March 31, 2008, - 11:46 am

Obama Pawns Off Controversial Statements on Low-Level Staff: Hmmm . . .Where Have We Heard This Before?

By Debbie Schlussel
Barack Hussein Obama is trying to pawn off very liberal statements he made on gun control, abortion, and the death penalty on low-level staffers, according to the Politico:

During his first run for elected office, Barack Obama played a greater role than his aides now acknowledge in crafting liberal stands on gun control, the death penalty and abortion – positions that appear at odds with the more moderate image he has projected during his presidential campaign.
The evidence comes from an amended version of an Illinois voter group’s detailed questionnaire, filed under his name during his 1996 bid for a state Senate seat.

barackobama.jpgpantsonfire.jpg

B Hussein O: . . . Pants on Fire

Late last year, in response to a Politico story about Obama’s answers to the original questionnaire, his aides said he “never saw or approved” the questionnaire.
They asserted the responses were filled out by a campaign aide who “unintentionally mischaracterize[d] his position.” . . . “Sen. Obama didn’t fill out these state Senate questionnaires – a staffer did – and there are several answers that didn’t reflect his views then or now,” Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for Obama’s campaign, said in an e-mailed statement.

But, as I reported back in January, this isn’t the first time Obama has used this lie, once he was caught making controversial statements and wanted to get out of it:

When Obama first ran for the U.S. Senate, he gave militant responses to the Chicago Jewish News about Israel. Obama denounced Israel’s fence–which he called a “wall” and “barrier to peace”–to keep out terrorists and favored working with Yasser Arafat. When members of the Chicago Jewish community circulated his responses, Obama said that the answers were not his positions, but the work of a low-level intern. He submitted new answers. But that was a lie, the insider says. In fact, they were the work of Obama’s Policy Director, Audra Wilson.

Obama then asked to fill out another questoinnaire from the Chicago Jewish News and changed his answers to please Jewish voters, even though his original answers were his real views.
And the Politico found that he is lying now, as he was with the Chicago Jewish News:

But a Politico examination determined that Obama was actually interviewed about the issues on the questionnaire by the liberal Chicago nonprofit group that issued it. And it found that Obama ‚Äî the day after sitting for the interview – filed an amended version of the questionnaire, which appears to contain Obama’s own handwritten notes added to one answer.

Barack Hussein Obama. He was a liar then. He’s a liar now. And he always pawns off his lies and misdeeds on his staff. Don’t look for any of this to change in the White House.

Related Posts with Thumbnails



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

14 Responses

Big surprise. Another lie from Gutter-Bama.

cankelz on March 31, 2008 at 12:27 pm

Folks – let’s also remember there were Che flags adorning several of his campaign offices.

JasonBourne81 on March 31, 2008 at 12:42 pm

How can you trust a government that doesn’t trust you to own a gun ??

Shootist on March 31, 2008 at 12:44 pm

Osama Obama must be exposed as the fraud that he is.

FreethinkerNY on March 31, 2008 at 1:40 pm

There’s just something about this guy…

America on March 31, 2008 at 1:43 pm

Shades of Jerimiah Wright or Michelle Obama. He’s always around people whose actions & positions he disagrees with. Poor guy.

c f on March 31, 2008 at 4:23 pm

If these are all honest mistakes that don’t reflect his views, you’d think one time Obama or someone on his staff might misstate his views in way that is more pro-American, pro-Israel, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense and more critical of leftist and black nationalist leaders than what he claims are his positions.
You haven’t yet had a adviser surface who is militantly overzealous in his support for Israel or a pastor who feels America can do no wrong.
The reason Obama has anti-Israel advisers is that they reflect his views and they believe that Obama shares their views. The same goes for all his hate-America pastors. None of this is a coincidence.

4infidels on April 1, 2008 at 1:42 pm

BO has commented that Denis Ross is an advisor of his on Jewish issues. Ross spoke to him once for five minutes and absolutely denies that he is BO’s advisor. Just another of BO’s many lies.

Words1inger on April 1, 2008 at 4:06 pm

Well the ObamaCon website has the Black Panther party once again proudly displayed on its Group website of endorsers.
They just took it down a week ago, after it was up there for 5 months because Fox news brought it to light, apparently his web site administrator felt AGAIN they are a group that should be advertised on his web site. I’m sorry, you don’t advertise on your campaign website views you don’t agree with.

wolf2012 on April 1, 2008 at 9:21 pm

“Folks – let’s also remember there were Che flags adorning several of his campaign offices.”
I wish that was true but sadly it isn’t.
**
“Well the ObamaCon website has the Black Panther party once again proudly displayed on its Group website of endorsers.”
I wish that was true, but sadly it isn’t.
[NP!: SADLY, THESE THINGS ARE, INDEED, TRUE. BUT I WISH THEY WEREN’T. DS]

No Pasaran! on April 2, 2008 at 5:32 am

Actually Pasaran, you dumb ass, the Black Panther party is true. They created their site on his group endorsment page. Look under groups supporting BO and the Black Panther endorsement comes up again.
And the Che flags adoring ONE campaign office in florida was also true. Pictures of the office are all over the web, they identify the woman in charge of the office and show the flags promently displayed throughout the office.

wolf2012 on April 2, 2008 at 11:01 am

“Actually Pasaran, you dumb ass, the Black Panther party is true. They created their site on his group endorsment page. Look under groups supporting BO and the Black Panther endorsement comes up again.”
Actually Wolf you dumb sh1t, it wasn’t true. The quote was..
“Well the ObamaCon website has the Black Panther party once again proudly displayed on its Group website of endorsers.”
Clearly untrue, the Obama campaign did not PROUDLY display the Panthers endorsement, as they can’t be responsible for everyone who endorses them.
For you to suggest that a candidate seeking to become the President of the USA would KNOWINGLY display a Panther advert on their website is just too absurd for words.
**
“And the Che flags adoring ONE campaign office in florida was also true.”
Yes, but as I’m sure you will have noticed THAT WASN’T THE QUOTE I WAS RESPONDING TO. The quote was…
“”Folks – let’s also remember there were Che flags adorning several of his campaign offices.”
Which even you now admit isn’t actually true.
So who’s the dumb ass now, wolfie boy?

No Pasaran! on April 2, 2008 at 6:03 pm

I think my brain just exploded when reading this post. Awesome work.

prom dresses on July 2, 2010 at 4:58 am

So who’s the dumb ass now, wolfie boy?

Becwarmnb on July 24, 2012 at 3:21 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field