October 12, 2011, - 6:27 pm

UndieBomber Pleads Guilty; Juror No. 235 Will Be Missed

By Debbie Schlussel

As you may have heard by now, Underwear Bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab decided to plead guilty today, rather than go through the trial, which began yesterday.  He will be sentenced by liberal Jewish (In Name Only) pro-Muslim Federal Judge Nancy Garlock Edmunds in January.  She is normally very soft on Islamic terrorists, but she knows the world is watching closely on this one, so she won’t bunt, unlike in many other cases before her.  (I’ve written about her before, and I’ll be writing about her again.  Plenty more to say about this uber-liberalette appointed by Daddy Bush.)

There are many theories on why the UndieBomber chose to plead.  Some say he didn’t want the photos of his badly burned “junk” made public.  There were plans to make this an exhibit in the trial, and thus, it would be public record.  Others say that he realized he wouldn’t get to use the trial as the soap box he had hoped.  Still others believe that he decided he’d already done the soap box thing in pleading guilty and saying his law is the koran, not U.S. law or other general international laws against blowing up a plane full of innocent passengers or trying to do so.  In my mind, I just think he’s your typical observant Muslim who doesn’t believe in America’s legal system and didn’t feel like going through the motions because he knew he did it and admitted doing it.

In any event, I’m glad that Assistant U.S. Attorney and universal scumbag, Jonathan Tukel, won’t get his moment of glory trying the case, since he worked overtime to help Islamic terrorists for the last eight years. And I’m bummed that Juror #235 didn’t get to do her duty.  True, she was an alternate juror.  But from what I read, she was the only juror who really gets it.

A retired state unemployment worker who lives in metro Detroit told Edmunds that she has problems with Muslim immigrants who don’t want to assimilate after arriving in the U.S.

“Dearborn is close to where I live,” she said. “When I go through there, it’s as though they have set up their own little country. They shop in their own area and don’t venture out. It’s something I don’t understand and I have a problem with it.”

She said the Muslims she’s talking about should remain in their homelands and fight for freedom there. She said she doesn’t understand why so many Muslims hate America – a question Edmunds said is not likely to be answered at trial.

The woman said in her jury questionnaire that she has formed no opinion about the guilt or innocence of Abdulmutallab. “I’d do my best to be impartial,” she said. “Where I’m sitting right now, I have no bias against the person.”

She expressed concern that it has taken prosecutors so long to try Abdulmutallab. Prosecutor Cathleen Corken asked her why she would assume it was the government’s fault that the case wasn’t tried sooner.

“Because you’re in control,” she said.

Edmunds told her these things take time.

She was accepted for jury duty.

We need more jurors–no, more Americans–just like her.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

14 Responses

Unfortunately, he was not subjected to a Casino Royale interrogation, which would befit him especially.

Occam's Tool on October 12, 2011 at 9:19 pm

“Still others believe that he decided he decided he already done the soap box thing in pleading guilty and saying his law is the koran, not US law or other international law”

DS, the “Attempted Underwear-bomber’s” perverted mindset doesn’t surprise me the least. I remember you wrote a story over a week ago when two muslim women from Somalia, living in Minnesota were prosecuted and they acknowledged islamic courts right here in the USofA instead of recognizing US courts. Now as for the juror who didn’t serve, I have to agree with her and here’s her statement:

“When I go through there (she’s talking about Dearborn, MI), it’s like as though they have set up their own little country. They shop in their own and don’t venture out.”

When I first came onto this blog nearly two years ago, I thought Debbie and some of the posters where a little out of their mindsets, but thankfully for me, I use plenty of critical thinking, and I used my brain/intelligence and notice that Debbie and all of the readers/posters know what their all talking about. I also believe more and more muslims in this country (not all muslims, but a good percentage of them) refuse to assimilate and adapt to our lifestyle, culture, values, etc. If they don’t like our culture, lifestyle, laws, etc., then I suggest the muslim immigrants who refuse to assimilate to US lifestyle to go back they originally came from, I’m sorry, but it’s the way I see it!

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on October 12, 2011 at 9:38 pm

    Will you still see so clearly about forsaking your roots when Israel asks for American aid? I hope so.

    Dave on October 14, 2011 at 2:21 am

I’m sure he must be aware of the deaths of Osama Bin Laden and Anwar Al Awlaki. I’d like to think that when those events happened, the guards watching over him moved a portable television up to his holding cell, flipped on the news, and then pointed at him and went “Ha Ha” Nelson Muntz style as he watched in humiliation. Perhaps he plead guilty just to get away from those guards.

Irving on October 12, 2011 at 10:34 pm

He wants to be a martyr and get the 72 virgins.
It’s what any Muslim true believer would do.

el zopilote on October 12, 2011 at 11:05 pm

Me? I’d have him taken out and shot. Terrorists should be summarily executed.

A trial implies their evil isn’t particularly terrifying or grotesque.

I think its only fitting terrorists receive exactly what they plan for us. They have no right to call on our civilized protection.

NormanF on October 12, 2011 at 11:08 pm

I have come to think that we may need a referendum on citizenship. But, the timing must be right or it could backfire. The Constitution doesn’t explicitly define ‘Citizen’ but I think that scholars would agree that a Citizen is expected to uphold, follow, and protect the law of the land and that means first and foremost the Constitution. There are implied loyalty and cultural norms as well.

To more exactly define Citizen as it is used in the Constitution, the work The Law of Nations by Emerich de Vattel, published in 1758 should be consulted as it largely influenced the founding fathers of the U.S. Based on it we would conclude that certain definitions follow:
1) A ‘natural born citizen’ is one who was born of parents who are both citizens, 2) a ‘native citizen’ is one who is born of a citizen mother within the jurisdiction of the U.S., and 3) a ‘naturalized citizen’ is one who has satisfied certain requirements (like: know the language) and taken an oath of citizenship.

Whether or not one accepts the above definitions as stated I doubt that anyone would see proper the acceptance of a citizen above a certain legal age who does not uphold, follow, and protect the law of the land (I am not saying that such a person cannot desire changes to be brought about by proper process).

That said, juror 235 sees people (in this case muslims) who do not meet the qualifications of citizenship put forth above. Muslims in particular cannot be accepted as citizens because they cannot honestly take the oath of citizenship and still remain adherent to the Islamic faith and practices. They will use their religion and the Constitution’s First Amendment to argue for their rights but their religion requires or promotes violation of nearly all of the first ten amendments including the First Amendment. There are other illegal and non-assimilating groups in the U.S. that do not not have the muslim stigma but nevertheless are not qualified for citizenship.

Ponderer on October 13, 2011 at 3:04 am

Off Topic

News
New dimension of Terror

Attack on ISLAM CRITIC (a former Muslim) in Berlin-Germany !

Attack on car
Strangers attack Islam Critic in Berlin

Strangers at Tempelhof have stopped a car in the morning and attacked it. According to information from Morgenpost Online the islam critic author” J. Gehirn ” should have been sitting in the car . He was not injured.

The two perpetrators stopped the car of the 39-year-old on Ring Road before Teuber-Bridge. Then there were three popping sounds and the windshield base was destroyed.

No trace of the perpetrators . The police searched the area with a drone – but without success.

As the police confirmed the victim is an Author, who writes under the Pseudonym “J. Gehirn”. The born Muslim wrote in his book, “Was it God’s word or the word of a man?” Dealt with the Koran and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad.

The state security has taken over the investigation.

http://www.morgenpost.de/berlin/polizeibericht/article1792553/Unbekannte-attackieren-Islamkritiker-in-Berlin.html

Mallory on October 13, 2011 at 5:07 am

    Hey Mallory…Take some time, if you are a reader, and start on SATANIC VERSES to get an idea of what sets these guys off. Rushdie is a genius.

    Dennis on October 13, 2011 at 9:15 am

PS:

With pictures (Attack on Islam Critic)

http://www.bz-berlin.de/tatorte/drei-schuesse-islam-kritiker-attackiert-article1293927.html

Mallory on October 13, 2011 at 5:26 am

Here is a Legal question: If the Captain of a Vessel is the ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY while the Vessel is under sail, then IS THE CAPTAIN OF AN AIRPLANE / AIRCRAFT / SPACECRAFT / LTA-CRAFT the ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY of his craft while engaged in carriage?

If so, then the next time a similar situation occurs, just blow the pirate terrorist away and no one will have to waste time, money, and prison space on the fool.

Dennis on October 13, 2011 at 9:24 am

Fizzle pants is a real genius, ain’t he?

RT on October 13, 2011 at 9:57 am

Daddy’s a banker, sfb son, life in prison. He will go insane there for sure. uhhh buh by

jake49 on October 13, 2011 at 12:00 pm

Debbie. Your probably not a fan of Alex Jones, but he had a guest an Attorney named Kurt Haskel who was a passenger on that flight and witnessed a man at the airport getting this guy on board the flight with no passport. When they found out that the underwear bomber was going to call him as his only witness they quickly got him to plead guilty. He will get a light sentence but only because he was a government patsy. Please watch the interviews with Kurt Haskle, he’s very credible. Thanks

Gary Born on October 14, 2011 at 2:09 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field