September 24, 2012, - 6:40 pm

Mitt Romney, Barack Obama & “The View” Hags (Plus Whoopi’s Fugly Shoes)

By Debbie Schlussel

One of the less-reported facts about the tape secretly made of Mitt Romney at a private fundraiser, is that he said on the tape that he would not go on ABC’s “The View” or “Saturday Night Live” (he said SNL is “not Presidential”–bingo! finally someone gets it, or so I thought). But, sadly, Romney’s reasoning about the annoying “View” hags has nothing to do with men running for Prez degrading themselves and the country by appearing on these lowlife talk shows. And he’s already flip-flopped on the issue (as he does with illegal immigration, ObamaRomneyCare, and everything else), buckling under to five far-left, anti-male, whining yentas on a sleazy talk show.

The Only Presidential Candidates Who Go On “The View” are Yutzes . . .

The appearances of Presidential candidates on daytime talk shows are something I’ve criticized, ever since the trend began in 2000, when both Al Gore and George W. Bush appeared on daytime talk shows, including Oprah. Then, the Bushes and the Kerrys appeared on Dr. Phil, even more disgusting and degrading to the Presidency. I thought, “Finally! Mitt Romney has some cojones and some dignity.” And, then, I read on, and I was wrong. Plus, now, Romney has reversed course, and after cajoling by “The View” and its faux-conservative, genuine airhead, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Romney will be on this crappy show in October, which will win him exactly zero votes and is a waste of time. I also see Romney has thrown out any concern with appearing “unpresidential” by appearing on “Live With Kelly & Michael” and telling us that he wears “as little as possible” in bed and how he admires “Jersey Shore’s” Snooki. Didn’t he learn anything from Bill Clinton’s “boxers or briefs” responses? Does he want to be President so badly that he’ll lower himself to any level?

And as for “The View,” Romney’s initial reluctance to go on that crappy show is hypocritical, since he’s already appeared on the show and pandered to the hags. It also appears cowardly, since his concern is not that it’s unpresidential, but that the “women” on the show are “sharp-tongued.”

[Romney] said “The View,” ABC’s daytime talker, “is fine.” But then, appearing to think better of that, Romney said “The View” is “high-risk, because, of the five women on it, only one is conservative, and four are sharp-tongued and not conservative.”

Memo to Mitt: um, Elisabeth Hasseldumb ain’t conservative. She’s in love with Al Sharpton, Snoop Dogg (now, Snoop Lion), affirmative action, Title IX, illegal aliens, Muslims (especially the ones who storm U.S. Embassies and murder officials), Sonia Sotomayor, San Francisco’s statist ban on McDonald’s Happy Meals, Canada silencing Romney-fan Ann Coulter, and YouTube banning videos and movies that offend Islam and Muslims (something she called for and which YouTube, thankfully, hasn’t done). She also doesn’t believe Muslims perpetrated the 9/11 attacks (I guess it was Martians), and she outed a Federal Air Marshal on live TV. Frankly, in many respects, the far-left Whoopi Goldberg is to the right of Hasselbeck.


And, again, Romney, per usual, did a 180 because he has no guts, no cojones. I expect the same if he gets to the White House . . . a big if that won’t be helped with a “The View” appearance. The mindless idiots who watch that show will be voting for Obama (if they vote at all), no matter what.


Check out Whoopi Goldberg’s bizarre, fugly shoes, which she wore to interview the Prez. Yup, those are chicken leg replicas as heels. Does Mitt Romney really need to go on a shoe with idiots who also dress like idiots? (Despite Goldberg’s hatred of Israel and support for the Palestinians and other Islamic terrorists, the shoes are by Israeli designer Kobi Levi, who makes other similarly bizarre shoes that are cute to look at, but incredibly foolish-looking on your feet.) Yup, the woman’s a clown . . . a Marxist clown that far too many mindless American women actually listen, too.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

75 Responses

back in 1960
when jack paar hosted
jack kennedy and dick nixon
on the tonight show

the equal time people forced him
to also host 3rd party candidates
the most entertaining was
lar ( america first ) daly

hopefully this will happen again
and force the idiots who host these shows
to stop their asshole politicking

prestigio on September 24, 2012 at 6:49 pm

    @ prestigio–It’s interesting that you should bring up Jack Parr. You can see his shows today on video, and they included appearances by JFK and Nixon. I think Parr may have been a liberal, but intellectually he was miles ahead of today’s media liberals. Moreover, Parr discussed the serious issues of the day with the candidates in a mature manner. TV was really different back then. And even when Johnny Carson took over the Tonight Show, he still tried to raise the bar, covering the issues in a serious manner with candidates, while still keeping the show entertaining.

    In this generation of TV, the bar has dropped dramatically. The View is just dreadful and I fail to see how women could find this show even entertaining. Even SNL fall far short of the bar set in earlier versions of the show, from the satire as well as entertainment standpoint.

    But I understand that these dumb shows go with the political territory, like eating a steak sandwich in Philadelphia and kissing babes. But stop and think about how many people voted for Bill Clinton because he appeared on the Arsenio Hall show wearing sunglasses and playing the saxaphone, saying to themselves, “Oh, he seems like a really cool guy; I think I’ll vote for him.” Dumb and Dumber: it’s more than just a movie.

    Ralph Adamo on September 24, 2012 at 7:21 pm

      (Ralph… please try to avoid “@” in referring to someone here. This comes from monkeyscum, and some of us use it to skip his posts entirely.)

      skzion on September 24, 2012 at 7:34 pm

        Ralph, I second Skzion’s request. Monkeypud makes it easy for us too totally ignore his solipsistic palaver with his dead (dopey) giveaway.

        Ralph, I like reading your posts so I don’t want to skip ’em by accident. Danke!

        Skunky on September 24, 2012 at 7:45 pm

          @skzion and @Skunky…………. Just kidding! I thought that the use of the “@” symbol preceeding a poster’s name meant that you were responding to that individual’s post. But I will be happy to omit that symbol when responding to other posts in future messages. Thanks for the kind thoughts.

          Ralph Adamo on September 24, 2012 at 9:51 pm

          Thanks dude!

          skzion on September 24, 2012 at 9:56 pm


          Again, I don’t care if YOU read my comments. Or rather, if you PRETEND not to read my comments. They’re for everyone. Everyone.

          I’ve been thinking of adding an avatar of my own. Maybe a picture of youtube sensation “Italian Spiderman.” He is one funny dude, and a hit with the ladies. Pretty much exactly like me in real life.

          Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 3:00 am


        So what are you supposed to be, the moderator or something? LOL, maybe you should just do a half a second more work before you pass over all those oogy words that call out your BS.

        As I’ve said before, I don’t care if *you* read my reply. It’s for the people who see your Hitleriffic comments and need to see a counterpoint. But you are welcome to them too – FOC.

        Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 2:16 am

The people who watch daytime talk shows are the unemployed, elderly, and disabled. Housewives left that market segment for the most part during the 1970’s. So, what does Mitt Romney hope to accomplish by parading in front of almost the least receptive audience conceivable? It is about one step above his giving an address to a gathering of the New Black Panther Party. If appearances on those daytime shows would actually be of some benefit, it would be reasonable for Mr. Romney to do them. However, there is no benefit apart from providing some goofy sounds bites that your opponent will use against you. The people who watch daytime television are for the most part are either those who do not vote, or those who vote Democratic. A half baked pollster could have told Mitt Romney that.

Worry01 on September 24, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    Worry, note that if Mittens really believed in his taped 47% claim, he wouldn’t bother with this audience, for the reason you mention.

    So, is he trying to say, “hey, I care about you guys who won’t vote for me!”?

    skzion on September 24, 2012 at 7:40 pm

      A sane politician never expends significant campaign resources on groups that will almost certainly will not vote for them. Finite resources need to be spent carefully. The borderline or marginal people are the ones you go after.

      Worry01 on September 24, 2012 at 9:26 pm

        Indeed, Worry. I guess this is Exhibit AA (we’ve already gone through the alphabet once) of the quality of this candidate. He actually seems to think that craven displays like this will humanize him, when all they do is persuade the marginal voter that he’s a fake.

        skzion on September 24, 2012 at 9:53 pm

          @@@Gay Obama,

          Well, he certainly knows that you are in the crate. Why would he waste any time on YOU?

          Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 2:18 am

    so the elderly and/or disabled are incapable of voting, Worry01? Did I read that right? Being both, I will say that if I were voting in the US election,I would not vote because someone pandered to my “special interests.” I would vote for the guy that I thought was best for the country overall and that is one reason I won’t be voting. The other is that now that I do not have a legal US residence, I don’t have a legal voter registration. I left in August 08 and that means up to 4 other people could have rented the place I was last registered. I personally believe that unless Americans in Israel have maintained or established a legal residence in the US with family and file their tax returns from that address, they are voting illegally when they request an absentee ballot. So I will not participate in voter fraud and give a Florida vote to a candidate who needs to carry that state because I have no interest in Florida. If I ever did return to US soil, it would be HI where my daughter and grandkids are. Not gonna happen, however.

    Italkit on September 25, 2012 at 5:06 am

It is a sign of Romney’s ineptness that he will be on the defensive against the worst President in US history.

He will be attacked for the Republicans ‘war against women’ and his comment about the 47% moochers, and will again be on the defensive, with all the moochers and women watching.

Little Al on September 24, 2012 at 7:25 pm

And Flip Floppney keeps the flipping flopping.

That dude *ONLY* has my vote in November. Nothing else.

Whoopie Goldberg has never had a styling day in her rotten life. I like avant garde and weirdo style but I know style when I see it and a dumpster dive dope when I see one (punk style is cool and rap style is ugly and retarded). I don’t understand the chook bone heels. That’s disgusting.

It reminds me of that old blues song that states “…when you kill the chickens/save me the heads.” She is strange and it’s ironic that “Caryn” has chosen a Jewish last name when she clearly is NOT a fan of Jews.

Skunky on September 24, 2012 at 7:53 pm

    Whoopie looks like something one would find in a homeless shelter with her deranged lesbian wardrobe. I doubt that there are many takers of either gender at her door.

    Worry01 on September 24, 2012 at 8:39 pm

      Worry, I have often wondered if “Whoopie” was a lezzer. As you pointed out she does dress like a deranged one. I know she has dated Frank Langella and Ted Danson in the past but who knows if they were “beards”?

      On second look of those awful shoes, the pink looks like stretched bubble gum. I have no idea if they are chook bones or bubbly gum. I don’t care either…they are ugly and look like something she would wear!

      Skunky on September 24, 2012 at 8:54 pm

        Worry and Skunky, I always assumed ol’ Caryn Johnson was a lezz bean (to quote John Waters). Her garb is fully consistent with this view.

        skzion on September 25, 2012 at 12:37 am

        Since Whoopi proudly admits to having had at least six abortions (some sources say the number is eight) I’d have to say she may have lesbian relationships, but she apparently also has relations with men. She may call herself bi-sexual. I just call her an undiscriminating whore. Even her production company name describes her as a “ho.”

        As for politicians appearing on vapid programs like “The Spew,” this is a trend in American politics that reflects the extreme dumbing-down of Americans in general and the openly prostituting nature of politics in general. I wish that candidates for the highest office in the land would value themselves and the dignity of the office they seek enough to avoid pandering to the lowest common denominator of the American people, but beginning with Bill Clinton it is clear that they do not. Apparently their market research shows that the American people, especially women, desire candidates who will sink to their level. Personally, I prefer candidates who are better and smarter than I am.

        DG in GA on September 25, 2012 at 11:32 am


          So do the Skuzz and Gay Obama. Except that’d mean that everyone in America EXCEPT them would be the president.

          Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 11:39 am

          DG, I did not know that about the abortions. I agree with you 100%.

          Mental illness is rampant here in the USA in 2012. It is incumbent on yanks (and other peeps) to know who is a fricken’ nutter and who is on the level. Whoopie is definitely a certified nutter. I don’t genuflect to the stark, raving mad sorts with huge character issues…

          Skunky on September 25, 2012 at 7:47 pm


    But he DOES have your vote, right? No offense, but I doubt you have that much to offer him beyond that.

    I guess you could always just copy everything he says and be a Romney fanboi (check, actually), but that might drive away the voters with IQs that are above room temperature.

    Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 2:21 am

    actually those are stork legs. haha! ridiculous either way.

    Italkit on September 25, 2012 at 5:08 am

Choosing between a businessman and a great communicator is the choice America`s youth will make in the November elections. College gals and bikini wearers prefer the candidate with the Jive talk and captivating bedroom manner. Youngsters out to make a buck, want their leader to be a businessman with a record of success. Retirees with a pension or Social Security check do not care about the economy; most are lonely and all they want is a blast of Obama`s warm and sugary words. Serious minded voters are in the minority that is why Romney is behind in the polls.

chowching on September 24, 2012 at 8:12 pm

    “Retirees with a pension or Social Security check do not care about the economy;”

    Oh, you mean like my in-laws who were extremely distressed that my husband, who upon turning 50 was virtually unemployable when he lost his job? These Holocaust survivors who hated, HATED that we came to Israel 24 years ago, then returned for a number of years are THRILLED that we are here now because we had no hope in the US. I’m a few years older than DH and NEITHER of us could get a real job since about 2002. He at least could substitute teach but I had nothing. During the summer, he was not too proud to work as a janitor but it barely covered basic expenses yet was too much to allow us food stamps. Our state, didn’t allow substitutes to apply for unemployment. We survived because I actually was able to get disability. The judge ruled MY AGE was a big factor in that. Isn’t that awful? Rather than find something I could do with a bit of retraining, they actually paid me not to work. Since this started in 2002, who is really to blame for the downward spiral of your society? That is not an endorsement of O. He’s made it worse but he had plenty of raw material to work with.

    So, chowching, you’re wrong about pensioners not caring. My in-laws are worried about their social security, especially Medicare because MIL is being kept alive with weekly transfusions and had two major surgeries which actually went well especially considering her Leukemia so I guess she’s meant to be here a while longer. If she survives until Obama care gets to their State, the death panels will probably take care of that because not only is she alive from transfusions (2pts a week), her blood type is pretty rare, A-. If there’s a disaster tho, guess who won’t be getting her transfusions.

    They voted for Obamanation 4 years ago. I don’t know if they will do it again but the realize now what a disaster he is.

    Italkit on September 27, 2012 at 2:23 am

Oh, and in the picture even the poncey Prez has his legs crossed and “Whoopie” is the only one sitting spread-eagle like an alpha male…

Skunky on September 24, 2012 at 8:56 pm

America, in its greatest need of strong leadership, produces Muslim wanna-bes or non-serious flip- floppers. Well, that’s just fantastic for America’s enemies. Once again, it will come down to — who is the lesser evil? I refuse to vote for the current occupier in the White House…

J.S. on September 24, 2012 at 9:10 pm


    Well, think of it this way: a vote for Romney in 2012 pretty much equals a vote for Joe Biden in 2016. If the Republicans don’t get spanked good this year, we’ll see another paperthin loser nominee 4 years from now. It’s really as simple as that.

    Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 3:09 am

Mitt Romney IS a liberal.

That why he has no core beliefs and goes on crappy shows like “The View” – the liberal women are never going to vote for him.

Gone are the days when men didn’t pander to women and act all deferential towards them. Just another sign of the matriarchy towards which we’re headed.

None has ever survived. Say what you like about Muslim men, they would never caught alive or dead appearing on “The View.” At least they still have a full set.

Which begs the question: where in the world have our men gone?

NormanF on September 24, 2012 at 9:19 pm

@skzion – I thought I’d been using the “@” for years to signify who I’m replying to. I would suggest you filter his name instead of the “@” symbol because I find it pretty handy – just a suggestion.

As for Mitt Happens, I think he’s fighting for his life right now after the 47% remark has been picked up and run with by the MSM. When SNL spoofed that “I can see Russia from my porch…” thing on Palin, something like 85% of people interviewed thought that the SNL quote was an actual quote by Palin. Now lots of average idiots will probably think he said. “I’m annoyed by poor people” or some sh*t like that.

I’m not saying that I think what he did was professional for a presidential candidate, but I understand why his handlers thought he had to do it and I agree. As floppy as Mitt Happens is, I’m more afraid of 4 more years of Obama.

DS_ROCKS! on September 24, 2012 at 11:00 pm

    DS_Rocks…you have an avatar that is recognizble so feel free to use @ (not that I can tell you what to do…I’m just saying I know your posts due to your avatar…). I always read your posts anyway and your avatar makes ’em easy to see.

    How f***ed are we that Romney is fighting for his political life in the advent of Obama-Putin? It sure IS a Kardashian world!

    Skunky on September 24, 2012 at 11:10 pm

      DSR, I never noticed your use of “@,” probably because your avitar made it unnecessary for me to scan for it. Perception and recall are powerfully based on cognitive machinery, as you may know. That must be why I noticed your posting just now. Certainly I intended no offense.

      That said, why propagate a usage that is not necessary in this forum? After all, we do not have nested responses (x quoting y quoting z) that obscure who is writing. So, this usage solves a problem that does not exist here. If others copy you without the avitar, filtering becomes more difficult.

      Obviously you will do what you want. I will still read your postings because I think they are valuable.

      Finally, are you aware of why poultry cannot be served with dairy products according to Kosher law? The basis for no meat with dairy is that one is forbidden to eat that which is cooked in its mother’s milk. Poultry, of course, has no milk. However, sometimes it might not be clear that some dish is poultry and not mammal. So, to avoid this possibility of error, it was ruled that poultry should be treated like meat. What I am saying is that making it easier for readers to avoid those who are on record calling a tzadik like R’ Kahane (whom Debbie has met and holds in high regard) an AIDS-infested genocidal maniac would be an act of kindness.

      Fair enough?

      skzion on September 25, 2012 at 12:14 am

        @Gay Obama,

        LOL, is oo offended? So funny to watch you misquote a comment of mine that you SWEAR you ignored.

        And now you’re hiding behind Schlussel’s skirt? Ha ha, what a man.

        And you still haven’t explained the cognitive dissonance between your pharisaical devotion to dietary laws and genocide, but your open defiance of the halakha in your own filthy lifestyle choices. Now go look up “cognitive dissonance.” Don’t they teach that at Yale anymore, or wherever it is that you pretend is your alma mater?

        Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 2:30 am

        sk, that’s right. Chicken became “meat” in the Middle Ages. I believe with the Shulchan Aruch because in Europe it could be misconstrued that someone was eating veal or “that other white meat,” you know, the one that’s not kosher.

        Italkit on September 25, 2012 at 5:12 am

          “The other white meat.” Lol

          skzion on September 25, 2012 at 9:07 am

    DSR, your point is well taken … but there are tremendous downsides to this pander. Mittens made one mistake: he should not have claimed that ALL of those 47% were opposed to him. He should have been clear that some people are welfare addicts. They never expect to be successful on their own, and they see Obama as their champion. These addicts will never vote for him.

    However, don’t believe for a minute that hardworking people on welfare will think that Mittens really had them in mind. I mean, I think he’s totally inept, but even I don’t think he’s such an idiot.

    No. Mittens’s handlers are idiots. You don’t staunch the bleeding by looking like a fake.

    Alas, Mittens IS a fake. He was a fake at that meeting as well. He said a demonstrably stupid thing to pander. This plays into the narrative that he has no core values. THAT shows the idiocy of his handlers.

    skzion on September 25, 2012 at 12:55 am

      Mitt Happens has no core values. There is nothing about which he won’t change his mind on.

      The GOP elite deliberately gave us the weakest and most under-performing candidate. I’m not even sure the debates can save him. What I do know is going on “The View” – no woman who watches it is going to be of a mind to vote for him. The first rule of politics is don’t go for folks who aren’t your core supporters.

      Mitt Happens has done nothing to excite conservatives and he needs a break. As things stand, Obama looks likely to be re-elected – this in the face of a terrible economic and social record. The right candidate could have beaten him but Republicans were stuck with Floppy.

      NormanF on September 25, 2012 at 2:09 am

        The fact that Obama has any lead at all in the polls, in spite of the increasingly irreparable damage he has done to his country with his radical agenda (never mind, again, that the GOP in many ways is indistinguishable from the Democrats in many areas and points), is as much a testament to the pervasive influence of the corrupt, Obama-lapdog leftist media as the increasing stupidity of the electorate (whose support of Obama is automatically equated, in the Democrats’ mind, with a clear and unequivocal mandate for his destructive policies). The reasons that many, especially in the 18-29 age range, give for their support for Obama (based entirely on emotion – how can the “someone to have a beer with” be even remotely construed as having anything to do with rational thinking), is one more example of why the 26th Amendment of 1971 which gave the vote to 18-year-olds has become as much a devastating failure as the 18th Amendment (Prohibition) and the “brilliant” idea to bring the legal drinking age down to 18 in many states (which led, in the 1970’s, to a massive spike in alcohol-related traffic accidents and fatalities among the 18-to-20 age group) – and why commentators like Ann Coulter have advocated its repeal. (That age group went gaga over Jimmy Carter in 1976, and Bill Clinton in 1992 and again in 1996 – but in the years since then, our culture has become increasingly dumbed down, and our “educational” system has further shifted to the left.)

        CP: It’s also a testament to what a horrible candidate Romney is. DS

        ConcernedPatriot on September 25, 2012 at 12:37 pm

      @Gay Obama,

      So the candidate is completely blameless, then? It’s all the handlers’ fault? LOL, WHO HIRED THEM??

      If you think Mitt Romney has only made ONE mistake, you should vote for him, ’cause that’d be one hell of a batting average.

      The real mistake was nominating him at all. But I earnestly suggest that you consider voting for him anyway. Obama himself probably hopes that Mitt won’t get dinged up too bad by the election results. It’s imperative for his party that McCainism stay alive and viable for 2016. Lindsey Graham or Mike Castle or whoever are counting on you – don’t let them down.

      Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 2:34 am

The fact that ole Mittens will go on a stupid show like the leftist View just proves my point. That point is is that we have a man running for president on the republican ticket that will do and say anything to get elected. I guess that it’s easy when you have no core beliefs. Now all I have to say about Odummer is that he is in his element with a show like the Spew. Look at the picture with Odumbo ad the “ladies”. President Mom Jeans looks like the rotten meat in an old stale hag sandwich. Everyone including Jar Jar Obinks has their legs crossed(real men don’t sit like that) except for the Whoopie cushion. What is the old bag wearing? Is that black lesbo gear? Oh and thanks for the visual of her shoes Debbie. I thought that ther were sneakers. Talk about ungly. They probably cost as much as Moobacca’s ugly footwear that she sported on her way to feed the poor not so long ago. Mittens is wasting his time as the largest portion of the people who watch the morning crapathons vote democrat.

Ken b on September 24, 2012 at 11:03 pm

    Ken b,

    When you have a liberal Republican running against a leftist Democrat, there isn’t much daylight between them.

    Mitt Happens has yet to give voters a reason why they should put him in. The demographics in the country have changed since Reagan was President and it would be very hard for him to win today.

    One wonders if Romney has the fire in his belly to win. The GOP favored electability over principle and it may find itself with Obama until 2017.

    NormanF on September 25, 2012 at 2:15 am


      A liberal Republican running against a leftist Democrat? Yep, and the media wants you to believe that the great American center is somewhere between these two dingleberries.

      And Romney “has yet to give voters a reason why they should put him in.” Correct again. I remember shortly after the 1996 election, some columnist wrote that the reason that Bob Dole (who I know a thing or two about, LOL) lost was because he never articulated a grand vision for a Dole presidency that went beyond Bob Dole moving into the White House.

      Sound like anyone who’s running this year?

      Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 2:40 am


      We can only hope that Mittens has the fire in the belly to go up against Obumbler in the 3 debates next month. We all know that Obozo will use the same tactics that were on display back in 08. Remember how he kept calling McCain by his first name and the old doofus kept calling him Senator Obama or just Senator. Obummer ran circles around McLame just by being a disrespectfully jerkwad and if Mittens isn’t careful el presidente “I WON” will walk all over him like a used mat. Much to the delight of the MSM.

      Ken b on September 25, 2012 at 6:18 pm


        “If Mittens isn’t careful el presidente “I WON” will walk all over him like a used mat. Much to the delight of the MSM.”

        If that does happen, it’ll pretty much be a 90-minute distillation of this entire election.

        Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 7:21 pm

        Ken b, that is a ridiculous hope. One reason Mormons don’t imbibe things like coffee and colas, not to mention alcohol, is to avoid any troubling “passions” from arising. Maybe he needs a caffein pump (like an insulin pump) but it ain’t gonna happen.

        Italkit on September 27, 2012 at 2:37 am

    Speaking of footwear, does anyone truly believe that fantasy proclaimed by Michelle Obama that he wore shoes one size too small and drove a rusted-out car, in her DNC speech?

    Rochelle on September 25, 2012 at 11:06 am

    This is just as aside. The thing about sitting is an Americanism. Men who are considered polite in other countries would never sit with their legs open, especially in front of women. I’m not just speaking of moslem countries either. So maybe it is an affectation by O, but it’s irrelevant to his masculinity. BTW, not all gay men are effeminate.

    Italkit on September 27, 2012 at 2:34 am

The problem is this: As the campaign season progresses, the swing vote gets smaller; people, one by one, have made up their minds. Undecided voters by October tend to represent the bottom of the barrel: voters who are poorly read, have weak party affiliation, and are likely to make up their minds based on candidates’ highly subjective traits having nothing to do with the issues.

It’s a dirty little secret among pollsters, but this residual swing vote is very heavily female. And guess what kind of people watch “The View?” I don’t have to tell you. This is why Romney has decided to appear on the show. He secretly knows this show is b.s. At the same time, he desperately needs the female swing vote, especially in swing states. If he can’t win Florida and Ohio, he’s virtually toast.

rocker on September 25, 2012 at 12:35 am

    In both states, Romney isn’t helped by unpopular Republican governors. He’s going to have to spend a lot of time there to have a chance. Obama is ahead in OH but its a close race in FL.

    The debates will help people to make up their minds and if Romney can’t state why he deserves the day job people are going to stick with what’s safe.

    This should be a year where the challenger is in the lead but unfortunately for Mitt Happens, no one is excited enough to care about him.

    NormanF on September 25, 2012 at 2:21 am


      Well maybe the candidate should do something to GET people excited, then.

      “All is well” isn’t going to hack it anymore. This campaign needs radical surgery. I would start by having the candidate look directly into the camera and make a solemn promise to have an absolute, top-to-bottom freeze on every last PENNY of spending increases…ESPECIALLY for Social Security and Medicare. Time for everyone to sacrifice. If he ever did that (and I actually believed him) I would drop Virgil Goode in an instant. And I would send Romney the full $5K tonight. Not that he’d ever do something so rash.

      Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 2:45 am

    Unfortunately you are correct that a large group of women do not watch “hard” news and get their information from such daytime shows and consider Stewart and Colbert “hard news shows” Truly sad.

    Rochelle on September 25, 2012 at 11:11 am

The establishment republicans keep trying to sell this mantra that “Romney hasn’t connected with ordinary people” thus the bowing to the pressure to appear with these daytime nitwits. Bad idea!

Gman213 on September 25, 2012 at 1:19 am

@skzion – I wasn’t offended by your notation about that cretin and his use of the “@” and your proposal to stop using it, I was just pointing out that I’m used to using the “@” thing and gaybama doesn’t own it. Sort of how like I resent the gays for commandeering the word “gay” and “queer.” I enjoy using archaic language and hate having to relinquish it because someone or some group abuses it. But I digress: I just discovered “@”‘s handiness: to wit, when replying to two people in one post!

Oh, and great piece of writing here – hilarious: “President Mom Jeans looks like the rotten meat in an old stale hag sandwich. Everyone including Jar Jar Obinks…”

@skunky – Thanks. I also scan for your posts by your avatar, too. I always enjoy reading them. When I finally get around to “Twitter”, I’ll be sure to follow you. I’m just now starting to realize what it is and its use.

@ chowching – I thought you were just a troll, but your last post shows some insight. Keep up the good work because I think we’re already booked up with enough inane ramblers around here.

DS_ROCKS! on September 25, 2012 at 1:53 am


    Archaic language? Cretin? Why THANK you, that’s very white of you!

    Where’s the love, there, fella? I’ve never criticized anyone on this site except for the two idiots who think they own it. IDK, maybe you’d better stop using the @ just to be on the safe side. You wouldn’t want to make them mad.

    And if you haven’t been paying attention, I call it “Gay Obama” because it thinks that society should be willing to destroy itself to prevent ONE more gay teenager from deciding to go all an hero. That means off himself. Well, this whole attempt at being a guilt-merchant hustler strongly resembles Obama’s approach to the race issue that has served him so well. I mean, right?

    He’s also pretty picky about which parts of the halakha he wants to observe. Exterminate Muslims (who didn’t even exist when the Torah was written)? Check. Dietary rules? Double check. Stoning sodomites to death? Ehm, he’ll have to get back to you on that one.

    The Christians have a word for empty, going-through-the-motions faith: pharisaism. And you don’t have to be a Christian to think that some of Judaism’s “leaders” had effed it up good by then.

    Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 2:55 am

      monkey, thanks for the anti-semitism. If you knew anything about Pharisees, you’d know that there were several sub-sects of them and only a few were even remotely guilty of what the false messiah accused them of. It was, in fact, the Pharisees who saved Judaism.

      Italkit on September 27, 2012 at 2:42 am


        Um, okaaay then – do we at least agree that “empty, going-through-the-motions faith” should NOT be the foundation for Judaism or any other religion? Because it sounds like Gay Obama never got the memo. I’d say that his hollow, mechanical invocation of religion fits those “accusations” to a T.

        Jesus never trashed Judaism itself, just some of its sorrier “leaders.” If you seriously believe that insincere hypocrisy is what “saved Judaism” (LOL, from WHAT?), then perhaps YOU are the anti-Semite.

        Statusmonkey on September 27, 2012 at 11:05 am

    Thanks, DS_Rocks.

    skzion on September 25, 2012 at 1:59 pm

It would have helped if Romney had been able to effectively attack Obamacare. But that is kind of hard, since he was one of the architects of it. So they both agree on it, as well as on admitting and incorporating illegal aliens.

And he has the deceptive tactic of giving verbal mention to some thought which appeals to conservatives, and never mentioning it again, e.g. defending Israel. He will say once that Obama should have met Netanyahu, and then the thought evaporates, never to be mentioned again, not emphasized in campaign speeches, and forgotten forever, unless he is asked a direct question, and then, maybe.

Little Al on September 25, 2012 at 7:06 am

And the Republican Party hacks are already working to insulate themselves from blame when Romney loses.

The trouble, you see, is organizational. The problem is the way the campaign is structured, the decision-making processes, and the awkwardness of the chain of command. But, by no means is the fault with his policies.

Little Al on September 25, 2012 at 7:27 am

This only goes to show the level to whick politics in our country have fallen………from the Founding Fathers to obama, romney, barney frank, maxine waters, sharpton and jackson, being “Interviewed” by the “Pimp with a limp,” etc. Going on these mindless “Shows” that are watched by what I call “Drones,” are degrading to the Office of Presidency. The obamas use these shows to shore up their moron base and romney uses it……..why? Probably, he was advised by the McCain advisors surrounding him…….and steering him towards a loss in November. Popular vote results? My prediction: Obama 53% Romney 47%…………with or without the help of the Spanish, Soros-backed company that will be counting our votes. As Stalin said, “It’s not who votes, it’s who COUNTS the votes that matters.” I sense that we now live in a country with only one political party……with two heads. You have to give credit to the dems…..they know how to circle the wagons….with the help of the state run media. The repubs are expert at forming circular firing squads.

herbster on September 25, 2012 at 9:19 am

How ’bout trashing Obama? You’re disgusting, Peggy!

A.Men on September 25, 2012 at 9:40 am

Haw-Haw! It made my heart feel like an alligator to see Monkeypud (who reads EVERY. WORD. of my posts and I skip over his narcoleptic vomit…)chuck a wobbly. Just as I expected. And he made it even more easy to skip his pablum.

Now’s a good time to let people know how they can get an avatar for here if they so desire…

To have an avatar here you must have a WORDPRESS and GRAVATAR account and both must have the same e-mail address you type in HERE. That’s all it takes. When you use your e-mail here that matches your e-mails at WordPress and Gravatar it automatically shows up.

It’s very enjoyable to watch a a fool hoist by his own petard. One just sits back and enjoys the self-induced implosion. Here comes the BOOM…..

Skunky on September 25, 2012 at 10:19 am


    When you pretend that you never read my posts (and also respond to them, LOL), is it me you are trying to fool – or yourself? “Fool” is pretty much your default setting.

    Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 10:55 am

Well. That was unpleasant. I am reminded of the hilarious and disgusting film clip from Monty Python’s Mssr. Creosote –

NSFW, boys and girls. Bring a strong stomach.

Jack on September 25, 2012 at 10:19 am


is recognized net-wide as a referrer in blogs and forums. To harp on someone using it in that fashion seems a bit overly sensitive bs to me.

RA2216 on September 25, 2012 at 10:27 am


    Ya think? As I mentioned elsewhere, most of the airhead comments come from two idiots who think that they own this site. Apparently never having heard of email, they like to use Schlussel’s site as their own personal Facebook page. Today they treat us to a discussion of dietary laws. You DO see the connection to Mitt Romney going on the View, right?

    Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 11:02 am

Romney will push congress to pass a few Tea Party – friendly tax laws and maybe try and get a few changes passed to improve the flawed Medicare and Welfare programs, but that will be it. Because he is too soft, I would be shocked if he did anything to stop the illegal aliens 30yrs and under from taking jobs from legal citizens, and I doubt he’ll do much in overturning most of ObamaCare. Maybe if Conservatives have full control of Congress, we can do what is right despite Mitt Romney. That is our best hope.

Dina K on September 25, 2012 at 11:25 am

One’s priorities are revealed by how one allocates one’s time. People who care about jihad do not spend their time engaging in endless flame wars (mostly one-sided, nowadays) with those who also care about jihad. This tells us everything we need to know about monkeyscum. Yes, I have asked whether he is a democratic operative or just an unemployed troll. Yes, his need for ego stroking is obvious and risible (no coincidence that “status” is in his nick). But really, who cares? Cretins may have different back stories, but they are no more interesting because of that.

skzion on September 25, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    @Gay Obama,

    “People who care about jihad do not spend their time engaging in endless flame wars.”

    LOL, no, they spend their time chattering about John Waters movies and baaawing about gay suicide.

    Go rub your sore cooter in private, dude. I doubt anyone else here besides the Skuzz wants to hear it.

    You and the Skuzz certainly waste a lot of words on people that you never ever read, ever. On this page, you and the Skuzz filled up the comments page with valentines to me before I even got here. Not that I mind, but WHO is the troll here?

    Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 3:20 pm

    Bingo, Skzion. Who cares what that latrine slime trail thinks? No one with a brain. Also, it is evident of what a sad loser he is because he can’t stop reading our posts and we don’t even read his when they are directed to us SPECIFICALLY. Also, you were diplomatic to him and he didn’t care…he was a retarded crotch back to you. That says it ALL.

    He is thin-skinned and from the get-go (other than being profoundly boring) he has never made sense or a cohesive point. We are not missing much by ignoring him. It’s easy, oh so easy.

    The most pathetic thing about Monkeypud is that he’s all mental-illness (waiting…waiting…waiting for Bob Dole…) and has ZERO to offer in the marketplace of ideas. Even if he spit fire at me with every post, if he had a brain and made a good point I’d have some respect for him but I have more respect for dumb bitchies who dedicate their lives to watching “The Jersey Shore” than that sh**-house nutter.

    Skunky on September 25, 2012 at 7:41 pm


      As I said to Gay Obama: “You and the Skuzz certainly waste a lot of words on people that you never ever read, ever.”

      Thanks for proving my point with your post.

      Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 9:20 pm

Long ago we had _Waiting for Godot_. Then we had _Waiting for Guffman_. Now we have _Waiting for Bob Dole_.

skzion on September 25, 2012 at 5:51 pm

    @Gay Obama,

    Good! It’d be an excellent double bill with “Waiting for Gay Obama to Stop Using Someone Else’s Site as his Personal Facebook Page.” Serbio-Croatian translators available upon request.

    Statusmonkey on September 25, 2012 at 7:10 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field