September 12, 2008, - 4:23 pm

Weekend Box Office: Pointless De Niro, Pacino Cop Flick, Most Annoying Women’s Movie Ever; UPDATE: Hilarious, Entertaining “Burn After Reading”

By Debbie Schlussel
**** UPDATE: “Burn After Reading” Review Added ****
* “Burn After Reading“: This is the best movie out, this weekend. Hilarious, entertaining, funny, and different, I think this is my favorite Ethan & Joel Coen movie yet. And the best part about it is that it’s a great comedic presentation of how inane and inept the CIA is. Also a great commentary about how stupid and shallow some Americans are, willing to sell out their country for some cosmetic surgery.
The talented John Malkovich plays a CIA analyst who quits when he’s demoted. He decides to write his memoirs of life in the CIA and puts it on his computer. Malkovich’s wife, who is having an affair with creepy, philandering Federal Marshal George Clooney (as if), decides to divorce Malkovich. And soon, it ends up in the hands of two dimwitted gym employees (Frances McDormand and Brad Pitt), one of whom is trying to get money for plastic surgery and both of whom are attempting to blackmail Malkovich.

burnafterreading.jpgrighteouskill.jpg

Could have done without a weird sex chair built by Clooney’s character, but other than that the movie is tight and well done. If anything, it could have used much more Malkovich.
This movie is NOT for kids, and every other word is a four-letter one. There is some graphic violence and blood, but it’s part of the story. A lot of fun. And unlike a lot of movies, it ends at just the right point.
THREE REAGANS
reagancowboy.jpgreagancowboy.jpgreagancowboy.jpg
* “Righteous Kill“: This movie is being marketed as only the second one in which Robert De Niro and Al Pacino have extensive time onscreen together (the other was “Heat” and they were not onscreen together in “The Godfather II).
Although mildly entertaining, it’s a rip-off. I can’t give away why it’s a rip-off or it will make the movie pointless. And frankly, it’s pointless anyway. The movie begins with and repeatedly features extensive video of Robert De Niro as a cop, making a video recording about all of his kills (and one frame-up job) as a veteran on the police force. He is corrupt and lawless. Think “Training Day” or “The Shield” or “Dexter.” All the victims were bad guys who got away with it via legal technicalities.
De Niro’s partner is veteran cop Pacino. While it appears they’re trying to hide who is doing the serial murders of criminals, Pacino is loyal to his partner. Meanwhile, two other cops, John Leguizamo and Mark Wahlberg, are hot on the trail of the killer, De Niro.
But there’s that twist, which is just totally off-base. We never really know what is going on and why until the end. And then, when we do, we realize we just wasted almost two hours. Like I said, the movie is mildly entertaining. But the most righteous thing about the movie is when it finally ends (after about three false-alarm endings).
There are some funny lines in the movie, but a lot of it is confusing and a mess. And it’s very crude. De Niro and Pacino were once great actors. But their presence on screen is an exercise in aging-actors-need-another-paycheck co-dependence.
HALF REAGAN
halfreagan.jpg
thewomen.jpg

* “The Women“: Sometimes things from 1939 actually are far better and more sophisticated than things from 2008. This movie, a remake of the 69-year-old flick, is one of them.
I never thought it was possible to make “Sex & The City” look like Shakespeare. But this absolutely horrid chick flick does the trick. This is the even more dumbed-down version of the “Sex” chicks ten years later.
Almost two hours of completely stupid dialogue, cackling, overwrought faux-drama, and crying, this wasn’t a guilty pleasure like, say, “Desperate Housewives.” It is just a damn shame . . . and waste of celluloid.
The “plot” (if you can call it that): Meg Ryan plays a rich woman who finds out her husband is cheating on her with the much younger Eva Mendes. Together, she and her mother (Candice Bergen) and her cackling, annoying friends (Annette Benning, Jada Pinkett Smith, and Debra Messing) figure out how to waste two hours of my time in a movie screening room.
Avoid this movie at all cost. Dumb beyond imagination. An embarrassment to even chick flicks. Ugh to the Nth. Pure torture.
What’s that rustling sound I hear? Oh, it’s Clare Boothe Luce, who wrote the original play, turning over in her grave.
FOUR MARXES
karlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpgkarlmarxmovies.jpg

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly




14 Responses

Movies like that are why I never liked chick flicks. I still like pacino and deniro, so I might see rightous kill

mindy1 on September 12, 2008 at 8:30 pm

Debbie, I smell another rat here. If I were a movie exec and you pitched that group of actresses in a movie, I would’ve known right off the bat it would be a critical and financial flop. And I’m no movie executive. I get the feeling these movies are some type of scam where the losses must get passed on to some over eager dupes and the insiders have a good chuckle.

Anonymous1 on September 12, 2008 at 9:18 pm

Anonymous1: I think you’re on to something. “The Women” is the equivalent of “Springtime for Hitler”. The real “The Women” is one of my favorite movies. I would NEVER and I mean never go to a movie with Meg Ryan, Candice Bergan and Annette Benning in it. Bleeech!

lexi on September 12, 2008 at 9:26 pm

Spot on all around. And I agree, disappointing that De Niro and Pacino couldn’t make a better onscreen duo comeback.

aStorygirl on September 13, 2008 at 7:19 am

Just saw burn after reading-and you were right on about that, although I disagreed with your traitor review.
[M: HMMM . . . YOU AGREE WITH "TRAITOR"'S MESSAGE THAT CHRISTIANS ARE JUST AS MUCH TERRORISTS B/C OF THE KLAN AS MUSLIMS ARE? AND YOU AGREE THAT FBI AGENTS WHO LOVE ARABIC AND ISLAM AND THINK THAT CHRISTIANS ARE TERRORISTS JUST AS MUSLIMS ARE, ARE THE GOOD GUYS, WHO KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT? AND THAT THE FBI AGENTS WHO GET IT ABOUT ISLAM AND JIHAD ARE DUMMIES AND VIOLENT THUGS? TROUBLING. DS]

mindy1 on September 13, 2008 at 11:59 pm

you’re right on debbie. mindy1, how dare you try to bring intelligent debate into this blog. how dare you try and convince us that there are “good” muslims. are you a muzzie?

lolwut on September 14, 2008 at 4:17 pm

I’m not a muzzie, just someone who’s politics were always centerist, leaving me with the ability to see both points of view. I don’t think christians NOWDAYS are terrorists, but the Klan in the 1920′s, and 1930′s could nowdays be labeled a domestic terror organization. You did not have to get angr, I just want a good debate.
[M: NOT ANGRY. JUST SURPRISED, SINCE THE MOVIE WAS FILLED WITH MORAL EQUIVALENCY PROPAGANDA. AGREED ON THE KLAN OF THE '20S/30S, BUT THE GROUP IS VERY MARGINAL NOW. DS]

mindy1 on September 14, 2008 at 8:24 pm

mindy1, “I don’t think christians NOWDAYS are terrorists, but the Klan in the 1920′s, and 1930′s could nowdays be labeled a domestic terror organization.”
Not sure of the connection here. The Klan is not nor ever was a Christian organization. I can’t think of any mainstream Christian organization or denomination who endorse the Klan. If you can cite a reference, I’d like to see it.
Since when were Christians “terrorists”? Sure many bad things have been done by Christians (or supposedly Christians) as individuals, but, again, I’d like to see some evidence of terrorism by a Christian organization or denomination.
That sounds like an awfully broad brush, but I’m willing to hear your evidence with an open mind.

Jeff_W on September 14, 2008 at 10:22 pm

My point was that the Klan labled themselves a christian group, even thogh they were anything but.

mindy1 on September 15, 2008 at 7:16 am

mindy1, “My point was that the Klan labled themselves a christian group, even thogh they were anything but.”
I agree they used The Bible to justify some of their actions, as many do for wrong at times. I’m not so sure they labelled themselves as a Christian group, though.

Jeff_W on September 15, 2008 at 8:51 am

Lefties (and Mindy is a lefty, not a centrist) are always invoking the Klan. The Klan is a spent force and irrelevant at this point. Plus, the Klan was never the threat to our country that Muslims are. I know, I know–not all Muslims are jihadis but where are they? Why don’t we hear from them?

lexi on September 15, 2008 at 10:26 am

you’re right lexi! how dare comrade mindy disparage the klan!

lolwut on September 15, 2008 at 2:03 pm

Funny, I never thought of myself as a lefty, and certainly never a comrade, I jsr wanted a debate without resorting to name calling. Is that so wrong?

mindy1 on September 15, 2008 at 2:50 pm

Omg its just a fckn movie get over it.

missy on March 18, 2010 at 10:25 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field