November 7, 2013, - 1:37 pm

Nermin Spahic: Iowa Muslim Imam Says Criminal Sex Charges Violate His “Religious Freedom” – Islamic Modesty Case #4,593,322

By Debbie Schlussel

Time for another edition of “Your Day in Islamic Modesty.”

You know how Muslims, Islamo-pandering politicians, and idiots like Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby are always lecturing us on “Islamic modesty” (and how their alleged claim to modesty is supreme to that of all other religions)? Well, here’s case # 4,593,322 of “Islamic Modesty”. Oh, and it’s also case #26,344,781 of “Awesome Naturalized Immigrants & Supermodels for Amnesty.”


Nermin Spahic: Muslim Imam is Latest Supermodel for “Islamic Modesty” & “Religious Freedom”

An attorney for a Des Moines Islamic leader charged with sexual abuse and exploitation has asked a judge to drop two of the charges, arguing that they violate the man’s religious freedom. . . . Nermin Spahic, 40, . . . faces one count of third-degree sexual abuse and two counts of sexual exploitation by a counselor or therapist. He was arrested in August after a 42-year-old woman and her 18-year-old daughter told police that Spahic sexually assaulted them during a religious ceremony.

Iowa law spells out that counselors and therapists are barred from “sexual conduct” with patients. But because Spahic never had a formal relationship with the two women, using his religious position to charge him should be unconstitutional, Campbell argued in the motion. . . . “The ceremony he was performing was not psychotherapy, nor was it counseling,” the motion said. “The sexual exploitation charges are therefore necessarily based on his religious identity and the religious nature of his relationships to the accusers.” . . .

The woman on Aug. 12 called Spahic to her house in Johnston for help with her daughter, who reportedly suffered from personal issues, including depression and drug use, police and court papers said. Spahic allegedly performed an Islamic ceremony that involved “chanting and rubbing the body with oil,” court papers said. . . . At the time of his arrest Spahic served as the imam — a leader of Islamic prayer services — at the Des Moines Islamic and Cultural Center Bosniak on Lower Beaver Road.

Please no jokes about the name of the road and Imam Spahic’s apparent uncontrollable predilection for it. In case you were wondering, Spahic is a Bosnian Muslim–you know, one of those stellar “persecuted” Bosnian refugees we allowed into America in droves.

This isn’t the first time I’ve heard that a Muslim imam in America engages in sexual abuse disguised as “counseling” of his congregants. I’ve heard from several Muslims about how a very prominent Shi’ite imam in the Detroit area insists on sex with women who seek a divorce before he will grant one.

Islamic modesty? It’s yet another oxymoron. The sooner the Islamo-panderers wake up to that fact, the better.

Remember the 9/11 hijackers’ fave hangout, “The Pink Pony”?

Remember, “Islamic Modesty” Looks. Like. This. . . .


Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly, PDF & Email


28 Responses

“Please no jokes about the name of the road and Imam Spahic’s apparent uncontrollable predilection for it.”

Damn 😀

DS_ROCKS! on November 7, 2013 at 2:08 pm

    Yeah, but you knew she was going to be one step ahead of us knuckleheads.

    WilliamMunny on November 7, 2013 at 6:18 pm

“An attorney for a Des Moines Islamic leader charged with sexual abuse and exploitation has asked a judge to drop two of the charges, arguing that they violate the man’s religious freedom…”

It’s the “this is who we are; this is what we do” defense.

lee of the lower case "l" on November 7, 2013 at 2:42 pm

A religion that sees nothing wrong with marrying nine year old girls – yeah, I can see how restricting that would violate Islamic religious freedom.

Its hilarious to be lectured to about freedoms by the religion of fatwas and jihad. You know – the same people who claim our decadence upsets them.

In the end – its all about their freedoms and not ours.

NormanF on November 7, 2013 at 3:45 pm

    Now Mr. Norman, all those lies about the Prophet Mohummed marrying a 9 year old is lies out of a satanic book called Hadith which by the way was written by Jews and the dumb Muslims follow it. Now you will never find that garbage in the Quran. But you will find it in the Talmud, the holy book of Jews. Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia — permitting molestation [raping] of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” (1) Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah”, or binding Jewish law. The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man” (See, “Judaism and Homosexuality: A Marriage Made in Hell”) Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not.” (5) Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can’t “throw guilt” on the active offender, morally or legally. (6)

    A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: “…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.” (7) The Talmud also says, “A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother’s wife acquires her (as wife).” (8) Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy. R. Joseph said: “Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.” (Sanh. 55b)

    “A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation …” (Yeb. 57b)

    A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)

    It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them.” (Yeb. 60b)

    [The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] “… fit for cohabitation … But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation.” (Footnote to Yeb. 60b) The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are “fit for cohabitation.”

    The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is “not a sexual act” and cannot “throw guilt” upon her because the little boy is not truly a “man.” (9) But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women,” sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.

    The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. “At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three.”The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen – an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for, “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye.” The footnote says that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (11)
    Also see all the Child rapes and molestation of children in America and Israel raped by Rabbis and Jews. According to their beliefs and holy books it is a god given right.

    Jenna on December 29, 2013 at 9:38 pm

Well, he would have a good argument for dropping the charges if he hadn’t used his penis to rub the oil on the girl’s body.

Jonathan E. Grant on November 7, 2013 at 3:48 pm


    WilliamMunny on November 7, 2013 at 6:19 pm

I was gonna ask if he was Croatian or Serbian because of his last name. Thanks for answering it in the column.

Yet another fine example of how un-religious Mooooslims are. He should have preformed Mu’tah to double the cover for his “religious” freedom, the sicko perv.

I have disdain for Mooooslims because the whole thing is a sham. It’s such nonsense and the quintessential example of hypocrisy and oxymoronism. Anyone who believes in such filth is worthy only of condemnation & disdain. It’s a zillion times worse than Scientology!

And I like when that picture is displayed to bolster the fact of the filth of Islam. I always think of it when I am looking at a holy-roller Moooooslima. Talk about hypocrisy! Islam has it alllllll!

Skunky on November 7, 2013 at 4:01 pm

    He is either a BAD Serb or BAD Croatian whose ancestors converted to islam when the Turks took over…FOR financial gain over their OWN people…because the Turks gave lots of privileges to their Serbian and Croatian converts back in the 14th Century.

    He was probably a refugee who came here in the Mid 1990s. They got so much financial help from the US govt. it would make you sick! They got special INTEREST FREE home loans, free college for their kids AT ANY STATE COLLEGE in the USA… food stamps and supplemental funds for their rent, even if they were making plenty of money.

    Those who came through Germany to the USA received over $20,000 per adult, $5,000 per child in payments JUST to leave Germany and move to the USA. FREE AIRFARE as well , courtesy of the Germans. : (

    YES, they did! I know a real estate agent in a certain large Florida city who sold over 30 homes to muslim Bosnians after they were in the in the USA for only 2 or 3 years. They were able to buy their houses and PAID CASH MONEY!

    Bosnians muslims in the USA should back to their OWN country.

    And never forget that several of Bosnian muslims MET with three of the 9/11 hijackers near a store front mosque in Jacksonville, Fl in February 2001. Those hijackers had been in Bosnia at the time of the civil war and served with the Bosnian Muslims.

    Who loves the USA, NOT Bosnian muslims!!

    It is just ME AGAIN on November 8, 2013 at 2:27 pm

“the charges violate the man’s religious freedom” Coming to a courtroom near you. This IS coming. Be prepared.

Tommy Thomas on November 7, 2013 at 4:20 pm

    Seems to me that it’s here, not coming.

    Pray Hard on November 8, 2013 at 9:12 am

I remember one time I was at a Dillards clothing store and took a shirt into the dressing room only to find that a Muslima was already in there. She had shed the black Ninja costume to try on some clothes. I was stunned to see her there wearing a super skimpy thong and sexy bra. That’s what she was wearing underneath the burka/nijab/ninja covering.

Alisia S on November 7, 2013 at 4:42 pm

I guess as soon as they get home they peel off the ninja and strut around nearly naked for their husbands/masters.

Alisia S on November 7, 2013 at 4:45 pm

Islamic modesty is on display for all to see.

Worry01 on November 7, 2013 at 7:39 pm

    Would that be “moose knuckle” or “camel toe”?

    nadie on November 8, 2013 at 9:57 am

I’m not defending Western skanks. But I’d hazard a guess they’re honest and far more modest than Muslims who keep their sexual proclivities barely beneath the surface. While dressing modesty is commendable, it tells you noting about a person’s real values. And Islamic dress – male or female – doesn’t make them examplars of virtue.

NormanF on November 7, 2013 at 8:41 pm

The issue is, do we let foreigners living in this country be judged by their statutes and standards – which are largely incompatible with ours?

ZZMike on November 7, 2013 at 11:54 pm

I was attending parents night at our daughter’s school in September. It had been hot and muggy and the school was not air conditioned. In walks a father and mother Muslim couple. She’s covered in the black garb down to her feet except for her face. He’s wearing shorts and a t-shirt.

Concerned Citizen on November 8, 2013 at 2:17 am

It seems the Imam was simply trying to “introduce” his fellow co-religionists to an “Oh, A****!” moment.

I hope his Defense Attorney know about these unique defenses:

However, the most comprehensive Defense I ever heard was Flip Wilson’s:



Dennis on November 8, 2013 at 8:44 am

Galloping sharia. This is very dangerous. Even getting this far, it warps and perverts perception, esp. with the help of our dhimmi media and justice system.

Pray Hard on November 8, 2013 at 9:20 am

I was blocked from facebook, because i said this” I agree boycott muslims” on a newspaper comment section.

We removed this from Facebook because it violates our Community Standards:

You’re Temporarily Blocked
You’re temporarily blocked from posting on Facebook for the next 12 hours. Please review our Community Standards so you can understand what’s allowed on Facebook and keep your account in good standing.

( i hate facebook, but someplaces it is the only way you can comment)

sal on November 8, 2013 at 9:48 am

I didn’t know bill clinton was mu-slime. And that’s how he got away with it ? !

William on November 8, 2013 at 6:03 pm

Y do u hate muslims? I can’t and won’t ever understand how someone can hate an entre nation or religion. U always comment negatively on immigrants, even though you yourself are an immigrant. So shut the fuck up and criticize your own people. Y hate muslims, i am muslim, what have I ever done to you?
And regarding this issue, do u even know what happened ein bosnia, no of course not. Do u know how many people were killed in that terrible war. No of course not, u can only hate on muslims. U always say we’re the Bad guys, we r terrorists but tell me how many innocent muslims were killed by Israelis, how many people were killed in Iraq, Afghanistan,…
Of course it’s very sad what happened during WW2 and I feel with every family that was affected by that. But that’s not a plausible reason for hating on all muslims or stealing the holy land of Palestine.
sincerely your Albanian muslim
PS: I don’t like your racist blog, please stop spreading hatre of muslims.

Fuckdebbieschlussel on November 13, 2013 at 8:38 am

    You think she hates Muslims? Google the percentage of Americans who hate Jews. Muslims do not have it even close as the entire world want to wipe out the whole Jews off this map. Muslims are not terrorist.. Jews are and everyone knows well 85% of Americans believe Israel was behind 9/11… give it time my brother, Syria and Iran are ready with Hezbollah and Russia… 7 million wipes out and 6 million to go…Christians are not stupid, we see Israel is running America… we taking back our country and money from these money hungry leaches…

    Jenna on December 29, 2013 at 9:43 pm

The imam never even touched them. Everything you said above was the woman’s point of view.why would a person text their friend to call the police if they are being sexual assulted. None of it makes sense. Why would the mmom let him do that to her if she saw what he was doing to her daughter was not right. BECAUSE none of it ever happened. The night he was taken to jail he asked the police to take dna off of his and they didn’t want to. THAT’S WHY NoW HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY And IS GOING TO SUE. Your article is a bunch of crap and you have no clue what you are taking about.

John Davis on February 16, 2014 at 2:09 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field