April 26, 2007, - 10:36 am

Dumb: Women’s Mag Honors Topless War Protesters

Time for another installment of “I read the women’s mags, so you know what’s infecting your daughters, girlfriends, and wives.”
Meet the women of SAG, which stands for . . . sag.
The May issue of Jane Magazine–which used to be home to the monthly “column” of Silicone Valley Pamela Anderson–features a glowing article on topless anti-war protesters. Not that we want women going topless around America, but let’s just say that for you guys who dream of topless women, these are not the ones occupying your REM.
They’re against the war, against our troops, and against President Bush. And these braless, topless, zaftig ones are also mad that men can go shirtless, but they can’t. They call themselves the “Top-Free 10.”

And here’s Jane’s editorial caption for this photo:

Says their lawyer, the coincidentally-named Mark Tietig:

We prefer the term “top-free” since “topless” has a connotation of strip clubs.

Uh, check out the pic, and I doubt anyone is getting these women mixed up with “strip clubs.”
“Top-free.” “Topless.” I just call them what they really are:
Brainless and witless. Brain-free and wit-free will do, though.
Yup, while our troops are out there fighting for freedom. These losers are fighting for the right to expose their sag to the world.
Only in America. Yup, this is what the woman in your life might be poisoned with, er . . . “reading,” every single month.

Tags: , , , , , ,

20 Responses

There’s more substance in the “Bat Boy” articles in the Weekly World News.

Candy Slice on April 26, 2007 at 11:19 am

I protest ugly women’s saggy boobs!
Have they ever thought of taking their demonstration on the road, like, maybe to Iraq? Let’s see what the imams think about that.

AmericanJewess on April 26, 2007 at 11:25 am

Are you sure the one on the left ain’t a guy? Is the full frontal topfree pic available?

TheOmegaMan on April 26, 2007 at 11:29 am

You can’t argue with “Breast not Bombs”!
Good thing about this protest … not a single person will be reading the sign.

Jack on April 26, 2007 at 12:00 pm

I guess people do these ridiculous time wasting things to feel that they have a “cause” and a purpose in life. These types of folk are usually unhappy with themselves and want to make the rest of us unhappy because misery loves company.

the_don on April 26, 2007 at 12:13 pm

Just wait for the all-male bottomfree version “Weiners Not War!” slogan.

TheOmegaMan on April 26, 2007 at 12:34 pm

Many is America would agree with the posters these “ladies” are holding, especially our men and women in the armed forces protecting their right to hold said posters (nude). However, these vacuum tubes fail to understand just WHY we fight. WHY we wage wars. The war is a whole lot larger than Iraq yet, as I believe history will show, Iraq truly was the place where the war with the latest version of vermin fascists would begin in earnest. There were 2.5 times as many soldiers killed in three months at Iwo Jima. Get over it. We honor those taken as heroes who gave their lives so that we may continue our way of life. It would be easy to call these women(?) dupes, dopes, or nutroots, but sadly, should we not prevail, they’d certainly be executed first as undesirables. The defense of freedom REQUIRES force with extreme prejudice.

FreeAmerican on April 26, 2007 at 12:40 pm

Sorry, Many IN America…

FreeAmerican on April 26, 2007 at 12:41 pm

Tis is not any more apalling than it is jejune. These women are very childish for displaying their bare breasts to make a point. They are a bunch of immature boobheaded ugly skanks who are not worth giving attention to. Its actually degrading their image to cavort around like topless amazon slut warriors but these women are devoided from their consciousness to bear a fracture of shame and dignity. I’m not shocked by this. If they want to behave like anti-war hussies, then why shouldn’t they be allowed to do so? If you expect decency, propriety, and decorum from these degenerate whores,then rethink your expectations. I’m just suprised not to see Hillary and the democrat women participating in this protest.

Jew Chick on April 26, 2007 at 1:22 pm

Ouch my eyes! Now I have to run to the ophthalmologist to get them checked. You know you should include a warning that should say SCROLL DOWN WITH CATION: CAN DAMAGE EYESITE! LOL! Also isn’t it Un-PC to call these “ladies” zaftig? Wouldn’t the term gravitationally challenged be better, so as no to offend these loons? Oops, I meant to say “ladies”.

OneIrishJew on April 26, 2007 at 1:22 pm

I meant to type EYESIGHT. Damn those pics! See What can happen!

OneIrishJew on April 26, 2007 at 1:26 pm

I never read Jane. Jane’s Defense Weekly (www.janes.com) is much better.

barrypopik on April 26, 2007 at 1:46 pm

It’s a good thing women can’t vote.

Jose on April 26, 2007 at 2:01 pm

This is just something these sca… women are using to run around half naked. This gives them the excuse to expose themselves in public without having to worry about it.
Now, I wonder if men could do the same thing… expose themselves and say its balls over bombs or something equally witty.

THE Old Goat on April 26, 2007 at 3:34 pm

Hummmm….interesting. They are out on the street making the case for our Islamist enemy, but doing so without their shirts? I wonder what position the Islamic councils will take on this. Maybe it will be acceptable because a few of the gals look like goats…

chucker on April 26, 2007 at 3:55 pm

They’re only “showin’ ’em in public” because unless these “topless 10” take a trip to the MD, nobody else WANTS to see their boobs…in any capacity.

P. Aaron on April 26, 2007 at 4:17 pm

I wonder what the dhimmwit holding the “breasts, not bombs” sign would say if someone actually asked her just what the hell that means.

stevecanuck on April 26, 2007 at 4:18 pm

Come on! I want some real tits, not gravity

KOAJaps on April 30, 2007 at 6:57 pm

so if people watch porn there supporting womens rights? Wait that doesn’t sound right

john on August 22, 2011 at 8:22 pm

I love your web site, maybe check out my web site if you have a chance http://www.insanemediaworks.com thanks

ray on January 12, 2013 at 1:25 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field