August 29, 2014, - 11:06 am

Pierce Brosnan Wants You to Know Chechen Muslims Aren’t Terrorists, America Is – “The November Man”

By Debbie Schlussel


I used to like actor Pierce Brosnan . . . until I saw his new virulently anti-American movie, pan-Muslim “The November Man.” The cliche-ridden film, which he executive-produced and in which he stars, debuted in theaters this week. The theme of the movie is that America is the villain of the world and that all Chechnyan Muslim terrorist attacks were really perpetrated by the CIA to frame the poor Muslims and help Russia. Huh?


Yup, this is the America that made Irish immigrant Brosnan fabulously rich and famous beyond his wildest dreams. And he repays us with America hatred on the silver screen. America hatred that is absolutely false and defamatory. The silver screen slander is absolutely disgusting.

Did the CIA and America really perpetrate the 2004 Beslan school massacre and not the Chechen Muslims who took over 1,100–most of them children–hostage and murdered 334? Did America and its CIA–and not Chechen Muslims–attack Moscow’s Dubrovka Theater, taking nearly 1,000 people hostage and killing 130 of them? Of course not. Brutal, hardened Chechen Muslim terrorists perpetrated these violent Muslim attacks. And Chechen Muslim terrorists have proudly joined their fellow co-religionists in ISIS for jihad over in Syria and Iraq.

But Pierce Brosnan’s absurd propaganda movie–posing as an action thriller flick–wants you to think that America is behind it all. That’s the central narrative of Brosnan’s latest, America-hating star vehicle–that America wants to set up and frame Muslims to help evil Russian rapists and war criminals gain power in Europe. If anything, in reality, the CIA sets up everyone else against the Muslims, as the agency has been–from its very inception–a pan-Arabist, pro-Muslim, anti-Israel, anti-American organization that would never dream of doing anything like what is done in this movie. Not even close, because the agency would never ever make Muslims look bad to the benefit of everyone else. Just the opposite in fact.

The story: Brosnan is a retired CIA assassin who fought for the good guys and is now retired and outta the biz. But he is drawn back in when a woman is spying for the CIA on a top Russian official (a former general who is seeking to become the country’s President). But the woman is found out and so the CIA murders her (“to get rid of loose ends”) just after Brosnan saves her. It turns out the woman is the love of Brosnan’s life and the mother of his young daughter. She obtained photos of young girls the Russian official raped (all of whom it conveniently turns our are Chechen Muslims).

Brosnan finds out that the shooter who killed his babymama is his young, smart protege, whom he mentored in the CIA and who was his closest friend at the time. The whole rest of the movie involves Brosnan trying to protect a young Chechen woman, whose family was killed by the Russian official, after the U.S. bombed a building and made it look like the Chechen Muslims did it. The Russian official raped the woman for years after that. Brosnan is trying to find which of two top CIA officials (both of whom he used to work with) ordered the terrorist attack to unfairly frame the innocent, victimized Chechen Muslim terrorists.

The movie is James Bond light and, at age 61, Brosnan is still trying to be James Bond, a position from which he was deposed well over a decade ago. This film comes complete with has-been Bond Girl, Olga Kurylenko as the innocent Chechen Muslim who was raped by the Russian general, after her family was murdered by him with the help of America and the CIA.

Like I said, Pierce Brosnan, with this movie, gives a giant F-U to America. And, if he thinks we are so bad–as America is the blatant villain in this movie–why does he still live here and make millions off of the American moviegoing public? Because we’re suckers, and he knows he can get away with it. Nobody seems to care that he made this America-hating movie. Except me and you.

In the movie, the head CIA official who set the whole thing up sums up why he promoted Russians who rape children and did it by blowing up buildings and framing Chechen Muslims:

“East versus West, that’s old news. Us versus the Middle East: I can live with. That’s our fight.”

Brosnan–who looked quite old and haggard in this–has already announced he’s making a sequel to this movie. I can only imagine the premise: that America–not ISIS–is raping, torturing, and murdering thousands all over the world and setting up ISIS to take the blame.

Heck, that’s already the going theory throughout the paranoid Muslim world, which “The November Man” plays right into. And all you need to do is substitute ISIS for Chechen Muslim terrorists in this movie. The message would still be the same:

Muslim terrorists: they didn’t do it, evil America did.

Thanks, Pierce Brosnan, for the tip. Now, go the hell back to Ireland.

**** UPDATE: Since there seems to be some confusion among certain readers, let the record reflect that I’m well aware and have noted on this site and elsewhere many times over the course of my life that the CIA is pan-Arabist/pro-Muslim, and anti-Israel. As I noted in a review of a similar movie in 2008:

“I’m no fan of the CIA, as I believe the agency is pan-Arabist, anti-American, and works counter to the goals of our country. Scholar Laurie Mylroie has written some excellent books on this. This movie essentially makes the same point. Except that the point of this movie is really not about the CIA. It’s against America in general. And that’s why it’s wrong.

I repeat that sentiment with regard to this atrocious movie, “The November Man.” If this movie had portrayed America as setting everyone else up to look bad, in order to help Muslims and make them look good and benefit from it, then this movie would have been accurate. Unfortunately, the movie shows just the opposite, as my review makes quite clear.


Watch the trailer . . .

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

39 Responses

Just curious: Did Mr. Brosnan come from the Northern part of Ireland which is still controlled by perenially Jew-hating England? If not, he certainly keeps ideologically after many British “artists” (i.e. Roger Waters, Elvis Costello, Emma Thompson) who have effectively taken the side of jihad against the West.
The other question: Which of the oil-rich Arab petrodollar states, if any, funded this pile of horse manure? (Given Qatar’s ownership of Al Jazeera, and the odious “ImageNation Abu Dhabi” – to say nothing of Prince Alwaleed’s share in the parent of Fox “News”[sic].)

ConcernedPatriot on August 29, 2014 at 11:12 am

    Actually the other side are Jew-haters too. They identify with the Palis.They stupidly see the Palis as being an “occupied” people and Israel as colonialist “occupier”. Much like their own situation with England. Ignorant fools, the two situations aren’t remotely alike.
    Ireland is VERY anti-Israel, and outright antisemitic..

    Laura L on August 30, 2014 at 11:57 am

Did Ron Paul consult on this? Pierce Brosnan is really biting the hand that feeds him.

Worry01 on August 29, 2014 at 11:27 am

It’s an in your face representation of the “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter” postulate. A page right out of the left’s playbook. It’s one that all too many, starting with the Jon Liebowitz-Steven Cold Bear Brigade will be happy to swallow at $11 a pop, or whatever movie tickets cost today.

Then they’ll take it home and spew it all over their households, school, work, bars, everywhere.

The Indoctrination is being televised.

Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock . . .

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on August 29, 2014 at 12:13 pm

That is precisely why movies like this are so insidious – and why continuing to allow the 18-to-20 year old vote is so dangerous to our continued survival as a nation.

ConcernedPatriot on August 29, 2014 at 12:32 pm

Yawn… another lefty libtardy Hollywood cliche of “the bad guy turns out to be the old White American”…

unPC on August 29, 2014 at 1:02 pm

It seems it’s really a truther flick because if the CIA perpetrated Dubrovka then hey it only stands to reason they were probably also behind 9-11.

japple on August 29, 2014 at 2:11 pm

Except Hollywood probably couldn’t quite get away with a real truther production so they dished this substitute up instead.

japple on August 29, 2014 at 2:11 pm

Wish Brosnan would move to Chechnya so he could find out more about the world of Chechen terrorism first hand but I guess he’ll stay in Hollywood were he gets the royal treatment.

japple on August 29, 2014 at 2:13 pm

    That won’t happen japple. In Hollywood he doesn’t have to deal with the real world consequences of supporting, abetting, and enabling terrorists. If he actually lived among them, he or someone he loved might become the victim of their evil.

    Lots cleaner to stay in your gated community mansions and propagandize against the West.

    PitandPen on August 29, 2014 at 6:29 pm

Thanks for the review, and the info!

We had seen the trailers, and thought the film looked good. Thank you for preventing me from wasting the money on the tickets, as well as my time.

I was a Brosnan fan, until today. Did not know he hated America so much. I had felt bad about the tragedies in his life. Now, well, serves him right.

Annoyed Rooikat on August 29, 2014 at 3:30 pm


The natural consequence of a mindless actor getting enough stroke to produce his own film. Reviews have been less than kind.

Prometheus on August 29, 2014 at 3:44 pm

The $11 that I saved by not seeing this trash will be gladly donated to your website!

Recalcitrant Zionist on August 29, 2014 at 5:25 pm

“In the movie, the head CIA official who set the whole thing up sums up why he promoted Russians who rape children and did it by blowing up buildings and framing Chechen Muslims:”

What writer would even think up such a disgusting, islamo-pandering/apologist plot and what vapid moviegoers would pay to watch this crapaganda?

DS_ROCKS! on August 29, 2014 at 5:42 pm

Like in “Non-Stop” and the Bourne movies, Hollywood is afraid to portray the real terrorists, so they make America the bad guy. I refuse to pay to see this nonsense. When I was a kid, John Wayne made action movies where we were the good guys. This is a sad commentary on 21st Century America, where we can’t identify our enemy because it might offend him.

Smitty on August 29, 2014 at 7:34 pm

Anyway I loved watching the movie, I hope that I am not going to hell for it :p

shisha_man on August 29, 2014 at 9:04 pm

Another dumb ass Brit.

Dave In Arizona on August 29, 2014 at 10:38 pm

Who wrote the script? I doubt it was Piers Brosnan, though, admittedly, he could have turned the part down.

Not that I will be seeing it as I learnt years ago to try to avoid the product of Hollywood. For one thing, it teaches us to be entertained by violence, which is something the God of Abraham, the true God, hates.

This is an odd and dangerous Grimpen Mire of PC from the sound of Debbie’s review – one I would not wish to venture into. And why Hollywood is so against America, which I would have thought has been rather good to it, I do not know. It is all part of the mysterious and murky world of politics, which I try to be no part of.

On the silver lining side, it makes me extra grateful for the rock of God’s inspired word. God’s standards don’t change to suit the politics of the day.

sue on August 30, 2014 at 2:38 am

    Sue, it is indeed odd, the America haters, especially Hollywood, and how they have contributed heavily to America hating becoming an industry. But perhaps you are familiar with the coffee table book Hollywood Babylon? It is a very old book. Hollywood has always been a cultural cesspool when you take in to account the motivations behind its “products,” and the collective cultural malaise existent therein.

    As we continue to hurtle toward The Great Tribulation at breakneck speed worldwide, I often liken the human race to being a macrocosm of what goes on inside a severely psychologically conflicted person. I believe Hollywood is exemplary of that.

    Alfredo from Puerto Rico on August 30, 2014 at 10:14 am

      No I haven’t read “Hollywood Babylon” Afredo, and I am not sure I could face it. And, yes, the forces in charge of the world are deeply neurotic, deeply damaged, and are bent on destruction. Isn’t that why we are to be “no part” of it, to stand clear?

      I am impressed you know we are heading for the great Tribulation. I was hobbling about this morning with my Bible, trying to tell people – and trying to tell them about the incoming Kingdom of God.

      sue on August 30, 2014 at 12:19 pm

        Sue, inasmuch as I do not like to post links, I will merely direct you to a story that appeared this morning. I sent it to a couple friends of mine. It may be appearing elsewhere, but I found it on FOX News’ web site. It has now been moved down to a lesser spot, but still on their front page. The headline states “Is there a microchip implant in your future?”

        After reading part of the article, I immediately sent an e-mail to two friends proclaiming that they should watch the Vatican and European Union, because surely The Mark of The Beast could be such an implant. I then came back to the page and finished it. I recommend you read the article. I think you will see that it connects well with the rest of the dots that are forming the picture of a world indeed poised on the precipice of The Great Tribulation.

        Remember the passage in scripture that no one could buy or sell, except those that have The Mark Of The Beast. With one-world government types like George Soros giving directions to The Teleprompter-In-Chief, the U.S. and Israel will soon be brought low.

        At that point, it could plunge the world in to the kind of chaos and darkness that would bring about the formation of The Beast, disguised as a “savior” of sorts, delivering the message that this religio-political system is the only way for the world to live in peace and cohesion, under this new superpower. Indeed, scripture says that the world will marvel, and believe that no other power could make war with The Beast.

        Of course, The Beast will require loyalty to its system of government, hence a microchip implant in everyone. Anyone who refuses, well, . . .

        you know the story as well as I do. Of course, after all that misery of The Great Tribulation, Christ returns, and eternity sets in, which will of course, be nothing but wonderful.

        Alfredo from Puerto Rico on August 30, 2014 at 12:47 pm

          Hello Alfredo – Yes, we are living in interesting times. It seems that even people who don’t believe in God, let alone the Bible, see that we are building up to something. According to a recent article in the Online Independent, there are now only 11 nations in the world free from some kind of conflict. And how long before they too are engulfed?

          1914 was a very significant date in Bible prophecy and we are now a hundred years into the end times.

          However, how should we understand the Beast and its mark? It is clearly vital that we get this right. We believe that the Inspired Scriptures explain themselves, which will avoid any conflicting human interpretations.

          And, if you look at the Book of Daniel, you will notice that in Bible prophecy the nations of the world are pictured as beasts.

          This is an extract from a verse by verse commentary on Revelation, published by the Watchower Bible and Tract Society:

          “Before the fall of Babylon in 539 B.C.E., the Jewish prophet Daniel saw visions involving ferocious beasts. At Daniel 7:2-8 he describes four beasts coming out of the sea, the first resembling a lion, the second a bear, the third a leopard, and “see there! a fourth beast, fearsome and terrible and unusually strong . . . and it had ten horns.” This is remarkably similar to the wild beast seen by John about the year 96 C.E. That beast also has the characteristics of a lion, a bear, and a leopard, and it has ten horns. What is the identity of the huge beasts seen by Daniel? He informs us: “These huge beasts . . . are four kings that will stand up from the earth.” (Daniel 7:17) Yes, those beasts represent “kings,” or political powers of the earth…
          It is clear, therefore, that the Author of the inspired Bible regards the political powers of the earth as beasts. What kind of beasts? One commentator calls the wild beast of Revelation 13:1, 2 a “brute,” and adds: “We accept all the connotations that ?????? [the·ri?on, the Greek word for “beast”] conveys, such as that of a cruel, destructive, frightful, ravenous, etc., monster.” How well that describes the bloodstained political system by which Satan has dominated mankind! The seven heads of this wild beast stand for six major world powers featured in Bible history up to John’s day—Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome—and a seventh world power prophesied to appear later.—Compare Revelation 17:9, 10.”

          You can get a copy from your local Kingdom Hall, if you want one (without charge).

          The point being that the “beast”, its mark, and its image are already here. Isn’t this why we must be “no part” of the world – be no part of its divisive politics and its cruel wars?

          The incoming Kingdom of God is already teaching us “to study war no more”.

          sue on September 1, 2014 at 3:19 am

          sue sez:

          “The point being that the “beast”, its mark, and its image are already here. Isn’t this why we must be “no part” of the world – be no part of its divisive politics and its cruel wars?”

          sue, as I’ve pointed out before, is a parasite who would try to make us all parasites. Except that every parasite needs a host.

          sue isn’t just a parasite, though. She lays the groundwork for evil to triumph. I thought she had been banned. Too bad she hasn’t.

          skzion on September 1, 2014 at 3:09 pm

I guess we are just supposed to forget about the Boston bombers, their radical mother and bomb threatening sister.

George on August 30, 2014 at 5:56 am

Isn’t this the same plot as Mel Gibson’s Edge of Darkness?
The only difference being that it was the evil American defense contractors that were the real terrorists, not the innocent Muslims.

Steve G. on August 30, 2014 at 8:31 am

Like I’ve said before, I don’t go to the movies but it is a shame. I also thought I liked Pierce Brosnan. sigh.

Laura S. on August 30, 2014 at 9:55 am

Did you miss this sports-rage cover story jihad incident? Ali Mutleq, 25; Omar Mutleq, 20; and Abedalfattah Mutleq, 18, appeared in South Central District Court Monday on one charge each of Class C felony terrorizing using anger over a foul call as a cover story. This also happened to another soccer coach was beaten to death.

Oliver Grant on August 30, 2014 at 7:27 pm

Hating Russia is back in fashion.

I guess in part if you need a villain – and hey, its not politically correct to cast Islam in that role – Russia will do.

They’re not gonna kill Pierce Brosnan and his producers. But Muslims can and will come after you if you cross that invisible line no one is supposed to cross.

The movie is dreck but its also politically correct and safe. And the nice bonus tossed in is America is morally equivalent in its evil as the baddies in Moscow.

“The November Man” will also play well in the Muslim World – because of its them and that’s where Hollywood movies are shown these days after their past-sell date in American theaters.

NormanF on August 30, 2014 at 7:35 pm

Brosnan is just another terrorist-fellating coward.

By the way, the original book WAS a Cold war thriller, by Bill Granger.

Tom Kratman, in his book “Caliphate” has a delicious scene in which the American Embassy in Switzerland turns down a request for immigration by a German former Lefty Islamic lover whose daughter was attacked and gang-raped by Muslims in the mid 2020s. The USA had been nuclear assaulted by Muslims by that time and had responded in a highly appropriate fashion—Mecca and Medina had ceased to exist, as had must of the Muslim world, save in Europe. (This was a flashback, the present of the book was 2112.)

The commentary by the Embassy’s factotum was along the lines of: “you have a dangerous illness which is destroying your country. We had a taste of it and it almost destroyed ours. We get enough good quality immigrants from India (Hindus and Buddhists) and Vietnam. Why should we take you in?” (Tom, I hope that is a short enough quote.)

And thus, back to Dhimmi-hood and essentially slavery.

I am not Tom, although he is a friend of mine. His “Caliphate” is awesome enough to be made into a movie, but it will not happen. It is, however, available on Kindle for Free. His other works are also awesome.

G-d Bless Debbie and her work.

Occam's Tool on August 30, 2014 at 8:14 pm

    I hate typos, and forgive me, Debbie. “Most” of the Islamic world. Forgive me my typos.

    Occam's Tool on August 30, 2014 at 8:17 pm

I read that Pierce Brosnan has both U.S. and Irish citizenship. If he were really smart,he would have turned down that role. There are people probably asking “Why did this guy become an American citizen in the first place?”

G: Again, Brosnan is the Executive Producer of this movie. He chose to make this movie and chose himself for this role. DS

Ghostwriter on August 30, 2014 at 8:42 pm

If the underlying political concept of “The November Man” is that the CIA framed the Muslims, then yes, this movie is anti-American trash. However, if, instead of framing the Muslims, the movie’s real concept is that the CIA provided assistance to the Muslims or provided direction–then this review is off base.

Of course, the Muslims are the primary actors in terrorism. But the CIA is far from innocent, and, in any event, attacking the CIA isn’t anti-American. (And neither is attacking the US State Department, the FBI, or even the US President.) The CIA has a long history of supporting terrorism and instigating violence throughout the world. This is not a leftist or kooksville view, but is documented fact. For example, the CIA backed Osama bin Laden. That’s right, the CIA backed one of the major Islamoterrorist figures of modern times. Although the CIA justified helping the Islamoterrorists because they claimed it would aid in the fight against communism, But you don’t fight an enemy by backing someone who is likely to be your next enemy.

The CIA is also loaded with anti-Semites. Oh, let me correct myself; I mean loaded with anti-Zionists. (And the same goes for the US State Department.)

Take the current head of the CIA, John Brennan (and “take him” as in the Henny Youngman sense). Brennan is not only an Islamopanderer, he is actively supporting Islamic interests. One ex-FBI agent, John Guandolo, even asserted that Brennan IS a Muslim. Go to YouTube and search under “John Brenan” and “al-Quds.” What’s al-Quads, you say? It’s what the MUSLIMS call what REAL Americans call Jerusalem. You can hear CIA Director Brennan’s own words where he refers to al-Quds FIRST, and only mentions Jerusalem because many listeners don’t know what al-Quds represents. Get it? Let me make it real clear for you: THE DIRECTOR OF THE CIA, JOHN BRENNAN, IS AN ISLAM-FIRSTER.

And while you’re researching at YouTube, as search under “Michael Scheuer” and “Israel.” Scheurer is an ex-CIA agent and is a spokesperson for the CIA current policies, including its policies on Israel. (I use the term “ex-CIA” loosely; as once you’re part of the agency you continue to be part of it.) Scheuer has testified before Congress and made the positions of the CIA clear: The US should cease supporting Israel and back Islam. And don’t tell me that Scheuer is just expressing his own views and not those of the agency’s. If the CIA did not explicitly authorize and condone such statements and the CIA wanted them stopped, Scheuer wouldn’t have dared to open his yap on the subject. And if he persisted in making public statements that were not CIA-authorized, he might end up like former CIA Director William Colby, who drowned in a canoe “accident” under mysterious circumstances.

And I’ve just scratched the surface of the CIA. (For those who have studied American history know that the CIA recruited Nazis to work for them.)

So is being anti-CIA anti-American? On the contrary, the CIA has been and continues to be loaded with neo-Nazi Islamists who are traitors to America and the US Constitution.

Ralph Adamo on August 30, 2014 at 9:07 pm

Norm, I recognize Russia’s faults, but the problem w/ the US is that as far as foreign policy went, the Cold War never ended. Along w/ inheriting all the Soviet rights & commitments, the Russians also inherited the US as a foe.

So you have the US supporting Russia’s Muslim enemies, like the Chechens, and then the Russians responding in kind – supporting not only their former allies like Syria, but even Iran, who was never their ally previously.

If only the movie was correct about the US being together w/ the Russkies, at least on the Muzzie threat

Infidel on August 30, 2014 at 10:55 pm

Are you a CIA propagandist? The idea that the CIA tries to make Muslims look good is ludicrous. The CIA has propped up Muslim dictators when the latter benefited the US government and the military-industrial complex that the government serves. Being critical of the American government and its foreign policies does not equal being anti-American.

FrankTalk on September 1, 2014 at 8:33 am

If it helps at all skzion, Debbie has given me a lecture about not proseletyzing (spelling?) on her site – but she did kindly let me answer Alfredo’s interesting post.

sue on September 1, 2014 at 4:16 pm

Brosnan has beena lefty for a long time (so has Hugh Grant by the way).

Repeat on September 1, 2014 at 8:41 pm

Thanks for your perpetual truth telling reviews Debbie. Now I know I wont even bother with November Man on Netflix whenever it shows up there.

A possible antidote to November Man would be 3 Days in September, about the Beslan School terrorist attacks. I am watching it right now. A big improvement to the documentary would be to make more references to these scum as being moooslim, instead of just as “Chechens”. I think this documentary would be also improved by a crawling subtitle stating “This is Islam” every time there is footage of the dead, the hostages, the destruction, and the dead-eyed scumbags who committed these acts. As it is, it is a stark look at that horrible incident.

Keep up the good work Debbie.

Disgusted with Media on September 2, 2014 at 10:49 pm


Assadiste on February 27, 2015 at 9:18 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field