March 27, 2015, - 5:47 pm

Lena Dunham’s “Quiz” is Same Jew-Hatred My Relatives Faced in Nazi Europe; Roseanne Barr Supports Anti-Semitism

By Debbie Schlussel

Actress/director Lena Dunham’s anti-Semitic “Dog or Jewish Boyfriend?” “quiz” in the New Yorker, is eerily similar to the Jew-hatred faced by my relatives both in Nazi Europe and right here in Michigan, where I live. That’s not to mention the Jew-hatred today in the Islamic world. And I find it notable that Roseanne Barr, who so many people insisted to me has changed from her self-hating slant against Israel and Jews, applauded Lena Dunham’s Nazi-esque Jew-hatred.

Quiz: Which is Jew-Hater Lena Dunham & Which is The Dog? Hard to Tell . . .


Two Fugly Dogs




In her “quiz,” Dunham compared Jewish men to dogs and asked the reader to identify which of the two she was describing, giving several insulting descriptions. An excerpt:

Do the following statements refer to (a) my dog or (b) my Jewish boyfriend?

He doesn’t tip. And he never brings his wallet anywhere. . . . He expects to be waited on hand and foot by the women in his life, and anything less than that makes him whiny and distant. . . . He comes from a culture in which mothers focus every ounce of their attention on their offspring and don’t acknowledge their own need for independence as women. They are sucked dry by their children, who ultimately leave them as soon as they find suitable mates.

My distant relative by marriage, cousin Sylvia, knows well the comparison between Jews and dogs, which Ms. Dunahm invokes. She lives in a home on Cass Lake in a suburb of Detroit, which has been in her family for years. But for a good number of those years, when the place was a haven of bungalows and cottages visited only in the warm summer months, the home could not be in her Rose family name. Instead, it had to be in the name of the family’s handyman. Why? Well, for many years, and as recently as the 1950s and ’60s, there was a sign up at Cass Lake: No Dogs Or Jews Allowed.” And that policy was strictly enforced. The Rose family, because they were Jews, could not own their home on Cass Lake and had to have it in their maintenance man’s name.

The Jews and dogs comparison also takes place daily in the Islamic world, just as it did under the other Nazis in Europe. My maternal grandparents and relatives on both sides of my family also experienced Lena Dunham’s Jew-hating comparison to dogs, as there were signs all over Nazi Europe with the same expression that the residents around Cass Lake put on their signs: No Dogs or Jews Allowed. Anyone who doesn’t know about those signs, put up throughout Europe by Hitler’s minions, is extremely ignorant of history.

I can only conclude that Dunham is either extremely ignorant (which is true in her case on many things) or she is deliberately anti-Semitic. Since she likes to provoke others and mock Judaism and Jewry, I vote the latter. She knew exactly what she was doing and so did the New Yorker, the bible of the pseudo-intellectual left. They have no problem with openly loathing the Jews, especially since many of them are Jews In Name Only.

In Dunham’s case, she is a Va-JINO–my name for female Jews In Name Only. But, worse, she is a hater of Jews. She mocks them in her disgusting, stupid show, “Girls,” on which she glorifies oral-anal sex (Jews–so uncool!; licking someone’s fecal material secretion hole–very hip). And she mocks them in her public statements and writings. Some idiot in National Review (friendly home to jihadist Grover Norquist) said he refused to call Dunham an anti-Semite because she has a Jewish mother. HUH? Some of the biggest anti-Semites–the biggest Jew-haters–are, JINOs. And Lena Dunham is Exhibit A.

Another exhibit in that genre is Roseanne Barr, who was vehemently anti-Israel and openly anti-Semitic (including to me on her stupid, now-defunct radio show) for years. She and her supporters keep telling me she’s changed because she now claims to be pro-Israel. But she hasn’t changed, and I’ll tell you more about that in another post. For now, though, note that she tweeted in support of Lena Dunham’s “quiz” comparing Jewish men to dogs. Gee, I wonder why no Jewish man has ever married her. Tom Arnold, the one man who did a Reform (or Humanist–I can’t remember which) conversion to Judaism to marry her) quickly realized his mistake.


It’s no coincidence that Dunham’s also one of the most actively political Hollywood liberals in a crowd of stiff competition. Only liberals think this kind of Jew-hatred is okay, and not just okay, but “funny.” Nothing funny about this. Not even close. Unless you agree with the “humor” of Goebbels and Eichmann.

As far as Jews being compared to dogs, karma is a bitch. Now, years later, this one-time haven of cottages and bungalows visited only in the summer when it was warm, is a ritzy area filled with big-foot mansions, several of them populated by Jews. Many of the grandchildren of the anti-Semitic non-Jews who once lived there have been priced out of the place or live in the shadows of their new neighbors’ fancier homes.

And since karma was a bitch for those who hated Jews in Cass Lake and for the Nazis, I hope that the same goes for the latest Jew-hater to invoke comparison between Jews and dogs. And maybe that’s already happened because . . .

After all, the only real dog anyone sees here is the one staring back at Lena Dunham when she looks in the mirror.

And all the hipster faux-cool in the world won’t change that (though maybe some really masterful plastic surgeons can).

Sieg Heil, Lena.

That Was Then . . .


This Is Now . . .


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

42 Responses

My German Shepherd takes offense at it!

Its beneath stupid – for a slur.

NormanF on March 27, 2015 at 7:37 pm

Lena Dunham is a haggish young woman. Her recent rape fantasies seem to indicate a growing mental instability. Also, self-loathing Jews are fooling themselves when they think that their self-abnegation will at all help them. It did not work during the Third Reich, and it will not work in the face of present day antisemitism. Self-loathing is the first step on the road to death.

Worry on March 27, 2015 at 8:13 pm

Hi Debbie,

Maybe for your next batch of film reviews, you could award the bad ones “Lena Dunhams”, along with “Obamas” and “ISIS beheadings”.

ETM on March 27, 2015 at 8:18 pm

These are the same liberals who throw fits if we rightly associate Muslims with terrorism.

Laura on March 27, 2015 at 8:43 pm

Overrated anti-Semite, ISIS is waiting for you. NormanF, my German Sheperd and my English Pointer are also offended.

Rodrigo Veleda on March 27, 2015 at 8:49 pm

If it hadn’t been for the anti-semitism fostered by Obama’s recent behavior, I don’t she would have dared do this. It shows clearly how the attacks on Netanyahu are so closely related to anti-semitism in general.

She manages to reinforce the most obnoxious anti-semitic stereotypes, especially Jews and money, Jews and parasitism, Jews and antisocial behavior, Jews and lower animals (in this case, dogs, highlighting the racial basis of anti-semitism). Dunham, and by their complicity, the New Yorker, have absorbed all the anti-semitic canards of the last couple of centuries.

It is especially appalling that a magazine like The New Yorker, representing a city with such a large Jewish population, is going along with this.

National Review’s reaction shows the complete incapacity of the conservative establishment to understand and deal with the trends in our society which, in a few decades, are eroding and eliminating the gains that civilization has attained over many centuries. The magazine has moved steadily to the left in recent decades, and the obtuseness on their part reflects the poverty of college education, even in the elite schools. Joseph Sobran lives on.

American literature has always had a strong anti-semitic bent, but one would have hoped that the New Yorker would have moved forward, and tried to elevate literary standards, instead of reinforcing the basest aspects of literary history. But the prejudice against Orthodox Jews has now broadened to prejudice against Jews as a whole.

Additionally, there has always been a strong anti-semitic trend in the women’s movement, going back historically at least to the suffrage and progressive movements, which tried long ago to show how ‘civilized’ they were in comparison to those dirty Eastern European immigrants. Such women, of course, also played a large part in the eugenics movement.

This is one of the reasons women’s groups they are not that uncomfortable with the attacks against women in the Islamic countries. Of course, their complicity in the Democratic Party is also a very important factor, but it is not the only one.

The conflation of Jews with males typifies a durable anti-semitic trope. Conflation of Jews with any group in society that is termed obnoxious; Jews and financiers, Jews and warmongers, etc., etc.

Little Al on March 27, 2015 at 9:17 pm

    Little Al,
    Thank you for such a brilliant and fantastic article.
    We need to hear more like this.

    Mrs. D on March 28, 2015 at 2:57 pm

And to elaborate, the ‘femininity’ of Dunham’s complaints, singling out Jewish men, fits hand and glove with the worst anti-semitic historical trends of the feminist movement.

Little Al on March 27, 2015 at 9:20 pm

And elaborating further on the National Review (sic)’ explanation of why she is not anti-semitic?

Reminds me of the argument that Muslims/Arabs cannot be anti-semites because they are semitic themselves. Slightly different, and all of this is partly a consequence of the fact that the study of modern-day anti-semitism is verboten on virtually every college campus (with a few exceptions such as Indiana, and to some extent, Nebraska).

Little Al on March 27, 2015 at 9:26 pm

    Joe Sobran made exactly this “argument” in one of his post-National Review articles. When he died about five years ago, I shed no tears.

    Primetime on March 28, 2015 at 12:04 pm

    To elaborate a little more on how Dunham’s screed carries on the century-old anti-semitic thread of the feminist movement, we have only to look at her portrayal of the Jewish Mother.

    The Jewish Mother, although generally well-meaning, does have undesirable traits, is not really quite ‘with it’, not quite Americanized, not quite modern. The persistence of this stereotype is in line with the antisemitism of the women’s movement a century ago.

    Most Jewish women of a century ago, like today’s ‘Jewish Mothers’, were seen as not quite American, not really modern like their progressive ‘sisters’, and would not have, supposedly, given the Suffrage Movement the positive image among Americans as a whole that was desired in order to gain women the vote.

    The anti-semitism of 100 years ago was reinforced by issues related to World War I. Jewish women, both in the U.S. and in Western Europe, were seen, to some extent, as representatives of Central Europe, in other words, representatives of our then-enemy Germany.

    Today, although this is still implicit, Jewish women who do not disassociate themselves with Netanyahu, and, more and more, from Israel, also run the risk of being considered not quite American.

    The fact that Lena Dunham is not able to see these implications and this historical thread, always lurking in the background, does not excuse her. She has to know, as Alfredo pointed out, that her portrayal is meant to be provocative and insulting.

    Little Al on March 29, 2015 at 10:50 am

And besides Lena Dunham’s trotting out these sick stereotypes, there’s the usual gaggle (which is enough to gag on) of Jew-haters who smear anyone who supports Israel’s struggle for survival and their fight against jihadis as “Zionist” (which we all know is code for Jew) or even implying such supporters are Jewish even if they’re Gentile; and suggesting such supporters all move to Israel. Such litmus tests of country loyalty are very much Naziesque, and those who make them and then claim to be “pro-American” are the same ones who smeared Bush and Cheney as “war criminals” over their commitment to Iraq War II (although ‘Dubyah’s’ track record is hardly exemplary in any area, as has been noted here in previous articles).

ConcernedPatriot on March 27, 2015 at 10:31 pm

Self loathing is the new neuroticism. Dunham probably likes dogs more than men.
I hope so for her dog’s sake anyway.

Takeshi Aono on March 27, 2015 at 10:37 pm

Grover gives quite a performance here if anybody who’s interested hasn’t checked it out already.

Takeshi Aono on March 27, 2015 at 10:58 pm

Lena Dunham, extremely unattractive inside & out.

Laurel Twist on March 28, 2015 at 1:41 am

Tom Arnold has remained a practicing Jew since converting for Roseanne. He is now married to another Jewish woman.

Dee on March 28, 2015 at 2:26 am

    He never was a “practicing Jew” because he never was a Jew, having not had an Orthodox conversion.

    skzion on March 29, 2015 at 5:54 am

Imagine an article that was so-o funny “Muslim boyfriend or pig?”
The entire city would be ablaze!

Crazycatkid on March 28, 2015 at 4:53 am

Wouldn’t this be considered hate speech? Past time to sue people who make these intolerable statements.

Gracie on March 28, 2015 at 5:34 am

    I’ll say this much: if I were Lena Dunham’s boyfriend ( a thought, in itself, lifted directly out of the Theater of the Absurd and the Impossible — but, for argument’s sake, I will indulge it, if only for a brief moment ) I would beat the living $hit out of her, until her head looked like a swollen green pumpkin, and then begrudgingly do the jail time for it ( but first, I’d get a smart, “Jew-lawyer” [ sarcasm ] to plea-bargain it down, from Assault & Battery, to Animal Abuse ). I’m not the type of Jew who advocates battling rabid Anti-Semitism with strictly legal or “gentle/peaceful/civilized” means — not by a long shot. Although I was too young at the time to have done so, if I had been born a decade earlier, I would have joined the JDL, when it existed, in a heartbeat. And accordingly, today, I advocate that the answer to Nazi-like Anti-Semitism is violence. The biggest mistake that the Jews have perpetually made, throughout all of the centuries ( with the exception of the Maccabees ) is that we have responded to such ( potentially or immediately ) life-threatening instances of Anti-Semitism with “peaceful” and “sensible” and “civilized” words and actions; that has been our biggest mistake, throughout ALL of history. Violence, or actions which are intended to precipitate violent acts at a later date, should be met immediately ( or, in some cases, strategically time-delayed, as the situation may warrant ) with violence. History has taught us — brutally — that animals such as these rabid Anti-Semites do not understand ANYTHING other than violence — and my position is, give them exactly what they do understand; in addition to solving an immediate problem, it also serves as a warning to others, and so is, in itself, not only just a remedial, but also a preventative, measure. And, I’ll add, also a quite-satisfying one, as well: there’s nothing that warms the heart, more than seeing a Nazi, prone and disarticulated into several pieces, lying in a pool of his or her own blood. Some here may think it gruesome to envision such a picture; I say, to each his own. Nature is thoroughly objective, and, yes, as such, brutal; to deny it, is to make the same mistakes that the European Jews of the 1930’s so tragically made. I say, let history teach us, instead of consciously choosing to ignore its lessons.

    Still Educating the Idiots on March 28, 2015 at 9:53 am

      Beating a woman to a pulp over a perceived anti-Semitic remark. Real classy, man. And illegal, too. I hope you’re not married. If you are, I’ll pray for your wife.

      Primetime on March 30, 2015 at 12:45 am

Let me ask this. Is there anytime that a Jewish person can make a joke regarding Jewish stereotypes and it is considered funny and not offensive, or is this type of humor always off limits to conservative Jewish people?

I'm asking on March 28, 2015 at 7:51 am

    In the company of other, non-self-hating Jews — yes; in the company of Gentiles and self-hating, JINO Jews — no.

    Still Educating the Idiots on March 28, 2015 at 10:04 am

    “I’m asking”—her mom is Jewish, dad is Protestant, but her religion is Liberal scum sucking dirtbag, aka “Kapo.”

    Occam's Tool on March 29, 2015 at 11:40 pm

Regarding Lena Dunham’s claims of rape as referred to by ‘Worry’: Besides the “if white, then racist” canard being drummed into people’s heads in this PC climate (see the latest “Get Hard” movie to see one example of the manifestations of this drumbeat), in college campuses and elsewhere we now see this mentality being likewise inculcated: “If male, then rapist / sexual assailant.” And both poisonous fruits will surely yield no good for society over the long haul.

ConcernedPatriot on March 28, 2015 at 9:15 am

Her dog in that picture is very cute.

DS_ROCKS! on March 28, 2015 at 10:17 am

This woman Leah Dunham is a DOG. Look how ugly she is. She is gay and lesbians probably go EEEEWWWW when they see that ugly face and body.

Glen Benjamin on March 28, 2015 at 10:52 am

    Glen – You’re probably looking at Lena Duncehead from a hetero male perspective. I have seen and met lesbians and the great majority of them are much more unattractive and would find her desirable. I find her views and ideology repulsive.

    Concerned Citizen on March 28, 2015 at 12:11 pm


Jack on March 28, 2015 at 11:14 am

(Licking someone’s fecal material secretion hole)
Ha ha- That was funnier than Dunham’s whole joke honestly.

Its called analingus. (Don’t ask how I know-none of your business)

Funny on March 28, 2015 at 12:30 pm

Bigotry is bigotry and anti-Semitism is not and has never been funny or “cool”.

I can’t believe that the New Yorker published this. Swap black for Jew and would they have published this bigoted garbage ??

Also her Mom being Jewish doesn’t give her a pass. Some of the biggest anti-Semites have Jewish blood in them. Theodor Herzl called people like this “anti-Semite of Jewish origin”.

JimmyPx on March 28, 2015 at 3:14 pm

Does she really have a boyfriend? I would be curious to find out more about the kind of “man” that would willingly subject himself to Lena Dunham. This article might be just an invention of her imagination – a case of wishful thinking.

salt1907 on March 28, 2015 at 5:22 pm

There came a time in America, where kids in classrooms and elsewhere found out you could get laughs by being outrageous, irreverent, and even downright disrespectful. This began to be imparted to our culture as a whole through the Baby Boomers. Fighting back against the “oppression” of parents and authority figures, some found out you could even make a living at it.

Such are the origins of people like Roseanne Barr and Lena Dunham. What I said about parents and authority figures is straight out of Karl Marx, . . .

and Satan. Kill the family structure. God is a family. The natural and good state of human existence is to have a strong family and good friends, living together in cooperation. The natural state of Satan is chaos. Where chaos exists, death is inevitable.

People like Roseanne Barr and Lena Dunham are unwitting pawns of the demise of wholesome culture. Just because you can get laughs, fame and fortune, doesn’t mean you’re doing good. Lena Dunham’s looks are irrelevant here. She’s not good looking, which may have contributed to taking the path she’s on. But what does matter is that she is insolent, disrespectful, and unreasonable.

Satan. He exists. Believe in him. He is the cause of all the troubles we visit on a daily basis, right here on this web site. Only One can defeat him. In the meantime, we have God, and those he has given us, along with the unvarnished truth.

Like Debbie.

By the way, Lena Dunham COULD be a lot better looking than she is. She probably doesn’t have the potential to be very good looking, but she almost seems to be working at being ugly. Because she is ugly inside. Without realizing it, she worships Satan. And probably claims not to even believe in him. That’s one of the greatest problems of those of us in Western Society. Spiritual confusion.

Alfredo from Puerto Rico on March 28, 2015 at 5:36 pm

    A very insightful comment.

    Little Al on March 29, 2015 at 7:33 am

To the Puerto Rican guy Paranoid much?

Extreme on March 28, 2015 at 6:17 pm

It would have been more apropos if Lena had compared her boyfriend to a straight male.

King David on March 28, 2015 at 8:16 pm

Still waiting on the Star Trek transporter to be invented. She and the other JINO self haters could then be beamed to Tehran, Tikrit, or Gaza to receive their just rewards, (preferably naked wearing just a Star of David necklace.)

Recalcitrant Zionist on March 28, 2015 at 8:48 pm

Israel-hating Obama about to abandon USA’s only friend in the Middle East?

Peter on March 29, 2015 at 3:58 am

I wonder why she can’t attract a decent guy?

Phil Lipofsky on March 29, 2015 at 9:19 am


a quiz

1. While walking through the parking lot of a shopping mall on a 96 degree summer afternoon, I see you unconscious and locked inside a parked car with all the windows up. And yet, I don’t even stop to help.

2. While hosting a cocktail party for some of my Oberlin College friends, you got down on the floor, lifted up one of your legs, and began to vigorously lick your own private parts.

3. I am no longer allowed to take you into our local Starbucks ever since the time you wandered away from my table, took a bite out of an unattended sandwich, and then peed on the carpet to get my attention.

E. on March 29, 2015 at 12:01 pm

Note to all Jewish single guys: don’t date Lena Dunham. Spend time with your dog instead.

Challah Maidel on March 29, 2015 at 12:19 pm

Another Hollyweird Luciferian Slut! If she wasn’t worshipping Satan she wouldn’t be in with the Hollyweird in crowd. These people are twisted and we need to pray for their souls.

MRobs on April 2, 2015 at 4:21 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field