Comments on: Memoirs of a Whore in a Kimono

By: KnightoftheImpaler

KnightoftheImpaler — Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:44:00 +0000

Prostitutes are not sympathetic victims of society, they are just petty criminals. It’s ridiculous how most of the entertainment industry either glorifies the pimp-and-ho stuff (rap music) or just the ho part (Hollywood). These people are just plain trash. And this has been around in this country even before feminism came into effect. Prostitutes have been made out to be sympathetic ever since the dubious circumstances of Lucky Luciano’s pandering trial. Nobody should feel too bad that one of the most powerful and dangerous crime lords of all time was finally taken off the streets, but it unintentionally left a negative social effect when he was railroaded by a bunch of lying hookers. I’m sick of hearing about poor, persecuted prostitutes.

By: JoeCanuck

JoeCanuck — Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:28:17 +0000

3 things. From what I’ve heard Geisha’s aren’t prostitutes. The white guy who wrote the book got it wrong. They seem to be more akin to a cross between strippers and ballet dancers. Basically, entertaining men with their dancing, music and tea pouring. All the while covered under 8 layers of komono.
2ndly, this whole thing results from our fascination with the “mysterious orient”. Japanese men can be the worst sorts of people when it comes to the treatment of women, but we have veiled the whole culture under some sort of romantic Lord of the Rings-esk land from another time and place all together. That and really cool karate kicks.
Finally, the most fasinating thing about this movie is will it make any money. I heard they spent a ridiculous amount of money on it. The level they spend on action flicks. Is the thinking that asian people will have to come out in droves to see it to support their inclusion into the culture. That a billion chinese people will be forced to watch it even though Geisha’s are chinese.
I’d rather look at Debbie. She’s hotter, and once in a while wears less clothes then a geisha. caaawww caaawww

By: Isaiah538

Isaiah538 — Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:22:57 +0000

Geisha or prostitute, either way Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is fully on board!
As for Howard Stern, we aren’t paying for him, not unless you are signing up with the ‘pay for a year’ satellite radio company, Sirius. He’s actually being marginalized this way. Thank God.

By: Y-2-DRAY

Y-2-DRAY — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:32:55 +0000

From “Deep Troat”:
“(…) And of course the grand opening of where our money will go to next! Howard Stern – $100 million dollars a year for 5 years coming out of our pockets because we want to pay to hear that smut. In his big NBC & CBS interviews he said he was going to bring in a live phone sex operator on his show to perform her talent with a live caller. Surprised? Why? Americans are paying the bill and the government says it’s free speech!
“When are we gonna get it? When are we gonna quite denying that we are the problem. We buy the smut and then we vote the political whores back into office!
People, you still don’t agree? Then that’s the problem!”
Hey relax… at least it ain’t kiddie pr0n! [dry sarcasm, off]
We have a choice whether to watch something or not. Howard Stern doesn’t really offend me, but that doesn’t mean that I can’t think of him as an ass.
Sadly, Hollywood is running out of great stories to tell and has resorted to glorified product placements and infomercials posting as tv shows. The news has been reduced to mildly entertaining sound bites. Morality is getting subverted in favour of narcotic hedonism while faith is getting blacklisted in favour of orgiastic profane saturnalian urges.
As an agnistic Jew, all this trivializing of the human condition makes me want to crucify someone. Someone pass me some Nine Inch Nails…

By: Y-2-DRAY

Y-2-DRAY — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:20:14 +0000

Geez… I want to watch something like “Memoirs of Geisha”, I’d grab a box of Kleenex and download some AZN pr0n via P2P.
And anyways, it’s not getting any good reviews.
Now if Spielberg could do the right thing and reconsider “Munich”…

By: KrnHwll

KrnHwll — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:29:46 +0000

I think hollywood knows no other type of woman only whores who would do anything. And I think that is why so many whoremongers gravitate to hollywood. Didn’t the give Pretty Woman an ocsar nomination???
You can put lipstick on a pig, but…it is still a pig!!
Personally, I don’t see the fasination with being a whore so why on earth do so many see fit to glamorize this behavior?

By: danny

danny — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:09:17 +0000

king of all Japs(koajaps)where have you been ‘no bragging on Debbie’s artical on P,harbor?”You do know when to stay silent don’t you

By: Deep Throat

Deep Throat — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:16:15 +0000

FYI,
Go to http://www.myjewishlearning.com/history_community/Modern/ModernSocial/JewsInHollywwod.htm and you will see the clothing and movie connection in black and white!

By: Jeff_W

Jeff_W — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:51:59 +0000

I couldn’t care less who invented Hollywood, I just want to know why there are so many movies about hookers with a heart of gold, ala Pretty Woman, this one, etc.

By: Deep Throat

Deep Throat — Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:09:08 +0000

Guys!
Who do you think turned the clothing business into an Empire of Their Own and still run it today? Same people and even they will accuse each other of being whores! Jewish businessmen!