January 23, 2006, - 9:36 am

New Definition of “Women’s Studies”: Prof Was Prostitute

By Debbie Schlussel
Hmmm . . . . Need more reasons to convince America’s left-leaning daughters and effeminate sons not to major in the so-called major, “Women’s Studies”? And sociology and anthropology, too? (If the college kids you know are neither left-leaning nor males effeminate, then this is not aimed at you.)
Take Brandy M. Britton, who earned her doctorate at the University of California, San Francisco, and was a professor at the University of Maryland-Baltimore–where she taught women’s studies.
She founded the Institute for Women and Girls Health Research out of her home. Also, out of her home, she worked as a prostitute. Cost: Up to $2,500. Services and rates were posted online.
Another lesson that would make PUTA (People for the Unethical Treatment of Animals and humans) proud: Be kind to animals. Britton was caught after multiple complaints about her animals–two pet pigs.
In her women’s studies pursuits, Britton–known as an expert on violence against women–won a $515,232 grant from the National Institutes of Health on the “Impact of Violence on Women’s Drug Use and HIV Risk.” But she falsified data on the project.
Maybe they should change the name of the major from “women’s studies” to “women’s prostitution, taxpayer rip-offs, and phony studies.”

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses

However admirable your ability to regurgitate old news, this post reads as though you may actually feel somewhat threatened knowing that you live in the same world as an intelligent female academic who has had sex on her own terms.
You may not share Ms. Britton’s liberated views, but dragging a couple of pigs into the rant seems a tad desperate.
When stoning whores, it’s perhaps best to stick to outraged indignation over the perceived lack of morality involved. That would be the tried and true method used so successfully in the past….or maybe that’s where you were going with the pig rant.
Prostitutes, if not fit to be labelled misguided, uneducated tarts, should be persecuted on the grounds that someone complained about pet pigs….it’s all so clear to me now.

Meretrix Jones on January 23, 2006 at 3:20 pm

I feel bad for the people of Maryland. What is this world coming to, when people’s tax dollars go to a whore? So how did she get that job at the university? That’s not a hard one to figure out. She must be pretty good at what she does, and I don’t mean teaching.

KnightoftheImpaler on January 23, 2006 at 4:47 pm

She wasn’t walking the streets. She wasn’t on crack. She was a strong-willed woman in control of her sexuality and of course that makes her a whore to some of you people, regardless of if she was taking money to have sex with people.
Ms. Schlussel and the swine she caters do don’t understand that a woman could be sexual. Or if they are sexual, only in the safe confines of marriage and on their backs.

jjames on January 23, 2006 at 7:23 pm

Hey Meretrix + James ;It’s the(GRANT)of $515,232 in tax dollars.

danny on January 23, 2006 at 8:36 pm

It’s just like the liberals these days to turn prostitution into some kind of a virtue. You can put a silk hat on a pig all you want, a hooker is still a hooker.

KnightoftheImpaler on January 23, 2006 at 9:26 pm

Ok,”I’m threatened”-and hopin’ that..goin’ by Meretrix Jones logic-she and JJames get a $2500 government grant to do Brandy the pig.

jaywilton on January 24, 2006 at 11:44 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field