Great Britain had issued the nefarious Balfour Declaration in 1917, after having duplicitously promised the Palestinian Arabs self-determination if they would join the British in the struggle to overthrow the Turks. wiki

Another case where some ignoramus –or conscious liar– put pure lies up on wikipedia. The British never promised “the palestinian Arabs self-determination.” Rather, they promised Sharif Husayn the Hashemite of Mecca, great-great grandfather of the present King Abdullah of Jordan, to help him set up a pan-Arab state. But the Land of Israel west of the Jordan river was not part of the promise. The Husayn-MacMahon [Hussein-MacMahon] Letters promised Husayn the land east of a line drawn south from Damascus. That excluded Lebanon and Israel from the future Arab kingdom that Husayn wanted to set up. The British betrayed Husayn in different ways. They –through the notorious H St-John Philby– allowed the Saudi clan to take over the Hijaz [northwestern Arabia where Husayn was king]. The British also allowed France to remove Husayn’s son Faisal from his ephemeral pan-Arab kingdom in Damascus in 1920. In compensation, the UK gave Faisal Iraq, with the less than eager Kurds in the north. They also compensated the Hashemites by letting Faisal’s brother Abdullah take over Transjordan, which was part of the Jewish National Home according to the League of Nations Mandate.

The victims who suffered most from British treachery were the Jews. First, the Brits denied the Jewish right to live in Transjordan, whereas the east bank of the Jordan had been part of ancient Judea. Then the Brits used various tricks to reduce Jewish immigration into the country, such as limiting the number of immigrants to the “absorptive capacity” as defined by themselves. Then encouraging Arab pogroms against Jews, in 1920, 1921, 1929, 1936-39. Then, short months before WW2 and the Holocaust began in 1939, the Brits issued a White Paper which violated international law, to wit, the League of Nations mandate for a Jewish National Home, by making it almost impossible for Jews to come into the country. The Brits set a quota of only 15,000 Jewish immigrants coming into the country per year up to 1945, when any further Jewish immigration would be at the pleasure of the Arabs. That is, when the Jews most needed a home, the Brits violated international law by keeping them out of it. In fact, they allowed in fewer Jews during the Holocaust than the ostensible yearly quota.

In this way and others, the British were silent partners in the Holocaust. Recall that the Allied powers refused to bomb Auschwitz. They wanted the Holocaust to go on. If the British want to make a positive contribution to peace prospects between Israel and the Arabs –which are now less than zero– they would acknowledge that they were partners [silent] in the Holocaust and that they helped the Arabs make war on Israel from the beginning. That is, from December 1947.

The problem is that now, prez obamanazi is following the old British policy. The whole call for a “settlement freeze” is not only racist, even Nazi-like in its Judenrein connotations, but fits in line with the Brit policy described above.

Great Britain had issued the nefarious Balfour Declaration in 1917, after having duplicitously promised the Palestinian Arabs self-determination if they would join the British in the struggle to overthrow the Turks.

But this pales before the bloodthirsty fourteen centuries of Islam, a slow rolling genocide of all the infidel subjects of Islam.

And don’t forget the Muslim invasions of the Indus Valley, the greatest slaughter in human history, a minimum of 80 million Hindu’s were butchered and thousands of Hindu temples destroyed. This is genocide beyond comprehension.

“The International Catholic-Jewish Historical Commission (ICJHC), a group comprised of three Jewish and three Catholic scholars, was appointed in 1999 by the Holy See’s Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews. In October of 2000, the group of scholars finished their review of the Vatican’s archives, and submitted their preliminary findings to the Comission’s then-President, Cardinal Edward I Cassidy. Their report, entitled “The Vatican and the Holocaust,” laid to rest several of the conventional defenses of Pope Pius XII.

The often-espoused view that the Pontiff was unaware of the seriousness of the situation of European Jewry during the war was definitively found to be inaccurate. Numerous documents demonstrated that the Pope was well-informed about the full extent of the Nazi’s anti-Semitic practices. A letter from Konrad von Preysing, Bishop of Berlin, that proved that the Pope was aware of the situation as early as January of 1941, particularly caught the attention of the commission. In that letter, Preysing confirms that “Your Holiness is certainly informed about the situation of the Jews in Germany and the neighboring countries. I wish to mention that I have been asked both from the Catholic and Protestant side if the Holy See could not do something on this subject…in favor of these unfortunates.” The letter, which was a direct appeal to the Pope himself, without intermediaries, provoked no response. In 1942, an even more compelling eyewitness account of the mass-murder of Jews in Lwow was sent to the Pope by an archbishop; this, too, garnered no response.

The commission also revealed several documents that cast a negative light on the claim that the Vatican did all it could to facilitate emigration of the Jews out of Europe. Internal notes meant only for Vatican representatives revealed the opposition of Vatican officials to Jewish emigration from Europe to Palestine. “The Holy See has never approved of the project of making Palestine a Jewish home…[because] Palestine is by now holier for Catholics than for Jews.” Some Catholic higher-ups violated this position of the Vatican by helping Jews to immigrate when they were able to; most did not.

Similarly, the attempts of Jews to escape from Europe to South America were sometimes thwarted by the Vatican. Vatican representatives in Bolivia and Chile wrote to the pontiff regarding the “invasive” and “cynically exploitative” character of the Jewish immigrants, who were already engaged in “dishonest dealings, violence, immorality, and even disrespect for religion.” The commission concluded that these accounts probably biased Pius against aiding more Jews in immigrating away from Nazi Europe.

The claim that the Vatican needed to remain neutral in the war has also been refuted in recent months. In January of 2001, a document recently declassified by the U.S. National Archives was discovered by the World Jewish Congress. The document was a report in which Monsignor Giovanni Battista Montini, Pope Pius XII’s secretary of state, detailed and denounced several abuses committed by the Soviet Army against German inhabitants of the Soviet Union. The report was widely viewed as demonstrating that the Vatican had no compunctions about speaking out against atrocities, even when doing so would violate neutrality.

In 2004, news was disclosed of a diary kept by James McDonald, the League of Nations high commissioner for refugees coming from Germany. In 1933, McDonald raised the treatment of the Jews with then Cardinal Pacelli, who was the Vatican secretary of state. McDonald was specifically interested in helping a group of Jewish refugees in the Saar region, a territory claimed by France and Germany that was turned over to the Germans in 1935. The Pope’s defenders cite his intercession on these Jews’ behalf as evidence of his sympathy for Jews persecuted by the Nazis. According to McDonald, however, when he disccused the matter with Pacelli, “The response was noncommittal, but left me with the definite impression that no vigorous cooperation could be expected.”(30) Pacelli did intercede in January 1935 to help the Jews, but only after McDonald agreed that American Jews would use their influence in Washington to protect church properties that were being threatened by the Mexican government.(31)

In 2005, the Italian daily, Corriere della Sera, discovered a letter dated November 20, 1946, showing that Pope Pius XII ordered Jewish babies baptized by Catholics during the Holocaust not to be returned to their parents. Some scholars said the disclosure was not new and that the Pope’s behavior was not remarkable. The more important story, according to Rabbi David Rosen, international director of interreligious affairs for the American Jewish Committee, was that one of the recipients of the letter, Angelo Roncalli, the papal representative in Paris, ignored the papal directive.”

That’s unfortunate because those who don’t know their history are condemned to repeat it.

I can go back to 100 AD or so and recall the battled that had Jews trapped in their homes and starving so that mothers ate their children.

Too much truth for you? Well, sorry.

Nice try. Convince everyone that your only friends are your enemies.

While many atrocities were inflicted upon the Jews under the sign of the cross (that I won’t wear one), they weren’t true Christians.

Every TRUE Christian befriends Jews. We love them because through them, everything that matters came…

I am glad you brought up Britain (not GREAT Britain) because I actually believe my Bible and suspect that England who refused refuge to the Jews in WWII are reaping their just reward: MUZZIE DOMINATION.

Sweden? Nonfeasance is has resulted in the same punishment: MUZZIE DOMINATION.

The problem is that the New Hitler will make Adolph Hitler look like a chior boy. The weaponry is frightening.