July 1, 2011, - 6:36 am

Told Ya!: DSK Muslim Rape Accuser Did Immigration Fraud, $100K Money Laundering for Drug Dealer Lover; Case Crumbles

By Debbie Schlussel

The rape allegations made by a devout Muslim immigrant against former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn a/k/a “DSK” are unraveling for EXACTLY the reason I cited when I originally wrote about this woman . . . and then got attacked by liberals for doing so.  I questioned whether the woman really deserved or needed asylum and noted that like many others seeking asylum in Immigration Court, she probably lied.  And guess what?  I was right.  She lied about rape before and made up claims she was subject to female genital mutilation. Not only that, but she’s involved in Muslim money laundering and drug dealing. Sooooo par for the halal course.  This “poor, hard-working maid” we were supposed to feel sorry for is a con-artist who laundered $100,000 through her bank accounts for her drug dealer lover. I told you back when this case was headline news that things were not as they seemed. And that was the understatement of the year. I also questioned why the alleged victim had HIV or AIDS if she was so “modest” (she lives in federal housing for the HIV and AIDS afflicted). I now believe she probably got it from her drug dealer lover or some other fellow low-life she slept with.


Devout Muslim Accuser of DSK is Liar, Immigration Fraud Perpetrator, Money Launderer for National Drug Dealer

Now, let’s see if the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Obama Justice Department have the guts to seek to strip this liar of her citizenship based on her phony asylum claim and deport her for this blatant immigration fraud and false police report.  Don’t hold your breath.  Here’s the scoop on this hijab-wearing malefactor and fraud:

The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her in his Manhattan hotel suite in May, according to two well-placed law enforcement officials. . . . Prosecutors now do not believe much of what the accuser has told them about the circumstances or about herself.

Since her initial allegation on May 14, the accuser has repeatedly lied, one of the law enforcement officials said.

Senior prosecutors met with lawyers for Mr. Strauss-Kahn on Thursday and provided details about their findings, and the parties are discussing whether to dismiss the felony charges. Among the discoveries, one of the officials said, are issues involving the asylum application of the 32-year-old housekeeper, who is Guinean, and possible links to people involved in criminal activities, including drug dealing and money laundering.

Yup, the “devout Muslim” in a hijab was sleeping with a jailed, convicted money laundering drug dealer. Hey, yet another example of “Islamic modesty!”

Prosecutors from the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., who initially were emphatic about the strength of the case and the account of the victim, plan to tell the judge on Friday that they “have problems with the case” based on what their investigators have discovered, and will disclose more of their findings to the defense. . . .

According to the two officials, the woman had a phone conversation with an incarcerated man within a day of her encounter with Mr. Strauss-Kahn in which she discussed the possible benefits of pursuing the charges against him. The conversation was recorded.

That man, the investigators learned, had been arrested on charges of possessing 400 pounds of marijuana. He is among a number of individuals who made multiple cash deposits, totaling around $100,000, into the woman’s bank account over the last two years. The deposits were made in Arizona, Georgia, New York and Pennsylvania.

The investigators also learned that she was paying hundreds of dollars every month in phone charges to five companies. The woman had insisted she had only one phone and said she knew nothing about the deposits except that they were made by a man she described as her fiancé and his friends.

In addition, one of the officials said, she told investigators that her application for asylum included mention of a previous rape, but there was no such account in the application. She also told them that she had been subjected to genital mutilation, but her account to the investigators differed from what was contained in the asylum application. . . .

Prosecutors had sought the restrictive conditions in part by arguing that the case against Mr. Strauss-Kahn was a strong one, citing a number of factors, including the credibility of his accuser, with one prosecutor saying her story was “compelling and unwavering.”

In the weeks after making her accusations, the woman, who arrived in the United States from Guinea in 2002, was described by relatives and friends as an unassuming and hard-working immigrant with a teenage daughter. She had no criminal record, and had been a housekeeper at the Sofitel for a few years, they said.

Mr. Strauss-Kahn was such a pariah in the initial days after the arrest that neighbors of an Upper East Side apartment building objected when he and his wife tried to rent a unit there.

Yup, because the rich liberals who populate the Upper East Side (and who mostly voted for Obama) always take the side of a Muslim alien fraud who cries “wolf” over rape. Let this be a lesson.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

45 Responses

There had been speculations I’ve heard that one motive among many for bringing down DSK with this phony “rape” charge was anti-Semitism, due to his being Jewish. Yet I have to concur that Obama’s so-called “Justice” Department (read: Vengeance, Retribution, Payback and Settling Old Scores Department) will not press any charges against this rape accuser. Especially given the Obama gang’s officially getting in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood.

ConcernedPatriot on July 1, 2011 at 6:53 am

“…forensic tests found unambiguous evidence of a sexual encounter between Mr. Strauss-Kahn.”

Does Dominique Strauss-Kahn get his reputation back?

This is one of those LIB media narratives that (as you predicted) unraveled into the thoroughly icky story that it truly is.

What’s the scoop on that Egyptian banker accused of rape? Any updates on him?

There is NO Santa Claus on July 1, 2011 at 7:05 am

The woman’s shady background was not news to me, since I read about it here when no one else in the media was doing due diligence and checking her history. A man may have lost his job and reputation because of a false accusation of rape. I would normally say put her on trial for this, but if convicted she would be entitled to health care in prison. Deport her and be done with it.

Jon on July 1, 2011 at 7:29 am

Federal housing for the AIDS/HIV afflicted? Let’s think about this when we are trying to lower the debt.

And we should all be thinking about this woman the next time we stay in hotels, even ritzy ones like the Sofitel, and think that we are staying in sanitary or safe conditions.

I’d expect a few lawsuits. Any updates about the Egyptian banker?

Little Al on July 1, 2011 at 8:49 am

Shades of the Duke/Lacrosse/non-rape fiasco. As to DSK “getting his reputation back,” not sure what that means in light of him asking for (and getting) oral sex from a hotel maid.

Red Ryder on July 1, 2011 at 8:52 am

    Dear Mr. Ryder: When are you coming back?

    One thing you, who compare the case of Dominique Strauss-Klein to the Duke lacrosse case, and Debbie, who compares it to the Dreyfus case, should keep in mind: UNLIKE the prosecution in the Dreyfus case, UNLIKE the prosecution in the Duke Lacrosse case, the NYC district attorney’s office has been fairly prompt in saying “We goofed.”

    Miranda Rose Smith on July 5, 2011 at 8:18 am

Watch this hilarious video:
about a Jewish touches kisser…
you’d love it.

Sabidabi on July 1, 2011 at 9:15 am

Why are we taking in drug-HIV infected non skilled Muslim immigrants into this country in the first place? I would say deport her but she should get the death penalty.

bejenin on July 1, 2011 at 10:12 am

What I find suspect is that as we see this case crumble a story came out that that lets us know that the woman taking DSK place at the IMF just happens to have worked for a very large Chicago law firm. That just seems a little to convenient. I wouldn’t have thought conspiracy, but having grown up in Chicago that is a blatant in your face example of the Chicago Way. Make it sound too crazy to be true and you’ll pull it off. No hard proof but, just look at the cr@p Capone pulled off.

Mark on July 1, 2011 at 10:36 am

Heck look at Blago! Yes they’re that nuts up there. All of them. I hate Illinois Nazi’s(Blues Brothers reference) and Illinois Commies too.

Mark on July 1, 2011 at 10:41 am

Dominic Strauss did have sex with her. That’s a forensic fact.

She has drug dealer ties, has obviously lied and is not quite the demure Muslima as self projected. Those are evidential facts.

So what we have here is the perfect storm.

A supposed socialist who lives as high on the hog as a Sun King and a lying Muslim woman crying rape and whose character is now crumbling under the scrutiny of attorneys.

In my view both are equally as guilty.

He, as head of the IMF held a position of not only fiscal but moral responsibility. In covering his previous advances he’s a proven liar.

She, an immigrant from Guinea, riddled with Aids, connected to criminals and guilty of lying, trying the shakedown.

This is now the Brave New World we live in.

The bent prince and the dissembling pauper collide in a New York hotel and bring $2000 a night suites to the level of a seedy, sea-front bordello.

How apt.

logdon on July 1, 2011 at 10:52 am

Mr. Kahn will not get his reputation plus his past philandering did not help either with that female economist several years ago. I am not saying that woman should not have the book thrown at her but Mr. Kahn was no angel either. Mr. Kahn should have know a man in his high position would make him a target for such scams. This is an example where both parties are dirt bags and one was trying to outdo the other like in the movie, THE STING. The real losers in all this are the legitimate cases where a woman is raped and not believed especially if she is a maid at this hotel. The other loser is the innocent man that will have a woman use the rape accusation to blackmail him and he will not be believed until some information comes out about the accuser like in this case.

Mario on July 1, 2011 at 10:55 am

Strauss-Kahn is a brilliant economist, and did an excellent job at the IMF.

I do not know whether or not he ever “sexually harassed” anyone; nowadays, every woman who does not get a promotion screams harassment to screw over their boss, without the sex or kiss. It is done in law firms and in the government all the time.

Strauss-Kahn is also European; signs of affection that are routine in Europe are called harassment by the feminazis that have taken over the USA.

Thus do not disparage this brilliant man; you do not know the entire story, and most likely none of us ever will.

Jonathan Grant on July 1, 2011 at 11:46 am

    Strauss-Kahn is also European; signs of affection that are routine in Europe are called harassment by the feminazis that have taken over the USA’


    I’m British which I believe is in Europe and I do not recognise your cliched and grossly warped characterisation. Is inserting a penis into a woman’s vagina now a mere ‘sign of affection’?

    As for Strauss being a brilliant economist what has that got to do with having unprotected sex with an Aids infected cleaning maid?

    By your argument it could be posited that Hitler, based on his political revival of Thirties Germany, was a great man as if killing Jews was neither here nor there.

    I’m not defending this Muslims but the evidence is there. He did, to mangle that other predatory philanderer’s words, ‘have sex with that woman’.

    logdon on July 1, 2011 at 1:02 pm

      Dear Logdon:

      You have no idea as to whether these two had sex; you only know what the prosecutor leaked to the press, and in this country, prosecutors often leak false information to bias a potential jury pool. In America, the police and the prosecutors further bias public opinion by “the perp walk,” walking the accused, in handcuffs, in the streets, before news photographers. Such behavior on the part of the prosecutor is illegal in much of Europe, and it violates the canon of legal ethics, yet no one dares complain to the bar.

      Besides, you said you are British. On the Continent, affairs of the heart are different, particularly in France.

      Jonathan E. Grant on July 1, 2011 at 2:06 pm

      Ironic that the past of the accuser is supposed to be ignored, but the past of the accused is somehow pertinent?
      Think of the Salem (MA, USA) witch trials of the 17th century (they mostly punished women-few men were accused or punished for witchcraft) and then think of our current witch trials (sex crimes) and note how in the current time it is nearly all men who are accused and punished for sex crimes.
      Also please note how sexual harrassment has been defined such that only men can commit them (women are not inncent angels who do no wrong sexually – men can and are raped in two out of three ways women are raped).
      The words “violence against women” should ring alarm bells whenever you hear them since they are the rallying cry of scoundrels who ignore, condone, or encourage violent women.
      Another woman has cut a man’s penis off (and the news of the case should demonstrate how much contempt or hatred of men exists in our society). Will this woman be charged with a sex crime (I doubt a man could cut off a woman’s breast without getting charged with sex crimes and domestic violence – she was his girlfreind).
      When women commit domestic violence and sex crimes, the misandric (man hating) media turns their backs and applauds….

      Mad at Misandry on July 16, 2011 at 6:41 pm

Maybe the whole episode was set in motion to institute a Chicagoan lawyer to head the IMF. Another controlling puppet for the Chicago political machine. DSK weakness was easy to exploit by those who wanted him gone.

Gino on July 1, 2011 at 12:37 pm

Seems to me like a scumbag trying to stitch up another scumbag. Why not put them both in the same cell and let them enjoy each other for ever?

Preposteroso on July 1, 2011 at 12:56 pm

Whatever the truth about the rape is, it is clear that money was far more important to this woman than her virtue. She is a liar, money launderer, and drug dealer. And it looks like an extortionist also.

pat on July 1, 2011 at 1:15 pm

This “hard-working immigrant” turns out to be the Islamic equivalent of Rev. Al Sharpton’s favorite hoax artist, Tawana Brawley. Why am I not surprised?

As usual, when it comes to Muslims, Debbie nails it.

Seek on July 1, 2011 at 1:27 pm

    And where is Mrs. brawly today? She is awaiting trial for allegedly trying to kill another one of her boyfriends (I forgot all the details – I think she lit the last boyfrined on fire and stabbed the current one to DEATH, allegedly).
    And why is it when a woman lights her boyfrined on fire, the press doesn’t label that domestic violence? And why is it when a woman allegedly stabs her boyfrined to death, there is no mention of domestic violence?
    Simply, there are many misandric (those hateful or merely contemptuous of men) POWERFUL people who seek to paint domestic violence as somethign that only men do.
    “violence Agaisnt Women” is the rallying cry of scoundrels who seek to ignore, condone or encourage women to be violent against senior citizens, children, women and men. Of these four groups, senior citizens, children, women and men, three of those groups are still percieved as requiring protection (men not only do not need protection according to the misandrists in our midsts, but they deserve every false accusation they get for the sins of their forefathers).

    Mad at Misandry on July 16, 2011 at 6:49 pm

“This “hard-working immigrant” turns out to be the Islamic equivalent of Rev. Al Sharpton’s favorite hoax artist, Tawana Brawley.”

Got that right Seek, question, who the hell is the alledged victim? Why hasn’t her identity been exposed to the media? I know why, it’s because of the pathetic stinking lesbian-feminist many years and decades ago said that any woman can make up a rape claim and hide her own idenity. Samething what happend five years ago with the Duke Lacrosse program team (the accuser was arrested and found guilty and the DNA is in jail right now for his false accusations), samething happend to Kobe Bryant eight years ago when his accuser claimed that he raped her and it turns out that the accuser was LYING and making up the whole story and Kobe Bryant was INNOCENT all the time. Now something similar happend to Ben Roethlisberger a few years when a girl claimed that he sexually assualted her and she hid her idenity, turns out that Big Ben’s accuser was LYING and the case was dropped, Roethlisberger’s accuser should’ve been locked up in jail for what she did to Big Ben!

Folks, these false rape accusations are an attack on us men in general from all races, ethnicities, etc., make no mistake about it!

“A nation is defined by it’s borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on July 1, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    Among the best ways to show men that rape needs to be taken seriously is to make sure we punish false rape accusers (those for whom it has been proven).
    And we need a false rape accusers web site and registry (women who lie about rape should be forced to register for life).
    We need a serial false rape accusers registry (any one on this list needs to have her name and photo posted in bars and anywhere men congregate.
    Men ought to be able to know who the false rape accusers are and be protected from them!

    Mad at Misandry on July 16, 2011 at 6:54 pm

First thing I thought was that joke of a prosecutor in the Duke case. Hey prosecutors, here is a tip for you, look a little closer when a educated successful white male is accused of raping an uneducated poor black woman. It never happens. How does someone with $100,000 in her bank account qualify for public assistance? Isn’t she required to disclose her assets. How about some taxes on that money? How about jail time for failure to comply with both of these rules.

Randal P on July 1, 2011 at 1:51 pm

You know Debbie, I wouldn’t doubt that her accusations were all premeditated fabrications against DSK because he is Jewish. This is a standard Islamic ploy to damage or destroy people. How did she get HIV if she is modest ?????

G. R. SCHAROUBIM on July 1, 2011 at 1:54 pm

Even though Strauss-Kahn was a frame-up victim, let’s not get too carried away by the IMF. The best way to do a good job at the IMF is to dissolve it.

It funnels taxpayers’ money to those who live beyond their means, and to the “developing” countries (kleptocracies and terrorism supporters).

Little Al on July 1, 2011 at 2:00 pm


Jonathan E. Grant on July 1, 2011 at 2:58 pm

A FEW WEEKS after Strauss was arrested, an Egyptian banker was arrested for rape in a New York hotel. There, there was real evidence against him.

How come the press did not splash his photo across the newspaper? How come the judge did not impose draconian conditions for his bail? How come the NY District attorney did not continuously leak information to the press?

What happened to that case? Oh, that’s right. He is MUSLIM. He gets a pass.

Jonathan E. Grant on July 1, 2011 at 3:01 pm

Debbie! You have more ‘I told you so’s’ then the great Maha Rushie!!

BLESS ISRAEL on July 1, 2011 at 3:12 pm

That’s why the prosecution is seeking to get the case dismissed. If all of this comes out on cross-examination, it will affect her believability with a jury. Then again, we know the Left believes Muslimas over Jews.

Ain’t nothing here… so much for the alleged sex assault case!

NormanF on July 1, 2011 at 5:33 pm

Jonathan E. Grant–

I usually like your posts, but don’t go so soft on DSK. “Brilliant economist”???

How hard is it to give away other people’s money, to debtors who know that they never have to pay it back? How hard is it to be a socialist when you’re living high on the public dole? How can any of that be “brilliant”?

AND–if you’re going to contrast Europe v the US, why not just come out and say it: For all practical purposes, there *is* no morality in Europe anymore. Gee, maybe it’s because what used to be Christendom disappeared, and the Muslims took over.

Tell me again why we Catholics are supposed to celebrate JPII?

Red Ryder on July 1, 2011 at 6:02 pm

From the start this was a ‘dirty tricks brigade’ set up. From the little evidence we know it appears that the housemaid could have entered the suite, removed the mobile telephone and handed it over for a transfer of information of the contents. This does not take long, it is done at airports unbeknowingly when ‘suspects’ are stopped at Customs/Immigration checks. He may then have come out of the bathroom and seen her there. She then took fright and ran away knowing she did not have time to replace the mobile. DSK in the meantime hurried because he had a luncheon date and a plane to catch. Having one’s mobile on the person is akin to locking the front door on exit. There was no phone there and he only became aware of the loss of the phone later when he called the hotel. By this time it had been replaced. Tracking of mobile telephones can only be done on the request of the Police, conveniently. This whole charade could be tested and trailed by forensics with exact location of phone etc.and time but the information is not available to us mere mortals.

The supposed semen stains are hearsay. Theses stains could have been acquired from the bed sheets from a previous encounter the night before. In the reports it states he was running down the passage trying to pull her tights down but she reported a forcible oral sex attempt, some anatomical confusion here.

The ‘housemaid’ must have been backed by higher forces because the brazen behaviour of her uniformed colleagues standing at the court house when DSK appeared would have been against company policy for a hotel of that calibre. Where were the surveillance cameras in the passage?

If I had my Sherlock Holmes hat on I’d say that the taking down of DSK, a major Int. Jewish figure was convenient for many, many people and could be helped along by USA Arab friends as retribution for the Dubai hotel murder which was pinned on Mossad.

Who knows….

Eyes Wide Open on July 1, 2011 at 6:47 pm

This is unverified, but I read in a comments section of a European news outlet that DSK was enroute to give a speech recommending that Greece not be bailed out as two American companies (Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch if I recall correctly) owned 70% of Greece’s debt, and bailing out the country would be tantamount to enriching private companies with government monies. The writer also stated that twenty-four hours before DSK’s arrest Hillary Clinton ordered the removal of his diplomatic immunity. And, as was later reported in the news outlets, Hillary Clinton initiated a push to get herself appointed as the head of the IMF.

Also, I am sure there was some satisfaction garnered by some people in taking down a wealthy JEW. Anti-Semitism is alive and flourishing.

King David on July 1, 2011 at 9:28 pm

There is a lot of poetic justice here. Dominique Strauss Kahn has promoted open borders and the mass immigration of the Third World into Europe and the USA for a career.
A professional con man at the International Monetary Fund he lives off the US taxpayer while staying in at the Sofitel in a 7 room suite in Central Manhattan whose MONTHLY rent
comes to $50,000, excluding 3 gourmet meals catered daily. All paid for by you and me DSK finally met his match in a con artist from the other side of the social scale..a
Third World “asylum” seeker exploiting gullible Americans with just as many lies as DSK tells. This asylum seeker, felon, drug runner, welfare scammer is the kind DSK invited by
the millions into our nation. Well this little episode is over, some of us have seen the incredible rot just beneath the surface of Liberalism. DSK will now jet off to one his other IMF funded villas and his accuser will disapper
into the vast sea of Third World scammers that Liberal Leftists have inflicted upon this dying nation all in the name of Diversity.

ehunter on July 1, 2011 at 9:56 pm

King David, I too have heard that news.As Germany had played a part in Greece’s first bail-out Angela Merkel was about to broach the subject of the USA banks and their mortgage related Ponzi scheme pointing fingers at Goldman Sacks.German investigations had shown that their actions had largely contributed towards the demise of the Greek economy. This being said, the debacle would have brought about the downfall of the USA economy because other debt riddled EU countries would have climbed on the debt bandwagon with the same complaint.

With regard to DSK living above his personal means at the Sofitel, the news stated that he was on personal business, not IMF business and therefore was able to be ‘treated’ that way by US police. The tsunami of migrants/asylum seekers into the USA and other EU countries has been as a result of the Muslim ME uprisings since before the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan. Why are Pakistanis leaving in droves and contaminating the universe when the West is hardly liable for their chaos and toxic ideology. UK’s Cameron has two months ago funded Pakistan to the tune of GBP 650 MILLION, why, sheer lunancy whilst the pensioners in the UK are poverty stricken. Why did BHO send ONE BILLION $’s to Yemen, 950 Million to Gaza, 450 Million to Lebanon, and over the years 40 BILLION to Egypt in weapons, missiles and US training,(which they will now turn on Israel with BHO’s blessings on the MBH) plus Fatah have had the benefit of US military/police training and bags of money. And when it comes to third world scammers BHO’s family are front runners here in the USA and Britain, all validated by newspaper coverage and from their own mouths.

As the French gendarme in ‘Ullo,’Ullo’ said ‘The Plid Thockens’..

Eyes Wide Open on July 1, 2011 at 11:03 pm

Sean R: I enjoy your posts. Please remove the apostrophe from your signature. You are spelling “its” incorrectly.

Debbie Fan on July 1, 2011 at 11:53 pm

Bingo! You scored a direct hit.

worry01 on July 2, 2011 at 6:25 am

“Hey prosecutors, here is a tip for you, look a little closer when a educated successful white male is accused of raping an uneducated poor black woman. It never happens.”

So, are you suggesting that all the sexual intercourse between slave owners and their slaves – and between white men and black women during the Jim Crow period thereafter – was consensual? Great way to deny history and reality.

Look, divorce yourself from the race angle, because in honesty race has absolutely nothing to do with this story. (That is why the references to the Duke lacrosse case was ridiculous, especially when you consider that the real outrage in that case was that the prosecutor systematically suppressed all evidence helpful to the players, which DID NOT happen in this case. Folks who claimed that the outrage was Nifong’s pursuing the case in the first place were simply lobbying to return to the Jim Crow era. Yes, I am aware that the vast majority of interracial sex crimes are committed by black males by against white females, but that doesn’t mean that white-on-black rapes NEVER happen.) Instead, the idea that wealthy people – regardless of race – are intrinsically more honorable, ethical, moral and law abiding than poor or working class people has been accepted as true by conservatives in this country in the past few decades. Sorry, but that is Rush Limbaugh/Sean Hannity class warfare political propaganda, some of which is a legitimate reaction to the class warfare propaganda of the left (the glorification of “workers” and the demonization of the rich and corporations) but mostly utter hogwash. The idea that rich, powerful people are “better” than poor people is easily refuted by history, by current events, by THE BIBLE.

This is not to say that this Strauss-Kahn wasn’t set up. But if it was, it was just a case of rich, powerful people turning on one of their own. Just as street criminals turn against each other all the time in back alleys, the rich and powerful routinely prey on each other in boardrooms.

And so what if Strauss-Kahn is Jewish. Look at his economic and social policies and his political activity. The guy is a major source of evil in this world. I do not mourn his fall one bit, save the possibility that the person who takes his place may be even worse. Sticking up for the loathsome Strauss-Kahn merely because he is Jewish and spouting these conspiracy theories … this is different from blacks who stick up for corrupt black leaders (remember the “Marion Barry was set up!” complaints) how exactly?

Gerald on July 2, 2011 at 7:27 pm

There’s something else at play here:
I was puzzled by this sordid affair. Nothing seemed to jive. Why now? Why this strange maid? After pondering the details, I came to completely different conclusion. Notice the timing. It was way too perfect, as if it were choreographed. The whole affair blew up just as the appointment of the new IMF head was about to get underway. Suddenly DSK was ingloriously snatched from the running. Then, just as the IMF head was appointed, the case was turned on its head.

This is a thug tactic of the Obama regime. An Alinsky tactic. Straight from the Chicago mob. Obama used it before to snatch his Senate seat, for Rahmbo to grab the title of mayor of Chicago. Find a weak point of your rival, sex in this case, and use the perfect decoy to foment a crisis. So who was installed as IMF head? Why a member of the Chicago machine! Christine Lagarde may be French, but she worked for Baker & McKenzie, a large Chicago-based international law firm. The Comrade Hussein Chicago mob didn’t want the French Jew. so DSK was tossed into the trash. This is how the Chicago mob machine works. They will attempt to steal the election again, if we’re not vigilant and turn this sinking ship around.

Redwine on July 3, 2011 at 6:39 pm


Even if what you say is true, the “French Jew” was evil. Rotten to the core. Pardon me, most esteemed Redwine, but are you naive, ignorant or willfully blind concerning the IMF? Of who started this organization? Of why it was started? Or of its activities? And get this: you are JEWISH. Are you not aware that the IMF is an enemy of the Jewish people and of Israel? So, if this Dominique Strauss-Kahn is indeed Jewish, then what sort of Jew is he? By his leadership of the IMF, he is one that is a traitor to and enemy of his own people. And that is just the IMF. What of his affiliation with the Socialist Party in France? Even if his ouster was part of some anti-Semitic plot by Obama, the fact is that Strauss-Kahn is just a big an enemy of the Jewish people as Obama is. You should be GLAD that because of this, Strauss-Kahn is not going to be running France.

Gerald on July 3, 2011 at 7:58 pm

leticia olalia morales of 15501 pasadena ave #8 tustin ca 92780 submitted fake documents and paid 5000 dollars to obtain a US tourist visa. she also submitted fake employment records to obtain a work visa. she is now applying for citizenship. her contact at the embassy was man named sandman.

anon on July 4, 2011 at 8:18 am

i.c.e. won’t do anything about it because they’re inept and run by legacy customs kool-aid drinkers who couldn’t investigate ants at a picnic.

IceNoMore on July 7, 2011 at 5:58 am

The misandric pontificators are coming out of the wood work (not that they were all that well hidden before) claiming that this case was PROOF that rape is not taken seriously (despite the fact that we treat rape more seriously than MURDER (which at last I checked is far more permanent than anything else-as I am a survivor of sexual molestation molestation, I am not unaware of the trauma that can come with victimization).
Critical in this as another poster has stated is the feminist canard that women never lie about rape (and men never tell the truth about rape – so glad we treat the sexes unequally gender warthogs).
Equally important in this discussion (as to whether or not we take rape seriously as a society) is the fact that the gender warthogs think that the history of the accused is highly relevant, but the history of the accuser should be off limits.
There was a university administrator (Katherine Cummins) who said that “a false rape accusation was sometimes good for men”. This is critical because college campuses (among the safest places –not for men – due to their demographics and overlapping police forces – all college campuses have their own police plus the regular police) encourage false rape accusations (maybe they think it is good for men to be falsely accused of rape)…

Mad at Misandry on July 16, 2011 at 7:10 pm

I’m not convinced

There is one thing that I will respect DSK on. He said that he had a wild streak in him..a thing for lot of women when before he married his wife.

Now if you want to call the DSK maid a liar, you should also say the same with him. They found his semen on the floor.It is also said that he attempted to pay the maid family off to keep silent about this ordeal. Supposedly, she told her fiance that he was loaded w/money in Fulani. Here is my problem with that..if she supposedly have said that in her native tongue, how would they known what she actually said? Did they have a translator over hear him on the phone?Lastly, there is a French woman accusing him of the same thing.

For years, I’ve noticed one pattern about White male rapists ans their Black female accusers like Tawana Brawley, Crystal Mangum and now the DSK 1) They have to be liars 2) They have to be prostitutes 3) and they are always contradicting themselves. It is beginning to become a pattern. Do I believe in what these women said, yes I do, for the fact there has never been a White man to ever be convicted of doing this to a Black woman, yet no matter how innocent a Black man is historical analysis of the past( Emmitt Till the most famous of them all) and present where they have been convicted of crimes they didn’t commit for White women.

People can say what they want about these women. We can say they are bad news,but i will guarantee you that those ” victims” like DSK are not. Anybody can pay people off to do their dirty work. You’re cheering now,but one thing I’ve learned is never say never, there are people who have committed crimes decades ago and are now are,if alive, are being prosecuted for it and people who have been exonerated from the electric chair because DNA said they were innocent. Even if DSK and guys like him never see a day of prison in his life,God will let the truth come out and there will nothing nobody will able to do about it.

Race shouldn’t be brought on this,but after reading some these horrible comments, it was done without my help.

Daphne on August 2, 2011 at 1:03 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field