October 20, 2016, - 6:55 pm

Last Debate Analysis & Reaction: Trump Hits & Misses, Hillary BS, Etc.

By Debbie Schlussel

thirddebate

I was away Monday and Tuesday in observance of the first two days of the Jewish holiday of Sukkot (Happy Sukkot to all my Jewish readers and friends). But it was fun to return to business with the third and last debate. You know my view on Presidential debates–they don’t matter. And my predictions for the first debate apply to this one. That said, I think there were some missed opportunities by, but also some great lines from, Donald Trump. Here’s my take and my instant responses from last night to Hillary’s BS:



If you don’t follow me on Twitter, then you missed my live analysis as the debate happened. You can usually catch me analyzing these things in quick hits, so I’ve added some of my and some of my Twitter followers’ tweets from last night, some of which have been regurgitated by others on talk radio and cable today. (Please forgive my many typos and grammatical errors, as Twitter is fast-paced and you can’t go back and edit tweets.)

Overall, I thought Trump did okay. But I think his second debate performance was better. This was his second-best performance (with the first debate being his worst, in my view). He didn’t do or say anything that will win him the election. Again, however, I don’t think debates matter. People know for whom they are voting and did before the first debate. Any undecideds at this point (or even at the point of the first debate) are total morons who probably won’t vote (and we probably don’t want them to vote, either).

I don’t think Chris Wallace was impartial at all. While he was incredibly weak and not at all impressive as a moderator, his questions for Trump were far tougher. He asked Trump about sudden unsubstantiated claims of sexual assault, made by media hounds and attention whores (that applies geometrically to the trolls rounded up by pimpette Gloria Allred, the White chick Al Sharpton). He didn’t really ask Hillary too many tough questions, and he let her get away with a lot of dodges. While Wallace was better than Martha Raddatz, that’s a low baseline to compare with. He wasn’t great. And he let things get out of control. A good moderator maintains control. At that, Wallace stank. He’s basically Megynecologist Kelly without the penis.

I heard the first ten minutes of the debate on the radio because I was returning from a screening of yet another crappy movie. And I thought Trump sounded tired and flat-footed at the beginning. I thought his opening statement wasn’t cogent or well-prepared, whereas Hillary started out of the gate on her toes.

Maybe Trump should have spent the day–or at least the few hours before the debate–preparing, instead of appearing for the zillionth time on Jew-hater Michael Savage’s radio show (yes, the Jew In Name Only has made a number of anti-Semitic comments on his show in recent years, including accusing a Jewish liberal member of the media of being a “rotten stinkin’ agent of Israel,” when that person is actually a self-hating Jew who is anti-Israel, just like Savage). Savage’s sheeple listeners are already voting for Trump, so what did Trump gain from that appearance . . . other than yet more verbal Lewinskys Savage profusely gives him?

But then, finally, after about ten or 15 minutes, Trump turned on and lashed out like he should have. He answered some of Hillary’s BS well, with good zingers. But there were other points that he should have hit out of the ballpark, and yet he missed them. These were things Hillary has raised several times, including in each of the other two debates, so he should have gotten them. For instance, when Hillary talked about Trump’s attacks on women and how she (Hillary) understands the importance of a woman’s dignity and self-worth (Hillary has an inflation rate of a million on that latter one), Trump shoulda hit that outta the park. He could’ve responded like this tweet, below, but he seemed to mostly stay away from mentioning the Bill Clinton rape victims and Hillary’s treatment of them:

But later on, he did make a good point on women that is unrelated and in response to another issue:

Not that Chris Wallace bothered to ask anything about the Clinton Slush Fund Foundation. After all, he wants Hillary to come back on “FOX News Sunday” to fete him. He’s a suck-up.

When Hillary kept harping on Trump’s “trickle-down economics” and tax cuts and then said she would create jobs and he’d destroy them, he should have verbally slugged her, but he didn’t, even though she said this same BS in each of the other two debates. He could’ve said this:

He could also have said this, since she is a big promoter of Obamacare and its expansion–and her cheating hubby is not (“sitch” is slang for situation):

To Hillary’s repeated attacks on business and her attempt to tie Trump to Wall Street and the rich and also with regard to her attacks on Trump’s tax cuts and “trickle-down” stuff, Trump could have added this–since it was in some of the past week’s Wikileaks e-mail dumps:

On foreign policy and Hillary’s claimed “years of experience,” Trump missed several chances to bitch-slap her. She cited her “monitoring” of the raid on the Bin Laden compound and the “alliances” she claims she built with foreign countries. But these are claims that are easily slapped down, like this (she was the ARCHITECT of the Iran deal, according to the Wall Street Journal):

Related:

When Hillary whined about the leaked e-mails being orchestrated by Putin and Putin’s alleged “interference” in our elections, Trump coulda responded to her with something like this:

On immigration, Hillary keeps making the stale claim she made at other appearances and at least one of the debates: that she would “bring illegal aliens out of the shadows.” As I’ve noted on this site many times, this is a phony baloney argument because there is always a new supply to re-occupy those “shadows.” And, then, in a few years, we’ll hear pleas to give them amnesty, too, to also “bring them out of the shadows.” It never ends (nor does their amnesty-driven competition for natural-born citizens’ jobs). It only gets worse.

Also on immigration, Hillary made the pointless observation that “the bomber of the Orlando club”–whose name (Omar Mateen) and religion (Islam) she wouldn’t mention–was born in Queens like Trump. But that is a distinction without a difference because once we let Muslims in–and we’ve let plenty of them in–they have kids with equally or even more noxious views. And Mateen’s father was an Afghan immigrant who openly supported the Taliban, yet we let him in. This makes Trump’s point. And that’s not to mention that this Taliban dad is a strong Hillary supporter who sat behind her at one of her Florida rallies. Trump shoulda hammered her on that.

Related:

When Hillary said we should google Trump and some scandal or another, there was such an easy response waiting to be uttered:

In all three debates, Hillary uttered the tired, meaningless, empty slogan about America being great “because we’re good.” This is so much Social Justice Warrior cowdung. Trump should have been ready with a zinger in response to slap her down.

By the way, I also noted that Hillary’s weird fetish for ugly Chairman Mao jackets that cost $15,000 apiece was front and center yet again. So, when hack Chris Wallace joined the dumb media chorus about Trump accepting the election result, I couldn’t help but tweet this . . .

Some people say it was White and repeated the hackneyed claim that you can’t wear White after Labor Day. But that’s old-fashioned “fashion.” The new rule is that you can wear White whenever you want, and now there are a rash of ugly, dirt-magnet White wool jackets and coats. Regardless, White doesn’t look good on TV, and people appearing on TV are generally discouraged from wearing it on-screen for a reason. Hillary looked like a new cast member for Star Trek Deep Crap 15 or like an outer space alien religious cult leader. Just sayin’. Did somebody give her the bad advice that, when your hubby is a serial rapist, you dress in a virginal color? Don’t put anything past the Slick Willie Fouundation “family.”

The media (including PAWNN–the Prince Al-Waleed News Network a/k/a FOX News) are deliberately overreacting to Trump’s use of the phrase “Bad Hombres” and his “refusal” to accept the election results, which is not what he said at all:

And yet throughout the Bush tenure, liberal Democrat Gore supporters questioned the legitimacy of the Bush election and Supreme Court decision regarding that. Al Gore did little to discourage it and got no media criticism for that. By the reaction, you’d think Trump said he was going to round people up and put them in concentration camps (but only Muslims–the media and pundits wouldn’t care if they rounded up the Jews or Christians and put them in camps; see ISIS and the Middle East for reference). Also, Trump was right to call Hillary a “nasty woman” as she was insulting him and it was nasty. “Nasty bitch,” however, would have been more accurate (though not Presidential, I guess).

And, yes, the whole system IS rigged form the get-go:

A few other observations from readers and Twitter friends and followers:

Reader Little Al:

I have not read or heard one critical comment yet about Chris Wallace.

I thought he did a very poor job. I did not count the number of his interruptions, but even if he interrupted both candidates equally, his interruptions of Trump always seemed to be when Trump was trying to make a key point.

Also, I guess the women accusing Trump was a fair character question, but the 33,000 emails, lying about everything else, or the hired gangs committing violence at Trump rallies were not appropriate character questions. Sad.

Who do you think won the debate? I thought Trump did OK. He had to reserve comment re the election, given the massive fraud that occurs in elections. I am concerned though whether he will have access to enough lawyers, since the Republican establishment, with all their attorneys, can be expected in large part, to support Hillary.

What’s your take?

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly, PDF & Email






32 Responses

While I think Trump did fine, I did have an issue w/ the Clinton Foundation getting very little mention. Although in Trump’s defense, I would say that it’s hard to hit every ball for a home run – there were bound to be misses.

I agree on Chris Wallace – I pretty much hated him ever since he replaced Tony Snow on FNS. As you mentioned, he’s desperate to get Clinton on his show, and is busy sucking up to her. It’s true that there wasn’t much to compare given Martha Raddatz or for that matter Cooper or the guy in the first debate.

On the issue of Putin, it’s funny to see the party that was pretty much soft on the Soviets during the Cold War and which created the Russian overcharge, er reset, and dismantled the Missile Defense for Poland and Hungary hit out at Russia for the Wikileaks. Trump could have asked whether it was Putin who made Debbie Wasserman Shulz say the things she did about Bernie, or the snide things that Podesta and others said about Bernie’s supporters.

I actually think Trump will pull an upset, and the biggest losers would be the Republicans who have been busy running away from Trump. They won’t get Democrat votes for doing this, and they won’t get the votes of Trump supporters in their states

Infidel on October 20, 2016 at 7:46 pm

I know that much of the media’s hostility towards Trump is because of his political positions, but I also think it is in large part because of the Republican Party’s abandonment o, and hostility towards Trump. If the Republicans supported Trump, the media would still be biased against him, but there would be some constraints. Now, with the whole Washington establishment against him, the media feel like they can get away with anything.

Little Al on October 20, 2016 at 9:13 pm

To me, the simple fact that Hillary never divorced the habitual sex addict, offender and cheater husband of hers proves she’s not strong enough or smart enough to be POTUS.

Faust on October 20, 2016 at 11:30 pm

Debbie, when you show a photo of Clinton in her $150,000 white Mao suit, you just have to include a side-by-side with a photo of Dr. Evil (i.e., Mike Meyers in character). They’re perfect together and clearly they have the same sartorial designer.

https://www.google.com/search?q=photo+dr.+evil&biw=1034&bih=615&tbm=isch&imgil=F5Kt5zMxAEGIBM%253A%253BFygdr2JCeV4QmM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fquotesgram.com%25252Fdr-evil-quotes%25252F&source=iu&pf=m&fir=F5Kt5zMxAEGIBM%253A%252CFygdr2JCeV4QmM%252C_&usg=__xKLLNA8WAAnI3a2tHvfV2Gqn13Y%3D&ved=0ahUKEwjppvfyn-vPAhUF4D4KHZCSCSYQyjcIMQ&ei=67IJWKmFLoXA-wGQpaawAg#imgrc=F5Kt5zMxAEGIBM%3A

Ralph Adamo on October 21, 2016 at 2:20 am

    Sorry, I was off a decimal in my Mao suit price. Fortunately, hyperinflation’s not here yet.

    Ralph Adamo on October 21, 2016 at 2:25 am

Fist off:
Your evaluation of Trumps performances in all 3 debates was spot on. In fact, Monday’s debate COULD have been his best except for his undisciplined few words at the end, ” nasty woman”. This was not a sign of inexperience per say, but an inherent “lack of humility” IMO.

It may not have made a difference to the leftist , miscreants media reporting the the next day but it certainly did not help him. Otherwise , and in the end, the biggest questions any person with common sense ( unfortunately lacking in at least half if not more Americans, particularly many slimeball Republicans, is how they refuse to see what Clinton will continue to do to the irreversible and decaying country we call America! 8 years of a pathetically , socialistic, malformed pygmie in the White House has incontrovertibly proved this.

No… most Americans are not an informed or dare I say, intelligent people; at least not anymore. In most any other country in the world (e.g. Israel ), she most definitely would be on her way to prison! ( I can assure you of that..)
By the way, Trump may not at all end up being the biggest loser on November 8th; the many dispicable Republicans in the house and Senate will hold that honor for sure!!
PS: Chris Wallace was, for the most part, close to ideal to anyone observing his questions….. in a non partisan way.

Howard on October 21, 2016 at 9:04 am

I would agree. Trump’s performance last night was alright, but not great. It will not change the outcome of the election. Mike Wallace was a terrible moderator who frequently lost control of the debate. Also, he was far more inclined to be soft on Clinton than Trump. Debbie is probably right about Wallace wanting Clinton not to freeze out FOX during her tenure, which is a very sorry excuse. What became of the idea of never showing “Fear or Favor”. Mike Wallace is craven, and his moderating performance demonstrated that.

Worry01 on October 21, 2016 at 9:25 am

Hillary has openly stated that she admires German Chancellor Angela Merkel (whose importation of millions of Muslims into her country, and her hunting down [with the help of Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg] of opponents of her open-borders policies, Mrs. “Cankles” seeks to emulate for us), and certainly both have an affinity for Maoist outfits and pantsuits. (Alas, The Donald himself thinks Merkel is a “great leader.” So much for Hillary sticking it to Trump and his supporters.)

I think I remember in the past reading Debbie criticizing the Media Research Center and its affiliates (i.e. NewsBusters) for some pockets of open Jew-hatred, and this comes to my mind because both they and Michael Savage praised Chris Wallace to the hilt for being “balanced”[sic]. (And with all due respect to ‘Worry01’, Mike Wallace today is worm food.)

One thing for sure: I certainly won’t vote for Huma Abedin . . . er, Cheryl Mills . . . er, John Podesta . . . who’s the one running again? (Sarc.) One wonders if Hillary’s supporters (outside of the leftist agitators, moochers/looters, etc.) actually agree with her open borders philosophy (and increasing the Muslim population in this country by up to 550%), her anti-police/pro-criminal stance, her intention to continue degrading and socially engineering our military, an agenda of anti-Catholic bigotry, the further entrenchment of the culture of death, the further homosexualization and transgenderization of this country, and so on. Far too many so-called “undecideds” should be more aptly called “fickle,” as too often they are like Olive Oyl of the Popeye cartoons, who if the sailor man makes the slightest misstep abandons him in a heartbeat for Bluto.

ConcernedPatriot on October 21, 2016 at 10:08 am

Trump speaks to Islamic executioners throwing gay men off rooftops.

Hillary smiles and chuckles throughout.

MSM ignores

Jack on October 21, 2016 at 12:12 pm

BD, nice, but I’d like to see a side-by-side of Clinton with Dr. Evil in matching white Mao jackets. Of course, Hillary Clinton and Dr. Evil owe a lot to Dr. Julius No, who set the sartorial standard for aspiring evil leaders out to rule the world, also in white, as you can see in this clip from the 1962 classic, with Joseph Wiseman as Dr. No and Sean Connery as James Bond:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsT1bLR2sfM

Ralph Adamo on October 21, 2016 at 3:53 pm

Good day to you dear Debbie! Happy Sukkot to you dear Debbie! The Jewish holiday of Sukkot! God bless you dear Debbie! God Bless America! God bless Israel! With my Respect to you! Tirdad.

TIRDAD GHARIB on October 22, 2016 at 3:44 am

I am glad that at the Al Smith dinner, Trump didn’t let off. That dog & pony show only served to show how chummy both Dems and Republicans are w/ each other, and how aloof they are from the rest of the population

By not letting up on the barbs and leaving the media gasping after the event, Trump demonstrated that he won’t be one of those who go to Washington just to make nice w/ his enemies when nobody is looking

Infidel on October 22, 2016 at 10:05 am

Also, Debbie, one disagreement w/ one of your tweets – I wouldn’t consider any of the Gulf Sunni Arab states as ‘allies’. That Iran vs Saudi Arabia faceoff is yet another of those ‘Alien vs Predator’ sideshows

Infidel on October 22, 2016 at 10:11 am

I wish Trump would have replied about the accepting results question “you mean like Al Gore accepted the results Chris”? Also disappointed he again didn’t ask Hillary just WTF is the “gun show loophole” and “online loophole”? They are both myths that show a glaring misunderstanding of legal gun purchasing, Trump could have filleted her with but apparently he doesn’t know that either. This debate proved he never prepared in advance for all three; just winged it each time, thus missing many opportunities for kill shots. The best line of the debate was when he quipped “your husband disagrees” when Hillary was touting Obamacare, but it was lost in the sauce due to no follow-up. Chris Wallace being talked about as being such a good moderator is a joke as he is a joke. He may have looked good to some only because the others were so bad; saying he was good is like saying he’s the tallest Pygmy in the Congo. Meaningless dribble. Trump 2016!

Todd on October 22, 2016 at 2:11 pm

Either that, or Trump didn’t take the “kill shots” because he really is a plant that was put there to fail on purpose as a ruse to get Hitlary Rotten Cun_on the presidency.

It is obvious that the American people are being played, and have been for quite some time, decades. TV ushered that in like never before, although the reading of War Of The Worlds on radio showed the possibilities of en masse media first.

But it doesn’t matter, because all of human history has been a farce, especially human attempts at self-government. With the fall of the United States, this will be apparent such as never before. The age of human self-governance is almost over, and the U.S. being in the center ring of this worldwide circus is the most glaring evidence of that.

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on October 22, 2016 at 3:47 pm

Hillary: I care about equal pay for women doing equal work as men.
Trump should have said: Really, then did you pay ALL your female employees as SOS, on average around 60% pay of men?

A.S. on October 22, 2016 at 4:54 pm

Hillary: From the moment the president gives the order to launch nuclear missiles, the response time is around 4 minutes to execute the order.

Trump should have interrupted: Wow, look at this: she just gave away a military secret, which proves she is completely incompetent to deal with any classified information.

A.S. on October 22, 2016 at 4:57 pm

I hope Trump wins despites the Bilderbergs already selecting Hillary. If Trump makes it, he should put in prison the whole Clinton clan, confiscate all their property and bank accounts, and expose all their dealings to the world, that wikileaks hasn’t already mentioned. He should pardon heroes like Assange and Snowden. He should also give a high post to Pollard who was also a hero.

A.S. on October 22, 2016 at 5:02 pm

WHY did Hillary have a panel of light on her podium and Donald’s was dark. The same podium for debates 1 & 3. What were those men in dark suits ‘fishing’ out from behind the podium. These were the same men from the first debate. Could this have been a teleprompter. The light suddenly went off as she left the podium. There is a clip on Zerohedge.com.

Some bizarre moments related to serious issues brought about the HRC’s excessive smiling. Surely this is a mental aberration.
The reference to her Muslim Poster parents and their fallen son should have prompted Donald to ask why she would never take calls from the mother of the fallen Benghazi hero or at least a meeting to personally console the still grieving mother.
How HRC skipped into this lying stance is quite something else.
Her OPEN BORDERS comments were about ENERGY.
Sounds rehearsed and another LIE.
She said that partial birth abortion is about saving the life of the mother. What a load of tosh.
Gennifer Flowers made known that Bill Clinton paid $200 dollars for her to have an abortion. Did you hear that Hillary…
Maybe the Catholic Cardinal gave her a special appointment to confess her lies, lies and more damn lies…

EYES WIDE OPEN on October 22, 2016 at 5:59 pm

    Just a thought…

    Against the black curtain, one of the objects taken from Hillary’s podium looks like a coffee mug–a perfect way to hide medication necessary to mask her health issues.

    Another video illustrates the advantages provided Hillary:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_T_NoNtmwlM&ebc=ANyPxKrPHobm_0gzJMsmBIqsAMA5M8pbkigb5h7FsRQSeDCBYH0rr7HzsG5e7nfqvtRnSsJx27z8lNC_0ITJYPUATUwuPJEtcQ

    There is an obvious soft focus on Hillary’s image. This hides her naturally hideous appearance. Alternatively, Donald’s image is incredibly sharp. It shows every nook-and-cranny of his features. It is not flattering. Her single color outfit lends itself to softening. Without a trained eye you won’t notice the lack of detail in her buttons. The contrast in Donald’s outfit would make such soft focus apparent–if dark were blurred with light and color blurred with white.

    In addition, you can find the full debate online. You will see how immediately after the introduction the cameraman futzed with Donald’s image. Hillary’s image was setup and focused in advance.

    I did not watch the debates (no TV, no time, little interest in rehashing the obvious) but these strategies are obviously perpetrated in Hillary’s favor. As Debbie says, the debates themselves don’t matter in the least. However, Lester Holt’s attention to the activities surrounding Hillary’s podium attests to the bias and unethical practices afforded Hillary in every aspect of this election process.

    I most certainly think that, unlike Hillary’s blurred image, the choice is clear, but the truth is that no matter which one wins, this country is ripe for proverbially “reaping what it sows,” “getting what it pays for,” and “choking on it’s own vomit.” While Trump is the better alternative, remember that he is merely a creation of the GOP ignoring (even violating) their own conservative values, and of the constituency tiring of GOP treachery.

    YCHtT on October 22, 2016 at 10:31 pm

Anyone who has their eyes wide open, knows that she is aptly named The Dragon Lady. Anyone who has been paying attention at ALL for the past quarter century, knows that these two, The Great StainMaker and The Dragon Lady, are two unscrupulous, downright evil, and VERY dangerous people.

Of the 63 bodies who suddenly and mysteriously died in the wake of their “political career,” I wouldn’t be surprised if The Great StainMaker wasn’t the only one giving the orders to take the “kill shots.”

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on October 22, 2016 at 6:07 pm

An interesting slant ……what should have happened…

Moderator: Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Let’s start the first
questions with you Mrs. Clinton.
When you were Secretary of State why did you let a Russian company purchase 1/2 of the United States Uranium reserves?

How much money was donated by Russian companies to your Foundation?

In your job as Secretary of State did you ever handle/see Classified information?

When you worked for the State Department how did you conduct Secret Classified business without using a secure email server?

What kind of assault weapons were you funneling through Benghazi to ISIS in Syria before Ambassador Stevens was murdered?

Why were you interested in the over-throw of Assad in Syria?

When you left the White House after your husband’s last term as president,
why did you steal $200,000.00 worth of furniture, China, and artwork that you were forced to return?

Mrs. Clinton, when you were Secretary of State, why did you solicit contributions from foreign governments for the Clinton foundation after you promised President Obama you would not?

Mrs. Clinton, why do you and your husband claim to contribute millions of dollars to charity for a tax write off when it goes to your family foundation that gives out less than 15% of the funds you collect and you use the balance to support yourself tax free?

Mrs. Clinton, why are you unable to account for 6 billion dollars of State department funds that seem to have disappeared while you were Secretary of State?

Mrs. Clinton, why did you say you were broke when you left the White House, but you purchased a 2 million home, built an addition for the secret service, and charged the tax payers of the United States rent in an amount equal to the entire mortgage?

And Mrs. Clinton, how is it that your daughter, Chelsea, can afford to buy a $10.5 million apartment in New York City shortly after you left the White House?
And speaking of Chelsea, how is it that her first paying job, in her late 20’s, was for more than the salary of the President of the United States?

Was there a quid pro quo of any sort involved??
Mrs. Clinton why did you lie to the American people about the terrorist attack in Benghazi but managed to tell the truth to your daughter the same night it happened?

Mrs. Clinton why did you lose your law license? Why did your husband lose his?

Mrs. Clinton, what Really happened to Ron Brown when he was about to testify against you and your husband?

Take your time to respond Mrs. Clinton.
Mrs. Clinton’s response —
How can I make this election about Trump when you keep asking me questions like this ?

EYES WIDE OPEN on October 23, 2016 at 4:16 pm

Right on, Eyes Wide Open, mind working extremely well. And let’s not forget the 912 FBI files that her fingerprints were all over, and the Clintonistas connection to Sandy Burglar. He’s the guy who walked out of the national archives with documents in his pants. Probably more than His Slickness has in his pants.

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on October 23, 2016 at 5:42 pm

Just read the headline. Expect Double Digit Hikes with ObamaCare. So why would any repub vote for Hillary because of their disdain for Trump? Complete ignoramuses. Just foolish

MrBigBrain on October 24, 2016 at 7:17 pm

Yes sir, OhBUAN-KenOh!B, that has been talked about for years, and it’s finally here. It was fixed for that to happen, AFTER The Erection-On-A-Plane In Chief was out of office. And of course, it’ll be blamed on either the new president if it’s Trump, or the Republicans if it’s Hitlary.

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on October 24, 2016 at 10:27 pm

There is so much fodder to take this lady down. I think Trump is the only person on the planet who could screw this up. This is too easy. Too easy. The rigging and corruption is staggering and they’ve become so arrogant about it. Liberals can’t be this brain dead, can they? Don’t answer, I know the answer

MrBigBrain on October 25, 2016 at 1:49 am

Yes, you do, big guy, you do. I’ve been around here for nearly four years, and it’s obvious you have clear vision and good sensibilities. Such a shame what’s happening to our “once great republic.” I just sent Debbie an article which in and of itself shows the utter chaos that our society is accelerating towards, and the frighteningly disrespectful nature of people toward any sort of DOS (Discipline, Order and Structure), not the old operating system.

That goes double for our rulers, the policymakers, who were supposed to be our employees. The system IS totally rigged, what with the statistics that have come out on the chaos in the voting rolls. 1.8 million dead people registered to vote. And of course, they’ll vote multiple times . . .

for Hitlary.

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on October 25, 2016 at 9:58 am

I think the Republicans are in for the shock of their lives if they think they’re gonna outpoll Trump. Like last year, when Trump and Carson were running high, the GOP was running pretty low. It won’t change on the 8th.

In fact, I think that every senator and congressperson who has been fleeing from Trump for something he supposedly said 11 years ago or did 35 years ago will find themselves dumped en masse by Trump supporters, and lose the vote. They think that they only have to appeal to women and swing voters, but they are forgetting that the support of Trump voters too can be fluid: why would they vote for candidates who openly disown the person that they’re most enthusiastic about?

And I’ll be glad if McCain loses. In 2008, regardless of my reservations about Barack Osama Obama, I was glad that he knocked out first Hilary, and next McCain. This time, I’m glad that Trump knocked out first Bush (and among others, Fiorina, Christie and Kasich) and hopefully 2 weeks from now, Hilary.

Infidel on October 25, 2016 at 9:37 pm

If you’ve heard of Pat Condell, the British commentator, please see his latest YouTube clip America’s Moment of Truth.

If you don’t know Pat Condell let me introduce you to an articulate and knowledgeable world affairs commentator.
A no frills and flounces person.

EYES WIDE OPEN on October 25, 2016 at 11:54 pm

With all due respect to ‘Worry01’, Mike Wallace is today worm food; his son Chris, as noted everywhere, was the moderator. But to get to the point: It should be noted that Hillary is a great admirer of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. It shows, not only in terms of both women’s affinity for Mao-style outfits and hideous pantsuits, but also (more important) their even more hideous ideology and statist, anti-freedom philosophy and agenda. Hillary has vowed to emulate Merkel in the way she intends to rule this country – right on down to the mass increase in Muslim immigration by 550% she has openly promised (I bring this up due to Germany now being swamped with Muslim “migrants,” and the concomitant increase in rapes of women and sexual molestations of children). Merkel has also been working in conjunction with Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg to hunt down any German who opposes her suicidal “open borders” policy, and many have indeed been dragged from their homes for same. Alas, “The Donald,” for all his talk of building a wall and vetting Muslims, has also opined that Merkel is a “great leader.”

I am reminded of Debbie’s comments (and those of some of her loyal readers/commenters, i.e. ‘NormanF’) over the years, of how no matriarchy has ever survived. Germany is going down in flames under Merkel. Should Hillary, G-d forbid, “win,” we will suffer the exact same fate (including and especially being taken over by Islam). That she enjoys any lead in numerous polls is not just how much intertwined with the Democrat Party and the government the “mainstream” media is, but just how stupid – and obsessed with the most trivial pursuits – more and more of the “American” sheeple are.

ConcernedPatriot on October 27, 2016 at 7:19 am

Leave a Reply for Jack

Click here to cancel reply.

* denotes required field