<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Banned, Unbanned?:  Constantly Changing Liquid Policy is Symbol of Homeland Security Disarray</title> <atom:link href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: About That Drink: Yet Again, TSA, Airports Give Britney Spears Special Treatment</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-126982</link> <dc:creator>About That Drink: Yet Again, TSA, Airports Give Britney Spears Special Treatment</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:58:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-126982</guid> <description>[...] complied.  And I&#8217;ve written repeatedly on how stupid and ineffective these rules are (here, here, and [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] complied.  And I&#8217;ve written repeatedly on how stupid and ineffective these rules are (here, here, and [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Descent</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21011</link> <dc:creator>Descent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:11:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21011</guid> <description>Sodamoca: the register delve into that exact matter, and found that a premature explosion would likely be caused by the materials being handle improperly, or something being off, and that the explosion would likely be enough to kill whoevers attempting to make the bomb, but not much else.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/print.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/print.html&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sodamoca: the register delve into that exact matter, and found that a premature explosion would likely be caused by the materials being handle improperly, or something being off, and that the explosion would likely be enough to kill whoevers attempting to make the bomb, but not much else.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/print.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/print.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MississippiGal</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21010</link> <dc:creator>MississippiGal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:43:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21010</guid> <description>Goodness, we are after Thirdgoat, including me!  Muslims do Profile us.  Ask Debbi to list, once more, all the incidences against us.  As far as retired Lt. Col. Wylde?s assessment of the bomb making scenario, what was the name of the retired Army general who said the hole in the Pentagon on 9/11 could not have been made by a plane?  Do I make my point?  profile - close the borders - walk softly and carry a big stick! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness, we are after Thirdgoat, including me!  Muslims do Profile us.  Ask Debbi to list, once more, all the incidences against us.  As far as retired Lt. Col. Wylde?s assessment of the bomb making scenario, what was the name of the retired Army general who said the hole in the Pentagon on 9/11 could not have been made by a plane?  Do I make my point?  profile &#8211; close the borders &#8211; walk softly and carry a big stick!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sodamoca</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21009</link> <dc:creator>Sodamoca</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:17:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21009</guid> <description>Just a minor question Thirdgoat, wouldn&#039;t a premature explosion of the liquid be nearly as effective as trying to reclaim the distilled solid explosive?   Then the time frame and requirements suggested would not be accurate.   Quite often things can be explosive before they reach a final phase where they are stable until a reaction sets them off (i.e. Composition B which is stable unless it receives both a fire and an impact).   Since terrorists don&#039;t, commonly, care if they are blown with the plane they are on then they would probably be mixing the liquids and expecting a premature explosion of the contents not a process to produce a solid explosive.
Since I am not familiar with the process and there was no link to follow I am not able to comment on when the fumes would make detection likely.   I just thought that your post raised the question. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a minor question Thirdgoat, wouldn&#8217;t a premature explosion of the liquid be nearly as effective as trying to reclaim the distilled solid explosive?   Then the time frame and requirements suggested would not be accurate.   Quite often things can be explosive before they reach a final phase where they are stable until a reaction sets them off (i.e. Composition B which is stable unless it receives both a fire and an impact).   Since terrorists don&#8217;t, commonly, care if they are blown with the plane they are on then they would probably be mixing the liquids and expecting a premature explosion of the contents not a process to produce a solid explosive.<br
/> Since I am not familiar with the process and there was no link to follow I am not able to comment on when the fumes would make detection likely.   I just thought that your post raised the question.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thirdgoat</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21008</link> <dc:creator>thirdgoat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21008</guid> <description>I believe this whole restriction on carry on is stupid as most in the science community says that the threat can not materialize due to the nature of manufacturing process </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this whole restriction on carry on is stupid as most in the science community says that the threat can not materialize due to the nature of manufacturing process</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Descent</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21007</link> <dc:creator>Descent</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:12:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21007</guid> <description>Being Atheist, but half Iranian, it&#039;ll be interesting to see how my upcoming trip down south goes at the airport. They didn&#039;t give me any hassle last year, but there was just a wee bit less tension with Iran at that time. Then again, I don&#039;t really look Iranian in any way so, they probably won&#039;t..we&#039;ll see </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being Atheist, but half Iranian, it&#8217;ll be interesting to see how my upcoming trip down south goes at the airport. They didn&#8217;t give me any hassle last year, but there was just a wee bit less tension with Iran at that time. Then again, I don&#8217;t really look Iranian in any way so, they probably won&#8217;t..we&#8217;ll see</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Avalon</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21006</link> <dc:creator>Avalon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:09:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21006</guid> <description>&quot;QUIT READING THINGS THAT ARE NOT THERE. HE PUT THE BOMB UNDERNEATH THE SEAT NEXT TO THE ONE FOR WHICH HE BOUGHT THE TICKET.&quot;
Wrong again, Debbie.  Youssef planted the bomb under his own seat, number 26k and got off the plane in Cebu.  The victim, Haruki Ikegami, took
Youssef&#039;s old seat and was blown in half.
ACTUALLY, IT IS DEBATED WHETHER IT WAS HIS SEAT OR THE ONE NEXT TO HIM.  AND BECAUSE HE LEFT THE PLANE, IT IS BELIEVED THAT HE PUT THE BOMB UNDER IKEGAMI&#039;S SEAT, NOT KNOWING WHETHER HIS WOULD BE FILLE AND DESIRING MAXIMUM CARNAGE.  REGARDLESS, THAT IS A DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE AS IT RELATES TO THIS POST, LIKE ALL OF YOUR NITPICKING AND OBNOXIOUS COMMENTS.  YOUR FIRST &quot;CORRECTION&quot; OF ME IN THIS POST WAS AN INCORRECT &quot;CORRECTION.&quot;  AND NEITHER IT NOR THIS MAKES A WHIT OF DIFFERENCE TO ANYTHING THAT I WROTE IN THE POST REGARDING THE CHANGING LIQUID RULES.  UNLIKE MOST OTHERS HERE, YOUR COMMENTS SIMPLY DO NOT ADD TO THE DISCUSSION.  THEY ARE LIKE FARTS AT A MAGNIFICENT MEAL.  THE FACT IS THAT YOUSSEF HAD ALL THE LIQUID NITROGLYCERIN HE NEEDED FOR THE BOMB IN ONE SMALL CONTACT LENS SOLUTION CONTAINER.  HOW THESE NEW RULES WILL STOP THAT, YOU STILL HAVEN&#039;T ADDRESSED.  AND PLEASE DON&#039;T.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;QUIT READING THINGS THAT ARE NOT THERE. HE PUT THE BOMB UNDERNEATH THE SEAT NEXT TO THE ONE FOR WHICH HE BOUGHT THE TICKET.&#8221;<br
/> Wrong again, Debbie.  Youssef planted the bomb under his own seat, number 26k and got off the plane in Cebu.  The victim, Haruki Ikegami, took<br
/> Youssef&#8217;s old seat and was blown in half.<br
/> ACTUALLY, IT IS DEBATED WHETHER IT WAS HIS SEAT OR THE ONE NEXT TO HIM.  AND BECAUSE HE LEFT THE PLANE, IT IS BELIEVED THAT HE PUT THE BOMB UNDER IKEGAMI&#8217;S SEAT, NOT KNOWING WHETHER HIS WOULD BE FILLE AND DESIRING MAXIMUM CARNAGE.  REGARDLESS, THAT IS A DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE AS IT RELATES TO THIS POST, LIKE ALL OF YOUR NITPICKING AND OBNOXIOUS COMMENTS.  YOUR FIRST &#8220;CORRECTION&#8221; OF ME IN THIS POST WAS AN INCORRECT &#8220;CORRECTION.&#8221;  AND NEITHER IT NOR THIS MAKES A WHIT OF DIFFERENCE TO ANYTHING THAT I WROTE IN THE POST REGARDING THE CHANGING LIQUID RULES.  UNLIKE MOST OTHERS HERE, YOUR COMMENTS SIMPLY DO NOT ADD TO THE DISCUSSION.  THEY ARE LIKE FARTS AT A MAGNIFICENT MEAL.  THE FACT IS THAT YOUSSEF HAD ALL THE LIQUID NITROGLYCERIN HE NEEDED FOR THE BOMB IN ONE SMALL CONTACT LENS SOLUTION CONTAINER.  HOW THESE NEW RULES WILL STOP THAT, YOU STILL HAVEN&#8217;T ADDRESSED.  AND PLEASE DON&#8217;T.<br
/> DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 4EVERCUSTOMS</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21005</link> <dc:creator>4EVERCUSTOMS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:10:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21005</guid> <description>Here&#039;s a point worth pondering...
There was all this talk about liquids, gels and cosmetics being the possible base of an explosive device, right? Well, where did all this stuff go? - IN THE STUPID TRASH, THAT&#039;S WHERE!
Was there any attempt to place these items in secure receptacles? Were there any bomb-sniffing dogs at checkpoints to screen for explosives in the trashcans? And, after we threw out all this stuff, where did it end up? IN HOT DUMPSTERS AND GARBAGE TRUCKS, THAT&#039;S WHERE! If there were truly explosives among the items discarded, DHS did a PISS POOR job of implementing appropriate isolation and disposal measures: I&#039;m surprised (although, thank G-d, it didn&#039;t) that one of those dumpsters or a trash truck didn&#039;t blow up.
DHS is SOOOOO stupid, it&#039;s pathetic, yea, criminal. ICE agents, get your parachutes out: It&#039;s time to bail out from this loser as quickly as possible, before we&#039;re held to answer for other people&#039;s stupidity.
U.S. CUSTOMS: 1789-2003 ... NOW, AND FOREVER MORE, WHAT A WORLD CLASS LAW ENFORCEMENT WAS AND SHOULD BE - WHAT A PATHETIC MESS. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a point worth pondering&#8230;<br
/> There was all this talk about liquids, gels and cosmetics being the possible base of an explosive device, right? Well, where did all this stuff go? &#8211; IN THE STUPID TRASH, THAT&#8217;S WHERE!<br
/> Was there any attempt to place these items in secure receptacles? Were there any bomb-sniffing dogs at checkpoints to screen for explosives in the trashcans? And, after we threw out all this stuff, where did it end up? IN HOT DUMPSTERS AND GARBAGE TRUCKS, THAT&#8217;S WHERE! If there were truly explosives among the items discarded, DHS did a PISS POOR job of implementing appropriate isolation and disposal measures: I&#8217;m surprised (although, thank G-d, it didn&#8217;t) that one of those dumpsters or a trash truck didn&#8217;t blow up.<br
/> DHS is SOOOOO stupid, it&#8217;s pathetic, yea, criminal. ICE agents, get your parachutes out: It&#8217;s time to bail out from this loser as quickly as possible, before we&#8217;re held to answer for other people&#8217;s stupidity.<br
/> U.S. CUSTOMS: 1789-2003 &#8230; NOW, AND FOREVER MORE, WHAT A WORLD CLASS LAW ENFORCEMENT WAS AND SHOULD BE &#8211; WHAT A PATHETIC MESS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mark</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21004</link> <dc:creator>mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:36:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21004</guid> <description>1.5 Billion of them eh ?, guess we should hire more screeners. Ya see Turdbreath, it is like all the illegal aliens, the saying is, &quot;Well, you can&#039;t deport 12 million of them &quot; Well if you deport (1) that is known as a start. Same applies to the swarthy, seedy looking Islamofascist, it is a start you know the ones who are so brave they have to hide their face, yeah the same ones who slaughter women and children, those heroes of the jihad, those first class losers, you are so quick to defend.
I believe they are dopers just like that little sawed of runt called Ahmaweeniejob, who is waiting for his mystical Imam to appear from a well, (what kind of cockamayme BS is that, and his people believe this crap and obvious you do too) so he can bring on the last days. If that pig-mutant even so much as tries to harm a hair on Israel&#039;s head that whole bassackwards excuse for a country will be turned into concrete. And as far as I am concerned the sooner the better. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.5 Billion of them eh ?, guess we should hire more screeners. Ya see Turdbreath, it is like all the illegal aliens, the saying is, &#8220;Well, you can&#8217;t deport 12 million of them &#8221; Well if you deport (1) that is known as a start. Same applies to the swarthy, seedy looking Islamofascist, it is a start you know the ones who are so brave they have to hide their face, yeah the same ones who slaughter women and children, those heroes of the jihad, those first class losers, you are so quick to defend.<br
/> I believe they are dopers just like that little sawed of runt called Ahmaweeniejob, who is waiting for his mystical Imam to appear from a well, (what kind of cockamayme BS is that, and his people believe this crap and obvious you do too) so he can bring on the last days. If that pig-mutant even so much as tries to harm a hair on Israel&#8217;s head that whole bassackwards excuse for a country will be turned into concrete. And as far as I am concerned the sooner the better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thirdgoat</title><link>http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/comment-page-1/#comment-21003</link> <dc:creator>thirdgoat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:21:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2438/banned-unbanned-constantly-changing-liquid-policy-is-symbol-of-homeland-security-disarray/#comment-21003</guid> <description>Yes profiling will really work. There are 1.5 billion muslims, how many would you profile? What happens when they started profiling us? What happens when every body started being negative to every body. Generalization will only lead to chaos. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes profiling will really work. There are 1.5 billion muslims, how many would you profile? What happens when they started profiling us? What happens when every body started being negative to every body. Generalization will only lead to chaos.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.debbieschlussel.com @ 2012-02-10 08:10:45 -->
