October 07, 2008
"View" Hags: "Statute of Limitations" on Obama's Terror Buds, McCain's "Cheating" Worse Than Terrorism
Every time I think the hags on ABC's annoying anti-male yenta-fest, "The View", can't get any more absurd, I'm disproven.
Yesterday, Baba Wawa was upset that Sarah Palin's baby was at the VP debate on Thursday Night.
Today, she asserted a fictional "statute of limitations" on Barack Hussein Obama's association with terrorists, like William Ayers, who attacked the Pentagon and tried to attack the U.S. Capitol Building.
As a lawyer, I certainly don't claim to know all of the statutes of limitation. But I never got the memo from the Federal Election Commission and Free Speech Limitation Joint Task Force that John McCain is not allowed to point out the Obama-Ayers alliance because of a "statute of limitations."
The quadra-headed hag-rectangle of aging "View" skankdom--Baba Wawa, Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, and Sherri Shepherd--all claimed that the past is irrelevant and that it's not important that Obama associated with this anti-American terrorist.
As I heard this verbal exercise in the absurd I wondered two things:
1) If a future Presidential candidate was friends with Mohammed Atta or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, will we say it's "irrelevant" and that "there's a statute of limitations"? There should never be a "statute of limitations" on these things. But it's shaping up that way.
2) Didn't I hear Joe Biden saying, "The past is prologue", in debating Sarah Palin about the Bush past and trying to transpose it on McCain?
I guess the past is only prologue for Republicans and conservatives. But not for Democrats and liberals with terrorist buddies and a scary past who want to occupy 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Oh, and "The View" hags provided another example of their double standard for statutes of limitations. Unfunny comedienne Sherri Shepherd said that John McCain's cheating on his first wife is far more relevant and important than Barack Hussein Obama's tight friendship with a terrorist who targeted America.
Like I said yesterday about "The View" hags: Priorities, Schmiorities.
As usual, faux-conservative/genuine-airhead Elisabeth Hasselbeck failed to point these things out or apply any sort of solid defense. Sean Hannity's talking points can't do it all.
That's why she's on the show. Stay pretty and remain foolish.
Posted by Debbie at October 7, 2008 12:09 PM
Comments
What a man does and says before he starts running for office is a better indication of how he will behave once he is in office When the media spotlight is not on you is a better reflection of who and what you really are.
Posted by: Ripper ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.debbieschlussel.com/nav-commenters.gif)
at October 7, 2008 12:44 PM
It's frightening that anyone in America watches "The View."
Posted by: barrypopik at October 7, 2008 03:49 PM
Hi Debbie,
Would there be a statute of limitation if McCain had a relationship with David Duke 20 years ago?
Posted by: dances with trout at October 7, 2008 03:50 PM
And of course, none of the hags on The View have ever cheated on anyone (except for those who have). Probably some of them haven't though. One regular panelist is so slovenly that no one in their right mind would want to get close to her.
Posted by: c f at October 7, 2008 04:04 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
