October 12, 2006, - 9:58 am

Condi-Clueless Endorses Gay Marriage, Phony Palestinian “Occupation” Claim to ALL of Israel

By Debbie Schlussel
A while ago an ad endorsing Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for President began running on this site for a few weeks. We couldn’t understand why they’d want to advertise here, since we’ve been very critical of the woman, who’s benefited more than anyone we can think of from PC job hiring and promotions based on minority status than anyone we can think of in the Bush Administration. Proof that affirmative action is alive and well in the congenital GOP.
Now, in a two-fer, Condoleezza has given us yet two more reasons why she merits our moniker for her, “Condoleezza Clueless.” It may be the first time merit and Condi-Clueless have met.

condigaymarriage.jpg

Condi-Clueless’ Flaming & Inflammatory Views

on Gay Marriage, Palestinian Claims to All of Israel

Today’s USA Today has an article on the non-existent “GOP’s Gay Identity Crisis.” It’s a trumped up story. Anyone who’s worked in Washington knows that especially there, home to DuPont Circle a/k/a “The Fruit Loop,” there are plenty of Gay Republicans in the circles of power. And here, we have to say the obligatory, Seinfeldian, “Not that there’s anything wrong with that.”
More notable about the article is Condi-Clueless’ statement about gay marriage, her implication that it’s legal, when it is NOT:

WASHINGTON – At a State Department ceremony this week, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice warmly acknowledged the family members of Mark Dybul, whom she was swearing in as the nation’s new global AIDS coordinator.
As first lady Laura Bush looked on, Rice singled out his partner, Jason Claire, and Claire’s mother. Rice referred to her as Dybul’s “mother-in-law.”

Mother-in-law? Huh? Since when is gay marriage legal throughout America? It isn’t. But it tells us a lot about Rice. She’s not qualified for most of the jobs she’s gotten, but she’s no dummy. She chooses her words carefully. The “mother-in-law” statement was no accident. It was deliberate.
Then, there’s her dumb statement about the Palestinians. It’s outrageous enough that she spoke, last night, at the annual banquet of the falsely-named American Task Force on Palestine (ATFP), an amalgam of extremist Muslims who support a host of terrorist groups that murder Americans and whose funding is apparently largely from overseas Islamists.
But then, in her speech to the Islamofascist group–she repeated the BS line that Palestinians deserve a better life “free of the humiliation of occupation” and in a state of their own. “I promise you my personal commitment to that goal.”
Free of the humiliation of occupation? Hello. . . Condi-Clueless. Did you bother to check a map? What “occupation”? They–your precious, “humiliated” Palestinians–already control, in their own pseudo-State of barbaria, over 97% of the land originally claimed to be “Palestine,” and has (but for Gaza–which they got the rest of over a year ago) for well over a decade.
If anyone is humiliating or occupying that land it is the various Palestinian “leaders” Condi-Clueless has welcomed to the White House and Foggy Bottom. It is the Fatah freaks and HAMAS-niks, which only too recently, Condi-Clueless said symbolized that the Palestinian people have “aspirations for peace.”
Rice’s–again, carefully calculated and deliberately uttered–statement can only mean that she agrees with the group’s claim that ALL of Israel is “Occupied Palestine.”
Is this the new U.S. policy? When the Secretary of State utters it to Islamofascists on our shores, perhaps it is.
If this is the chick you want leading the country, please get a lobotomy (perhaps the problem is that you already had one).

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

9 Responses

You know how you know that Condi is doing a piss poor job?
The Dems are not calling for her removal!

Ripper on October 12, 2006 at 11:35 am

I wouldn’t vote for anyone that panders to Pallywood or shoves gay wedding cake down my throat.

Yiddish Steel on October 12, 2006 at 11:58 am

Condi was the one who ran interference for that vapid combover, Ehud Olmert, for three weeks, until he decided not to try to win the Lebanon war. Then she wisely called timeout. You seem to be blaming her for this.
Condi is black and quite capable at what she is doing. For that, you call her an “affirmative action” hire. Thanks. Yet another reason that it is hard for Republicans to get black voters to consider voting for us. I can guarantee you that you would not want to try to get into a room and try to debate that woman. I have had conversations with people who have seen the experience.
Condi was speaking to a group of Palestianian-Americans last night who want their own state. At the dinner, she spoke of a two state solution, which is American policy. She spoke of an end to Israeli occupation of Palestine, which has been longstanding American foreign policy. This is also the policy of most of the Israeli body politic, with the exception of the Gush Emunim lobby.
You would be best to tell the Israelis to prepare for the Next War, as Condi privately has done, and to stop blaming her for not being able to hold Ehud Olmert’s hand.
This was one of the most stupid posts I’ve seen since I stopped posting on Usenet. Really. It was that stupid. “Affirmative Action” indeed. You need to get yourself down to your local Klavern and sign up.
THERE ARE PLENTY OF SMART, QUALIFIED AMERICANS WHO HAPPEN TO BE BLACK, WHO ARE CONSERVATIVES AND/OR WHO ARE IN THE BUSH ADMIN. CONDI IS NOT ONE OF THEM. IF YOU LOOK AT HER CAREER, SHE GOT HER JOBS EVERY STEP OF THE WAY BASED ON HER COLOR, NOT QUALIFICATIONS, AND EVEN SHE ADMITS THAT, TELLING GEORGE MAGAZINE THAT “I AM AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BABY.” HER EXPERTISE WAS ON THE SOVIET UNION. GUESS WHAT? IT’S GONE. WHO WOULD PICK SOMEONE AS SECSTATE WHOSE EXPERTISE IS ON A LOST CIVILIZATION? ONLY A PRESIDENT WHO SAID, UPON ELECTION, MY CABINET WILL “LOOK LIKE AMERICA.” WOULD LOVE TO SEE A LARRY ELDER OR THOMAS SOWELL OR WALTER WILLIAMS OR WARD CONNERLY IN THE BUSH ADMIN. BUT HE DOESN’T PICK BLACK CONSERVATIVES. BLACKS APPARENTLY CAN ONLY BE LIBERAL–NOMINAL REPUBLICANS IN THE BUSH VIEW. NOW, WHO’S THE RACIST? OH, AND BY THE WAY, HER MENTOR/TEACHER ON INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS WAS MADELEINE ALBRIGHT’S FATHER. NOT EXACTLY A KEY CREDENTIAL FOR A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION.
AGREED THAT OLMERT SUCKS, BUT SHE IS HARDLY THE ONE WHO “RAN INTERFERENCE.” SHE WANTED THE ISRAELIS STOPPED RIGHT AWAY, BUT IT WAS BUSH, CHENEY, AND RUMSFELD WHO OVERRULED HER. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. IT HAS NEVER BEEN U.S. POLICY TO SAY THAT ISRAEL AS IT STANDS TODAY IS AN OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN NATION. THAT’S JIHADI POLICY. AND, APPARENTLY, CONDI POLICY.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

Section9 on October 12, 2006 at 1:46 pm

Section9
You want to see more evidence she is an affirmative action hire, read the following article where Condi Clueless if going to arm the enemy with US made assault rifles to the tune of 26 million.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52414
“After a meeting with Abbas in Ramallah last week, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told reporters the U.S. would “do what it can” to bolster Abbas”
“Sources in the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem confirmed to WND the U.S. is slated to transfer weapons to Force 17 “within days.”
“These weapons will not be used in an internal war but against Israelis,” he said. “Force 17 is proud that we were the first to lead the Palestinian people during tough times such as resistance operations (against the Israeli army during large-scale operations in northern Samaria in 2002). We will also be the first to lead the Palestinians in the current struggle against Israeli occupation.”
Together with the Islamic Jihad terror group, the Brigades has taken responsibility for every suicide bombing inside Israel the past two years, including an attack in Tel Aviv in April that killed American teenager Daniel Wultz and nine Israelis. The Brigades also has carried out scores of deadly shooting and rocket attacks against Israeli civilians in recent months.
So tell me how smart she is by using US taxpayor money to arm the enemy.

ScottyDog on October 12, 2006 at 2:41 pm

‘Scuse me scotty, but you’re forgetting we trained/armed the taliban, before they became a threat. Also, Rumsfield played an important role in getting N. Korea nuculear capabilities.

Descent on October 12, 2006 at 3:31 pm

Nuclear*

Descent on October 12, 2006 at 3:32 pm

Aside from questions of Condi’s competence, she is following the traditional State Dept policy of hostility towards Israel. She is the sepia face on what was originally a very “white” policy. It seems that Condi is very similar to Madeleine Halfbright in her policy towards Israel, in contrast to the promises that she made in behalf of Bush supposedly in favor of Israel before the 2000 election. Now, the State Dept was hostile to saving Jews from Nazi mass murder during World War 2. Today, the State Dept is still hostile towards Jews. What has changed?? What has changed is that now, after 66 years –at least– of anti-Israel policy [that is, even before the rebirth of the Jewish state], two government-financed professors [Walt and Mearsheimer] shamelessly lie that US policy is pro-Israel, whereas it may seem pro-Israel only in contrast to European Onion policy towards Israel. Europe was oppressing Jews 2000 years ago and they’re still doing it, although I realize that there are many good Europeans who sympathize with Israel and understand its plight.
Another new feature of State Dept anti-Israel policy is that it now hides behind black faces [Colin Powell before, now Condi].

Eliyahu on October 14, 2006 at 7:21 pm

Aside from questions of Condi’s competence, she is following the traditional State Dept policy of hostility towards Israel. She is the sepia face on what was originally a very “white” policy. It seems that Condi is very similar to Madeleine Halfbright in her policy towards Israel, in contrast to the promises that she made in behalf of Bush supposedly in favor of Israel before the 2000 election. Now, the State Dept was hostile to saving Jews from Nazi mass murder during World War 2. Today, the State Dept is still hostile towards Jews. What has changed?? What has changed is that now, after 66 years –at least– of anti-Israel policy [that is, even before the rebirth of the Jewish state], two government-financed professors [Walt and Mearsheimer] shamelessly lie that US policy is pro-Israel, whereas it may seem pro-Israel only in contrast to European Onion policy towards Israel. Europe was oppressing Jews 2000 years ago and they’re still doing it, although I realize that there are many good Europeans who sympathize with Israel and understand its plight.
Another new feature of State Dept anti-Israel policy is that it now hides behind black faces [Colin Powell before, now Condi].

Eliyahu on October 14, 2006 at 7:23 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field