November 12, 2012, - 1:22 am

Petraeus Catfight: Did Ex-CIA Director Have More Girlfriends? Other Lessons I Learned From the General

By Debbie Schlussel

So, now, we’re learning that the reason disgraced former CIA Director David Petraeus’ extra-marital affair with Paula Broadwell (age 40) came to light is that she was e-mail harassing his younger female friend, Jill Kelley (age 37). Wow, this is gettin’ better than “Fatal Attraction.” Was Kelley another Petraeus concubine? She says no, and so does Petraeus. Whatever the case, we now know that the FBI knew about all of this back in the summer.

“Look at My Harem!”: David Petraues w/ Paula Broadwell (above) and Natalie Khawam, Scott Kelley, Jill Kelley & Holly Petraeus (below)

While it’s being reported that Kelley and her husband were close friends of the Petraesus, Broadwell certainly thought there was something going on between them, which is why Broadwell send threatening e-mails to Kelley. It begs the question: how many other chicks did this unscrupulous then-CIA Director have? He may turn out to be the White Kwame Kilpatrick . . . at least in the “dating” (euphemism) department.

What kind of CIA Director has multiple girlfriends other than his wife? Maybe this one. He does like Islam, and, hey, he’s got his own harem. Imagine the blackmail this doofus exposed himself to. If it weren’t so scary to U.S. national security, it would be comedy gold. I mean, is this guy Petraeus gonna turn out to have more mistresses than Tiger Woods? Don’t bet against it.

And the story has shown us a lot of things:

1) Whenever an author says he or she had “exclusive access” as Broadwell constantly did, you gotta ask: does that mean the author is sleeping with the subject? I mean the book she wrote is a gushing loveletter to a hayseed goober pan-Arabist in uniform who butt-snorkled Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan at the cost of thousands of American lives. And, yes, like you, I laughed at the title of the book, “All In,” which should’ve been called “All In With a Condom,” or if they didn’t use protection (which means Broadwell’s hubby now has the diseases of all the General’s chicks), then, “All In Without Protection,” which kind of describes what Petraeus did to America by using CentCom and the CIA as his personal pick-up joint, and by sending American men to build roads and hand out candy to people armed with SAMs aimed at the Americans. Insider access sometimes really means inside her access. I think there’s no question that two egomaniacs–Broadwell and Petraeus–temporarily found their soulmates. How many times must we hear about their six minute miles and how Broadwell was at the top of her class at West Point and a fitness champ. Me, me, me, me. Look at me, notice me, I’m important! Too bad Glenn Close is too old to play her in the movie.

2) Anyone who was worried that Petraeus wouldn’t be there to spout the BS he already spouted about the Benghazi consulate murders (he already blamed it on the anti-Mohammed video), well, you have something else to look forward to. I guarantee there will be hearings on Petraeus unzipped. Yup, our great Kardashified country just got even more dignified. Thanks, General.

3) You have to doubt what you read from Ronald Kessler and NewsMax and many other so-called “journalism” outlets on the right, just as you have to do the same with those on the left. For much of the weekend, Drudge had as his main headline a link to a “report” by Kessler, claiming his FBI insiders told him they were the investigators and that the investigation began as a look into corruption. Uh, WRONG. It began when Paula Broadwell sent threatening e-mails to what she believed was her Petraeus co-concubine, Jill Kelley, and Kelley reported it to a friend who is an FBI agent. NewsMax’s Kessler also claimed that Broadwell broke up with Petraeus and he sent her “thousands of e-mails” trying to get her back, which failed. WRONG again. It’s pretty clear Broadwell was still very much hot and heavy for Petraeus, but that he was either not interested or was, indeed, still having an affair with Broadwell. I mean, why else would she threaten what she thought was the other chick . . . if she broke it off with the General and ignored his e-mails trying to get her back. Clearly that isn’t what happened. Either Kessler made all of this up (which it sounds like) or his source was a fraud. Either way, his “reporting” wasn’t too accurate. Not even close. But, hey, he wrote for the New York Times for years, until they dumped him and NewsMax scooped him up from the trash bin.

It’s probably the same for NewsMax, where there’s little fact-checking or real journalism to speak of, and you can’t believe the vast majority of what you read. The right constantly complains about the left-wing mainstream media, but then serves up completely false, totally fabricated crap at places like NewsMax, WND, and Breitfraud (all of the sites of which spent two weeks covering Sean Hannity’s ass when my story broke that he committed the Freedom Concert fraud – the three Breitfraud sites all backed Sean Vannity’s claim that he paid for his private planes, his posse’s fancy suites and vehicles, etc., and yet never ever obtained or demanded any receipts or financial records . . . because they show otherwise). (Conservative News Service did the same, because it’s owned by Hannity buddy Brent Bozell, Jr.)

Breitfraud chief Joel Pollak repeatedly tweeted what a great guy and friend of Israel Nelson Mandela is, something only a complete ignoramus or liar would say (he’s both). It’s well known that Mandela is a Jew-hating, anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian piece of crap, despite the fact that dhimmi Jews helped him during Apartheid. Pollak just doesn’t know what he’s talking about or care about the facts, and again, he heads Breitfraud. That’s not to mention that for weeks, the Breitfraud sites ran the “work” of Jeff Dunetz, who goes by the deceptive name “Yid With Lid” (he’s not a religious Jew), attacking Anthony Weiner’s exposing himself on Twitter, all while Dunetz knew that he, himself, had posted his own masturbation video online and sent it to women other than his wife, in addition to apparently rating the prostitutes he patronized. (He used the fake name “Sammy Benoit” for some time, as well as “Gridney,” in order to evade detection.)

Yup, you cannot believe these people and you have to question their motives . . . whether it’s Paula Broadwell, whose “work” appeared in the New York Times or things you read on these “conservative” sites, which simply lie to get their own slice of the Drudge links and traffic. Whose itch are they scratching? It usually isn’t an arms length, journalistically ethical relationship. And what they’re serving up isn’t fact or accurate.

Bottom line: I doubt Broadwell is the only one. She’s just the most mentally unstable concubine. David Petraeus didn’t just start doing this at age 60–or 59, since he only recently celebrated his birthday.

So, how many chicks did this arrogant fool have on the side? You can bet I’m not the only one asking. His wife is, too.

Aren’t you glad this guy wasn’t the Republican nominee for President, as Roger Ailes and Peter King and William Kristol and others wanted? The information would have come out, and Obama would have won in a landslide.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

85 Responses

    Debbie, you write, “If it weren’t so scary to U.S. national security, it would be comedy gold.”

    I respect your work and read you regularly, but am beginning to think there really is no national security left to lament. obama and his head flunky, Slow Joe, have leaked all kinds of secret info, from the details of the Bin Laden mission, to the classified codes of the missile systems we sold to the UK, to God knows what to Kathryn Bigelow for her pro-obama movie, to the attempted prosecution of the CIA interrogators for being too effective, and so on.

    Knuckles on November 13, 2012 at 10:56 pm

And Kelley is Lebanese? And Allen was spending at least 40 minutes per day emailing her? And we wonder why the Afghan war is lost…with such individuals at the top…Utterly disgraceful on so many levels.

J.S. on November 13, 2012 at 11:20 am

    not only that, J.S., Khawam is a common IRAQI name according to some genealogy sites. The sisters ware Maronite Christians but so what?

    Italkit on November 14, 2012 at 8:12 am

    *ARE Marionite.

    Italkit on November 14, 2012 at 8:13 am

Clinton must be jealous. This guy was getting more than he was.

burt on November 13, 2012 at 12:09 pm

Yeah, just wondering too. What kind of “liaison” work was this? Other than what they were fronting for? These ladies had the goods on Petraeus and the Afghan commader I imagine.

jake49 on November 13, 2012 at 5:14 pm

A couple of pieces of info floating around as facts – and three questions – keep them in mind as you put the puzzle together in the weeks to come. In no particular order:
(1) Christopher was arranging for Pan Am 103 relatives to visit Libya and speak to some insiders with knowledge of that attack.
(2a) Three or more were being held in detention in the Annex. (I’d believe this even though Pussy Galore said it first)
(2b) The Seals were guarding them. (as above)
(2c) The Seals were on double duty then as they were supposed to be protecting Christopher. They ran to find him when things got nastier.
(3a) Christopher or the CIA there were trying to send arms to Syria to help the “rebels” (i.e., aka the various factions there that include the MB and other terrorist groups)
(3b) They were also trying to prevent the arms from going to the Al Qaeda part of the Syrian rebels.
(4) Obama had signed on his Day 1 an executive order there will be no more secret CIA prisons. His access to Bin Laden in Pakistan was predicated on that per Hillary. Key elements in the ISI knew, they were tired of having to have him there, he had outlived his usefulness even to them, but they can’t after the fact appear have gone along with it.

Now for the big quiz:

Which other big connected US Lebanese family is totally in at the top with the FBI?

Which other big connected US Lebanese family has deep political ties within Syria.

Which other big connected US Lebanese family rose to the top of terrors news during the first 9/11 terror attack.

More pieces later.

IamNOTPussyGalore on November 13, 2012 at 10:47 pm

Extra-marital affairs a threat to national security? That would be anywhere within the 100 worst things they have done?
You really thought that CIA directors nowadays kind of DOESN`T multiple girlfriends other than his wife? That such things just doesn´t happen in the US military and CIA? In that case, I got a bridge to sell you!

Nope, that is the very last thing to worry about from such a leadership, compared to the bigger picture, that is simply trivial.

It isn´t even blackmail material, noone in the US governement gives a shit, male hookers and animal husbandry could have been involved too, it wouldn´t have made a difference. It is just an excuse, so Obama can replace him with a more politically loyal cronie for whatever reasons.
Intrigues, like in the incapable, corrupt regimes for which construction thousands of US soldier lives have been wasted for.

There is just no morality/ethic left, only self-interest, Ayn Rand´s wet dreams come true.

Radonvium-312 on November 14, 2012 at 11:17 am

Good stuff folks. I never liked Patraeus especially after Obama replaced Gen McChrystal with him in Afganistan. Patraeus just looked like a “weak sister” as compared to McChrystal. It always amazes me…These guys (Patraeus and the like)big egos, big accomplishments and perceived to be powerful generally by younger women and the like. It’s an old story..all for naught because of that mesmerizing part of the young female anatomy…and the saga continues. I guess as they say “it’s lonely at the top”?

Jack Kates III on November 17, 2012 at 3:36 pm

I truly love your website.. Great colors & theme. Did you
make this website yourself? Please reply back as I’m hoping to create my very own site and would love to find out where you got this from or what the theme is named. Appreciate it!

Golf practise balls on July 24, 2013 at 6:25 pm

So true! And thank you for pointing out Dunetz’ hypocrisy. I’m the woman he made that disgusting video for and I was sick when I opened it and note saying this was proving his ‘love’ for me. Glad I didn’t delete it. For him to say a word about Weiner is hysterical. At least Weiner took responsibility. Dunetz is blaming a lady in NYC who called him on his sex addiction and continues to smear her as a liar, stalker, etc after he tried to seduce her too. I’m in California and I moved a couple years ago so now Dunetz can’t find me or get my internet pulled AGAIN. I got plenty of emails accusing me of Loshan Hara, knowing I’m a fierce supporter of Israel and a Jew myself. Dunetz is a attention whore at best. Dunetz had ads for sex partners all over the web since 1998. Makes me wonder if Petraeus did the same? Keep up the outstanding work!

Elisheba on August 16, 2013 at 2:37 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field