilant in defense of freedom.
You are doing a great job.

Jeff_W on May 22, 2006 at 2:41 pm

Abu Abdilah do not be disheartened:
Many Western Scholars have pointed their accusing fingers at some of the Ö verses in the Qurían to be able to contend that world of Islam is in a state of perpetual struggle against the non-Muslims. As to them it is sufficient answer to make, if one were to point out, that the defiance of Godís authority by one who is His slave exposes that slave to the risk of being held guilty of treason and such a one, in the perspective of Islamic law, is indeed to be treated as a sort of that cancerous growth on that organism of humanity, which has been created “Kanafsin Wahidatin” that is, like one, single, indivisible self. It thus becomes necessary to remove the cancerous malformation even if it be by surgical means (if it would not respond to other treatment), in order to save the rest of HumanityÖ The idea of Ummah of Mohammad, the Prophet of Islam, is incapable of being realised within the framework of territorial states much less made an enduring basis of viewing the world as having been polarised between the world of Islam and the world of war. Islam, in my understanding, does not subscribe to the concept of the territorial stateÖ
Allah Buksh K. Brohi, “Preface”, in Brigadier S.K. Malik,
The Quranic Concept of War, 1986, pp. xix-xx.
“Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into the opponentís heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy (sic); it is the decision we wish to impose upon him.”
- Brig. S.K. Malik, The Quranic Concept of War, 1986, p. 59.
America wants to destroy all Muslim countries one after another, so let us go and fight in the way of Allah.
- Maulana Rahmatullah, Tanzeem-i-Ulma, Peshawar, April 3, 2003
http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/kpsgill/2003/chapter4.htm

hutchrun on May 23, 2006 at 12:39 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field