February 3, 2012, - 4:02 pm

Israel, Iran, Obama & the “Impending” Nukes Strike

By Debbie Schlussel

I’m always asked what I think about the evergreen news story that “Israel will strike Iran by year’s end.”  It’s a story that’s been in the news for years and never happens.  And I always laugh at how self-styled “experts” on Israel, Iran, and the Middle East constantly elaborate ad nauseam, diarrhea-of-the-mouth-style about how Israel is going to destroy Iran’s nuclear weapons “in the next few months.”  Yeah, whatever.  You keep tellin’ yourself that.  It’s like today’s ABC News story that Israel put its companies in North America on high alert.  That could be justa red herring to trick the media, Iran, and especially Israel’s worst enemy in high office:  Barack Hussein Obama.  And, frankly, Israel’s companies in America need to be on high alert at all times.  They’re hated by all things Muslim.  Here’s what I know for certain:

If and when Israel ever strikes Iran’s nuclear facilities and warheads–which I’m not sure is a certainty to happen–you won’t be reading in the news that the Israelis are about to do it.  These leaks are Obama’s way of trying to stop Israel from doing so.  And before that, they were Bush’s and Condi Clueless’ way of stopping Israel from doing so.  And I’m simply tired of hearing this BS story.

I also know that when Israel struck Iraq’s Osierak nuclear facility, it was a whole different ballgame.  There was only one place to strike.  It was in a well-known location above ground.  And Israel had it much easier than is the case now with Iran.

There’s the issue of Iran’s nuclear warheads or “nuclear warheads in development.”  And that’s another story I’m tired of hearing every few months:  that Iran’s nuke development is just a few months to a year away, which we’ve also been hearing for  years, which means none of these full of it, so-called “experts” really know what they are talking about.  They’re just BS artists who know less than you or I, but got moronic producers at FOX News to fall for the scheme.  A few years ago, the number of locations of Iranian nukes/nukes in development was believed to be at least 39 in number and perhaps, by now, there are many more.  They are believed to be in many locations around the country and hidden deep underground.

Even assuming that the Israeli intelligence is that sharp (and I do believe they are, indeed, that sharp) and that they know exactly where all or most of these are located, they would have to strike all of them at once and find a way to get to Iranian airspace undetected with a lot of planes and/or stealth bombers.  And they would have to use special extra-strength bunker-buster bombs that can destroy many feet below them.  Or they’d have to have a large legion of spies capable of attacking a number of these locations on the ground.

Good luck with that.  It’s just nearly impossible.  If it could have been done easily, it would have been done already.  And we’d be hearing the same worldwide condemnations of Israel that we heard when Israel did the world a favor and a “clean up at Aisle 8” of Osierak.

My favorite BS story is today’s attack on Israel by Obama-surrogate Aaron David Miller, a hideous Clinton HAMASnik and Arafat ass-kisser I had the pleasure of hissing and heckling when he spoke in Detroit and promoted recognizing HAMAS as a regular political party.  He headed the Seeds of Peace moral equivalency summer camp in Maine for leftist Israeli kids and the kids of Islamic terrorists.  Then, the morons at FOX News frequently consulted this uber-schmuck.

“There’s a growing concern — more than a concern — that the Israelis, in order to protect themselves, might launch a strike without approval, warning or even foreknowledge,” Aaron David Miller, a former Mideast peace negotiator in the Clinton administration, said today.

Puh-leeze. There’s no concern except on the part of Obama and far-leftist Jews In Name Only like Miller who would run over his own children to give a threesome-Lewinsky to Abbas, Meshaal, and the ghost of Arafat. But he’s doing Obama’s and Hillary’s by making this public BS comment.

Aaron David Miller w/ His Man-Crush Yasser Arafat

Remember these facts the next time you hear this or that phony “expert” on FOX News or anywhere else claiming to know what Israel is going to do with regard to Iran and when.

They know nothing.  And they’re simply full of s**t.  Period.

Like the woman who dresses like a hooker and never delivers, the non-stop stories about Israel’s “impending attack by year’s end” or “in the next few months” are  just the ultimate tease.

And the people who market the stories are even more skanky than the hooker chick.  And a lot more indecent.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

22 Responses

Barry Rubin, for one, is convinced that there will be no Israeli strike on Iran. Clearly this is a chess game with many players: Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the U.S., Russia, Syria, the Gulf States, inter alia. Throw into the mix the Shia/Sunni divide. With so many players it is hardly inconceivable that some splinter group or individual could overturn this already unstable apple cart.

Charles on February 3, 2012 at 4:13 pm

debkafile posts stories on this nearly every day… they’re so convincing!

K: Debkafile is as reliable as Obama’s spokesman. You cannot believe most of what’s on there. DS

KIRCHE on February 3, 2012 at 4:26 pm

    i realize that debbie, but i get a kick out of the site because you get this inside-scoop viewpoint — which i’ll admit i used to be snookered by — that is interesting in comparison to the msm.

    i think i’d caught on something was not kosher a couple years back ( ? ) when they posted the sotry about 5 US carrier strike groups in / heading to the persian gulf. debkafile’s tone was “this is it!” and when that didn’t pan out, i finally put 2 and 2 together.

    KIRCHE on February 3, 2012 at 4:45 pm

And a scam by a number of officeholders and candidates is to say that the military option is “on the table”. This is empty rhetoric to make people think they have a strong foreign policy.

The fact that they say that they have taken nothing ‘off the table’ means nothing. The only meaningful thing is for someone to either do it, or to state unambiguously that they will bomb Iran, no ifs, ands, or buts, and even then…

Little Al on February 3, 2012 at 4:33 pm

yeah, i’d also agree that israel’s intelligence organizations know as much as possible about iran’s nuke program… reading a great book right now, ‘gideon’s spies’, that documents the history of the mossad (and other israeli intelligence groups) by providing the personal story of each successive mossad chief and the events that occured during their tenure.

i’m about halfway through… a great non-fiction read.

KIRCHE on February 3, 2012 at 4:35 pm

Bolton says that if they could, the Obama administration would announce Israel’s flight plans for the bombing runs.

More Israel bashing from the President so many left wing Jews and Jews in name only (including reform Rabbis) will vote for for re-election.

Jonathan E. Grant on February 3, 2012 at 4:59 pm

    Actually, it sounds more like John Bolton is slandering the President.

    Paul on February 5, 2012 at 6:32 pm

Maybe I’m crazy, but I’ve always thought that IF Israel was going to launch a bombing raid on ANYONE, they would not be calling the New York Times first to announce it. Israel has always been good at keeping secret things secret until after they are over – and sometimes even after that.

DG in GA on February 3, 2012 at 5:53 pm

I’m thinking about getting the War Game “Persian Incursion” about how a raid could be carried out. Anyone play it yet?

Apparently, it would require several raids over a period of 10 days for Israel to do it. They could, but the political pressure from an Obama WH would be huge, because he’s such an antisemitic scumbag.

Occam's Tool on February 3, 2012 at 6:42 pm

Thank you DS. This thread is a keeper, informative and answered some questions I hoped you would tackle.

Skunky on February 3, 2012 at 7:36 pm

I have always been amazed of the incredible work Mosad does,I believe them a whole lot more than our agency,when the time comes if needed they will do what s necessary and apologize later,and I d have no problem with that at all.

Juan on February 3, 2012 at 8:17 pm

Debbie I’d like to see an attack on Iran before they announce their first nuclear weapon is ready. Otherwise we’ll have to drop the first half of the phrase “never again”. Text me après Shabbat.

A1 on February 3, 2012 at 8:49 pm

Then there is the story of the Saudis egging on the Israelis and giving them unofficial approval to overfly the Kingdom.

Peter on February 3, 2012 at 9:14 pm

Do you think Israel will nation build win they smoke multiple Iranian sites? I think Israel has given up on the United Stares bombing these sites. They see Obama in for four more years and think we must go it alone.

CaliforniaScreaming on February 4, 2012 at 8:20 am

If Hussein Obama was a whitey he would not have gotten away with committing fraud on the American people

Jules Tabak on February 4, 2012 at 10:30 am

“If Hussein Obama was a whitey he would not gotten away with committing fraud on the American people”

Actually Jules, if Obama were a Republican (either white, black, etc.) he wouldn’t be getting away with his BS with the public! I think you meant to say something like that?

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on February 4, 2012 at 1:46 pm

I’ve not seen Obama look at anyone with as much hatred as he did to Netanyahu. The veins on his forehead look they’re going to pop!

Yasmin on February 4, 2012 at 4:15 pm

Thanks for the post, Debbie. I was worried and angered at the thought that Israel would tell anyone in the Obama White House about their plans to attack Iran–or for that matter–their plans to do anything else major, knowing that Obama, et al. would betray them by blabbing about it to the world.


Aaron David Miller, the moronic dhimmi, as quoted in the Bloomberg article linked here by Debbie:

“There’s a growing concern — more than a concern — that the Israelis, in order to protect themselves, might launch a strike without approval, warning or even foreknowledge,”

Actually, I am hoping for precisely that, to be exceeded only by a joint U.S.-Israeli operation–which certainly won’t happen as long as Obama is President.

My concern is actually the opposite–that neither the U.S. nor Israel will do anything, will wait until Iran attacks either Israel and/or the U.S., go into what would be a costly and unavoidable war with Iran, and then afterward (if we win) wonder why no one did anything sooner against Iran when Iran was weak.

Anyone with a brain also shares my hopes and concerns, which leaves out Aaron David Miller and other JINOs and/or dhimmis.

JeffE on February 4, 2012 at 11:37 pm

Rest assured that if Israel attacks Iran it won’t be with conventional weapons. Unless the IDF has gone completely insane. Israel has been attacking Iran: killing its scientists,using computer viruses and working with other groups in blowing up nuclear facilities. I think Israel has other such unorthodox weapons up its sleeve.

Jerry on February 5, 2012 at 10:01 am

Debbie, thought you knew the game. Let me explain, when Iran test fires underground its first nuclear bomb like the one hundred or so North Korean advisors taught them to do our Black house ( I use the term black house only in reference to the color they will be wearing at the mock funeral they will have for state of Israel, just before the party with his Saudi freinds afterwards). As I was saying after the first confirmed nuclear test our President, no doubt will claim that it was Israel’s decision not to go ahead with the attack, and that our forces were poised and ready, however we had the understanding that…and so on, and so on.

Ron Wolf on February 5, 2012 at 7:18 pm

This is a very entertaining blog, full of expert opinion and interesting hypothesis. Having said that, let’s assume the following scenario. Israel attacks Iran in any form you envision, whether through conventional warfare, hacking their computers, spies infiltrating their facilities, etc…Offcourse this is all done in the name of national security mainly for Israel, and to a lesser degree for the United States(hence why we are not so keen on an attack). Offcourse, if your source of information is from media outlets in the U.S and Israel, be it from the right or left, this is a no brainer. But if you actually know there are 194 other countries on earth, and given how this planet has gotten smaller and more connected in the last half century with the advent of the internet and global trading, you would realize that the average individual will not view this preemptive attack as necessary to avoid a repeat holocaust. Rather, it would be viewed as an aggressive act, by a nation that posseses more nuclear weapons that any other country in the region, which has systematically annihalated generations of inhabitants from it’s land in the name of it’s god. Furthermore, every American corporation looking for it’s bottom line, and with only so much land, investment, market share and potential in Israel and the U.S, will likely face it’s share of scrutiny in the other countries it hopes to expand and operate in. Not to mention, the average American consumer’s complaint of $4/gallon gas during the peak of the Iraq war would be a walk in the park compared to the $8-$10/gallon prices that will affect every facet of their lives. Good luck garnering any support for Israel on this and other various websites after this intelligent act takes place.

Scenario on February 11, 2012 at 10:12 pm

Benjamin Freedman’s 1961 Speech at the Willard Hotel (Complete)

alchemy777archon on February 12, 2012 at 1:10 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field