October 25, 2006, - 9:16 am

New “24″ Trailer Features ACLU-CAIR-John Conyers Message

By Debbie Schlussel
We watched the two-minute trailer for the upcoming season of “24,” when it was unveiled yesterday. Passersby in New York’s Times Square saw it broadcast on a giant screen.
As we’ve noted previously, executive producer and star Kiefer Sutherland stated that this season the show “will take a strong political point of view.” And judging from the trailer, we think it’s just as we predicted–a strong politically correct point of view. We were struck by the scene showing the woman who, last season, was the head of Homeland Security in L.A. In the trailer she is shown in the Oval Office, pontificating:

There are people in this Administration who are willing to tear up the Constitution!

24.jpg

Sound like Johns Kerry & Conyers/ACLU/Michael Moore/CAIR speak to you? Ditto for us. Gee, where have we heard these words before? Oh, just about every time there is any law enforcement measure enacted or about to be, enforced or about to be, etc., etc., ad nauseam.
But Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff and his top advisor, apologist for jihadists Daniel Sutherland, should be proud of their apparent new female impersonator on “24.” She spouts their line in the trailer (Chertoff strenuously objects to profiling b/c of the enemies’ civil rights and got very upset that the FBI released photos of the 11 missing Muslim Egyptian students, this summer.)
Oh, sure, the trailer has scenes showing some Muslim terrorist mastermind out to get Agent Jack Bauer and blowing up U.S. cities. But, as insightful reader Sultan Knish, pointed out here, that’s always the plot . . . at the beginning of each season. Then, we learn that it’s really corporate, whitebread Americans–not Muslims–who are really the main actors. With Eddie Izzard playing “the villain,” this season, don’t expect that to change.
**** UPDATE, 10/27/05: Eddie Izzard has now been replaced by another White, British actor, David Hunt, to play the villain, Darren McCarthy in this season’s “24.” Hmmm . . . hardly an Islamic name.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

28 Responses

Murdoch can sell shares of his empire to the Saudis, sleep with Muslims, broadcast shows sympathetic to Islam and the Muslims, but he cannot, did not and will not force me to watch or read any of his media outlets.
Last time I switched channels away from FOX was when I learned that that “24″‘s Canadian actor was going to apologize to the Muslims at the beginning of an episode. I stopped watching the FOX channel since then, except for local news from time to time.

Independent Conservative on October 25, 2006 at 10:37 am

The 24 muslim terrorist plots are basically a repetition of the left’s response to 9/11… that the Muslims carried out the attacks but they were really a product of the Republicans backing Osama (a myth) and the Bush administration’s desire for war
Transpose that onto 24 and you have their plots and their real villains, ‘hawkish secretaries of defense’, ‘defense contractors’ and ‘presidents who want a pretext to start a war with muslims to seize their oil’

sultan_knish on October 25, 2006 at 11:25 am

The basic setup is that 24 suckers in normal americans and conservatives who want to see a toughminded hero fighting terrorists and transition that to bromides about the government being ultimately responsible for terrorism

sultan_knish on October 25, 2006 at 11:29 am

One final note, I don’t know kiefer sutherland’s politics but considering how he seems to be pushing it, it’s worth remembering the far left anti-american FTA Jane Fonda roots of his dad

sultan_knish on October 25, 2006 at 11:44 am

I don’t watch TV anymore.. Why would anyone? Time is too valuable to waste on such politically correct crap!

lonewolf on October 25, 2006 at 1:14 pm

Hmm, how many times has Lush Bimbaugh acknowledged “24″ during his shows? Crap.
Funny thing, if Chertoff is so anti-profiling, why is there so much money being spent on Primal and Cognitive profiling studies? He would be MORE accurate to say he’s against racial profiling. Note: Race is not synonomous with ethnicity. For the latter, profile away period.
La Astasalim.

SickBoy on October 25, 2006 at 2:07 pm

CAIR – 1, FREE SPEECH – 0
Islamonazi CAIR Intimidates Yet Another American Business In Dhimmitude
http://www.terrorfreeoil.org/videos/MS092506.php – MSNBC video
Free Patriotic Corner Banners: http://www.terrorfreeoil.org/cb/

Terror-Free Oil on October 25, 2006 at 7:23 pm

The show is entertainment, I mean the last season was so over the top I don’t believe anyone took it seriously. It is just entertaining, a genuine television spy thriller. If what you’re saying is that everytime the plot should be “Jack bauer hunts down and kills Muslim extremists” the show would be very boring. People want to be surprised, that is why there are always thick plots to the show. It is a thriller not a political treatise. I also believe your statements on the Muslim population are very thinly veiled racism/ethnocentrism.

eluril on October 26, 2006 at 10:37 am

Actually eluril has an extremely valid point. Why is it that EVERY F*ing show HAS to be about islamic terrorist with you people? Why can’t you accept a fictional series, you know, one that is based outside of our reality, like, hmm, 24, as, well FICTION, and let it be? If the show went around proclaiming that it was influenced by true events, yadda yadda, then sure, fine, maybe you have a valid point.
I don’t understand why everyone has politicize the most trivial things, such as FICTIONAL tv shows. It seems like this just a filler article rather than anything CLOSE to hard-hitting journalism.
And, for hating muslims so much, you guys SURE DO want to see them every time you turn on your tv, don’t you?
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, this show is FICTION, it’s not rooted in “our” world, it’s rooted in “jack bauers” world, and therefore should not have to reference, include, or conform to events happening in the REAL world.
Now, remember, I’m writing this assuming that you people can tell the difference between REALITY and FICTION. Quit taking yourselves, and everything else so damn seriously.

FSM-FTW!(descent) on October 26, 2006 at 1:07 pm

To FSM-FTW!(descent);
I believe the reason why people are getting fed up with the redundancy in tactics (plots using Muzlums as fronts to attract viewers) employed by “24″ is that people resent the tried and true “used car salesman” techniques of BAIT-N-SWITCH.
It has NOTHING to do with reality and fiction.
Let me expound: As everyone is aware, we are living in a post 9/11 world where a bunch a religious death merchants (not Amish, Hindus, Buddhists, etc) are constantly threatening the demise of the West. You constantly see these Muzlum ragheads on video; beheading people, blowing up innocents, and proclaiming jihad against the infidel. At the same time, we are living under/at the mercy of government agencies that are charged with protecting America, yet they seem more interested in bending over backwards to kiss the Muzlum ass.
So, intelligent people on the one hand see the very real threat as it exists, yet on the other, they feel themselves more at risk through the touchy-feely bull sessions employed by DHS, FBI, etc., and the incompetent prosecutors who blow terrorism cases, and judges who dish out wrist slaps.
Now, when we are teased with a popular TV show such as “24″ that portrays (at least initially) the real threat against us – Muzlum jihadists – for the first 6 or 7 episodes, then it reveals its true plot in the 8th episode where the perpetrator is big business, etc., people get PISSED OFF! It’s the old BAIT-N-SWITCH routine all over again. When people are yearning for someone, anyone, to speak the truth about our true enemies (Islam), they get all ginned up because for once, someone dares speak the truth. Certainly our government, the media, and academia aren’t doing so. Therefore, “24″ is not being honest about the content of next season’s show. If they indicated that it would be a plot that was NOT rooted in real threats, and instead, indicated that it would be all about the military/industrial complex, then people would have the option of tuning in or not without being sandbagged. Besides that, they wasted 6 or 7 hours watching a show that they otherwise would not have watched.
It has nothing to do with reality and fiction.
It has to do with taking advantage of peoples’ fears, desires, and sensitivities.

Thee_Bruno on October 26, 2006 at 2:07 pm

That makes sense. I’m getting real fed up with all the sensitivity to Muslims. Did you hear about the french(i think it was french..) that, at one point, had the heads of buhdda, jesus, and some other religious figures on chairs for some reason, and mohammed was supposed to be included, but was later decided against for fear of inciting violence. WTF is that?!?! Why should people have to go around bowing down to muslims? We need to do something to keep them in check, or else shits going to get realll messed up.
And for the record, I’m not speaking about most Muslims..or at least I hope not. I’m speaking about the radical muslims that the play directors were afraid would cause the violence. Hopefully, the majority of muslims will grow up, and take a more moderate stance on things. I’m not holding up much hope for it though.
And as a note, this is why I’m an atheist. Yes, religion helps ground people morally in most situations, but, and this counts for almost every religion, that grounding goes a little too far in their own respective areas. And with muslims becoming increasingly violent, i’m starting to think that religion really is doing more harm than good.

FSM-FTW!(descent) on October 26, 2006 at 3:03 pm

uhm that first paragraph is refering to a french play!

FSM-FTW!(descent) on October 26, 2006 at 3:05 pm

Well, according to your basic logic that “When people are yearning for someone, anyone, to speak the truth about our true enemies (Islam)”, why not round up all Germans and Japanese too because they committed acts of aggression in the past. Why are Japs and Krauts portrayed as good people in films and television shows now? As you well know, all members of a group behave and believe as a cohesive unit at all times. Some kind of collective conscious thing. Get real people, the problems of the world are not just one groups fault. Furthermore, 24 is as far as I can tell a totally conservative show in that it supports extreme action against terrorism, not coddling. It also acknowledges how special interest and political interference can effect that goal.

eluril on October 26, 2006 at 5:37 pm

I understand your points, descent, and I’m glad to seer your developing consciousness about Islam.
As far as “eluri”, a/k/a “delerious”, is concerned; Wow, what a lesson in twisted “logic” you demonstrated.
This may come as a complete shock to you, but WWII ended over 61 years ago. The “Krauts” and “Japs” are now our F-R-I-E-N-D-S. Sure they committed acts of aggression during WWII, but I don’t think they flew any planes into the WTC or Pentagon recently. They also haven’t waging a violent jihad against civilzed man for the last 1,400 years, either.
As for your statement that “Japs” and “Krauts” are portrayed positively in films and TV: please name some shows, because I haven’t seen any. (BTW, ever see any of the “Die Hard” films? Those “Krauts”, as you put it, are portrayed as blood-thirsty, maniacal thieves. There was another recent movie whose setting was on a plane, instead of terrorists being portrayed as Muzlums, they were portrayed as Neo-Nazi’s – “Flightplan”, maybe?).
As for your statement that “24″ is conservative: please give some examples (not something pulled out of your ass) to justify that. “24″ is just as PC as the rest of the Hollywood bilge seen on screen and on TV. “24′s” producers can’t even stick with a plot throughout the entire show to illustrate how evil Muzlum terrorists are without Kiefer Sutherland pulling down his pants, bending over, and “catching one” from the Islamists by claiming that Islam is a religion of piece, just as the season starts.
Lastly, I noticed that you used the words; “Kraut” and “Japs”. It seems you’ve got some issues. However, while you’re at it, why not use other words other than, “one groups” (sic), to describe Muzlums. Why not call them the degenerate, barbarian savages that they are? Is that because you, yourself, is a pedophile prophet worshiper? Do you kneel, bottoms-up, while praying to the Moon god?
Away with you. Go back to your mosque and never defile this blog, again.

Thee_Bruno on October 26, 2006 at 6:09 pm

Conservative as in Jack Bauer and CTU are willing to torture terrorist suspects to save lives (seen in all seasons). That radical enemies must be killed, not negotiated with. That the defense of the nation may involve the violation of civil rights that may be justified to save lives and protect the nation. That there is a right way to act and a wrong way to act.
In your last paragraph, you seem to have missed the point of my sarcasm. I used Krauts and Japs the same way you described “Muzlums” as “degenerate, barbarian savages”, only I meant it to show how the use of ethnic slurs is unacceptable and idiotic. You’re pretty much completely ethnocentric (actually, let’s just call it what it is-racist) because you blame all muslims for the actions of a few extremist movements. By the tone of your closing statement, I also see you are not a fan of Free Speech as guaranteed in the First Amendment. I’ll make it a point to keep visiting this blog.

eluril on October 26, 2006 at 7:08 pm

I, FYI, have no problem with muslims..for the most part. Hell, I’m even half-iranian, and lived there for a year. The problem I have is with RADICAL muslims..but then again I have a problem with radicals of any religion. The thing that I thought about, and that got me steaming, in my last comment was that we’re in America, where free speech rules, and ANYONE, muslims, americans, mexicans, whoever, should be allowed to say whatever they want-yet when south park had the mohammed episode, THEY DIDN’T AIR HIM BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T WANT TO OFFEND THEM, FOR FEAR OF VIOLENT RETALIATION. In fact, that episode, nailed it clearly, and bruno, I think you’d enjoy it. It was a two parter called cartoon wars, and ridicules the PC treatment people often reward to muslims. In my opinion, ANY religion should be an EQUAL TARGET of ridicule, questioning, and even the butt of jokes, because it’s our right as Americans to do such things. But the fact that we’re actually SCARED to do such things concerning islam is beyond me. Everyone else gets to get made fun of, why should islam be any different. Now, with that being said, there’s a clear line between racism/predjiduce(sp?) of religions, and things said in jest, and I’m against complete hatred of a peoples just because they all share the same belief. I know that just because some people are crazy, doesn’t mean everyone is, and it’s not right to make sweeping generalizations. There’s a huge difference between saying “those muslims, they just love camels” or something like that, and calling one “sand nigger”(which, unfortunately, i was for a while a victim of such hate), and the same goes for jews, blacks, mexicans whatever. So, point of the post is: jokes, ok, racism/prejiduce, bad, and i’m not going out of my way NOT offend anyone.

FSM-FTW!(descent) on October 26, 2006 at 7:34 pm

I see that both; FSM-FTW!(descent), and eluril, very often post within hours and minutes of each other, and seem to express almost the identical sentiments.
There was also a time, a few months back, when “Descent” used to post under various other names (including mine – he hijacked it). Strange how it is that those other “posters” have stopped posting since I alerted Debbie to it. I e-mailed Debbie about that “phenomenom”, but nothing was done about Descent. Those other “posters” have since disappeared, but Descent still continues to post here. Nothin wrong with that (?), yet, the problem still seems to continue; he’s still using other aliases. Sure, Debbie e-mailed me back…but the problem still remains.
Now we see that descent is changing his name, once again; FSM-FTW!, and eluril. (It’s very easy to change IP Adresses using the same computer, as descent already illustrated – I saved his postings that indicated as much, and I can re-post them here to prove my point).
Descent says that he’s an Iranian atheist. Somehow, I doubt that. To those reading this post, ask yourself this; How many Iranians have you come across in your lifetime who declare themselves to be atheist? HMMMMMM? Almost ALL Iranians are MUZLUM!! Very few are Christian, fewer yet are Jewish, and NONE are ATHEIST! After all, Iran is not the center of Judaism, nor Christianity!! It’s dominated by, you guessed it, MUZLUMS!!!! I believe that “descent” posts under several names and is a devout Muzlum. Why else would he stay here and always take the side of the Muzlum hordes? HMMMMMMMMM? He declares himself to be Atheist, but that’s only a ruse to deceive the infidel posters to gain credibility. Yet, he always takes the sides of Muzlums.
That’s it, Descent, I’ve had it with you and your bullshit other aliases, and your false atheistic claims – yet you always give the Muzlums the “benefit of the doubt”. You always side with the hijackers and the suicide bombers. You’re a Muzlum, pure and simple. If you claim to be anything other than that, then, once and for all, condemn, in no uncertain terms, and with no qualifications, the Muzlum scumbags who you claim are taking your country (Iran) hostage. Condemn your Iranian president, once and for all, for the murderous barbarian that he is. Reject him, and Islam, once and for all. Somehow, I don’t think you will. So, take your allah and your moohammad and shove them up your ass. As I say….RENOUNCE ISLAM, ONCE AND FOR ALL! But, you won’t do so. And, don’t say that you’re an atheist and that you don’t believe in Islam.
If that’s the case then repeat after me;
“I, Descent and all of the other aliases that I post under, and in front of my family, renounce, once and for all, the pedophile prophet, Mohammad, and my false god, Allah, and I detest Sharia Law and all that it stands for. I proclaim that women have the same rights, privileges, and equality as men. I understand that Islam is a false religion, and if I am lying, may I burn in hell alongside my pedophile prophet for instigating the murder of tens of millions of innocent people for the last 1,400 years in the name of the moon-god, Allah. I know the Qur’ an to be nothing more than the Satanic Bible, dictated by the illiterate pedophile prophet, Mohammad, to one of his brain-dead followers to transcribe onto paper using his penis as a pen.”
In addition to that, you must go out and buy the Qur’ an, rip out the pages, and flush them down the toilet.
BTW, I see that you’re still using your employer’s computers, on your employer’s time, to post here.
To descent;
Ass-a-lamb a-lick-’em. In other words; Kiss the Balls of the Lamb You Slaughter, you Muzlum scumbag! Go back to your native Iran and kiss the ass of that demented president you, and your relatives elected to office.
You’re a barbarian, pure and simple.
Now, let’s see how you AND “eluril” will respond to this post. Let’s see WHO says WHAT!
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thee_Bruno on October 26, 2006 at 9:47 pm

Whoa bruno, down boy. First of all, i did nothing to provoke this…
Second of all, i added (descent) to the end of this NICKNAME(if you highlight the little icon next to my name, you’ll see that it still leads to my original typekey profile of /descent, not FSM-ftw as it would if i had made a new USERname)so that i would be able to avoid accusations of trying to be someone else. hear that? I could have left it as just FSM-FTW, but PURPOSELY DECIDED TO ADD (DESCENT) TO THE END OF MY NAME SO AS NOT TO CONFUSE ANYONE OR STIR UP BASELESS ACCUSATIONS.
Second of all, i may be half iranian, but i was raised in america..my whole life, save for that one year that i hardly remember, however, bruno knows best.
if it helps though, fuck allah, and fuck mohammed, but while i’m at it, god kind of sucks too. all three preach hatred and intollerance and bigotry. The only difference is that the first two tell people to kill if they catch people commiting it, while they last one, ACTUALLY tells people to “turn the other cheek”(they don’t)
Also, i have no reason to hide anything i’m saying. Why would i start posting shit under someone elses name? And again, i’ve still retained my original username, i just changed the NICKNAME. very easy to do. and it’s nothing like changing the user name. You may have saved the post on that too. i have no reason to attempt to prove anything to you, or anyone else. I simply come here and express my opinions. if you don’t like it, skip my posts. the fact that you’ve saved my posts is frightning, and very stalkerish. and again, i did nothing to provoke you, so your attack baffles me. You and i post close together sometimes, does that mean that we’re the same person?
by the way, the FSM-FTW stands for “flying spaghetti monster-for the win”, in other words, the flying spaghetti monster is an example often used by atheists such as myself, to show that the belief in mohammed, allah, god, God, jesus, whatever is flawed. Just so you know. google it.
and also, can you please tell me what provoked you to have another psychotic break?

FSM-FTW!(descent) on October 26, 2006 at 10:14 pm

I assure you I am not part of some conspiracy using fake aliases. I am agnostic and caucasian German-American. I believe in God, but I have to question the overall organization of religion. However, I believe religion is a personal choice and should be left as such. I oppose extremism of any form. I don’t know why I feel the need to explain myself, but there you have it.

eluril on October 26, 2006 at 10:40 pm

Descent,
I know it is you with the spaghetti ID. I was alluding to the “other” names you posted under a few months back.
Delerious, a/k/a, eluri, or should I say, descent;
You are a complete fucktard. This is what you said – now, pay attention;
“I am agnostic…”, “I believe in God…”
Now, how in the hell can you be an agnostic and believe in God, at the same time?
You also said; “I oppose extremism of any form.”
Again, please state which religion has all the “extremists” in it. Is it the Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Amish? Again, you just can’t bring yourself to say that it is only ISLAM that breeds the terrorist mentality. And, that’s because you’re a Muzlum, yourself.
You, like descent, (probably one and the same) are like those “seminar” callers to conservative talk radio – “I’ve been a Republican all my life but I can’t stand Bush.” It’s so obvious. It’s a crock.
What you said sounds a lot like what descent said in his last post here;
“if it helps though, fuck allah, and fuck mohammed, but while i’m at it, god kind of sucks too. all three preach hatred and intollerance and bigotry. The only difference is that the first two tell people to kill if they catch people commiting it, while they last one, ACTUALLY tells people to “turn the other cheek”(they don’t)”
It’s all convoluted, and completely off-base. Tell me where God (the non-Muzlum God) preaches hatred, tolerance, and bigotry. Gee, for an “agnostic”, you’re really fucked-up.
The two of you (you’re one and the same) are of the same mindset. You can see it in your posts.
BTW, descent & eluri, neither (you’re one and the same) of you took my pledge. LMFAO!

Thee_Bruno on October 27, 2006 at 10:27 am

Why randomly bring up other names that i posted under a while back? What’s it matter?
And..again, I’m not eluri, so I’ll only address the comments made specifically towards my post. And, also, again, I don’t understand what I would stand to gain by arguing with myself??
What you said sounds a lot like what descent said in his last post here;
“”if it helps though, fuck allah, and fuck mohammed, but while i’m at it, god kind of sucks too. all three preach hatred and intollerance and bigotry. The only difference is that the first two tell people to kill if they catch people commiting it, while they last one, ACTUALLY tells people to “turn the other cheek”(they don’t)”
It’s all convoluted, and completely off-base. Tell me where God (the non-Muzlum God) preaches hatred, tolerance, and bigotry. Gee, for an “agnostic”, you’re really fucked-up.”
Perhaps I should break down what I meant about the christian god. You’re right, the bible, doesn’t outrightly preach hatred and bigotry, so, as far as religous texts go, i don’t really mind it. It’s SOME of the bibles followers that twist the words of the bible so that it preaches bigotry. now, i’m talking predominantly about homosexuality, and the fact that gay marriage is banned. but whatever.
And, bruno, perhaps I should fill you in on what I’ve been doing in my free time. I got around to reading the complete quar’an recently, and honestly, that shit is fucked up. The thought that islam is the fastest growing religion in the world scares the hell out of me. We need to start doing something about it. I’m all about dropping random screenings at airports, and enacting screenings on suspicious looking people, as long as they’re executed correctly. What it boils down to for me is: islam scares the shit out of me, and what really pisses me off, as i’ve mentioned a bajillion times in this thread, is that people are actually changing the way they act, and the way they would like to express themselves, so as not to offend them. That shouldn’t be happening.
So, bruno, if you want to go on claiming i’m 90 different people, go for it, but i have no desire to put in the time and effort to trick a bunch of people that i really have no reason to trick. If you don’t like where i stand on a subject, or where someone else stands on a subject, fine, but at least address it in a civil manner.

FSM-FTW!(descent) on October 27, 2006 at 10:55 am

Descent,
Address it in a civil matter? LOL! I will when you do. In a post on this thread you vomited;
“and also, can you please tell me what provoked you to have another psychotic break?”
Pot calling the kettle black?
Anyway, Islam is one of the world’s fastest-growing religion only because Muzlums breed like rats. It’s their spawn who are brought up with the murder mentality.
Anyway, I’m glad that you corrected yourself regarding God, and the fact that he doesn’t preach hatred, intolerance, bigotry, etc. It’s the Moon god that did that via a deranged Mohammad.
As for homosexuality, may I remind you that Islam also forbids it – even though Muzlums engage in it and dismiss it as something else.
Tell me if I’m wrong, but are you a homosexual? The reason I ask is that on several threads, you seem to take offense at people who are critical of homos and their practices.
Don’t let Islam scare you. Just treat the Muzlum hordes for the subhuman savages that they are. Do your utmost to not patronize their businesses and don’t go out of your way to make them feel loved – because they sure hate you.
Lastly, do us all a favor and rip out the pages of the Qur’ an, and flush them down the toilet after wiping your ass with them.

Thee_Bruno on October 27, 2006 at 11:20 am

Bruno, thanks for calming down a bit. Anyways, I realize that mohammed preaches intolerance to homosexuality, in fact he preaches intolerance to just about everything, and we both know that. And no, I’m not a homosexual, but my fiance’s brother is, and he’s a great guy, and I hate to see that so many people get upset about what he does on his own time.
So, whatever. I don’t know if you ever did catch those south park episodes I was talking about, so here are links to a site where you can watch them full, and free, online:
http://www.dailymotion.com/visited/search/cartoon%20wars/video/x2axr_1003-cartoon-wars
and
http://www.dailymotion.com/visited/search/cartoon%20wars/video/x2iy2_1004-cartoon-wars-part-ii
Here’s a quick plot synoposis:
“The town panics when Family Guy shows an episode with Muhammad as a character, though he appears only in a brief cutaway drinking tea; leading several townspeople to hide in the Community Center. The episode winds up being censored, but it is revealed that a second half of the two-parter, without censors of Muhammad, will be shown. Kyle, who likes the show, finds no problem and thinks it’s wrong to censor Family Guy; shockingly, Cartman actually finds it to be offensive and declares it’s wrong to do this. Kyle thinks he is faking, but when Cartman gives an impassioned speech about keeping people from getting hurt, Kyle is guilted and, after a terrible dream where he and his little brother Ike are killed, agrees to go with Cartman to get the episode pulled.
The people in South Park, however, decide to literally bury their heads in the sand, as a way of showing Islamists they don’t want to insult them; on the way to Hollywood, however, Cartman suddenly reveals something shocking—he simply wants Family Guy taken off the air, and wants to use fear to destroy Freedom of speech. ”
This is a perfect example of how Muslims around the world want to destroy free speech in America.
Let me know what you think..

FSM-FTW!(descent) on October 27, 2006 at 11:39 am

I’ll check ‘em later today and get back to you.
ps. I’m glad to see you’re back on your stress-control medication.

Thee_Bruno on October 27, 2006 at 11:48 am

Haha, trust me, I’m glad you took yours too ;)
Still think elriu or whatever his name is, and I are the same person?

FSM-FTW!(descent) on October 27, 2006 at 11:52 am

YES.

Thee_Bruno on October 27, 2006 at 1:23 pm

I admit my comment about believing in God and being agnostic is somewhat contradictory. I don’t have, however, have to explain myself to a bigot like you. And for extremism from the Christian right, allow me to point out Timothy Mcveigh and Terry Nichols. Hindu extremists thrive in India. There are extremists from every group.

eluril on October 27, 2006 at 1:54 pm

To the ignorant little fuckwad, eluni;
“I admit my comment about believing in God and being agnostic is somewhat contradictory.”
You are correct, as I pointed it out. That’s because you’re an ignorant little piss ant who doesn’t have two brain cells to rub together.
“I don’t have, however, have to explain myself to a bigot like you.”
Although I am not a bigot, you just did, however, explain yourself.
“And for extremism from the Christian right, allow me to point out Timothy Mcveigh and Terry Nichols.”
Tim McVeigh & Terry Nichols never yelled, “God is great”, as they murdered innocent men, women, and children. They were not Christian fundamentalists who were told by their pastor (as imams in mosques do to their fellow Muzlums) to murder innocent men, women, and children. They never said that they will kill the non-believers as they clutched the Bible at any of their trials. In fact, there is a lot of evidence that they had help from Muzlums living in the Philippines. Nichols made many trips there in the months prior to the bombing. And, it wasn’t just because his wife is Philippino.
So, you see, yet again, you don’t have a clue as to what you’re talking about, you Muzlum scumbag.
“Hindu extremists thrive in India.”
Those “extremist” Hindus are just trying to preserve themselves and their way of life from the Muzlum savages who want to kill them. I suppose Americans are extremist because we want to preserve ourselves and our way of life from the same 7th century barbarians. I suppose the British, Israelis, Russians, Spanish, French, Chinese, Indonesians are all extremist because they are fighting the same pestilence on their soil.
“There are extremists from every group.”
Again, you never say that Muzlums are extremists. In NONE of your posts do you say so. Besides, how many “other extremists” are there who murder, en masse, because their religion dictates so? How many other religions prescribe wholesale murder? How many other denominations fly planes into building, behead people, and blow others up in the name of said religion.
You’re a Muzlum scumbag!
Keep posting; you just further reinforce everything every intelligent person knows about Muzlums.

Thee_Bruno on October 27, 2006 at 3:54 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field