Comments on: Weekend Read: Clintons Block New Release of Records

By: yawninggulf

yawninggulf — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:56:04 +0000

cf wrote: ” Somehow these two liberals/isolationists have tried to change the subject away from the failure of the Clintons to release pardon records. This is a self-contained action…”
Not even close, cf. Nice hack labeling job, though. Ms. Schlussel made the point that this is neither a partisan nor self-contained action when she wrote:
“So, just what are the Clintons hiding? What do Bill and Hillary Clinton not want us to see until after a certain date in November? Just what is George W. Bush hiding for his dad and for himself into the future?”
Everybody’s hiding something. Juxtaposing Clinton with Prince Bandar was pure daring, and laughable partisan propaganda when the relationship between W. is far longer & deeper, including business dealings and loans — and leads us to wonder about 9/11 as well.
cf continues getting in the last word: “It just shows that the writers of these childish contributions do not have enough faith in their positions to let substantive entries stand on their own.”
Childish? cf, you’ve disproven and shown nothing, posited no argument or debunked a single word. All you can do is label and build straw men to slur.
Substantive entries will always stand on their own.
Hopefully all your hot air will help usher in Spring.
yawning gulf

By: c f

c f — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:38:16 +0000

A couple of things I’ve noticed about isolationists or supporters of candiates such as Obama who have unsupportable positions; their positions and egos are so fragile that they ALWAYS have to have the last word. I knew losers like that in grade school — no matter what anyone said, you knew they would come back with something like the little kids they are. The other thing about these people is that they always try to change the subject. Somehow these two liberals/isolationists have tried to change the subject away from the failure of the Clintons to release pardon records. This is a self-contained action, and criticizing the tone of someone else’s comments, trying to deflect the comment by saying that someone else supposedly is just as bad, or responding to what anyone else says so you will always have the last word doesn’t deflect emphasis away from the point of the original post. It just shows that the writers of these childish contributions do not have enough faith in their positions to let substantive entries stand on their own.

By: Audacious

Audacious — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:14:36 +0000

Red Ryder — Life is simply too short to be so hostile. Some folks wake up every mornng and see who they can rip up and tear down in a blog. Others rise in the morning and try to make a difference in making someone’s life better. You tell me which is more honorable.

By: Audacious

Audacious — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:13:51 +0000

By: yawninggulf

yawninggulf — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:26:32 +0000

The history of Presidential Pardons from both parties is quite interesting.
Lovely, how Ms. Schlussel paints Clinton as a close associate of Prince Bandar, and blithely leaves out the fact that he’s known as “Bandar Bush”, no less, back at the Crawford Ranch, and his 9/11 funder wife is also a frequent and long-term guest there. There are scores of press photographs of W. & Bandar Bush French-Kissing, and walking passionately hand-in-hand in public. You can’t make this up.
Credibility, schmedibility, but the local sovereign gets an “A” for style and bravado.
The cigars in question were Cohibas, and they came through McDill AFB, courtesy of Norman S., who used to have what seemed like an endless supply.
What should the word for Barack’s potential crookedness be? Schroedinger’s Crook? Honorary Republican? Crookling? Neocrook?
Yes, we have some yawning choices for this sorry semblance of an election. McCain, who, like Rudy and W., has no philosophy, no consistency — Insane McCain voted TWICE against W’s tax cuts, and now did a double somersault flip-flop and agreed to make them permanent. LoL! He’s just a typical low-octane opportunist. Ever look at his list of contributors? Many employ illegal aliens.
Hillary, who’s fast becoming a female version of the duplicitous Lieberman, and foundling Obama, the well-washed phenomenon, though really just another Zbignew Breszinski puppet, like Jimmy Carter was.
This bunch made a lone nut gunman like Ron Paul begin to look good, and a Target-Shopping, bible-thumping snake handler like Huckabee almost normal!
Any way you look at it, we are soooo fked, specially when someone inherits the super-sized mess W. made.
Can’t you get another terrible Hillary pic? That one’s OLD.
yawning gulf
Ps. It’s an honor to be here. The Sovereign came highly recommended, and I turned a blind eye towards her association with FOX.
[Y: HUH? ON BANDAR, I CLEARLY MENTIONED BANDAR BUSH. PERHAPS YOUR EYEGLASS PRESCRIPTION IS NOT UP TO SNUFF. AND I WAS CLEARLY REFERRING TO BUSH WITH REGARD TO BANDAR, NOT CLINTON. YOUR CLINTONISTA PARANOIA IS SHOWING. DS]

By: Red Ryder

Red Ryder — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:01:49 +0000

Audacious–
This is a blog. Maybe you’ve heard of the concept. Journalistic niceties are often dispensed with.
Or perhaps you think the NY Times is a class act, in the wake of their McCain piece–He “may” have had an affair with a lobbyist.
I’m sorry you are apparently so naive as to not realize that essentially every politician is at least a scumbag and probably a crook. As a longtime observer of the scene here in DC, the good guys probably number about 5%.
Then again, if you had brain one, you would be criticizing the content of the postings, rather than the style.

By: Audacious

Audacious — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:11:47 +0000

Schlussel: “when he and Mrs. Bitch-ama leave the White House . . .”
c f: “Barack, the up-and-coming crook . . .”
This website is one class act.

By: c f

c f — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:50:36 +0000

We have quite a choice this year. Hillary, the big-time crook, along with her husband, Barack, the up-and-coming crook; the only reason he isn’t as big a crook as Hillary is that he hasn’t yet had as many opportunities as she has. There’s new information that bill raked in $700,000 from a stock deal just before Hillary announced, in which China may be involved.
McCain is not known to have as many crooked dealings other than the Keating 5, and is marginally better than they are, but it is hard to distinguish his policies from those of Bush, who, many people agree, is one of our worst presidents. Especially with what is going on in Israel, I think we need something more from McCain than a ritual denunciation of Hamas. We also need more than the pro forma denunciations of Iran, and weak-kneed sanctions that are meaningless.