July 27, 2006

Pictures Worth 1,000 Words: U.N.'s Annan & Hezbollah's Nasrallah

Printer Friendly

By Debbie Schlussel

In response to all the whining regarding Israel's accidental killing of a few U.N. "peacekeepers," we present these pics of Hezbollah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah and U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan:

nasrallahannan.jpg
Hezbollah-U.N. Lovefest
nasrallahanan2.jpg

Question: Why is a U.N. leader meeting with a terrorist leader? Memo to Kofi: Hezbollah ain't a country and doesn't have a U.N. Mission.

Also, don't forget our post, yesterday, about how U.N. "peacekeepers" aided and abetted the Hezbollah kidnapping of Israeli soldiers in 2000.

Thanks to my friend, Bob "Arby" Arbetman, for sending one of the pics. He calls Hezbollah U.S.A., "HezUSA." We like it, as we do Rush Limbaugh's nickname for them, "Hezbos."

Posted by Debbie at July 27, 2006 10:02 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1173

Comments

Two America-hating savages shaking hands and plotting against us. One plots using bombs and missiles, the other contorts reality and engages in scandals to thwart American foreign policy at the U.N. The end result of these murdering scum's actions is that more people are forced to live under brutal, murdering dictatorships, and less people live in freedom. Two sides of the same coin. Two primates who emerged from Turd-World cesspools.

Coffee Annan and Shriek Assrallah - perfect together.

Posted by: Thee_Bruno [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2006 11:11 AM

Debbie,

Where and when were these photos taken? While I would not give credit to Annan for being able to come up with any valid excuse, time, or circumstance, to shake hands with a vile Islamic jihadist leader such as Nasrallah, it would bring some context to the photo.

Brian

Posted by: 75273 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2006 01:11 PM

Brian,

I found one of the photos on the following news website.
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2000/487/re3.htm

And there are references to this meeting on the CNN website archived stories from 2000.

Shawn

Posted by: Kirch66 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2006 01:31 PM

Brian,

The smaller photo appears to be a Reuters photo according to the news site I provided above.

Shawn

Posted by: Kirch66 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2006 01:32 PM

Shawn, I appreciate the link very much. As I suspected, I'm still not planning on inviting Annan over for dinner and tea.

Posted by: 75273 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2006 02:51 PM

The UN has a history of legitimizing and bestowing respectability on terrorists. It is filled with a deep seated anti-Israel bias. Guess who the most frequently condemned country at the UN is. Israel is the only member state under assault for the crime of daring to defend itself from its enemies. No need to wonder why with that kind of record, Israel distrusts the UN as an impartial broker in the Middle East. What ought to be added here is the UN is part of the problem of the Middle East conflict and I challenge any one to show me where it has brought about lasting stability and peace in that part of the world.

Posted by: NormanF [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2006 06:21 PM

Debbie, by several reports, it was a precision targeted bomb that hit the UN position, so it's pretty hard to believe it was wholly accidental. Do you think some Israeli soldier was drinking and bombing?

Posted by: Jim M [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2006 07:31 PM

I like and agree what you're saying:

"Two America-hating savages shaking hands and plotting against us. One plots using bombs and missiles, the other contorts reality and engages in scandals to thwart American foreign policy at the U.N. The end result of these murdering scum's actions is that more people are forced to live under brutal, murdering dictatorships, and less people live in freedom. Two sides of the same coin. Two primates who emerged from Turd-World cesspools.

Coffee Annan and Shriek Assrallah - perfect together.

Posted by: Thee_Bruno [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 27, 2006 11:11 AM"

Thee Bruno, but if Bush and hs admin cared about our safety, why is the U.N. still in New York? which leads me to this question:

Fox's Hannity and Colmes is saying that Hezzbollah is getting their weapons from Pakistan and North Korea but get this

"http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html

2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea

2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaUmFvg2zNU

So did Rumsfeld inadvertently set the war between Hezzbollah and Israel, for $190,000 a year?

Why then is the U.N. still here? Because none of our current or previous leaders want them gone.

Posted by: KOAJaps [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 28, 2006 04:01 AM

Until this UN 'outpost' was bombed it was the first time I'd ever heard of it.

Now what was the purpose of this 'outpost?' To warn Israelis of Hezbollah rocket attacks? To alert the Israelis to Hezbollah terrorist movement? No and no.

Perhaps this post's real purpose was to spy on Israel and warn the Hezbollah of IDF troop movements?

If so, then the UN is an accomplice to the murder of Israeli citizens and soldiers, and in that case, they got bombed for good reason.

Posted by: joemccarthy [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 28, 2006 07:37 AM

KOJaps,

Rummy sat on the board of a company that helped with the design of the nuclear plants to North Korea, however, he did so during Slick Willie's reign of terror in Washington. Furthermore, it was Slick Willie and Madeliene Halfbright who concocted that policy - not Rummy.

After joining the Bush team, Bush stopped that lunatic policy of supplying N. Korea with nuke technology. Something that should be applauded.

What connection are you trying to make? There is no connection between N. Korea's nuclear reactors and Hezbollah's mission to annihilate Israel.

As for the U.N. in NYC, well, no president can just kick them out of America. It is a useless and dangerous world body whose charter stipulates that it be wherever they want it to be.

Posted by: Thee_Bruno [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 28, 2006 01:12 PM

Thee_Bruno, it just goes to show that it doesn't matter what side you are on, both the conservative aqnd libral party are corrupt. But Rummy sat on the board making $190,000 sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea and now that North Korea is the Axis of Evil, are selling nuclear weapons to terrorists to destroy israel according to Fox? Rummy made the money and now Israel is going to to get it in the ass. that's the connection. I wouldn't be surprised we don't get bombed by Israel for our government's stupidity...Oh yeah, they did...USS Liberty. See? Fuck with Israel and she gets back at you

Posted by: KOAJaps [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 28, 2006 02:45 PM

KOJaps,

I disagree with your assessment about both parties being corrupt.

Republicans are HEAD AND SHOULDERS above Democraps when it comes to national defense.

Rummy sat on the board of a company that did business with N. Korea, BUT, there was no law against dealing with N. Korea in that capacity. It was all LEGAL, as declared by The Slickster. That was YEARS before Bush won and declared N. Korea a trifecta in the Axis of Evil (that occurred post 9/11). If it wasn't Rummy's company that got the contract, it would've been some other company. Rummy just happened to be associated with it. After all, Slick Willie's admininstration awarded the contract to Rummy's company.

I don't believe N. Korea is exporting nuclear weapons to terrorists at this point. If they did, the Satanic, brain-dead, Muzlum scumbags would've certainly used them by now.

Still, there is no connection between N. Korea's nuke ambitions and Hezbollah missiles. Those missiles are coming from Iran.

Lastly, Israel is America's only true ally in the Mideast. However, The U.S.S. Liberty attack still sticks in my craw. I don't buy the official version of what happened.

Posted by: Thee_Bruno [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 28, 2006 03:44 PM

Yeah, I was thinking the photo must be a few years old because I didn't notice Sheikh Nazi-Rallah w/o the panties and bra he was wearing in the photos on the site last week. After looking at the previous story with the kids giving the nazi salute, it made me remember reading or hearing about Herman Gohring's proclivity for wearing women's clothing on occasion. It seems to me if Ahminidjead (or however the f*&k you spell the Iranian guy's name) is the new Hitler, than Nazi-Rallah would be the logical choice for the new Gohring.

Posted by: CornCoLeo [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 29, 2006 06:04 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?


 

Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics





Blogroll

 

home - columns - bio - blog archvies - fan club - media - discussion - contact

Copyright 2000 - 2007 www.debbieschlussel.com