February 25, 2009, - 6:01 pm

Obama’s Anti-Semitic, Anti-Israel, Pro China “Intelligence” Man

By Debbie Schlussel
My friend, Brian, calls our President, “Mao-bama,” and that’s lookin’ more and more correct for a number of reasons–some of ’em literal.
Barack Obama’s choice of Chas Freeman, Jr.–a supporter of anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and pro-Chinese Communist sentiment–as head of the National Intelligence Council should disturb all Americans.
Yid With Lid, Ashley Rindsberg, and Gabriel Schoenfeld (in today’s Wall Street Journal) have important pieces on this man who will write daily intelligence briefings, known as the National Intelligence Estimates. It’s scary.
Yid With Lid writes about some of Freeman’s statements:

Do you know that when the British explorers came to the “New World” they met “Iroquois and Algonquin chiefs with names like Abdul-Rahim and Abdallah Ibn Malik?”

Read all of his following pieces on Freeman and his Middle East Policy Council:


Obama Intelligence Dude Chas Freeman w/Anti-Israel, Anti-U.S. Prince AlWaleed Bin Talal

* Mayflower MUSLIMS??? What Obama’s Proposed Intelligence Chief is Teaching Your Children
* Obama’s New Spy Chief Publishes a Vicious Anti Israel Journal
* Obama Picks Israel Hater to Lead National Intelligence Council ?!?!
Ashley Rindsberg writes about how Freeman was still doing biz with the Bin Ladens AFTER 9/11. This guy is gonna be writing Intelligence Reports for the Prez???!!!
You want a guy who owes the Saudis and pimped vile anti-Semitic smear-papers by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt briefing the leader of the free world, every single day and culling which info the Prez sees and which he does not?
Only if you want Islamic terrorists and Chi-coms to be promoted as our allies in national security matters.
Here are a few excerpts from Schoenfeld’s WSJ piece, along with my commentary:

In 1997, Mr. Freeman succeeded George McGovern to become the president of the Middle East Policy Council. . . . [I]ts original name until 1991 was the American-Arab Affairs Council, and it is an influential Washington mouthpiece for Saudi Arabia.
As Mr. Freeman acknowledged in a 2006 interview with an outfit called the Saudi-US Relations Information Service, MEPC owes its endowment to the “generosity” of King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia. Asked in the same interview about his organization’s current mission, Mr. Freeman responded, in a revealing non sequitur, that he was “delighted that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has, after a long delay, begun to make serious public relations efforts.”
Among MEPC’s recent activities in the public relations realm, it has published what it calls an “unabridged” version of “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” by professors John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt. This controversial 2006 essay argued that American Jews have a “stranglehold” on the U.S. Congress, which they employ to tilt the U.S. toward Israel at the expense of broader American interests. Mr. Freeman has both endorsed the paper’s thesis and boasted of MEPC’s intrepid stance: “No one else in the United States has dared to publish this article, given the political penalties that the Lobby imposes on those who criticize it.”

The Mearsheimer/Walt article and book are well known to be anti-Semitic diatribes–the modern day Protocols of the Elders of Zion, for which the two have been richly rewarded on the Arab Muslim speaking tour circuit.

Mr. Freeman believes, as he said in a 2007 address to the Washington Institute of Foreign Affairs, that “Israel no longer even pretends to seek peace with the Palestinians; it strives instead to pacify them.” The primary reason America confronts a terrorism problem today, he continued, is “the brutal oppression of the Palestinians by an Israeli occupation that is about to mark its fortieth anniversary and shows no sign of ending.”

Anyone who echoes that BS is completely clueless. Bin Laden–when he first started in the terrorism biz–never even mentioned Israel. He only latched onto it, when his attacks on the Saudi monarchy didn’t get traction. There is terrorism because there is Islam. And because there are those who are not Muslim. Period.

The specter of a Chinese threat, he remarked during a China forum at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies in October 2006, is nothing more than “a great fund-raiser for the hyper-expensive advanced weaponry our military-industrial complex prefers to make and our armed forces love to employ.”
On the massacre at Tiananmen Square in 1989, Mr. Freeman unabashedly sides with the Chinese government, a remarkable position for an appointee of an administration that has pledged to advance the cause of human rights. Mr. Freeman has been a participant in ChinaSec, a confidential Internet discussion group of China specialists. A copy of one of his postings was provided to me by a former member. “The truly unforgivable mistake of the Chinese authorities,” he wrote there in 2006, “was the failure to intervene on a timely basis to nip the demonstrations in the bud.” Moreover, “the Politburo’s response to the mob scene at ‘Tiananmen’ stands as a monument to overly cautious behavior on the part of the leadership, not as an example of rash action.”

Wow, a guy who not only defends the massacre at Tiananmen Square, but a guy who thinks it wasn’t tough enough. Incredible. Yup, just the guy we need to have final say on the President’s daily intelligence briefings.
I urge you to read all of the articles linked above.

15 Responses

A month since the fools put him in the White House and Hussein didn’t waste time showing how much he hates America and how loyal he is to his buddies, the fifth columnists and America’s enemies.
From “his” first “decision” to send Dollars to kill unborn babies around the world to his torrents of “executive orders,” sleazy appointments, and decisions -which I lost counting- he is putting America on the path of self-destruction.
My advice to all of you who care about this country and your families: if you don’t own guns, start buying.
Hussein is up to no good. His socialist government will not protect you, he is siding with the enemies of America against you.
Hussein is accumulating more power and he is fooling the idiots with a teleprompted rhetoric to blind and brainwash his cheerleaders and die-hard fans.
Buy guns before he bans them, he might not do it directly and even object to the idea, but he will do it from a back door as his some of his unpopular “decisions” are made, like the fairness doctrine, for example.
We are living in the worst time America has ever seen.
We have a douchebag, clown, SOB, usurper, empty suit in the White house who shouldn’t have been there except because he is half-Black, who will ruin America more than any other president ever did.
In fact, under Hussein, America will truly never be the same.
From Capitalism to Socialism.
From Freedom to Government Control and Censorship.
From a strong Military to a weak one that will be the mockery of the world.
From standing up and fighting terrorism to submitting to the Muslims.
From border control to open borders.
From teaching values to more government sponsor depravities in schools and colleges.
You idiots who selected him, I hope you feel good about your Hussein.
I know every time he goes on TV, you have an orgasm.
You and your Hussein make me sick, you bastards!

Independent Conservative on February 25, 2009 at 8:01 pm

We need regime change or a revolution in the American Jewish community.
The Jewish political, organizational and religious leadership in the US has betrayed the people they claim to support and protect. During the Presidential campaign, “professional Jews” (to use Ezra Levant’s term) acted as though their job was to cut down any airing of concerns regarding Obama, delegitimizing questions about his political convictions, personal associations, radical past and Muslim sympathies as baseless slander unbecoming of the Jewish community.
Those Jewish community leaders, Rabbis and editors of local Jewish publications should have been honest about their support for Obama. They could have said, “We are liberals who favor Obama because of his positions on a variety of social, economic and environmental issues.”
Instead, they chose to portray him as a true friend of Israel, based on a couple votes in the Senate, his (often poorly worded and ambiguous) campaign promises and the endorsements of liberal-left Jews in Chicago. This may be what they wanted to believe, or what they wanted others to believe, but it was not a view that could be proclaimed with conviction based on Obama’s history.
Obama, to paraphrase former football coach Dennis Green, is who we thought he was. His actions toward Israel and the Jews are consistent with someone who attended a church where the bulletin featured articles written by members of Hamas; who counts Rashid Khaildy, Bill Ayers, Ali Abunimah and Jeremiah Wright as friends; who attended pro-Palestinian/anti-Israel functions; who along with his wife displayed disdain for American patriotism; who voted present rather than be forced to take a stand on controversial issues; who campaigned on behalf of his pro-radical Muslim cousin in Kenya; who referred to the legitimate grievances of Hamas and Hezbollah; who talked in the language of his anti-Israel activist friends with his negative comments about Americans supporting Likud positions and his praise for the Israeli left; and who sat idly by during many events when he could have stood up against anti-American and anti-Jewish venom in his church and community.
And assuming they knew at least some of the above mentioned information about him, it makes me sick to think that 76-78% of Jews voted for Obama.

4infidels on February 25, 2009 at 8:17 pm

Obama is a traitor, not just against the US, but also against Judeo-Christian civilization.

arius on February 25, 2009 at 8:51 pm

American Jews are dumbass. They knew all about Obama and yet they voted for a guy who surrounded himself with anti-Israel advisers. When it comes to left-wing anti-Semitism, they have no moral standing to complain about it.
Elections do have consequences and that’s why we have the anti-Israel and pro-ChiCom Chas Freeman as our nation’s intelligence chief.
Debbie pointed out the truth for months last year and was ignored and now the chickens are coming home to roost.

NormanF on February 25, 2009 at 8:59 pm

How ironic. Chas Freeman promotes Mearsheimer and Walt’s “Israel Lobby” canard – which accuses Israel’s supporters of holding the USA in thrall to Israeli interests – while unabashedly shilling for the Saudis. The hypocrisy is beyond blatant. But I expected this to happen, given Obama’s allies and cohorts in both the religious and political sphere – what else should one expect, given Obama’s associations with the likes of Wright, Ayres, Khalidi, et al.? It’s only going to get worse – Obama’s been president for merely one month, but he’s shaping up to be the most disastrous president of the last hundred years – worse, even, than Jimmuh Carter. And Congress, aiding and abetting the shift toward neo-Marxism, is not far behind.

commonsense on February 26, 2009 at 12:31 am

Look at that muzlum in that pic…he looks like a dwarf monkey sitting in his bedsheets wearing a diaper!!!

Thee_Bruno on February 26, 2009 at 10:28 am

Israel and Palestine are mentioned at least 7 times in Osama Bin Laden’s “Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places.”

ramjordan on February 26, 2009 at 11:50 am

Obama’s campaign war chest is estimated to have been in the neighborhood of $500 M or half a billion dollars. Obama claims he’ll “save” America. Anybody know who in the world would support Obama to the tune of 1/2 B to save America? No one I know of. The Obama campaign was a campaign to “usurp” the government of the US, install marxism and destroy America. We need a return to constitutional government. We need to deliver our land out of the hands of the unrightous. “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” I forget who said it.

joesixpack31 on February 26, 2009 at 12:47 pm

Osama Bin Laden’s “Declaration of War Against the Americans…” (see above) was in 1996.

ramjordan on February 26, 2009 at 1:38 pm

Boy, now I’m pretty sure I’ve had a stroke.
This can’t be anything out of the mouth of an actual member of an actual administration of the America I was in before I stroked out.

BlackFlagQ55 on February 26, 2009 at 3:48 pm

Lissen up….we have been warned what was going to happen and there is no use crying about it now. Ain’t nuthin we can do about it short of a revolution. The band of thugs in Washington will absolutely bankrupt (we already are) during the next four years. We need a conservative ACORN or we will never turn it around. The insipid followers of Obomer will be more entrenched within the next four years. They have lost the ability to think and all we want to do is grip about what they are doing to us. God Help Us!!

arejaymack on February 26, 2009 at 7:03 pm

A traitor leading our national intelligence? Big deal! Why aren’t we talking about the important things here, like Obama’s new dog?

barrypopik on February 26, 2009 at 10:07 pm

Someone should tell the 70% that they can STOP VOTING For FDR, who btw, DID NOTHING to save European Jews . He Died in 1945,only 64yrs ago.

CHOI on February 27, 2009 at 2:13 am

I find it humorous that the critics of Measheimer and Walt’s article and book toss around words like “anti-Semite” and canard without actually addressing the arguments.

Well, Debbie does mention someone else’s summary of M/W, claiming, “This controversial 2006 essay argued that American Jews have a ‘stranglehold’ on the U.S. Congress, which they employ to tilt the U.S. toward Israel at the expense of broader American interests.” There is a problem. That is not actually what M/W argue. They made clear in the article and book that they do not believe that proponents of Israel policy have any more of a ‘stranglehold’ than the NRA or AARP.

Do some respected social scientists reject the arguments in M/W? Yes. Does Dershowitz call them anti-Semitic? Almost, though not in those words. Do many well-respected social scientists with no stake in the issue think the article is a quality piece of scholarship? Yes. Do Measheimer and Walt have more impressive credentials as scholars than Debbie. Yes.

Of course, understanding that would require reading the article, which apparently Debbie has not. She just knows that someone in the Wall Street Journal says they criticize current US and Israeli policy, so they must be bad.

Mike on May 19, 2010 at 3:36 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field