November 25, 2013, - 11:55 am

FBI Hate Crime Stats: Jews Victims 62.4% of Attacks; Anti-White Hate Crimes Up 30%; Muslims Only 11.6% – EXCLUSIVE Analysis

By Debbie Schlussel

Today, the FBI released its annual hate crimes statistics for 2012 (yup, this efficient government agency takes nearly a year to crunch the numbers). And the results are nearly the same as they were for 2011, except in Black hate crimes against Whites, which are up 30%. Jews are still the victims of nearly two-thirds of all religion-based hate crimes in America. Muslims only about ten percent, despite their constant whines about being victims. The percentage of anti-White hate crimes is 22%, up by nearly half from the previous year (the actual number of anti-White hate crimes is up 30% from 2011).

fbihatecrimeslogo

fbihatecrimesfbihatecrimes2

fbihatecrimesracefbihatecrimesrace2

fbihatecrimesreligionfbihatecrimesreligion2

(Note: “Offenses” are crimes charged and/or prosecuted for each incident and are usually multiple in number.)

In 2011, the percentage of religion-based hate crimes against Jews was 63.2%. In 2012, it was 62.4%, nearly no change. Jews still are the victims of nearly two-thirds of all religion-based hate crimes. And as I always note, the FBI unfortunately does not collect the religious identity of offenders, or I’d be writing about high numbers of Muslims as the offenders. And note that while, in 2011, Muslims were the alleged “victims” of 12.5% of so-called “hate crimes” (and we know that Muslims are frequent hate crime hoaxers and exaggerators), for 2012, the percentage is 11.6%, so it’s a decline of nearly 10 percent.

It is also significant that racial hate crimes against Whites have gone up significantly–30% from 2011 to 2012.










For 2011, the FBI reported 504 criminal incidents against Whites based on their race, or 16.3% of race-based hate crimes committed against Whites. Hate crimes against Whites in 2012 went up to 657 hate crime incidents against Whites. Yes, 22% of race-based hate crimes in America were committed against Whites in 2012.

And while the FBI doesn’t collect the religious identities of offenders, it does collect their racial identities. The percentage of White offenders went down, while the percentage of Black Offenders went up from 2011 to 2012. In 2011, 59% of hate crimes were committed by Whites, 20.9% by Blacks. In 2012, 54.6% were committed by Whites, and 23.3% were committed by Blacks. Oh, and despite all the BS-laden hype about Trayvon Martin and so on, the fact is that anti-Black hate crimes went down. In 2011, anti-Black hate crimes were 71.9% of all race-based hate crimes in America. In 2012, they were 66.2% of race-based hate crimes.

So, to sum up: nearly two-thirds of all religion-based hate crimes in America are against Jews. And the race-based hate crimes against Whites in America are up 30%.

yellowstar.jpg

reverseracism

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

42 Responses

This is no surprise to anyone paying attention and sucked into the vortex that is the mainstream media. Just like the new “fashionable” attacks to knock out innocent people are being perpetrated by an overwhelming majority of blacks, the MSM NEEDS to sweep it under the rug as it ruins their agenda.

Happy Thanksgiving and Chanukah.

Sanford D. Horn on November 25, 2013 at 12:40 pm

    I’ve seen it referenced in one or two MSM outlets, but they never mention the race of the perpetrators (or the victims), only referring to them as “teens” pr “youths.”

    DS_ROCKS! on November 25, 2013 at 6:39 pm

Race-based crimes against Whites is so skewed in data collection that any attempt to use it to show increase or decrease is practically pointless. Actual White-on-black violent crime is extremely rare compared to the black-on-White crimes. All it takes is a brief look at the types of crimes being committed and you can see how the assumed intentions and mentality of the perps, no matter the seriousness of the crime or the actual facts involved, always gravitates toward socioeconomic causes when it is a black perp. The rare occasion of White perps attacking blacks is almost always guilty before proven innocent of racial bias and Hate Crimes.

What kind of odds are we talking about when there are extremely large numbers of black perps attacking White victims, but the total number of incidents of anti-White bias crimes is only 657, while the number of anti-Jewish crimes is 674? That is really an astonishing contrast in numbers when you understand the per capita involved.

Debbie, didn’t you write something about being harassed and threatened in a store by some black women not too long ago? I’m gonna assume that it wasn’t because they deemed you Jewish, but rather just another White girl who dared to be White in their presence. If there had been any kind of physical altercation, you would have been ignored and probably laughed at if you were to try and justify any actions you needed to take to defend yourself because of the racial comments they threw at you. Most likely mens rea would never be established with the “Hate Crime” charge, and it would have gone on the records as simple assault at best. There’s almost a 100% chance that the exact opposite would happen had you been black and the women that threw race into the mix were White.

Celestial Time on November 25, 2013 at 1:07 pm

    Oh joy. Celestial Slimes has returned. I’m not sure exactly what BS point you’re trying to make although for some reason I actually tried to make sense out of it.
    Anyway if the data about white on black crime is so skewed that you can’t make any comparative analysis then it’s basically worthless is what you are saying. What a surprise that you would take that track.
    Forget the socio-economic mumbo jumbo celestial Dumbo. All that means I assume is that white people are generally have more cash so the perps of black on white violence get a free pass in your book.
    You really are the slimy slime mold I always assumed you were and I really should get an award for reading your crappola.
    No idea what you’re on about in the last paragraph though.

    Frankz on November 25, 2013 at 2:19 pm

      Frankz, nobody is as dense as you are passing yourself off to be, unless it is done on purpose. If you really are that dense, then you should probably get an award for putting your pants on by yourself. That surely takes a great deal of courage and conviction from a person with your condition.

      Celestial Time on November 25, 2013 at 2:29 pm

        LOL that’s almost funny coming from somebody who probably isn’t allowed to wear pants.

        Frankz on November 25, 2013 at 3:27 pm

          FrankZ, I appreciate you calling out Celestial Slime (and remembering what a Bozo he is…) and I am glad you pointed out he used lots o’words but didn’t make a cogent point.

          Slimeball, if you’re gonna make a point make it pithy and cogent. I’m not gonna try to read your word-vomit salad again. FrankZ served you up quite nicely, no need to.

          So many bloody bores who lack the skill of forming a readable sentence.

          Skunky on November 25, 2013 at 5:09 pm

          Thanks Skunky

          Frankz on November 25, 2013 at 7:47 pm

          Isn’t it a treat when Celestial Slime comes out to play?

          skzion on November 26, 2013 at 4:40 am

          Kudos to you Skzion. You sussed out Celestial Slime and your were correct. You were on to him early! :D

          Skunky on November 26, 2013 at 9:40 am

The FBI statistics are very misleading when it comes to hate crimes. Time and time again I have heard about crimes against Whites (which also includes Jews) where actual racial epithets were used and the police flat-out refused to call it a “hate” crime. This is due to Obama’s butt plugs in the DOJ in my opinion.

The infamous “knock out” game has been going on for two years at least and yet very few of these cases are reported as hate crimes. I think they are clearly racially motivated and therefore qualify as such.

Thanks for the stats. They are still quite alarming. Muslim stats overinflated of course. They’ve learned to play the “hate crime” game. They weren’t evem targeted after 9/11 for Peat’s sake!

Alisia S on November 25, 2013 at 1:47 pm

Isn’t amazing what a difference walking the Obama road to redemption has made for the last few years.

Frankz on November 25, 2013 at 1:56 pm

Why doesn’t the FBI divide up the Muslims into sects, like they do the Christians?

KrazyKafir on November 25, 2013 at 1:58 pm

I noticed from the FBI data that black victims outnumber white victims by about three to one. As a white, I somehow am not comforted. Most likely, the vast majority of white-on-black “hate crimes” are verbal taunts, not physical attacks. While such behavior should not be condoned, it should be put in perspective: Insults are NOT up there with beatings, robberies and murders. And the latter are what blacks routinely do to whites, often in groups. Lumping in nonviolent with violent offenses gives an inflated appearance of black victimhood, thus enabling “civil rights” leaders (e.g., Al Sharpton) to proclaim: “See? Blacks are still the primary victims of racism.”

I’m not buying into that for a second. I’m not blind to reality. Whites fear to tread in black neighborhoods far more than vice versa. And as we saw in the phony case against George Zimmerman, even violent “crimes” committed by whites against blacks may be nothing more than cases of self-defense. And if they are actual crimes, they’re not necessarily motivated by race.

The whole idea of “hate crimes,” I might add, makes me queasy. All crime, at bottom, is rooted in hate — Freud, Dostoyevsky, Nietzsche and others insightfully have argued as much. The covert motive behind the establishment by Congress over two decades ago of a separate “hate crimes” category was to punish emotions, at least of the sorts held by whites. Arresting people for thought crimes is what goes on in police states. I fear the U.S. is on its way to becoming one.

Seek on November 25, 2013 at 1:58 pm

    @Seek

    Most of the actual crimes comitted against blacks are committed by Hispanics (very common in Calif. etc) but for some bizarre reason the FBI counts them as Whites just as George Zimmerman was called White. The kicker is that Hispanics are only deemed as Hispanic when they are the victim of a crime. Go figure. Weird to say the least.

    Alisia S on November 25, 2013 at 2:27 pm

Of course I mean non-black on black crime. The vast majority of crimes against blacks are committed by other blacks. Most of the others are Hispanic on black crimes.

Alisia S on November 25, 2013 at 2:31 pm

The way things are going, the FBI will have to add a category of offenses committed by packs of wild dogs. This is already a problem in Detroit, and is spreading to the rest of the country.

Little Al on November 25, 2013 at 2:41 pm

And as I’ve said a number of times, it’s really about time that a few candidates run on a Law and Order platform. But these spineless politicians run away from something like that.

Little Al on November 25, 2013 at 3:13 pm

I just finished reading “White Girl Bleed a Lot”: The Return of
Racial Violence to America and how the Media Ignore it. It is a scathing indictment of the massive cover-up going on in this
country. If the average person is kept in the dark, how will we ever confront this very real nightmare? It is bound to keep growing as treacherously as any untreated cancer.

Nicole on November 25, 2013 at 3:36 pm

Debbie, to be honest, I’m really not that surprised that hate-crimes against the average Jewish person is that high, close to 65% in this years FBI statistical crimes. But I’m also not all surprised that hate-crimes against white individuals have sky-rocketed, I know that you haven’t published any articles of the so-called “knockout” games committed by young black teenagers who’re mainly 18 years old on this blog, but have indeed read and followed those stories as a concept.

And I didn’t know that the anti-black hate-crime offenses have declined to the 60 percentile, where a few years ago according to the FBI’s hate-crime stats, it was barely over 70%.

Now to the religion hate crime stats, the muslims can bitch and cry “Islamophobia, there’s an epidemic of anti-muslim crimes in the USA blah blah blah”, while the FBI’s hate crime stats have debunked and refuted their subjective mythical claims of anti-muslim crimes high, while it’s the other way around, the most religious hate-crimes are directed at “Jews” and NOT Muslims. And when I saw the statistics of religious hate-crimes, those who are atheists, agnostics, secular-humanist, skeptics, free-thinkers, etc. are at all time low, close to 0%!

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on November 25, 2013 at 3:37 pm

    Just to correct myself in my last comment, I mean to say this:

    “I know that you haven’t published any articles of the so-called “knockout” games committed by black teenagers who’re mainly 18 years old on this blog,”

    I should’ve said, “I know that you haven’t published any articles of the so-called “knockout” games committed by teenagers who’re mainly “under” 18 years old on this blog”, that’s what I meant to say, forgive for my Freudian slip of the tongue, lol.

    “A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

    Sean R. on November 25, 2013 at 3:43 pm

How long before Holder and Obama have this whitewashed…no pun intended

sal on November 25, 2013 at 4:14 pm

These stats are worthless. 657 hate crimes against whites when whites are 72% of the population? 1805 hate crimes – 2.75 times as many – against blacks when blacks are 13.5% of the population? Doesn’t pass the smell test. Another way of looking at it: that is 60 incidents in each state a year. And that is presuming that blacks are roughly equally distributed in each state (we aren’t). So presuming that the number of hate crimes against blacks in Montana, the Dakotas, Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Vermont, Maine etc. is statistically insignificant, let’s go ahead and say that this makes over 100 incidents a year in states where blacks actually live.

Even giving respect to the theory of Alisia S. (that most of the anti-black hate crimes are committed by Hispanics … which is kind of difficult because I thought most of the Hispanic on black crime was gangs/street crime?) I have real difficulty in believing that there were over 100 hate crime incidents on average in every state with an appreciable black population in 2012. Especially when there were ONLY 13 incidents per state against whites. Using some very simplistic statistics, that makes blacks 30 times more likely to be victimized by hate crimes than whites.

The only conclusion that I can muster is that hate crimes against blacks are being extremely overreported, and hate crimes against whites are practically not being reported at all. And if that is the case with blacks and whites, what does it say about other groups? For example, how do we know that hate crimes against Muslims are not being overreported while hate crimes against Jews are not being underreported?

Sorry, I can’t trust these numbers. Even if the 1805 hate crimes against 38 million blacks is believable, the 2.75 to 1 black/white ratio is incomprehensible, making 657 hate crimes against 224 million whites unfathomable.

Gerald on November 25, 2013 at 6:01 pm

    Gerald,

    Please watch the number of syllables and logic you put into your comments. Some people here are a little on the slow side.

    It’s not just the black/white discrepancy. Look at the number of Pacific Islanders on the list. The number of incidents for them is roughly 1/5th the number of Whites on the list. How many Pacific Islanders do you know? I don’t believe I know any. That kind of discrepancy in numbers is practically a numerical impossibility when you factor in the reality that their population is only about 1/70th of the White population, and the fact that Pacific Islanders are mostly concentrated in areas where they are surrounded by other Pacific Islanders. The FBI statistics could only lead me to believe that any time a Pacific Islander is the victim of a crime from a non-PI person, “racial bias” is part of the equation.

    In a country where White people are at least 15 times more likely to be killed, raped or assaulted by a black or brown person than vice versa, we have a statistic that says anti-black “hate crimes” are almost three times more likely than anti-White crimes. This alone defies even basic logic. White people are almost always just “random” victims and victims of socioeconomic circumstances, while black people are almost always the victims of racial bias. That’s what these statistics imply. Anti-White crimes are not just underreported, they are purposely and methodically skewed to hide the truth.

    Celestial Time on November 25, 2013 at 6:29 pm

      Celestial Muslima who is not allowed to wear pants for the sake of modesty. ( you’re actually supposed to be a butch WASP male or radical leftist lesbian… so you say)

      Pacific Islanders are lumped together with Asians so it doesn’t matter that they’re supposedly 1/70 of the population because the total incidents is combined with that of Asians as far as I can see.

      Frankz on November 25, 2013 at 7:27 pm

    Gerald, although I do find your comments interesting and thought-provoking, I have to disagree with your logic.

    The independent variable here (or the ‘x’ variable) is the people committing the crimes. The dependent variable (or the ‘y’ variable) is the universe of people the crimes are being committed against.

    Whites outnumber Blacks in this country by about a 6:1 ratio. Therefore, everything else being equal, one would expect there to be six times as many anti-Black crimes as anti-White crimes. Of course this is not the case. Even with the bias of reporting, which many commenters have noted, the ratio is only 3:1, meaning the incidence of racial crimes committed by Blacks outnumbers those of Whites by 100%.

    But certainly, the ratio is higher because of the reporting bias, and the failure to note much Black criminality as racial, due to political correctness.

    Of course, since Whites outnumber Blacks, the per capita (so to speak) crime incidence against a Black person will be higher than that against a White person. Carried to an extreme, if there were 10,000 Whites, and 10 Blacks, and the rate of criminality of each population was 10%, there would be 1,000 anti-Black crimes, and 1 anti-White crime, so each Black person would be victimized by 100 crimes, and each White person would be victimized by 1/10,000 of a crime. This disproportion shows the importance of looking at the independent driver, i.e. crimes committed.

    Little Al on November 26, 2013 at 8:29 am

I meant to say the Amerindian population, not Pacific Islander. Debbie needs to add a better editor or use Disqus.

Celestial Time on November 25, 2013 at 6:32 pm

    Celestial Time:

    Well, the Asian/Pacific Islander thing is believable (to me) because, well, blacks at times do target Asians for hate crimes. It was a much bigger issue during the 1990s with the Los Angeles riots and the LaTasha Harlins incident, but it hasn’t totally evaporated. But I have read that Asians are among the victims that blacks have targeted for “the knockout game.”

    I look at it this way. Racism is a character flaw. Criminality is a character flaw. So why is it so hard to believe that a person that possesses one character flaw won’t also have others? This whole “other than dealing crystal meth he’s a good guy” or “thief with a heart of gold” trope is a liberal/Hollywood invention. If violent criminals are also shown to be far more likely to be racist than everyone else, then I am not the least bit surprised. Meanwhile, law-abiding, honest, family-oriented people are the LEAST likely to be racist. The latter is trying to be a good person where the former isn’t even putting forth the effort.

    I guess the reason why hate crimes statistics are unreliable and useless is that the whole concept of hate crimes is also. Criminals are criminals. Look at the neo-Nazis and the NRA. Lots of them are drug dealers and other common criminals. The same with the Black Panthers back in the day. Despite how they are romanticized by the left, most of them were just thugs who later became involved in the urban gang scene. The same was/is true with the Nation of Islam … their best recruiting ground is prisons, not MBA school. The KKK? That was a bunch of criminals also.

    Thugs are thugs, and some of them happen to be racist too. That’s pretty much the whole story.

    Gerald on November 25, 2013 at 6:53 pm

    nonsense

    Frankz on November 25, 2013 at 7:32 pm

    American Indian and Pacific Islander so easy to confuse

    Frankz on November 25, 2013 at 7:34 pm

“Most likely, the vast majority of white-on-black “hate crimes” are verbal taunts..”

This is a foolish thing to say, the effrontery to make such a statement is despicable. Always trying to absolve one’s ethnicity lol.

To the G-man-Gerald your point of disparaging the B.Panthers of yesterday and the N.O.I is not well taken. I don’t think any black in the 50’s and 60’s fighting for justice can be called a thug, we’re the whites bashing blacks heads in, thugs also?

But you did make some go statistical points, but all in all its all just a bunch of pontificated bullshit. Fact is, the inner cities are crime laden, you can break down population stats all you want, the inner cities are a dystopia there is no getting around that. This knockout game combined with social media just exacerbates things. Thats why B.U.A.N exists, its had enough of niggas.

Big D on November 25, 2013 at 8:56 pm

    Big D:

    Read “A Taste Of Power” by former Black Panther Elaine Brown and learn about their “fight for justice.” And as a bonus, you will learn about Maulana Karenga (slave name Ronald Everett) who started Kwanzaa, as well as some of the stuff that the NOI was really up to. Oh yes, and read the bio of H. Rap Brown (who murdered a black police officer in cold blood, the officer was only trying to serve him a warrant over a speeding ticket, and this incident was AFTER several violent crimes in the 1970s – including shootouts with police officers – for which he should have been imprisoned for life … had he been it would have saved the life of that black police officer.) I say that should alter your opinion of the Black Panthers and the N.O.I. somewhat. If it doesn’t, then Google “Betty van Patter” and see what you find. Bunch of criminals …

    Gerald on November 25, 2013 at 10:08 pm

    @Big D:

    I also did not deny that inner cities are a dystopia. The sole point of my nonscientific statistics was to state that the black victim of hate crime statistics were way too high and the white ones were too low, so the stats were worthless. Since there are so many black criminals in general, there ought to be a lot more blacks who commit “hate crimes” in these dystopias that you speak of, and the statistics should reflect that, and that racist criminals are just another flavor of criminals with character flaws. So whatever point or offense of yours you were getting at, it had nothing to do with what I actually wrote.

    Gerald on November 25, 2013 at 10:15 pm

Why didn’t Debbie provide a link to the FBI report methodology?

I guess footnotes are a waste of time.


Caution to Users

Valid assessments about crime, including hate crime, are possible only with careful study and analysis of the various conditions affecting each local law enforcement jurisdiction. (See Variables Affecting Crime.) In addition, some data in this publication may not be comparable to those in prior editions of Hate Crime Statistics because of differing levels of participation from year to year. Therefore, the reader is cautioned against making simplistic comparisons between the statistical data of this program and that of others with differing methodologies or even comparing individual reporting units solely on the basis of their agency type.”

8th Grade Master Debater on November 25, 2013 at 11:02 pm

    The pig is back using what I called him as a handle (with his puerile genital fascination thrown in).

    The swine does what he is told by his LIBTARD overlords. Notice his whole text is a quote.

    8th Grader, if you like your Doctor, you can keep your Doctor. If you like your health care, you can keep your health care. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    Everyone else ignore this fool. His nonsense will be deleted…not that he takes much time to actually try to break an argument. He just believe the Libtard canards and is annoyed we don’t. So sad, too bad.

    Skunky on November 26, 2013 at 12:26 am

      Matok Skunky,

      You are hilarious. I couldn’t possible dream that shit up… Libtard Overlords? ROTGLMFAO. The FBI, the most conservative, tight-ass bunch of dorks in the USA are Libtard Overlords. You need to cutback on the Prozac brother.

      Like I said, the blogging and commentary on this site is nothing short of that offered by a group of sorority girls… thoughtful and intelligent.

      God I wished I’d found this site sooner. I am committed to read this hilarious shit every day. It’s like a dozen Woody Allens all roled up into one. Keep up the good work.

      8th Grade Master Debater - Underling of the Libtard Overlords on November 26, 2013 at 1:33 am

I will G-man, thanks for the info, information is always good, and I may have to stand corrected!

Big D on November 26, 2013 at 1:25 am

BigD, if I may offer another thing to look up. I’m not really taking any one’s or any subject’s side here, but the movie “Foster and Laurie” is fascinating. A young, and extremely good looking Dorian Harewood plays Gregory Foster, and a young, up and coming Perry King plays Rocco Laurie. They were two young cops in a neighborhood I was doing some very formative growing up in, ambushed and shot in the back by black Revolutionaries.

The 60’s were a tough and scary period for people like me growing up in the ghetto, white, black, no matter what you were. Junkies, thugs, burglars, revolutionaries, left wing politics and schoolteachers erupting all over the place, poverty, just listen to The Temptations Ball Of Confusion. I and tens of millions of others lived it.

The story of Foster and Laurie is a fascinating combination of a microcosmic look in 1972 at a big part of life in America for many people, and a very accurate look in to the mindset of black revolutionaries.

It wasn’t all about We Shall Overcome. I know, because I was jacked up, ripped off, nearly killed on a couple occasions and continually assailed for being white in various neighborhoods I grew up in during the period 1960-1970. That was when I went from 4 years old to 14. Like I had a big hand in slavery and the Jim Crow oppression of black folks in America.

Kill Whitey is not some romanticized phrase from a flower studded era gone by. It was all too real for my pasty white, blond(e) haired, blue eyed living in the wrong neighborhood ass. But I didn’t wind up hating any group, and I had friends, played ball, hung out with a rainbow coalition of people, made lifelong friends with some.

I’ve already talked about my favorite music, and it ain’t white.

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on November 26, 2013 at 1:39 pm

Right on Alfredo, there’s no side in this, because I wasn’t there, I have had many many conversations with O.Gs like yourself who seen it, ski’d it and jumped it. Growing up in Sactown and its approx to Oakland, I’ve come across people who were there, and it comes down to perspective I suppose. No way am I saying these B.Ps and even F.O.I. weren’t involved in the streets, however it ssems that those times were so different and so much going on, its hard for me equate those times with these especially when someone makes an analogy or comparison to them.

Big D on November 26, 2013 at 2:08 pm

Exactly, BigD, . . . “those times were so different” . . .

You know why? Because that was The REAL 60’s, NOT The Revisionist 60’s, or The Overly Romanticized 60’s. “The Cause” was a REAL thing, and much of the rhetoric of the Black Revolutionaries early on, was right on. But just like all aspirations to power and notoriety go, it became twisted. That’s why you HAVE to try and search for “Foster and Laurie.” I think it was just a TV movie, very obscure, even people who were gangsters, TV cop show buffs and who knew the streets are not that familiar with it.

Dorian Harewood was SO GOOD LOOKING, and I’m a STRAIGHT guy!!! LOL!!!

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on November 26, 2013 at 2:23 pm

Anti semitism and anti white are on the rise. For some crazy reason people now have it in their head that Israel did 911. Maybe someone needs to unlock what really happened so that people aren’t blaming Jews. Why of all nations would Israel do 911?. It is ridiculous that accusation but a good many people sincerely believe that.

Lisa Smith on January 26, 2014 at 4:37 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field