January 9, 2012, - 3:40 pm

Freedom of . . . Sluttiness in High School Year Book Pic?

By Debbie Schlussel

We live in a really spoiled country.  If you need evidence to back that up, check out the attempted yearbook photo of Sydney Spies, a senior at Durango High School in Colorado.  She is threatening to file a lawsuit over the rejection of her hooker get-up photo.  The only thing missing from the photo is the caption, “$10 per act.”  What ever happened to head shots for yearbooks?

Sydney Spies, Low Class of 2012

I’m amazed and heartened that five student editors of the yearbook had the guts to reject the photo.  Not sure who told this bim that a yearbook photo is an audition for the Fredericks of Hollywood catalogue or the Hustler Cafe.  But apparently, she has a moronette womb/egg donor posing as a parent who thinks the pic is not only okay, but some sort of civil rights issue. (“I have a dream that one day my children will be judged not by the color of their skin but by the . . . color of their pasties and thong underwear in a yearbook photo?!”)  The only benefit to Spies’ slutty photo is that, at the ten-year high school reunion, her former classmates can be reminded of who this miserable, rapidly aging, coke-addicted cocktail waitress/diseased former porn star once was.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

A Colorado teenager whose yearbook picture was rejected for being too revealing is vowing to fight the ban with her high school’s administration, but the editors of the yearbook insist it was their decision alone on the photo.

The five student editors of the Durango High School yearbook in Durango, Col., told the Durango Herald they were the ones who made the call not to publish a picture of senior Sydney Spies. . . .

“We are an award-winning yearbook. We don’t want to diminish the quality with something that can be seen as unprofessional,” student Brian Jaramillo told the paper on Thursday.

Spies was joined by her mother, Miki Spies, and a handful of fellow Durango High students and alumni in a protest outside the school Wednesday after, she said, administrators informed her the photo would not be permitted because it violated dress code.

“I feel like they aren’t allowing me to have my freedom of expression,” Spies told the Herald. ”I think the administration is wrong in this situation, and I don’t want this to happen to other people.”

I don’t want other people to be unable to be unable to show their ass . . . ets. Hilarious. I can just see this now as being a winning essay for admission to Harvard in response to, “Tell us how you overcame tremendous obstacles in life.”

I can only imagine what the signs at the protest said. “Freedom to be a Ho!”

Despite the clarification from her peers into how and why the decision was made, a meeting Spies initiated between herself, her mother, and the school’s principal, Diane Lashinsky, was held today as planned.

Wow, this “mother,” Miki Spies, needs to be arrested for child abuse. What an idiotette. “Fighting for my daughter’s right to bare it all!”

Mommy of the Year. By the way, Miki Spies is openly a lesbian and gay rights activist.  She has a very strange idea of feminism. Check out these other photos of the no-class Spies “family.”

Yup, these are the kinds of “Americans” those porn-addicted hypocrites in the Muslim world cite when they attack “American decadence.”  And with regard to creatures like this, they have a point.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

41 Responses

“What ever happened to head shots for yearbooks?”

Looks like they’re exactly what this girl is aiming for.

Louie Louie on January 9, 2012 at 4:13 pm

Debbie, prior to my graduation in high school in 1997, I took only a “head-shot” to post my picture in the yearbook of my former high school.

Doesn’t this kid knows that you’re NOT suppose to post racy pictures in high school yearbooks? Just about everyone in high school are minors who are under the age of 18 and NOT mentally developed like adults.

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on January 9, 2012 at 4:20 pm

    Hey Sean, I tried to send this to you a week or so ago:


    Interesting read…hope you like it.

    Dennis on January 10, 2012 at 8:14 am

    Unfortunately, the bint is 18. Legally, an adult.

    But, Debbie, I must disagree with you. It won’t take 10 years to get to the “miserable, rapidly aging, coke-addicted cocktail waitress/diseased former porn star” moment. In my professional opinion, 5 years ought to do it. 😉

    Occam's Tool on January 10, 2012 at 12:17 pm

After seeing the other pictures, i’m scared to find out what goes on between mother and daughter…

Ed C. on January 9, 2012 at 4:29 pm

I am so glad to see in 2012 that feminism is a absolute success! (sarc/)

It’s funny to me in 2012 that silly gits like this skank are taken so seriously because in my opinion, expressing oneself in such a stupid and shallow way screams that these exhibitionists are either too dumb to think with their brain or that they mistakenly believe others are taken with their (as DS said) assets.

Those taken by the “assets” don’t value these slutty chicks in the way almost everyone wants to be eventually valued…by being respected.

In fact, in the new year, I have been paying special attention to how certain people comport themselves and I am sad and annoyed to see that a many men today (those not of the good ilk…and there are many of the good ilk out there) are barely men. If they are not so annoyingly and disgustingly chick-if-ied, they are letches and use dopey broads like the one above for one thing. Use once and move on (easily). Use once and destroy.

And the men are just taking advantage of spoils they can obtain. Most if not all the fault rests on the dumb women.

It’s nice to see that in a once great country, crap like this makes the news en mass in lieu of judging it harshly as cultural rot. It’s nice to see USA is more attuned to Paris Hilton-like narcissistic behaviour and Kardashian living uber alles. I’m glad in 2012 Feminism was able to quell all of this “women as a sex object” foolishness.

NOT. The fact that silly skanks like this WANT to present themselves as such proves the women’s movement did NOTHING but make life more retardedly stupid. Dumb women will always want to skank out like this no matter what. I dont think the feminists counted on it or even acknowledge it…but I do!

And it is why females can never and should never rule the world. But their stupid movement also made many men into wusses and had those same dopey, effeminate men STILL use and discard stupid females…no matter how they try to hide it or dress it up.

Skunky on January 9, 2012 at 4:40 pm

    Skunky, the only ones taking this girl seriously are the people up in arms about a silly photo of a 17 or 18 year old grown woman (she looks years older than 17 or 18) wearing an ugly outfit.

    I doubt that photo was intended to be her “portrait”, most likely it’s one of the many photos of students and faculty that are sprinkled throughout the yearbook.

    What is a feminist anyway? Ask a zillion “feminists” and you’re likely to get almost as many versions of what a feminist is.

    Feminists are not a monolith. They run the gamut from seeking equality all the way to hatred and/or dominance of men. I’ve even seen at least one crackpot feminist on TV declare that all heterosexual sex is rape.

    You can label me a feminist because my libertarian leaning mindset believes in equality of opportunity without special treatment, such as allowing female fire dept candidates to carry lighter weight dummies in tests to become firefighters.

    Scott on January 9, 2012 at 11:23 pm

Looks like the mother is breeding her playthings.

You know, I always thought that I was pretty strong in Constitutional law. I guess I missed that section about the right to pose half naked in a yearbook picture. Oh wait, I now remember that part of the amendment that says, “the right to BARE arms …shall not be abridged. Modern courts have interpreted “arms” by the modern accepted practice of showing stomachs, butts, and boobs, so this woman may have a case.

Lest anyone take me seriously, yes, I know it it is the right to keep and BEAR arms…

Jonathan E. Grant on January 9, 2012 at 4:45 pm

OMG – I think this “mother” should be report to children’s services for child abuse. It looks as though she is using her own children for sexual stimulus. What a freaking SKANK. Unfortunately the apple doesn’t fall to far from the tree is very true indeed. Poster family for the phrase “Trailer Trash”.

MRobs on January 9, 2012 at 4:59 pm

@ Skunky, good post. I agree ‘feminism’ may be the greatest gift that men of the love ’em and leave ’em variety ever got. I think this is exactly what feminism was aiming for. In essence, this girl is ‘owning her sexuality’, I believe feminism never really was about strengthening women, it was about degrading them, and the family, and the culture,it was a creation of, or at least hi-jacked by, the Fabian socialist movement in it’s plan to ‘fundamentally transform’ the US.

ant on January 9, 2012 at 5:08 pm

    That is right Ant. You summed it up quite rightly.

    It is why “feminism” makes me madder than a cut snake. It is why I will always speak out against the farce of feminism whenever I can. It is why when I do watch “Judge Judy” (which I hardly do) I feel I cannot be wrong after watching dumb broad after dumb (unmarried) broad take her trifling boyfriend to court to get back all the money she wasted on his dumb, broke unmanly ass! Women should NEVER rule the world when such dopiness is legion in 2012!

    And I look at frauds like Gloria Steinem and Naomi Wolfe and the Roiphe’s and I wonder how in 2012 they can show their eggy faces. It’s one thing if THEY are in denial, but those with a brain should only view them as frauds who could not and won’t admit they can’t deliver on their promises.

    Skunky on January 9, 2012 at 6:09 pm

This is ridiculous. Minors don’t technically have the same freedoms adults do, and if she is an adult already (God help us), she’s a guest at the school and doesn’t have to finish. Dress codes have been fought in court, and the schools always win.

Sadly, the dress code isn’t enforced at my school, and she would probably be let off the hook and into the yearbook after a few minutes of “private conversation” with our principal. Hopefully the administration at this school will stand up for what is right and support banning the photo.

Austin on January 9, 2012 at 5:26 pm

I once saw a Dave Chappelle sketch that put this whole thing in a nutshell:

Dave’s in a night club. The girls are all dressed in skirts so short you can “see the color of their thongs”.

Dave approaches a girl: “C’mon, Ho, let’s dance”
Girl: “HO??? Who you callin’ a HO? I ain’t a HO!”
Dave: “Well, honey, you’re wearin’ the uniform!”

Michelle Plumb on January 9, 2012 at 6:06 pm

G-d bless this yearbook board for having the guts and common sense to stand up to this slut terrorist and the jihad she is waging on decency. Ms. Spies needs to be airlifted to her buddies in Jenin or Benghazi. Let’s see her being permitted to walk around naked over there.

Martin L. on January 9, 2012 at 7:24 pm

    Dear Mr. L.: Bravo.

    Miranda Rose Smith on January 10, 2012 at 8:30 am

But, but, but… a loving lesbian parent is just as capable a parent, as those homophobic heterosexual couples that won’t let lesbians adopt orphaned children. Right?

FrenchKiss on January 9, 2012 at 7:44 pm

Amen Skunky. I have found very few high school kids who can compose a sentence or do simple math. What I have found are a lot of foul mouth kids who have no respect for themselves or others. Young girls who talk about their body functions in a grocery store line is very nauseating. I hate to think where we’re headed with this level of incompetence

Confederate South on January 9, 2012 at 7:59 pm

The fact that the school allowed it to happen should be called into question.

If she wants to look “hawt” go ahead and let her, because when she gets raped, no one is gonna come to save her because she was begging for it. Just like I said on your facebook, debbie.

Squirrel3D on January 9, 2012 at 9:53 pm

    Squirrel, your rape comment is way out of line. Rape is a violent,criminal act that violates one of the most basic rights any person has, the right of ownership of one’s body.

    It doesn’t matter how someone is dressed or perceived to be dressed by a would-be rapist, they have a right not to be raped.

    Scott on January 9, 2012 at 11:33 pm

      No Scott, he is NOT out of line. Out of line are the dumb females who want to flaunt their bodies while expecting MEN to view them and act as if they are fellow females.

      You know what he means. Stop acting like a castrated male when it comes to feminism. And people are upset about the photo NOT because of he photo itself BUT because the selfishness and inappropriateness and the lack of adherence to social mores over one’s narcissistic desire to showboat their “assets”. The cultural rot is what annoys us. In the past, this skank would have been shamed but due to the lack of cultural values and the zeitgeist of self-centeredness uber alles, this hornbag thinks the rules do not apply to her.

      Feminism, in a true sense of “generating the opposite of its stated intent” also has a hand in this foolish behaviour. For years the frauds blamed all the MEN for this type of exploitive behaviour and it is plain to see that it is FEMALES who like to degrade themselves this way. Men just go along for the ride because it pleases their pleasure principle. Wake up!

      Skunky on January 10, 2012 at 3:23 am

        Skunky, we may not agree on this topic, but your post had me cracking up.

        Squirrel was most definitely out of line. Women get raped wearing everything from burlap sacs to bikinis, so his comment is BS.

        No Skunky, women who “flaunt” their bodies DO expect men to view them with sexual thoughts. As far as the “acting” part is concerned, that varies with different women. Some only want men to look, some may want whistles or comments or even more.

        The “cultural rot” you refer to is a mixed bag. In some important ways, American society has changed for the better, and in some ways it’s worse.

        Scott on January 10, 2012 at 11:56 pm

          Squirrel was most definitely out of line. Women get raped wearing everything from burlap sacks to bikinis, so his comment is BS.

          Dear Scott: You took the words right off my keyboard.

          Miranda Rose Smith on January 11, 2012 at 2:56 am

      Rape is a violent,criminal act that violates one of the most basic rights any person has, the right of ownership of one’s body.

      It doesn’t matter how someone is dressed or perceived to be dressed by a would-be rapist, they have a right not to be raped.

      Scott on January 9, 2012 at 11:33 pm


      Dear Scott: True.

      This whole incident shows up the hypocrisy of SOME so-called “feminists.” They scream “sexual harassment” if a MAN puts up a suggestive picture in a workplace, a highschool girl wants to publically record herself, for posterity, as a slut, it’s fine with them and it’s an infringement of her constitutional rights to try and stop her.

      Miranda Rose Smith on January 10, 2012 at 8:25 am

        These “hypocrite” feminists you’re referring to DON’T approve her choice of wardrobe, they believe she’s “lowering” herself to be a sex object for men.

        “Slut” is another word that means different things to different people. Usually it’s based on jealousy and ignorance.

        To some women, a slut is a woman who they believe has a better sex life than they do, and they’re jealous of what they might be missing.

        To some men, a slut is a woman who “plays the field”, which means the woman is not devoted only to him and has had sex before meeting him and will have sex after him. This can cause ego issues for him so he calls her a “slut”.

        Scott on January 10, 2012 at 11:22 pm

Syndey Spies? Har har har. There’s just something I find intrinsically funny about names that sound like complete sentences when you say them out loud. Other examples include “Tom Waits” “C. Thomas Howell” “F. Murray Abraham” and (if your speaking in ebonics), “Jennifer Love Hewitt.”

Irving on January 9, 2012 at 10:48 pm

I suspect that Miki is really looking for an out of court settlement that would give her a nice payday. My concern is with Syndey Spies case killing off high school year books. School districts can’t afford to go to court over such things, so the natural inclination would be to dump what is not critical to what they do.

Worry01 on January 9, 2012 at 11:01 pm

Yup, these are the kinds of “Americans” those porn-addicted hypocrites in the Muslim world cite when they attack “American decadence.” And with regard to creatures like this, they have a point.

But when Muslims are talking about ‘American decadence’, they bunch events like the above w/ normal activities, like wearing swimsuits @ the beach or @ the swimming pool, or even couples kissing @ weddings. It’s not like they are against things like what Syd Spies did, but okay w/ say, girls dressed in jeans & t-shirts, or women dressed in female business attire. For them, if you are a woman, either you don head to toe in a jilbab/niqab/burqha/hijab or whatever it’s called, or else, you are a slut. And as you’ve several times pointed out, they themselves are hypocrites about it.

I agree w/ you Debbie – I do think such behavior, whether it’s submitting the above photo to a high schrewl yearbook, or doing sex simulation dances, or live-in relationships et al are tacky. That’s not the point however when it comes to Muslim opinions about us. Muslims want to get the world to structure itself all around their own medeaval order, and take the worst of the West to conflate it w/ being representative of Western values @ large.

Infidel on January 10, 2012 at 2:54 am

NOW WAIT A MINUTE! Today, young girls and young women have RIGHTS.

Young girls do not need parental approval to discuss or to have abortions…the girl owns her body, not the parent. However, in schools, young girls may not accept aspirins from fellow students.Why not?

This young lady may be auditioning for the NEW “LOLITA” or “BABY DOLL” or “BARBARELLA” movies that will surely be remade sometime in the future.

Perhaps the other graduating females are simply jealous that she has upstaged them and now the movie scouts will soon be knocking at her door. This Summer, watch the new releases!

Dennis on January 10, 2012 at 8:27 am


Your editorial about Ms. Spies is excellent. The best thing that may come of the sorry incident is that it will become a great skit during Snowdown, Durango’s winter carnival.

Michael Lubin
Durango, Colorado

Michael Lubin on January 10, 2012 at 12:48 pm

Ok, I guess I’m just a little younger than most posters here. While I think this bimbo’s “Mom” should be shot for turning this into some “cause celeb,” this picture is about the very tippity tip of the iceberg for high school behavior these days. I graduated highschool in ’97, & the uber sluttiness was just coming into “vogue.” Being the hormone crazed 18 year old I was, I was rather approving of it, to be honest. However, no one at my school was posing for porno mag pics in their yearbook. They did that stuff outside of school.

Now that I’m about to be 33 & have been married for almost 6 years, again, this stuff doesn’t shock me. All I think when I see a chick like this one is, “yep, I knew you’re kind ALL too well.” I’ve never pretended to be a saint. Chicks like that are the one’s guys meet at the bar, take home & never call again. And then the chick wonders why she has trouble keeping a man. Here’s a clue, honey:


Like one of my favorite rap songs from back in the day said, “you can’t turn a ho into a housewife.”

Con Chef (NB) on January 10, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    That’s “your kind” in Engrish!

    Con Chef (NB) on January 10, 2012 at 4:15 pm

    Chef you got it 100%. You took it around the bend a bit but in the end you are spot on. Especially your version of the four “F’s” (if you will). You got it. You’re right on target.

    And that is why this bint (great word OT!) is not edifying herself even though she may think she is.

    And your references to the school year is also interesting because if that is indeed the apogee of the skankomania it further proves that Feminism is construct discarded by females themselves and NOT males (males just benefit greatly from fallout of the fraudulent movement).

    If Feminism could actually be realized, by 1997 this type of sad, self-exploitation by silly females would have been at least ten years dead. It never died so females have NO ONE to blame but themselves.

    Skunky on January 10, 2012 at 5:38 pm

She looks fine to me. They would rather have some fat hog in track pants then have a good looking girl who looks after herself. If she wants to show what she’s got,why not.I’d rather have that in the kitchen then a fatty. Debbie Shlussel is talking our her ass.

jablow on January 10, 2012 at 4:29 pm

Debbie’s prediction of drug addiction,disease, and pornography is rather over the top here.

That truly ugly outfit she’s wearing is a whole lot less revealing than what many women and even high school students wear.

No cleavage of any sort is showing, and nothing below the waist either.

It’s certainly not unusual for a high school yearbook to have photos of girls in swimsuits and shorts that show a whole lot more than that photo does.

Scott on January 10, 2012 at 11:35 pm

Whether she’s trustworthy or a slut, whether feminism encouraged this with the enjoy sex and variety meme is just an aside. The fact is, this is what I get from this picture, “I’m probably not bright, I’m hot but not pretty, not the one to trust or take home to meet the family, I’m a piece of meat, all that matters are physical attributes, and when gravity kicks in years from now, I’ll most likely be a shallow shell of an older woman with a whole lot of baggage.”

ant on January 11, 2012 at 11:10 am

    Ant, again you summed it up PERFECTLY. And the gist of your post INCLUDES someone being a slut, being trustworthy or not and the absolute failure of feminism. Bravo!

    And Scott, perhaps you ought to look up “Slutwalks”. Many, many neo-feminist movements support and encourage them. It makes me so proud that by the time the 90’s were in their mid-years I had the strength to say and know I was fed a bunch of horsesh** when I was a feminist. And I was pretty militant too!

    So I know all about what a farce and a fraud it is. You’re a male and you can’t even see it but I am telling you what the truth IS. And I ought to know because I was deep in the movement for a while.

    Skunky on January 11, 2012 at 1:06 pm

This is the norm in American high schools, not the exception.

Tanstaafl on January 11, 2012 at 4:51 pm

After being turned down by Larry Flynt?

She has to resort to this kind of self published porn.

She may turn up on Reality TV or Reality Kings.

Change name to Sydnyee Spyes

Panhandle on January 12, 2012 at 1:16 pm

Thanks for the kind words, Skunky. I’m male, but I too was used to part of the liberal side. After awhile, I realized there were too many contradictions, too much raw hate, disguised as ‘tolerance’, but ‘tolerance’ for only the chosen. Tolerance is BS,anyway, it just means you have no principles that you’ll stand for. The left had many negative attributes, once one starts having real-life experiences and a discernment for lies, it gets pretty easy to turn your back on that ideology.
Feminism was just one aspect, whereas they call themselves supporters of women, they mean only if you march in lockstep with their dogma. Just as I don’t believe this girl is making a wise decision, unlike the feminists, I would not pile personal insults and hate onto her because I differ, but I actually feel bad for her, she is just a child afterall and simply misled.

ant on January 12, 2012 at 2:05 pm

“was part of the liberal side”. I don’t know where that first line of jibberish came from, must’ve been typing too fast.

ant on January 12, 2012 at 2:08 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field