November 6, 2008, - 3:24 pm

USA Today Agrees: Ineffective, Ignorant Faux-Conservative Airhead Hasselbeck Makes “View” Debates Lopsided

By Debbie Schlussel
It’s rare that liberal USA Today TV critic Robert Bianco and I agree, but he singles out a certain someone as a very weak conservative against several hags on TV. I don’t agree with all of his comments, but a good deal of them. I’ve underlined the things with which I agree, things that I’ve stated a gazillion times on this site. This chick is a total airhead. Vacant, vapid, and hey, she came in fourth by eating bugs on “Survivor”. Excellent.

hasselbackusatoday.jpg

hasselbeckusatoday2.jpg

You see, even Bianco wants the debate to be fair. And with her “representing” us, it simply ain’t.
To sum up just a few of her positions: She loves Title IX, Affirmative Action, and Syria. She heaped the praise on racist, anti-Semite Al Sharpton and agreed with his call to fire Don Imus, then the next day changed her tune when the FOX News talking points finally arrived and clued her in to what she missed after 30 years on “Survivor Island”. She hates Ann Coulter–who has more intellect underneath a single toe-nail than this imbecile has in her minuscule brain (assuming there is a brain)–and hates Rush Limbaugh (she says he’s a “dream killer”). And there is so much more. But that’s the Debbie’s Notes version.
Of course, they’ll never dump her. She’s the perfect idiot to fill their set-up. They want us to look dumb. And she gets the Oscar (in this case, Emmy) for that.
Sadly, as reader Scott notes, she isn’t acting.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly, PDF & Email






6 Responses

I rarely watch the view but have seen the numerous clips on the Internet with Hasselbeck defending conservative positions.
She is no conservative in fact IMHO she is a moderate liberal.Not only is she an airhead but she is so vain that is makes my stomach turn.
It is just like the MSM to pack panels with lousy conservative voices and Barbwa Wa Wa is no different with her nag fest of hags discussing politics.

ScottyDog on November 6, 2008 at 3:53 pm

Hear Hear Debbie … Although I have only seen the view via highlights on the O’Reilly Factor, or through YouTube, I would agree wholeheartedly … there are many women that are far more intelligent and articulate to Conservative values and principles. But why on earth would ABC, or the View, ever want to hire any one of them?

Jimmy Lewis on November 6, 2008 at 4:11 pm

Not really relevant to the point of Debbies write up- but geez- they needed twice the layout space for Behar-Blowhards head than they did for Little miss Eli-Sissy.

MarySJ on November 6, 2008 at 5:57 pm

Go for it, Debbie. However, do you think that you can keep your hands off the wattled necks of your co-hosts?
chsw

chsw on November 6, 2008 at 11:03 pm

Airheaded Hasselbeck couldnt win an arguement with a sweaty basketball gym shoe. She’s an embarassment.

RadicalRightWinger on November 7, 2008 at 12:12 am

Elisabeth is not a political pundit. She is a talk show host who does a decent job of defending herself against a stacked deck. Behar can barely structure a sentence beyond ” Bush Sux” and conservatives call Elisabeth dumb. This is why we are losing. We are cannibalizing. Do you see liberals calling Behar a moron publicly??
[D: ELISABETH IS A COMPLETE IDIOT AND IGNORAMUS. IF YOU EXPECT DEFENSE OF IDIOCY, GO TO A LIBERAL WEBSITE. THE MORE YOU DEFEND A DUMMY, THE MORE YOU SOUND LIKE ONE. ELISABETH IS NO CONTEST FOR THAT. I DON’T DEFEND IDIOTS. AND HERE’S A NEWSFLASH, SINCE YOU REFUSE TO READ WHAT I WROTE: SHE IS NOT–I REPEAT, NOT–A CONSERVATIVE. DS]

Dennis D on November 9, 2008 at 9:37 am

Leave a Reply for chsw

Click here to cancel reply.

* denotes required field