November 23, 2005, - 9:40 am

Roger Ebert Responds, But Court Affirms His Friend is a Terrorist

Recently, we Roger Ebert’s and Yes-man Roeper’s absurd, positive reviews for two pro-homicide bomber movies, and about how the director of one of the movies was upset I wrote about his “film” instead of agreeing with the two syndicated movie dupes’ reviews (which he e-mailed me).
Now, Roger Ebert e-mails me his response, below. He and I have had a running disagreement–, here, and even in one of his syndicated movie review columns–about his friend, PKK Islamic terrorist Ibrahim Parlak. Yesterday, just a day after Ebert wrote me that Parlak was not a terrorist, the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (the appeals court on deportation decisions) affirmed that, in fact, Parlak IS a terrorist.

Court: Thumbs Down to Roger Ebert’s Terrorist Buddy Ibrahim Parlak

From: “Roger Ebert”
To: “Debbie Schlussel”
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: WAR WITHIN/PARADISE NOW . . . .
> Debbie, Debbie, Debbie,
> I did not give two thumbs, or any number of thumbs, to Ibrahimn
> Parlak, who is not a terrorist and who even his local Republican
> Congressman supports. I only give thumbs to movies.
> Best,
> RE
(Note: The Republican Congressman to which Ebert refers is Fred Upton, among the MOST LIBERAL Republicans in Congress. Ebert used the same line about only giving thumbs to movies when asked by US Magazine about having dated Oprah. Must not have been too good.)
The three judge panel affirmed that Parlak is a terrorist, persecutor, and liar–upholding these charges against him: committing or inciting to commit terrorist activities; soliciting funds for terrorist activities; and providing material support for terrorist activities.
Congratulations to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Assistant Chief Counsel Mark Jebson for this affirmation of his work as a skilled jurist. Let the deportation begin for the liberal movie critic’s Islamic terrorist buddy.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

7 Responses

You can’t get rid of these Islamics. The US immigration appeals process is allah sent. Such a sham. Now he can get a ‘special stay’ from the appeals review board. Anyone who doesn’t understand how corrupt and Islamic friendly the deportation appeals process has become should read Michelle Malkin’s book.

John Sobieski on November 23, 2005 at 11:06 am

Wow! That response to Ebert by Debbie in that March 30, 2005 in was mighty impressive.
Ebert’s letter is basically to tsk tsk Debbie for questioning the Great Ebert who seems utterly shocked to even have his “enlightened” opinions questioned, and then Debbie lays out a very documented response.
Come on, Great Ebert, “I’m not fat” and Debbie is a meanie won’t cut it as a reply. Like Debbie says, just because a Republican says so doesn’t make it so.
Ebert’s whiny replies gets a big thumbs down.

Jeff_W on November 23, 2005 at 11:49 am

Lacking anything pertinent or intelligent to say, I’ll just say “Roger Ebert Gives Thumbs-Up to Terrorism” is a great title. I give it 2 thumbs-up.

MichaelRoland on November 23, 2005 at 12:17 pm

I bet if Ibrahim had burned one of Roger’s steaks Ebert would have personally esocrted him out of the country.
Because it was amusing, I give Ebert’s “I am rubber you are glue” defense a thumbs in the middle.

The_Man on November 23, 2005 at 9:30 pm

Hey Roger, tell him you got Debbie pissed off at you and ask Howard what he thinks and will you say goodbye to him?

KOAJaps on November 24, 2005 at 11:14 pm

Roger Ebert (sounds French, doesn’t it?) is just another America-hating LIBERAL. He should be deported to Syria or Iran and review the $hit their movie industry turns out:
Flicks about how evil western civilization and the United States are,
Epics about how Muhammed (bees pee upon him) had such wonderful insight to invent a religion hell-bent on destroying anything and anyone that had an ounce of civility,
Films about how Allah (a god who creates nothing, but just happens to rule over an accidentally-formed universe) promises brain-dead followers of Muhammad (bees pee upon him) 72 virgins (be them sheep or camels) for murdering people who can’t bring themselves to convert to a religion that worships Satan.
Yes, Roger, I know it’s been hard on you and your fellow LIBERAL ilk since the collapse of the Soviet Union, but then, there’s always Islam.

Thee_Bruno on November 28, 2005 at 10:01 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field