January 15, 2006, - 10:43 am

Classy “Religion of Peace” E-mail of the Week

By Debbie Schlussel
Well, the “Religion of Peace” is at it again.
Here’s the latest e-mail I received from one of its many “peaceful” and “modest” members. So, what was that columnist Jeff Jacoby was saying about how Muslims have a special need for modesty above and beyond all other religions (as his justification for opposing using women’s breasts to “torture” Gitmo detainees?:

— NOUR IDRISS kayidriss@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:53:23 -0800 (PST)
From: NOUR IDRISS kayidriss@sbcglobal.net
Subject: love to fuck you
To: dschlussel@yahoo.com
When was the last time you were fucked in the ass or
any part of your body for that matter.My name is
kareem and I wish to stick my bsaeball
[sic] bat up yours.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: ,

12 Responses

Have pity. Obviously the loss of his pet goat has deranged this fine lad.

Walter E. Wallis on January 15, 2006 at 12:15 pm

Must be embaressing to see his email on display here like this.

lawman on January 15, 2006 at 5:41 pm

Debbie,
Everyday, you should reply to that email. It looks like ‘sour’ Nour used his wife’s email address!! Perhaps she would be interested in what wonderful emails he’s been sending through her account.

NJBeachbum on January 15, 2006 at 6:10 pm

Debbie you must be getting to him(Them).Right on

danny on January 15, 2006 at 6:46 pm

The idea of Muslims being a more sexually moral society than the West is absolutely ludicrous. They were perverts before we were. Back in the days of the Ottoman Empire they had sex slaves in the sultan’s court, and they still keep sex slaves in many Muslim countries today. At least one sultan (Mehmed II, who conquered Constantinople and would have conquered all of Europe but was stopped by the Romanians and Hungarians) is on record as having sodomized young boys, and many more men in the Ottoman court were into that stuff. If these people have virtually the same goal as a menacing empire of old times known for its degenerate sexual behaviour, should this e-mail be any surprise? I’d say it just confirms what we already knew. (Plus we get more great humor from Debbie, “microscope and tweezers.” Definitely a funny gal, and doesn’t let lowlifes like this bother her.)

KnightoftheImpaler on January 15, 2006 at 10:40 pm

Perhaps you noticed that he makes no mention of violating you with any part of his own anatomy? That is typical of Muslim males, as a result of both their inferiority complex toward women – whom they absolutely refuse to recognize as anything other than mere chattel – and their innate fear of being unable to satisfy women sexually lest they be thought of as anything less than manly. Which of course normally they are. That naturally brings derision from their own hypocritical peers who also can’t satisfy their women but have the horse sense to keep that fact to themselves instead of blathering idiotic statements like this one all over the net.
In any event, I suggest you forward his e-mail to the proper authorities to give this a-hole the scrutiny he deserves. Who knows? Maybe he’s living here on an expired visa.

thebobbo on January 15, 2006 at 11:59 pm

“In any event, I suggest you forward his e-mail to the proper authorities to give this a-hole the scrutiny he deserves. Who knows? Maybe he’s living here on an expired visa”.
I dont think he is a non citizen. He was probably raised here as you can tell by the way he has phrased his email.
Btw in some European nations, this email would be considered hate speech against women.
In the US of course, the first amendment protects this speech.
“The idea of Muslims being a more sexually moral society than the West is absolutely ludicrous”.
I tend to agree not because I believe that Muslims are less moral but because its impossible to compare the sexual morality of the east versus the west. As Bertand Russel said ‘Sin is geographical’, so the east and the west differ on the definition of morality.
For example, in the East, its considered immoral to have sex outside marriage. The percentage of married couples who are virgins at the night of their marriage, would be much higher in the east than in the West. This however does not make East more moral. It only means that in the West, sex in a loving committed relationship is not considered immoral, if the couple is not married.
I think a good parameter would be to see the rate of deviance from accepted social norms in the East and West respectively.

lawman on January 16, 2006 at 9:53 am

Sin is geographical? Utter nonsense.
Why stop at sexual mores, then? I have a bunch of rules I want to make up for my benefit. I’m sure Hitler and Stalin thought they were moral guys. Watching Saddam at his trial, he thinks rape rooms, torturing, and slaughtering were moral, too.
Morality is not a magic 8 ball you twirl around for answers.
lameman, I bet if someone broke into your house and stole your posessions, got caught, said, “It’s not a crime in the East!”, oh, I am sure you wouldn’t hold it against him would you? After all, sin is geographical.

The_Man on January 16, 2006 at 12:15 pm

“lameman, I bet if someone broke into your house and stole your posessions, got caught, said, “It’s not a crime in the East!”, oh, I am sure you wouldn’t hold it against him would you? After all, sin is geographical”.
Your analogy makes no sense and does not refute the fact that some sins are indeed geographical.
I live in the US where the law reflects the mores of Americans. As Americans consider stealing a crime and thus reflected in the criminal code, all people in the US have to live within the criminal code or pay the price for violating it.
Just because some sins are treated differently in different nations, does not mean that you can use the defense in the other nation.
Not all sins are geographical and I never suggested that
However some sins are indeed geographical. You can go to jail in India for selling beef. In the rest of the world there are no laws against selling beef. Marijuana is allowed in Amsterdam and so is prostitution. In most countries, both are proscribed. Anal sex between men is criminalized in Iran but as the Supreme Court recently decided it cannot be criminalized in the US. I could go on and on.

lawman on January 16, 2006 at 12:44 pm

Speaking of criminalization of sins,
“One who is allowed to sin , sins less”
~Gaius Cornelius Tacitus

lawman on January 16, 2006 at 12:58 pm

Hey Dune Coon, learn to spell.

KOAJaps on January 19, 2006 at 5:56 am

Islam, Peaceful or Violent? I have a post at http://sayanythingblog.com/2006/01/18/islam-peaceful-or-violent/#comments on that subject. Come weigh in on the debate. Personally, I find this repulsive creature to be just another moonbat that might be found at dailykos.

czekmark` on January 19, 2006 at 4:01 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field