By Debbie Schlussel
In Hollywood’s warped and twisted trash they put forth on America, there’s unfortunately never an ultimate nadir in how low the industry will go in making our great nation its giant circular file.
The latest is the “romance” movie, “Zack & Miri Make a Porno,” out later this year, written and directed by Kevin Smith and now shooting. It stars Seth Rogen and Elizabeth Banks. Nope, it’s not a porn flick. It’s a major motion picture put out by a major studio. The story: two friends, Zack and Miri, are desperate to pay off debts, so they make their own X-rated film. But, in making the “film,” they soon discover their romantic feelings for each other.
Awww. Prime Valentine’s Day material. . . at Jackson State Prison.

Oh, and to add to the “romance,” USA Today asked stars Rogen and Banks to “share some candid thoughts from the set,” like what they worry about in preparing for a sex scene. I kid you not–That tastelessness (yes, I admit it’s semi-funny, but mostly gross) appeared in the paper. I’m not repeating it here.
What’s next–Hollywood doing a “mainstream” movie about bestiality and calling it “interspecies love”? Oh, wait, Kevin Smith already did that.
Sickening.
Don’t just luck up your women. Lock up your whole family. And throw away the key.

By Debbie Schlussel
On this site, I’ve written repeatedly about jihadist doctors and medicine, “Religion of Peace” style. I’ve written about the jihadist Muslim doctor cell in Britain and their failed multiple terrorist attacks last summer, Islamic doctors who led various Islamic terrorist groups, who murdered patients to harvest organs, who murdered patients because they were Jewish, and who cut off hands of cadavers to give them as gifts to stripper girlfriends.
But you’ll never see that in the movies. (Gary Busey only plays fictional Jewish doctors who commit these sickening crimes on-screen, even though there is no record of a Jewish doctor ever having done thse things.)
Now, the latest doctor in this never-ending, real-life jihadist version of the movie, “Coma,” is Dr. Ali Moayed. Moayed, a urologist, lied to elderly patients who could not speak English, telling them they had cancer, so he could collect on phony insurance claims.

First, Do Harm
Since his defrauded patients were poor people who are apparently Latino aliens, it sounds like Dr. Moayed was running one of the medical mills my late father, an honest Medical Doctor decried, in which the poor are treated in mass volume numbers, receive poor medical treatment, and the unscrupulous doctor cleans up on questionable insurance claims.
This story is horrifying:

A Los Gatos doctor was sentenced Friday to three months in jail and three months of house arrest for falsely telling an 87-year-old patient he had prostate cancer and convincing him to undergo unnecessary therapy in which tiny radioactive rods were inserted into him with needles.
Ali Moayed, 41, was also accused of falsifying pathology reports for two other patients and recommending they undergo the treatment, known as brachytherapy. Moayed’s deception was uncovered before those two men had the procedure, Santa Clara County prosecutors said. All three instances were in 2005.
All three victims were older men who spoke English as a second language, Deputy District Attorney Bill Butler said.
Moayed pleaded guilty Jan. 25 to one count each of felony elder abuse and felony insurance fraud.
It’s still unclear why the urologist engaged in the deception. Moayed received about $5,000 in insurance payments for the treatment, but the amount was paltry compared with his income and property holdings, prosecutors said. [DS: Um, ever heard of greed? Hello . . . ? Then, there is the concept of “Halal Money,” money that is extra special because it is garnered by ripping off non-Muslims. That’s what this is.]
“There was no financial angle to this,” Butler said. “We may never have the answer.” [DS: Um, repeat comment above.]
During a California Medical Board hearing before he surrendered his license, Moayed told investigators the three patients were going to get cancer anyway, Butler said. . . .
Moayed had 16 to 20 radioactive “seeds” – rods or pellets about the size of a grain of rice – implanted in the 87-year-old man during an operation, Butler said. The man was under anesthesia during the procedure, he said.
Moayed told the patient that he had prostate cancer just weeks after the man’s son had died of another form of cancer, prosecutors said.
“He had just buried his son, and the doctor was aware of that,” Butler said. “That’s the thing that’s really appalling about this.”
As part of his plea deal, Moayed will be required to perform 100 hours of community service and serve three years of probation after being released from jail. He was sentenced to 90 days of actual jail time and can serve the rest of his sentence under electronic monitoring. [DS: A slap on the wrist. Sickening.]
Moayed was also ordered to pay $50,000 to the California Medical Board for investigative costs and about $5,000 in restitution to Medi-Cal.
Moayed also paid $75,000 to the man who underwent the procedure and $12,500 to the two who didn’t.
“He’s never going to practice medicine again,” Butler said.

That’s little comfort to the elderly people he traumatized or the insurance companies he ripped off, who pass the costs on to customers.
What’s even more nauseating than what ex-doctor Moayed did is that he got a slap on the hand. The guy should be doing 5-10 years in prison.
Thanks to reader Duane for the tip.

By Debbie Schlussel
Remember the U.S. policy of not negotiating with terrorists? Throw that out the window, because the Bush Administration just did.
HAMAS and Islamic Jihad leaders traveled to Egypt, last week, to meet and confer with Egyptian intelligence officials. And guess who just happend to be there also? Condi Clueless’ hand-picked Assistant Secretary of State David Welch. The fish rots from the head first. And the head is George W. Bush, with the next notch being Condoleezza Rice. If John McCain picks her as Veep, he will lose my vote (and I will vote Libertarian). This is nauseating beyond belief:

Clueless Condi Bends over:
HAMAS . . . The New American Partner for “Peace”

Egypt, backed by the United States, is exploring a truce between Israel and Hamas that would stop rocket fire on Israel in exchange for an end to Israeli attacks on militants and the resumption of trade and travel from Gaza. Border crossings have been closed since Hamas seized control of the coastal strip in June.
Militants from Hamas and Islamic Jihad traveled from Gaza to the northern Egyptian city of el-Arish on Thursday to confer with senior Egyptian intelligence officials on a truce. Assistant Secretary of State David Welch also was in Egypt.
The diplomacy appeared to reflect a growing understanding that a peace deal will not be possible as long as Hamas is in control of Gaza and refusing to recognize Israel.

Ya think?
Substitute the word Islam for HAMAS, and the same holds true. The fact that any U.S. official would meet with HAMAS and Islamic Jihad–and we know this isn’t the first time, just the first time it’s been acknowledged publicly–is just the latest slip down the slope.
You’re either on America’s side, or the terrorists’ . . . and the Bush Administration’s side.
You give 8 lives (and countless others beforehand), Condi Clueless takes a mile.

By Debbie Schlussel
ABC News’ “Nightline” did an extensive report on that all-important news story of the day–the one-woman economy of Britney Spears.
But what struck me is that the “one-woman economy” has multiple beneficiaries, many of whom are Muslim foreign aliens from Britain. What are they doing here? And how did they get visas and green cards? I’ve already told you about Spears’ Muslim manager Osama “Sam” Lutfi and photog-turned-kept-boyfriend, Pakistani Muslim Adnan Ghalib. But now there’s another dude in the picture–Sheeraz Hasan, who mysteriously came here from Britain.
What is his immigration status? Why is he here? Do we issue special talent visas for paparazzi and website operators, because this is “the work Americans won’t do”? Hasan, a devout Muslim, got the idea for a Britney Spears paparazzi website while on the Muslim Hajj [pilgrimage] to Mecca. When you click on his site, where are the profits going? Are you helping to contribute to Islamic “charities” and terrorist groups? Don’t be surprised if you are:

Sheeraz Hasan: Latest Brit Extremist Muslim Alien in the Bim Britney Biz

Hollywood.tv was founded by Sheeraz Hasan, who came to the United States from London, where he was running a restaurant with his family. Hasan always wanted to be a part of Hollywood, so he moved to Los Angeles. He says he found the key to his success during a pilgrimage on a mountaintop in Saudi Arabia.
‘God Showed Me Britney Spears’
“I went to go get a drink and all of a sudden, I just look up and I see Britney in a magazine. So I think to myself, wait a minute. I’m here on pilgrimage. What the hell is Britney doing here? Of all places. God showed me Britney Spears,” Hasan said. “I said to myself, OK, I’m going to go back to Hollywood, Hollywood.tv. I’m going to get the stars. I’m going to get all the stars, but also my main person I’m going to get is Britney Spears.” . . .
The business model for Hollywood.tv is unique. Sheeraz says that he spends about $50,000 a month on Britney coverage but gives away the content for free. It’s all about building the brand. The ultimate plan: Take the company public.
“Obviously you make money on revenue from advertising. I have partnerships with Google and YouTube,” Hasan said. “But for us, what’s more important is building the billion-dollar brand online. We’re already in negotiations with a couple of major studios to buy us out. And we’ve only been doing this for nearly six months. We have a brand that’s recognized to the entire world. In order for them to beat our brand, they would have to go to the Hollywood sign and take those letters off the Hollywood sign and put their brand on, because that’s who they’re competing with.”

So, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), why is Sheeraz Hasan in America? What is his immigration status? And when will you send him back?
Do we really have a shortage of extremist Muslims from Britain that we need to import more for the profligation of more brands in the Trashy-Former-Teen-Hussy-Goes-Whackjob Britney Spears industry?
And, if you click onto his site, are you helping Hasan contribute to Islamic jihads worldwide? It’s not a stretch to assume that you are.

By Debbie Schlussel
Uh-oh. Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the water at the Clintonista Presidential Library, the sharky slickster couple is blocking yet a new release of documents, including those relating to Slick Wet Willie’s pardons.
As we all remember, some of those pardons were calculated to win Slick Hilly Rodham Cankles the New York U.S. Senate seat. Still others were to set get the Rodham Laurel and Hardy Bros of Slick Hilly some cha-ching (they lobbied for pardons in exchange for cold, hard cash).
Oh, and we can thank George W. Bush for some of this. He signed an executive order–presumably to protect Poppy Bush–expanding the power of former Presidents to withhold certain archives. Heckuva job, Bushie. (Now, we’ll never know just which kind of Cuban cigars he and Bandar Bush a/k/a Saudi Prince Bandar–whose wife funded the 9/11 hijackers–were smoking on the Roosevelt Balcony of the White House the night of 9/11. Damn.)

As much as I prefer a President Cankles to a President B Hussein O, this is important. And don’t kid yourself–as much as Barack Hussein Obama is making an issue out of this, when he and Mrs. Bitch-ama leave the White House, they’ll hide their excrement from public viewing, too. Here’s the latest expose on the Clinton-via-Bush refusal to let us see the docs:

Federal archivists at the Clinton Presidential Library are blocking the release of hundreds of pages of White House papers on pardons that the former president approved, including clemency for fugitive commodities trader Marc Rich.
The archivists’ decision, based on guidance provided by Bill Clinton that restricts the disclosure of advice he received from aides, prevents public scrutiny of documents that would shed light on how he decided which pardons to approve from among hundreds of requests.
Clinton’s legal agent declined the option of reviewing and releasing the documents that were withheld, said the archivists, who work for the federal government, not the Clintons.
The decision to withhold the records could provide fodder for critics who say that the former president and his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, now seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, have been unwilling to fully release documents to public scrutiny. . . .
In January 2006, USA TODAY requested documents about the pardons under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The library made 4,000 pages available this week. However, 1,500 pages were either partially redacted or withheld entirely, including 300 pages covering internal White House communications on pardon decisions, such as memos to and from the president, and reports on which pardon requests the Justice Department opposed. . . .
Former president Clinton issued 140 pardons on his last day in office, including several to controversial figures, such as commodities trader Rich, then a fugitive on tax evasion charges. Rich’s ex-wife, Denise, contributed $2,000 in 1999 to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign; $5,000 to a related political action committee; and $450,000 to a fund set up to build the Clinton library.
The president also pardoned two men who each paid Sen. Clinton’s brother, Hugh Rodham, about $200,000 to lobby the White House for pardons – one for a drug conviction and one for mail fraud and perjury convictions, according to a 2002 report by the House committee on government reform. After the payments came to light, Bill Clinton issued a statement: “Neither Hillary nor I had any knowledge of such payments,” the report said.
The pardon records released by the library divulge little that might settle debate about those and other pardons. But they do shed new light on the volume of clemency requests that former president Clinton received – and the pressures he and his staff faced as friends, advisers, political leaders and foreign heads of state weighed in to influence which petitions would be granted.
The files contain handwritten letters from several of the president’s close associates. Former Democratic Party chairman Donald Fowler of South Carolina wrote a note seeking clemency for former congressman John Jenrette, D-S.C., who was convicted in the 1980 Abscam sting in which FBI agents, posing as Middle Eastern businessmen, offered lawmakers bribes for political favors. Clinton did not grant the pardon. [DS: Thank Heaven for small favors!]
Most of the withheld documents, including dozens of clemency pleas sent to the president, were blocked from release under FOIA rules that protect personal privacy. The 300 pages of internal White House documents on pardon requests were blocked under the Presidential Records Act of 1978, which allows presidents to maintain the confidentiality of communications with their advisers for up to 12 years after they leave office.
In 2002, Clinton sent a guidance letter to his library that urged quick release of most White House records but retained the confidentiality prerogative covering advice from his staff. Still, Clinton said the restriction should be interpreted “narrowly” and allowed that certain records detailing internal communications could be made public if reviewed and approved for release by his designated legal agent. . . .
The archivists’ decision to withhold records that could be construed as confidential communications between Clinton and his advisers is more consistent with the Bush administration’s hard line on the release of White House records . . . .
President Bush signed an order in November 2001 that broadened former presidents’ prerogative to block the release of internal White House records. That order, which Bill Clinton opposed, also allows a president’s immediate family to assert the privilege.

So, just what are the Clintons hiding? What do Bill and Hillary Clinton not want us to see until after a certain date in November? Just what is George W. Bush hiding for his dad and for himself into the future?
Just asking. . . . And probably never getting an answer.

By Debbie Schlussel
Of the new movies out, this weekend, none of the three I reviewed were bad. They were all okay. Two are set in London, and one is set far off in ancient times. I did not screen, “College Road Trip.” The reason: three words – Martin Lawrence, Raven. Translation: Life is short. I liked “The Bank Job” the best, although its violence and blood toward the end ruined it for me.
* “10,000 BC“: While there was nothing objectionable in this movie, and even the minor killing was such that you could take your young teens to it, I just found this movie dull. It wasn’t interesting. It wasn’t exciting. There wasn’t any suspense. And the story was very simple and old hat. The special effects were so-so, while the costumes were good. And that’s about it. There was no spark or charm. It was kind of boring, actually. The “scary monster animals” were simply laugh-inducing giant dodo birds, more comical than scary.
This movie was like “300” lite–way, way, way lite. And the part about the captured peoples working as slaves, building pyramids in an Egyptian-like heat, and at first not wanting to rebel and leave, seemd kind of ripped off from the Biblical story of the Jews’ slavery in Egypt.

The story: It’s 10,000 BC and a small community living in a tundra climate survives by hunting Wooly Mammoths. One of them, D’Leh (pronounced “Delay”), is the son of a great hunter who left the tribe. He aspires to be a great hunter like his father and to win over both the prized white spear and the girl with the blue eyes, Evolet (whom we last saw in the remake of “When a Stranger Calls“).
But the tribe is invaded and many of the men and Evolet captured by a more advanced neighboring community of a sweltering hot climate. They are made into slaves who build pyramids for shaman-like blind pygmies with blue eyes. D’Leh leads some of the remaining tribesman into the wilderness and then into the enslavers’ community to rescue them.
* “Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day“: Although this is basically a chick flick, I liked its throwback to the late 1930s/early 1940s London. Yet again, the talented Amy Adams shows her versatility as floosie gold-digger/fame-seeker Delysia Lafosse in this period piece. And although the movie was a little too cutesy for me, it reminded me of old movies, of which its basically a color replica. The costumes got the most attention in this script. Still, it was hard to take 1.5 hours of Adams’ giggly, sigh-filled interactions. But that is the style of this kind of movie and I liked the moral message. Could have done without seeing a guy’s naked butt in my face toward the beginning of the film. That was the only objectionable part.
Frances McDormand is Guinevere Pettigrew, a homeless English woman around the start of World War II, searching for a job in London. She can’t keep a job as a governess, but she steals a lead on a job with a new employer. Soon she learns that the new employer, the young Delysia Lafosse, is looking for a social secretary, not a governess, and she plays the part.
Lafosse is an American who is kept by a wealthy club owner she doesn’t love, and is also sleeping with the son of a musical producer, in whose play she wants to star. But, alas, she truly loves a third man, an ex-con piano player who can’t offer her anything but love and happiness. And she can’t see it.
Although Pettigrew is basically a homeless woman not accustomed to Lafosse’s station in life, her sound, moral advice is soon taken as gospel and respected by Lafosse and all of her high society friends. Some of them, though, start to look into her past.
Oh, and guys, don’t let the sexy movie poster for this one fool you. There is no scene in which these two women are looking up at barely clad women with those expressions. Instead, they are at a lingerie show–1930s lingerie. The poster is just a way to get you in the door with your girlfriends. This movie has nothing to do with what’s implied in the poster. Sorry.

* “The Bank Job“: Also set in London, this time in the early ’70s, this is based on the true story of a bank heist, set up by MI5, the British intelligence agency. I liked this clever, cunning caper movie, until it degraded into violence and blood towards the end. That ruined it for me, but you might like it despite that. It wasn’t that violent or bloody, but enough for me to turn me off.
A has-been model tells her petty thief, married former love interest about a London bank safe, the security of which will be temporarily turned off for technical reasons. She tells him how easy it would be to dug a tunnel into the safe and get millions in jewels, gold, and cold hard cash from the safety deposit boxes. Since he needs money to feed his family, and he still pines for her, he’s convinced and gets his gang of common criminal friends to join in.
But the model is actually working for MI5, which wants pictures in one of the safety deposit boxes because they show members of British royalty, intelligence, and government in compromising positions. And who has the photos is also interesting. A Black Muslim from the caribbean is into blackmailing to make money for his phony liberal “civil rights” group.
The intrigue in this film, with so many groups involved, at first seems confusing, but you soon figure out what is going on. It’s interesting and captures your interest until the end, when, again, it degrades into some limited violence and blood. Definitely entertaining. And mostly well done. Though I didn’t exactly like the ending.

By Debbie Schlussel
Yesterday, it was Jerusalem. Today, it’s the area where I live. The escalation of anti-Semitism and violent attacks on Jews continues because our President and Israel’s Prime Minister continue to capitulate to the chief fomenters of it.
The interesting thing–but not surprising at all–is that when the attacks are on Orthodox Jewish men with beards, hats, and yarmulkes, it’s “not a hate crime,” but when a Muslim gets a paper cut, it is:

For the second time in the past several months, there have been a string of assaults on members of the Orthodox Jewish community in southern Oakland County, prompting residents to once again meet with city officials to formulate a plan to stop the attacks.
Residents organized a meeting at a private residence in Oak Park on Thursday to discuss the situation with law enforcement and city officials from Southfield and Oak Park.

Residents met with city officials after attacks last summer, as well.
Three people were assaulted in Southfield, near Oak Park, last Friday and Saturday. These incidents mirrored assaults on three Orthodox men in Oak Park last summer, including one in which a man reported being pushed down, kicked and punched in the eye. . . .
In each case — including the attacks during the summer and an incident in Oak Park in early February — people were assaulted as they walked in neighborhoods or parks during the Jewish Sabbath, on Fridays and Saturdays. Traditional Jewish law forbids driving on the Sabbath, which is why Orthodox residents walk to and from synagogue.
There were only minor injuries suffered in the most recent assaults, which all happened in neighborhoods near 10 Mile and Greenfield.
Police said they believe teens committed the assaults, but no one has been arrested in either community. The incidents have prompted police in both cities to increase patrols in neighborhoods with heavy Orthodox populations.
Southfield Police Chief Joseph Thomas said there’s no indication that the assaults last week were hate crimes.

Thomas was also, reportedly, at a party at Detroit’s Mayoral Manoogian Mansion, at which an assault against a stripper, Strawberry, reportedly occured (which led to her murder in a driveby shooting). And he now claims, he wasn’t there.
So, I guess we can say he’s, at least, universally “blind.”

By Debbie Schlussel
Since the story broke late last week, a number of readers have sent me the story about Harvard’s latest capitulation to Muslims with separate hours for women at the Ivy League university’s gym. I didn’t write about it because I’m kind of fed up (plus I was waiting to contact the Great David Lunde and have him make this logo per my specifications for the new Halal Harvard).

Harvard’s New HALAL Logo By David Lunde
I’m fed up that this is not the first time this has happened and that Americans are doing nothing to take back their country. As readers know, I already wrote about the Fitness USA gym chain and how it agreed to install a wall separating men and women at its Lincoln Park, Michigan location per the demands of Muslimas and CAIR.
The most nauseating part of the Harvard story–and the rest of the American story of Islam making these outrageous demands–is this:

Student Ola Aljawhary, who is Muslim and works out elsewhere on campus but is not one of the women who requested the change, rejected that argument.
“The majority should be willing to compromise,” she said. “I think that’s just basic courtesy. We must show tolerance and respect for all others.”

WRONG. The fact is that Muslim women could work out at Harvard or Fitness USA with their get-up on, but they don’t want to do it. This isn’t about “compromise” by two parties. It’s about domination of the tolerant, wimpy majority by a tough, vocal minority that never takes not for an answer and always gets what it wants because of the majority’s soft, ever-sanguine disposition. They want to be able to wear very un-Islamic, skimpy clothes to work out. Tough. Build your own Islamic gym, complete with explosive belt-tightening exercises.
But, instead, they need not build their own gyms because American institutions are capitulating to Islamic demands one by one, like dominoes.
The fact is that, while Harvard is a private university, it gets federal tax money in research grants and certain federal aid. That means it can be subject to laws that govern public and quasi-public institutions. But no-one is suing or complaining or writing legislation that requires Harvard not institute sexist policies at its gyms at the request of six Muslim women (that’s how many made this request–just six).
Your tax money is going to Harvard. What are you doing about this capitulation to Islam and discrimination against men?
Harvard’s motto, “Veritas”–“Truth”–is no longer. Veritas has been replaced by Shariah.
And Harvard Crimson is now just another shade of Islamic Green.
At the time that the women in the Dearbornistan area made the demands that Fitness USA capitulate to their Islamic precepts (which it did), one of them, Ammerah Saidi, wrote this comment on my site:

If it (America) falls to Islam, so be it.

Will you let that happen? What are you doing to stop it?

By Debbie Schlussel
Yesterday, America’s biggest boondoggle with an equally enormous deceptive name, the Department of Homeland Security, celebrated its five-year anniversary. Other than President Bush–its creator–and incompetents like Michael “Serpenthead” Chertoff and Julie “The ICE Princess” Myers and John “George Costanza” Torres, do you hear anyone celebrating?
Like my friend, Sirius Patriot Channel 144 host Mike Church said, “I only wish the President announced he was shutting it down.”
President Bush marked the “occasion” by warning Americans not to become complacent about terrorism. Has he said that to his mirror, lately (or to the idiots he has running DHS)? Hello . . . ? (Oh, and by the way, it’s still “NOO-KLEE-ER,” not “nook-yuh-ler.”)

Homeland Security: Congress Wants Minorities & Unqualified Incompetents
(Julie Myers Diet Coke by David Lunde/Lundesigns)
Sadly, instead of looking into waste, extreme mismanagement, PC law enforcement policies, the mass exodus of good agents, and the promotion of unethical/lawbreaking individuals to positions of leadership, Congress is barking about Homeland Security’s lack of minorities in leadership.
In response to that, I say look at the white men–Michael Chertoff–and the “minorities”–Julie Myers and John P. Torres–who’ve been appointed. All equally disgusting in their incompetence, lack of law enforcement experience, and dishonesty. Picking someone with a vagina or whose last name might indicate some sort of ingestion of tortillas and chicken mole at some point in life, hasn’t seemed to be the panacea. It’s been the problem, in the cases of Myers and Torres.
It’s not a matter of minorities, it’s a matter of picking competents–regardless of internal plumbing and ethnic background–with actual law enforcement experience in the areas they “oversee.” Still I did find this exchange amusing:

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff apparently forgot the adage “When you’re in a hole, stop digging.”
On Wednesday, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee were reviewing a report that said Chertoff’s department lags behind others in hiring women and minorities to senior positions.
Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) asked all the Chertoff aides sitting behind him at the hearing to stand up. Men in ties and jackets, all of whom appeared to be Caucasian, stood up. Without comment, Scott moved on to ask Chertoff about another issue.
But Rep. Melvin Watt (D-N.C.) returned to the diversity question. “You brought 10 staff people with you,” he said, “all white males. . . . But I hope you’ve got more diversity in your staff than is reflected here. Please reassure me that is the case.”
“I think that is definitely the case,” Chertoff said.
“Okay,” Watt said, and appeared to begin moving to another question.
But Chertoff continued: “I wouldn’t assume that the ethnic background of everybody behind me is self-evident.”
Watt replied: “I wouldn’t assume the ethnic background of everybody behind you is self-evident, but I think I know an African American when I see one. . . . If anyone wants to stand up and volunteer and tell me they are an African American, I hope they will do that right now.”
No one stood. Some in the audience began laughing.
“If anybody is a female that’s sitting back there and wants to stand up and volunteer to tell me that,” Watt continued, “I hope they will do that right now. And I want the record to show clearly that nobody stood up to volunteer in either one of those categories.
“So if you want to make that point and be cute about it,” Watt said, “let me be explicit about it. . . . If we are going to do law enforcement in this country . . . we need to understand that there is an element of diversity in our country that is not represented here.”

Don’t worry. The next time, Chertoff will bring lackeys Myers and Torres–and some new agent they can find in a hijab–along as extras for this “Match of the Anti-Titans [Congress and DHS]”. Whatta joke!

By Debbie Schlussel
Thanks to the many readers who sent in this story. As usual, we know who the perpetrators are, and as usual, who they are isn’t exactly identified. You know, the “Religion of Peace” and tax fraud and cigarette smuggling and on and on and on. Hmmm . . . maybe one of these names is actually of Samoan or Hawaiian derivation. My fave is that one of these men used an alias of “Anthony Stallone.” No, he was not from the Islamic branch of Sylvester’s family (so no calls of “Allahu Akbar, Adrian!” in the very near future).
This is one of the many reasons why I’ve always been against taxes on cigarettes. They tax the working class to pay for Hezbollah and other Islamic terrorists’ activities:

A federal tax-fraud case against a group of 14 men who cheated the state of Minnesota out of $2.5 million in cigarette tax revenues ended on Thursday when the last two men likely to be punished for the fraud were sentenced to prison.

Cigarette Transfer Tax: $$$ Transferred Out of Pockets of America’s Working Class Into Pockets of Islamic Terrorists

Kamil Madfoun Al-Esawi and Musaab Fares Wazwaz were each sentenced to two years in prison and fined $500. Three more defendants remain at large overseas and are not expected to return to the United States. [DS: Shocker.]
Most of the 14 defendants belonged to four groups of brothers with the last name Wazwaz. According to the indictment, they owned 52 Twin Cities-area tobacco stores, and made numerous attempts to conceal earnings and wealth through fraudulent bookkeeping and tax returns, as well as property transfers and large cash transactions.
In addition to the men sentenced today, those who pleaded guilty to tax-fraud charges were:
* Sabry Mohamed Wazwaz: 42 months in prison, three years supervised release, restitution of $1,244,859.93.
* Tawfiq Othman Wazwaz: 42 months in prison, three years supervised release, restitution of $723,936.27.
* Kennedy Mohamed Wazwaz: 30 months in prison, three years supervised release, restitution of $720,260.37.
* Ziad Mahmoud Wazwaz: 33 months in prison, three years supervised release, restitution of $699,805.17.
* Houd Othman Wazwaz: 27 months in prison, three years supervised release, restitution of $389,369.71.
* Adel Salem: Two years in prison, three years of supervised release, restitution of $262,541.53.
* Taleb Mohamed Wazwaz: 15 months in prison, three years of supervised release, restitution of $192,754.40.
* Raed Yassin Wazwaz: One year and a day in prison, three years supervised release, restitution of $151,733.96.
* Yousef Mahmoud Wazwaz, also known as Joseph Mahmoud: Two years in prison, three years supervised release, restitution of $100,343.
The men who remain overseas are Anthony Stallone, also known as Zuhair Yassin Wazwaz, Fares Othman Wazwaz and Othman Majed Wazwaz.

Hmmm . . . “overseas” where? Why won’t they even report the name of th country? HUH?!