May 1, 2007, - 2:59 pm

“Civic Duty”: Muslims Will Drool Over This Halal (& Silly) Movie

By Debbie Schlussel
Reader Andrew tipped me off to the leftist movie, “Civic Duty,” starts Friday in theaters, and which I’ve screened. It’s about an unemployed accountant who suspects his new Islamic neighbor of being a terrorist. He becomes deranged and eventually takes the innocent Arab Muslim neighbor hostage. Besides the horrid message of this movie, with a teeny-tiny pay-off at the end, I intensely disliked the movie for many reasons. I’ll post my complete review later in the week. In short, it’s a direct rip-off of “Arlington Road,” which was far better.
For now, you can see what I mean from this absurd trailer, which asks, “Do you know what terror looks like?” Yes, I do know. Too bad the writer, producers, and director of this boring propaganda don’t know . . . and don’t want to know, either:


FYI, you’ll probably recognize the mousy and annoying actress Kari Matchett, who currently plays the President’s slutty secretary/girlfriend on “24.” She’s equally as hideous and annoying in this movie as the bitchy pro-Muslim wife.
Reader Andrew wrote:

I’m guessing it’s another film in which the innocent Muslim acts suspiciously but is wrongly accused, and the white American is the bad guy.

Pretty much, other than a teeny-tiny pay-off at the end. Oh, and by the way, this trailer makes this dull movie look for more exciting than it actually is.

civicdutymovieposter.jpg

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses

More liberal indoctrination on how we so mistreat the poor Islams. But in truth, the information obtained by reading this and other blogs where we are reminded constantly of the favoritism provided to muslims from every government branch from the White House to the DHS, to ICE… it is not inconceivable that someday, somebody is gonna go off an innocent muslim…So why does the message of this movie offend you?

chucker on May 1, 2007 at 3:37 pm

IF you’re ever to become a SERIOUS film critic Debbiekins you have to realise that “Triumph of the Will” and “Birth of a Nation” were LANDMARKS in film making DESPITE their Aryan/white-supremacist philosophies!!!
YOUR pro-Zionist spin on everythang else is cute, but once you start denigrating art because of your politics you’re missing the boat:(—Art IS—and should only be judged on the criteria of whether or not it WORKS.
ONE PROB, EM’S REVENGE: THIS MOVIE ISN’T ART. IT’S JUST BORING AND POORLY DONE. IF I THOUGHT IT WAS WELL DONE, BUT JUST DIDN’T LIKE ITS MESSAGE, I’D SAY SO.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

EminemsRevenge on May 1, 2007 at 3:39 pm

Yea, Eminems, what she said. Perhaps you need an emenemena. Schlock is schlock regardless of message. People have been telling variations of the same stories since ancient Greece. Show me something new. ‘The Birth of a Nation’, studied that in the 11th grade (1965), landmark, what 1917, next.

John Cunningham on May 2, 2007 at 3:15 am

“The Birth of a Nation”. D. W. Griffith’s father, if memory serves me was an officer in the Confederate Army. 1917 was closer to post Civil War days than we are today. After the Civil War there was a complete breakdown of law and order in the South. In it’s early days the ku klux klan served a useful purpose. Local klans gave protection to their commuities. They outlived their usefulness when legitement law and order was restored and it evolved into to the grotesque hate group we know them as today. People take out of context Griffith’s seemingly favorable portrayal of the klan.

John Cunningham on May 2, 2007 at 3:38 am

Debbie: Actually, “Civic Duty” (and what a misnomer!) sounds like a direct rip-off of “Arlington Road” (which was indeed a good, though not great, movie, and is no doubt far better than this latest anti-White America screed — haven’t seen it yet, and have no intention of doing so, having read your review/summary).
Other than “24,” and even they are becoming more and more rapidly PC, I can’t recall any movie other than “Flight 93,” and “The Path to 9-11″ on TV, that calls a Muslim terrorist a MUSLIM terrorist, and not some idiocy like “insurgent,” “mis-guided ute,” or worst of all “freedom fighter,” all belonging to some unknown religion.
Considering the source, I doubt we’ll ever see anything out of Hollywood that doesn’t denigrate America, first and foremost. At least until one of “24″‘s suitcase nukes goes off in Hollywood, instead of Valencia, and the survivors have to change their tune, involuntarily.

theendisnear on May 2, 2007 at 2:15 pm

This isn’t liberal bias, it’s Goebbels-quality propaganda to stamp out White group-identity, White confidence, and White preservation. Do any of you doubt that this movie, and a thousand other examples like it, are part of a conscious Genocide against whites? Are there opposite-themed movies where non-whites prey on whites, and whites are the victims?

davidlanham on May 3, 2007 at 1:53 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field