March 22, 2007, - 3:37 pm

Shariah Winds Blow Westward

By Debbie Schlussel
Shariah (Islamic law) winds are not only blowing our way, they’re here. A couple of stories in the news indicate that in spades.
First, there’s the story out of Germany, which a plethora of readers sent. It’s about a completely idiotic judge, Christa Datz-Winter, who cited the Koran in her ruling that corporal punishment against women in Islamic marriages is okay. Remember, this is in GERMANY, not MOROCCO or PAKISTAN. She made this ruling in a divorce matter:

The judge, Christa Datz-Winter, said in a recommendation earlier this year that both partners came from a “Moroccan cultural environment, in which it is not uncommon for a man to exert a right of corporal punishment over his wife,” the court said.
She argued that it was not an exceptional hardship case in which fast-track divorce proceedings would be justified.

islamiccrescent.jpg

When the woman protested, Datz-Winter cited a passage from the Islamic holy book, the Quran, to back up her argument that reads in part, “men are in charge of women.”

I guess that’s her way of saying, “Islam says you deserved it, bitch.” Say Good-bye to Germany, folks. Auf Wiedersehen.
But don’t rest on your laurels, thinking this can’t happen here. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court has, many times recently, cited laws of other countries for some of its absurd decisions, such as the one outlawing the death penalty for youthful murderers tried as adults. If they can cite other nations’ laws for their decisions, what will stop them from citing other religions’ laws?
Nothing.
Then, there are Dr. Rafiq A. Sabir, Tarik Shah, Abdulrahman Farhane and Mahmud Faruq Brent–three men on trial in federal court in New York for conspiring to help terrorists. The jury selection will exclude anyone with anti-Muslim bias. Hmmm . . . does this mean that the men’s attorneys are finally admitting that most terrorists are Muslims?
Today, they screen for those who are biased against Muslims (which is everyone who isn’t a complete fool or left-wing America hater–hello, we remember 9/11).
Tomorrow, they will apply Sharia, just like Judge Datz-Winter did. Wake up, America! Or you, too (and your daughters, sisters, and mothers), will soon be smacked around, all with legal sanction.

Related Posts with Thumbnails



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

23 Responses

I feel sorry for Germany…they already had to deal with Nazism and now Islam. Two different faces but the same evil.

the_don on March 22, 2007 at 4:02 pm

This judge’s hyphens are clearly impeding her judgment.
She should realize that not all women like being smacked around and religious law has nothing to do with national law.
Leave your spanking fetish at home, Hyphen-Klapsenfrau!

Koozebane on March 22, 2007 at 4:25 pm

Latter-day Holocaust guilt.

Jeremiah on March 22, 2007 at 4:42 pm

Unfortunatly, we have been blinded by the illusional concept of p.c. to see the threat of radical islam thats metastasizing like a cancer throughout the west. America is not to far from becoming a Caliphate State with the incessant honor-killings and Sharia Law that the islamists want to implement on our own soil. I don’t want to wake up to see the staue of liberty claded in a burqa. I don’t want to see the White House converted into a madrassah. I don’t want Arabic to become the official language in America. Its bad enough that we have to put up with poll booths in Spanish. I don’t want Ramadan to be declared a national holiday in this country. I don’t want to be coerced to kneel down on a prayer rug 5 times a day towards Mecca. I don’t want to see churches, synoguage, and temples being tourched on our soil. I certainly don’t want to see Shariah Law being enforced in the Supreme Court. Unless we pack up the guts to stand up and stop the tidal wave of islam that wants to flood us with their primitive lifestyle, we are marking the demise of our own survival.

Jew Chick on March 22, 2007 at 4:48 pm

“…Datz-Winter cited a passage from the Islamic holy book, the Quran, to back up her argument that reads in part, “men are in charge of women.””
As a result of the above quote, the headline of the story should have read:
“GERMAN JUDGE CITES EVIDENCE: ISLAM SUBJUGATES WOMEN…MOHAMMAD OK’D BEATINGS…NO RELIGION OF PEACE”

Thee_Bruno on March 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm

AT ALL COSTSÖÖIslam must be stopped.
Not only for human rights violations, and as an affront to reason, but is not God’s plan for humanity ~

The Canadien on March 22, 2007 at 5:56 pm

So, let me get this straight…
Woman: My husband is beating me. I want a divorce.
Judge: You’re from Morocco, right?
Woman: Yes.
Judge: So you should be used to it.
Woman: But…
Judge: Tough luck. Your husband owns you.
And this is what passes as progressive these days?

Dan on March 22, 2007 at 6:08 pm

PUT MUSLIMS in places of high authority and this is the kind of treason you can expect…
BETTER HAVE all kinds of resources available to battle these idiotsÖÖthey have no qualms about wasting a country’s resources on their being a “public nuisance”ñ
MUSLIMS live in the SUB-BASEMENT of humanity and its going to take a lot JUST TO get them up into the basement. To refine them to the point of Judaism or Catholicism WILL NEVER be possible.
MUSLIMS will always be MISCREANTS.
MUSLIMS hold allegiance to A RELIGION that examined “objectively” can only be reduced to a compulsive silliness. It really takes a special grace, not to laugh in a Muslim’s face when they “earnestly” try to “explain” their “faith”.
PLEASE EVERYONE pray that I receive this gift!
My CATHOLICISM and belief in God require me to be polite EVEN TO the pathetically brainwashed ~

The Canadien on March 22, 2007 at 6:21 pm

The Germans exterminated their Jews (who were the most productive citizens of Germany) and have replaced them with Muslims.

Ripper on March 22, 2007 at 6:26 pm

The Torah, the Bible, and the Koran may be great books for personal inspiration, but are lowsy manuals for governance.
Canadien,
I’m an atheist so I’m free to call you an idiot at will; not out of being rude, but being truthful.

jaillibby on March 22, 2007 at 8:18 pm

This is the mentality of the socialist…multiculturalism. Ain’t it just grand.
Give me an excuse to kill anti-American left, start the damn war already before my eyes get any worse. Hold up that big hammer and sickle flag! Parade it around if you like but don’t have a hissy fit when someone opens up on you.

warpmine on March 22, 2007 at 9:25 pm

What if a muslim in germany desires to kill an infidel? Would that be deemed legal? After all, the Koran permits that, even madates it!

Witch-king of Angmar on March 23, 2007 at 4:04 am

It is always useful to start with the basics. The Constitution in Amendment I states- do not mix religion and government. So we then know that no matter what the words say in the official book of rules for a real religion or a pretend religion, these words do not apply in a court of law. For example, if a pretend religion says it is OK to kill infidels or slap around your wife, then a court of law will not recognize these matters as exemptions from our laws. So, any court decision to the contrary is hollow, not legal and need not be followed and is in fact unjust. A strong Executive branch of government, charged with the enforcement of the law, will see to it that this “non binding” decision is not carried out. We can be sure of it. After all, does not the pledge to the flag remind us that there is “liberty and justice for all?”

Happiness Pursuer on March 23, 2007 at 8:16 am

As a post thought to my comment, I should add- “So what are you worried about, Debbie?”

Happiness Pursuer on March 23, 2007 at 8:36 am

*Religion of Peace*
If Islam is a religion of peace then why are there no peaceful Islamic nations?
Why can people undermine or ridicule Christianity or Judaism but the minute anyone says anything negative about Islam or Muhammad…Muslims threaten violence?
Why in nations where Muslims are the majority is there immense poverty with the exception of a few lucky oil rich Islamic nations?
Why are Muslims the only group of people who cant get along with people of other religions?
Why are 95% of the terrorists Muslim?
Why are suicide bombers only Muslim?
How come none of the other major Holy Books instruct their followers to kill members who aren’t of their religion?
Why is Islam the only religion that allows honor killings?
Why has the world never had problems with Hindus,Christians,Jews,Buddhists as a whole?
Why does the Islamic holy book the Qu’ran encourage terrorism and martyrdom?
Of course Muslims always bring the argument that all people commit crimes…but the Qu’ran is the only major Holy Book that encourages (rape,murder,torture,martyrdom)against nonparticipants of its religion.
Well here is Islam in action. Viewer Discretion is advised. And guess the Qu’ran condones all these acts.
http://www.rawa.us/movies/farah-q2.mpg
http://www.rawa.us/movies/beating.mpg
http://www.rawa.us/movies/zarmeena.mpg
http://www.rawa.us/movies/adam.mpg

the_don on March 23, 2007 at 8:44 am

Nice film clips. If there was any doubt in anyone’s mind that muzlums are nothing but sharp-toothed, blood-thirsty, cave-dwelling, murder-monkeys then these clips would erase it. AND, although these clips showcase muzlum Arabs at their favorite pastime, this barbaric behavior is exhibited wherever you find muzlums anywhere in the world.
Nothing but a bunch of Dark Age throwbacks.

Thee_Bruno on March 23, 2007 at 9:06 am

by the way that was a woman who was shot to death in head for violating Shari’a law
http://www.rawa.us/movies/qasash-l.mpg
This clip is not for the faint of heart. The truth of the Taliban is that they live by the same Shari’a that the rest of Muslims live by. And Muslims like to say that the Shi’a are radical but the Taliban is of the Sunni sect of Islam. Another thing to note is that this type of thing is commonplace in African Islamic nations as well as Pakistan,Afghanistan,and the poorer countries of the Middle East.

the_don on March 23, 2007 at 9:32 am

label me a scold,but…PLEASE,stop spelling “Religion of Peace” incorrectly…
isn’t it really:”Religion of Piece” (as you usually end up in “pieces” from a sword) ?
Is there a better demonstration of “Dhimmitude” than this judge’s action and does’nt her hyphenated-name tell you all you need to know about her proclivaties?
Her invoking the precepts of Shar’ia law for legal finding is preposterous and thus I grant the title of “dhimmi-Frau” (or dhimmi-Fraulein) for her legal stationary instead of Honorable so-and-so.

billybob on March 23, 2007 at 9:48 am

Under Sharia law non-muslims may be subjected to Sharia Laws however it codifies the treatment of dhimmis (Arabic) in relation to the Muslim state and in cases of over-lapping jurisdiction. Dhimmis are distinctly second-class citizens in that they cannot serve in public office, cannot testify in court and must follow certain rules meant for living on muslim land and under muslim protection(such as paying the jizya). The jizya or tax is enforced on those who broke a treaty or attacked Muslim with no right (as a punishment) or required from those who ask for protection without enrolling in the army. The rules include privilege to practice their own religion, except for public demonstration of non-muslim religious practices and the right to convert muslims.
The core component of treatment is the jizya, or tax specifically upon non-Muslims. The jizya originates in the Koran [9:29], which says “Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger and those who acknowledge not the religion of the truth among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” The “Book” refers to the People of the Book, Jews and Christians, who don’t follow their religion righteously, but the jizya was extended to all conquered non-Muslims. The jizya ultimately is less than the Zakah (money given to the poor and needy) and Sadaqah (charity) that Muslims give. In practice, this was rarely the case.
In addition, Dhimmis are forbidden to build or repair churches or synagogues. Bells, crosses, sacred books and other public demonstrations of religion, including laments at funerals, are forbidden. For example, churches and ancient gurdwaras in present day Pakistan, have been preserved and the minorities live in sizable numbers in the Guru-Nanak pura and Karachi.
_________________________________________________
Freedom of speech
Sharia does not allow freedom of speech on such matters as criticism of Muhammad. Such criticism is considered blasphemy against Muhammad.
The Qur’an says that Allah curses the one who harms the Prophet in this world and He connected harm of Himself to harm of the Prophet. There is no dispute that anyone who curses Allah is killed and that his curse demands that he be categorized as an unbeliever. The Judgment of the unbeliever is that he is killed. […] There is a difference between … harming Allah and His Messenger and harming the believers. Injuring the believers, short of murder, incurs beating and exemplary punishment. The judgement against those who harm Allah and His Prophet is more severe — the death penalty.
ñ [40]
In Egypt, public authorities annulled, without his consent, the marriage of Prof. Nasr Abu Zayd when he got in conflict with an orthodox Islamic cleric from the Al-Azhar University in Cairo. The cleric had condemned Abu Zayd’s reading of the Qur’an as being against the orthodox interpretation and labelled him an apostate (seen as a non-believer and consequently not permitted to marry or stay married to a Muslim woman). Abu Zayd fled to the Netherlands, where he is now a professor at the university of Leiden.
__________________________________________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Sections_of_Sharia_law

the_don on March 23, 2007 at 10:15 am

Thanks to the_don for the link to the Dia-Sharia page. That sort of info should be broadcast on TV 24/7. There should be a cable channel devoted to informing people as of the truth about the Muslim Nation. People need to wake up and see the nightmare they’re faced with.

FreethinkerNY on March 23, 2007 at 12:51 pm

~the_don~
instead of the VERY questionable accuracy and/or integrity of your reference source of wikipedia on many subjects (and conceding your above info is ok) there are far more reliable & accurate sources on all things Islam.
May I suggest one of the ones I use for unquestioned accuracy & intellectual honesty:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam101/
There is also an exc. blog & comments section on their main page.Hopes this helps.

billybob on March 23, 2007 at 1:51 pm

” Canadien,
I’m an atheist so I’m free to call you an idiot at will; not out of being rude, but being truthful.”
Posted by: jaillibby
Now, jaillibbyÖdo you really think anything your neutered mind could come up withÖis going to derail me?
PaganÖyou have yourself a good day!

The Canadien on March 23, 2007 at 4:46 pm

“I feel sorry for Germany…”
Eh? What? I never thought I would read anything so dumb ever.
Save your compassion for those who did not CHOOSE their fate. As far as I (a German born, bred and based) know, nobody forced the Germans of 1933 to elect Hitler, neither does some alien evil force them into dhimmitude now. They are doing that all by themselves.

The Editrix on March 24, 2007 at 6:52 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field