Debbie Schlussel: It's Hard Out There for a (Pseudo) Ho: Sarah Jessica Parker's Guide to Ethics
As I suspected would happen, the National Female IQ Test a/k/a "Sex and the City," was a one-weekend wonder, as it sunk to fourth place this past weekend.
Still, it's fun to watch the desperate Sarah Jessica Parker flailing around promoting this movie. And now she's instructing the world on her own special brand of "ethics." The woman who built her career on a show (and now, movie) glorifying high-style ho-dom, without batting an eyelash, has an interesting sense of what is ethical and what isn't.
It seems Parker is upset that a gazillion-dollar designer gown she wore to the "Hags and the City" premiere was once worn by equally ho-ish but far more attractive Lindsay Lohan, in a fashion mag back in December and was also worn by an attractive heiress at a charity event. And now the world is over:
What they did was so short-sighted. It's just unethical and disappointing that they would allow the dress to be worn again.
To sum up: Teaching the world's 12-year-old girls about giving oral sex and the glories of sleeping around, on her syndicated SATC TV show--not "unethical and disappointing" or "short-sighted." Two far more beautiful women wearing the same dress some time ago--completely "unethical and disappointing," not to mention "short-sighted."
Glad this one-note, over-rated movie starlet has her priorities straight.
As a friend of mine--a former Muslim who converted to Catholicism--writes:
"Unethical"..?! Humans starving, genocide, terrorism,and allowing illegal immigrants to stay is unethical. "Disappointing" is that people actually care about what this hag has to say. Silly that she gets that much attention because her whole act is about "putting out" and being a psuedo-whore.
As you'll recall, back in late 2000, Parker told the Washington Post that she was worried about the Bush Presidency because her poor Ohio relatives on welfare would have their services cut. Not that she'd ever give her relatives a dime of her estimated $100 million empire (endorsement deals, perfume line, acting gig and syndication royalties, clothing line). But "Oh, No!" if the taxpayers stop funding them.
Yet more reinforcement of why Maxim Magazine picked SJP as its 2007 Unsexiest Woman Alive.
Posted by Debbie on June 9, 2008 12:27 PM to Debbie Schlussel