December 7, 2011, - 4:55 pm

OUTRAGE: UK Judge Frees Muslim Gang Who Kicked Woman’s Head b/c They’re “Not Used to Drinking”

By Debbie Schlussel

It’s official:  the British legal system is now the sharia legal system.  I’ve already told you how UK judges allow vandalism and other crimes against companies that trade with Israel.  Now, it’s worse.  The Kingdom’s judges look for BS Muslim excuses to free Muslim women who kicked another woman’s head in.  Even when Muslims engage in violent attacks against non-Muslims, after violating Islamic bans against drinking, the judges find an Islamic reason to excuse their violence–not being used to alcohol. And get this: the a-hole judge also said that the women needed to be violent to react to the woman’s boyfriend who was trying to defend her from their attacks. HUH???? This is outrageous. But this is what happens when Western authorities pander to Islam. Not just in Great Britain, but right here in America, too. THIS. IS. ISLAM.


Religion of Peace: British Muslim Gang Kicks Woman’s Head In, Judge Frees Them

A Feral gang of Somalian girls who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were “not used to being drunk” because they were Muslim.

The four girls — three sisters and their cousin — were told the charge of actual bodily harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years, against 22-year-old care worker Rhea Page would normally land them in custody.

But the judge handed the girls suspended sentences after hearing that they were not used to alcohol because their religion does not allow it.

Victim Rhea said Ambaro Maxamed, 24, Ayan Maxamed, 28, and Hibo Maxamed, 24, and their 28-year-old cousin Ifrah Nur screamed “Kill the white s***” while kicking her in the head as she lay motionless on the ground.

The support worker from Leicester was left “black and blue” with bruises and needed hospital treatment following the attack which came as she walked to a taxi rank with her boyfriend.

She was also left with a BALD patch after having her hair yanked out.

Rhea was left so traumatised by the attack that she lost her job due to repeated absences with stress and flashbacks.

Rhea had been walking home with her boyfriend after a night out when the drunken women attacked her, knocking her to the ground and taking turns to kick her in the head. . . .

“We were just minding our own business but they kept shouting ‘white b****’ and ‘white s***’ at me.

“When I turned around one of them grabbed my hair – she literally wrapped her fingers in my hair – then threw me on the ground.

“They were taking turns to kick me in the head and back over and over. . . .

Seventeen months on from the attack, which happened in Leicester city centre, she is still undergoing counselling and suffers from panic attacks and flashbacks.

The women all admitted actual bodily harm at Leicester Crown Court, but received six-month jail sentences, suspended for 12 months on November 22.

Sentencing, Judge Robert Brown said: “. . .Those who knock someone to the floor and kick them in the head can expect to go inside, but I’m going to suspend the sentence.”

He said he accepted the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from Rhea’s partner Lewis Moore, 23, who tried desperately to defend her from the attack.

Uh-huh. Violent thugs now apparently have an expectation that victims’ boyfriends are not allowed to defend them. Thanks to moron Judge Robert Brown. . . .

During the hearing, James Bide-Thomas, prosecuting, said Ambaro Maxamed, who started the violence, had called Rhea a “white b****” during the incident.

However, the women, who are all Somalian Muslims, were not charged with racial aggravation.

Why not?

Ambaro Maxamed had grabbed Rhea’s hair, causing her to fall on the ground.

Mr Bide-Thomas said: “Miss Page was repeatedly kicked on her back and head and was crying and screaming throughout.

“Afterwards, she was sick and was pulling her own hair from her mouth.”

Gary Short, mitigating for Ambaro Maxamed, said the attack was down to alcohol. . . .

“They’re Somalian Muslims and alcohol or drugs isn’t something they’re used to.” . . .

Rhea labelled the sentence “disgusting”. . . .

“The attack has had a devastating affect on my life and they have just been allowed to get away with it.”

Sadly, Muslims get away with it far more often than not. And, again, if you think this warped Muslim-dominated legal system isn’t coming to America, think again. It’s already here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

44 Responses

I wonder if the judge would feel the same way if he got this beatdown?

CaliforniaScreaming on December 7, 2011 at 5:05 pm

You can bet that if this was reversed, ie, whites attacking Muslims. Then the full wrath of the British legal system would have rained down on the attackers. However, in our new world, where Muslims are always the victims, no matter what they do, they get off Scott free. G-d help us all, because the future is bleak!

Mark Schneider on December 7, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    “in our new world, where Muslims are always the victim, no matter what they do,”

    Got that right bro, the reason why some-to-most muslims (not all muslims play victimhood and use taqqiya) get away with this BS of playing victimhood is because they have the left wing MSM, the far-left establishment and some right wingers doing their bidding and apologizing for them, etc.

    “A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

    Sean R. on December 7, 2011 at 5:28 pm

God help us all is right!

I purposely avoided this story ’til it was posted here because I just didn’t have the emotional currency in stock. And now the story is worse than I imagined. I feel so badly for the poor victim. Too bad no one else did in England.

I am at least glad I learned here what Islam is about. And taqiyya. And I am glad DS is NOT afraid to state that these filthy pigs want SPECIAL treatment and not fair treatment.

God, I wish there was a “Dexter” to take these beasts out.

I am so sure these clean and pure Moooooooslimas will NEVER touch a drop of booze again.///////////

And honour killings NEVER seem to happen to freaks like these.

Skunky on December 7, 2011 at 5:21 pm

I’m sure if His Honour had his head stomped on by Islamic savages – he wouldn’t be excusing them.

But it happens to someone else – and hey, Muslim hypocrisy must also be acknowledged.

And they’re allowed to do any thing they want to infidels but infidels are not allowed to fight back.

That’s as perfect a definition of Sharia law you can find in the UK courts. Presided over by dhimmi judges like Robert Brown.

Alhamidullah – Praise Allah – His servants truly have servants everywhere!

NormanF on December 7, 2011 at 5:23 pm

“And they’re allowed to do any thing they want to infidels but infidels are not allowed to fight back.”

That’s exactly what sharia demands. Muslims are the superior authority and one is not permitted to challenge it. For centuries, non-Muslims were not permitted to defend themselves if a Muslim attacked them. They had to just take it. Now that system has come to the West because some fools allowed it.

Raymond in DC on December 7, 2011 at 5:57 pm

    Exactly. And it won’t be too long before Europeans’ children pay the jiyzah tribute to the Muslims. It doesn’t bother me – its just that after centuries of Jew-hatred, they are getting at last what they deserve. If they want to submit to Islam, I’m not saying we should sacrifice blood, sweat and tears, to coin a Churchillian expression, to save them from the consequences of their own stupidity. They’re voluntarily committing civilizational suicide and if this ruling is any indication, that’s happening right now.

    NormanF on December 7, 2011 at 6:37 pm

“They’re Somalian Muslims and alcohol or drugs isn’t something they’re used to.” . . .

Has this judge actually been around Muslims? Why does Robert think that this gang was not used to drinking or drugs? Does that mean that if I convert to Islam, I could use that excuse to pound Judge Robert Brown’s daughter, if he had one? Is the United Kingdom now handing down sentences based upon one’s religion? Even under a Muslim system, these women dressing, drinking, drugging up, and being out of the supervision of male relatives or husbands would be in violation of Sharia. Islam is apparently something that can be turned on and off at one’s convenience. Finally, it seems that identifying oneself as a Muslim in the U.K. is a get out of jail free card now. These women even admitted to the crimes that they had committed, but that did not mean a thing to Mr. Brown.
This judge is a parasite who should be disrobed, since he understands neither the law or precedent. Instead, he has made himself a corrupt bureaucrat who dispenses favors to thugs rather than justice. Robert needs to be investigated, since the decision he rendered goes beyond judicial discretion or flawed logic. He literally “threw” an air tight case, and it is legitimate to examine whether some outside interest entered into it.

Worry01 on December 7, 2011 at 6:14 pm

Neither Debbie nor you guys understand the issue. The English woman was deeply offensive to the brave Somali women. How? By walking in public with a man who was not her husband or a blood relative. That outrageous behaviour offends Allah and thus rightly attracts punishment.
And only a racist bigot would point out that the women were welcomed to the UK as refugees and have fed off the welfare system since admittance.
Don’t forget – you or I can freely go to Somalia or Saudi Arabia and beat the hell out of any local who offends our culture. And some kindly Muslim judge will let us go.

Nir Lieu on December 7, 2011 at 6:19 pm

    Good sarcasm.

    In real life, a Westerner doing that would be beaten to a bloody pulp first or be facing beheading later.

    That is Islam.

    NormanF on December 7, 2011 at 6:45 pm

      Thanks, Norman.

      As an aside, the gutless English police will often arrest a westerner for the most minor infractions, while turning a blind eye when Muslims do far, far worse. (Such as ‘grooming’ dummy dhimmi underage English girls for the sex trade).

      Nir Lieu on December 7, 2011 at 9:57 pm

Worry, the whole point of Sharia is to establish Muslim superiority over the infidels. They are moral and intellectual hypocrites. They can do whatever they want, they just don’t want other people to have the same freedom. In the implementation of Sharia law, that’s what they want to take away from the rest of us. And in Western courts, they’re going a long way to make sure whatever we do, it happens only on THEIR terms. That’s the message sent to infidels in the UK with Judge Brown’s outrageous edict: cross Muslims at your own risk.

NormanF on December 7, 2011 at 6:43 pm

    I more than understand that. What I wrote was simply an effort to bring the double-standard out into the open. Also, if you do not even follow what you profess to believe, of what value is your belief? This contradiction needs to be forcefully brought into view each and every time it occurs. The fraud that is Islam needs to be made explicit wherever its snout appears.

    Worry01 on December 8, 2011 at 12:35 pm

I know what lets do! Idiot UK judge should put the Somali sluts in jail, why for their own protection of course! Just like they did with that UK woman making racist comments on the tram.

sgtvinnie16 on December 7, 2011 at 6:50 pm

The perps’ behavior is to be sympathetically understood ’cause they’re not used to drinking? Yes, and perhaps the victim is used to being kicked in the head.

lee on December 7, 2011 at 6:54 pm

Wonder how much cash was in that suitcase the judge got for that verdict. They deserve the insanity they’re getting.

samurai on December 7, 2011 at 8:43 pm

The British have already been neutered since they are not allowed to own guns. When muzzies start kicking the crap out of whites and getting away with it, the conquest of Britain is complete. Just waiting for Sharia courts to replace the British legal system. If Europeans had any balls, there would be a backlash so severe that the holocaust would look like a picnic. But, alas, that won’t happen.

FrenchKiss on December 7, 2011 at 8:56 pm

[Debbie – Sadly, Muslims get away with it far more often
than not. And, again, if you think this warped
Muslim-dominated legal system isn’t coming to America,
think again. It’s already here]

A judge in New Jersey would not issue a restraining order
against a Muslim man who raped a woman because under
Sharia law it was not rape.

IAM: That’s exactly the case to which I was referring. Great minds think alike. DS

I_AM_ME on December 7, 2011 at 9:03 pm

The Amish are also not used to drinking, and yet, I can’t seem to recall ever having read anything about them exhibiting this sort of behavior during Rumspringa.

Irving on December 7, 2011 at 9:33 pm

So it seems that, due to the size of their welfare state & the resulting mothballing/scrapping of Ark Royal & her Harriers, Britania not only no longer rules the waves, but Britons have, INDEED, become slaves. Slaves not only to their socialist nightmare nanny state, but also slaves to the Muslim occupiers of their land.

And thus a once proud empire & nation continues its decent into irrelevance & obscurity.

Con Chef (NB) on December 7, 2011 at 11:34 pm

I am curious as to how long America, Britain, and Europe are going to get fed up with this nonsense.

Confederate South on December 8, 2011 at 12:17 am

The only response to such a failed legal system is to borrow a chapter from Puzo’s The Godfather. Most of you have seen the movie, and it’s not all that much different from the book, except for the details. In the opening scene, the undertaker speaks with the Godfather about how the American legal system handled his daughter’s rape and beating at the hands of thugs. The thugs got off easily and laughed at the undertaker. In the movie, the Godfather assigns the job, instructing that the street soldiers should basically do and ‘eye for an eye,’ as opposed to executing the thugs.

In the book Puzo covers the details more thoroughly, and we learn that the revenge enacted by the Godfather’s street team results in a beating to the thugs that is so substantial that it takes years of plastic surgery to make them look normal again.

That is the same kind of justice that must be enacted when the system is a complete and utter failure, as the above article on the U.K. makes clear. And in this case, I think a little punching bag practice is in order using the judges body in place of the dummy, since he’s proven that his intelligence doesn’t exceed that of the dummy.

When the system breaks down, you have to create a new and better system. Unfortunately, while most people on this board already “get it,” I don’t think the vast majority understand quite how bad this system breakdown trend really is, unless they’ve experienced it first hand.

Ralph Adamo on December 8, 2011 at 1:11 am

How to teach the UK a lesson? Money. They are spending millions to prepare for the olympics. Just boycott them. No travel, it’s not safe. No merchandise sales. Nothing. If everyone lets them know that their empire is no longer considered safe for civilized people they just might start to get the point.

Ender on December 8, 2011 at 1:56 am

If a young, white, British born and bred Anglo-Saxom male, who wasn’t used to drinking, and consequently didn’t know how quickly a few beers can hit your bladder, created a public nuisance, would the judge be so lenient?

Miranda Rose Smith on December 8, 2011 at 5:10 am

    CORRECTION: If a young, white, British born and bred Anglo-Saxon male, who wasn’t used to drinking, and consequently didn’t know how quickly a few beers can hit your bladder, created a public nuisance, would the judge be so lenient?

    Miranda Rose Smith on December 8, 2011 at 5:10 am


    Miranda Rose Smith on December 8, 2011 at 5:19 am

If one thinks about it, Judge Brown is an appalling racist. Know what “the soft bigotry of low expectations” means?

Miranda Rose Smith on December 8, 2011 at 5:13 am

muslims are effing animals… every last one of them.

KIRCHE on December 8, 2011 at 8:38 am

The UK is a nation of stupid fools because they pay taxes for unelected parasite royalty (police protection etc) and for unelected House of Lords. I’m so glad we broke away from England in 1776.

Truth on December 8, 2011 at 9:03 am

I’m not used to doing hard drugs, so I wonder if it’s alright if I go to the UK, score some coke and then beat the crap out of some muzzies?

Jarhead on December 8, 2011 at 10:22 am

If they had been forced to drink, then the “They’re not used to alcohol” defence might have had some merit – similar to date rape, when someone is slipped a pill, and then acts in ways they would not otherwise do, even having sex with someone when they would not, if they were sober.

BUT – these women CHOSE to drink. They CHOSE to violate thier own moral code, and then used that as an excuse to break the law and inflict bodily harm on a complete stranger who had done nothing to them.

This judge is an idiot. If some man had chosen to drink and get high, and then chose to beat up the judge’s daughter, do you think he’d be so easy on the guy? No!

These girls were not drugged against their will. They were not held down, while someone poured alcohol down their throats. That would be the only way this excuse could possibly fly. That NOT being the case, they are fully responsible for their actions. This judge is also fully responsible for his ruling, and will pay, one way or another. God sees all, and karma will come.

Michelle on December 8, 2011 at 10:45 am

This whole affair should be brought to the mainstream media so everyone will know about it. Rhea, I wish you a speedy recovery.

wayne on December 8, 2011 at 11:00 am

    This whole affair should be brought to the mainstream media so everyone will know about it. Rhea, I wish you a speedy recovery.

    wayne on December 8, 2011 at 11:00 am


    Dear Wayne: So do I, and I’m sure that you, Rhea, if you happen to read this, are in the thoughts and prayers of millions of decent people, all over England.

    Miranda Rose Smith on December 9, 2011 at 1:48 am

They come at my girlfriend like that and I will kill them. And I will gladly do the time. I have pepper spray, a blade, two fists, two elbows, and two legs. I’ll stop the attack or die trying.

Fleiter on December 8, 2011 at 11:28 am

    my thoughts exactly

    KIRCHE on December 8, 2011 at 11:48 am

Who is this judge? Does he live in an insular world in which rabid muslim somalians will not pop up outside his house to beat him? Is he a muslim himself? Does he have any special connection with the somali “refugee” community from somalia (aka importing cultural pestilence parading as refugees)?

In other words, does he have any real life experience that would make him a wise judge or is he just a soft-headed fool who falls for the “poor, sad refugees just don’t know what they’re doing” line?

Wondering about facts on December 8, 2011 at 11:35 am

can’t believe the BF didn’t send one or two of these beasts up to allah. let’s see: the one muslim animal slams the GF to the ground by her hair… i’d like to think it would take less than a second for the typical man to deliver a full retaliation and this bitch would be down… a couple seconds later, same for the next muslim animal… how did these scum have enough unfettered time to kick this woman to pieces?!

KIRCHE on December 8, 2011 at 11:52 am

Once upon a time, I was young and not use to being blottoed to the point of getting into trouble. The “I’m a dumb ass” defense did not work for me. Boyfriend should have stomped the living s*** out of the first one that kicked his woman. Might have made the others stop and think about a possible ass whipping.

WilliamMunny on December 8, 2011 at 12:47 pm

Piety is highly overrated as a virtue and highly underrated as a vice. Nowhere is this more true than under Islam. These brutish females — I hestitate to call them women — should have been given a choice: swift deportation or swift execution. As for the boyfriend, I can understand his reluctance to intervene decisively, given that the law would brand him and not the attackers as criminal (think what would have awaited him in prison!). That’s why an armed, responsible citizenry is a free society’s best defense.

Seek on December 8, 2011 at 12:52 pm

With the way things are going in the UK, it won’t be long before it becomes an Islamic country.

As I just e-mailed Debbie, justice is not only thing under threat in the Western World.

Its already happened here too as I AM pointed out and it promises to get worse.

NormanF on December 8, 2011 at 2:40 pm

The judge is an idiot! How can he justify his decision. If this happened to a member of his family would he have been so generous to the perpetrators? How come racism is so one-sided? Get rid of this fucker. He is stupid beyond belief.

Ian Wilkinson on December 8, 2011 at 8:44 pm

If they ran away when police showed up that means they knew what was good for them even though they were under the influence of alcohol. That means they knew of the consequences that would have come from their actions. The judge is spoiled! Get him out!

V on December 9, 2011 at 8:34 am

File a civil lawsuit against the judge. Protest outside his residence. Make that idiots life a living hell.

zefal on December 31, 2011 at 9:15 pm

where do you think those raghead twats would be today if they had attacked my wife and i?they would not be in court but they would be at the funeral home.i don’t take that kind of shit from our home grown urban maggots so i will give them the same .45 treatment i give to the urban maggot.

bruce on December 1, 2012 at 1:04 pm

You guys should start doing what Canadians are doing. Charge politicians with treason. It worked on jason kennedy. That guy is kicking out the scum by hundreds from Canada:)

l on February 2, 2013 at 7:45 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field