August 8, 2007, - 1:29 pm

Hamtramckstan Not Dar Al-Islam Yet: Muslims Defeated in Key City Council Race

By Debbie Schlussel
Many readers have asked me about the much-touted Hamtramck City Council primary elections, which took place yesterday. Over the weekend, the Detroit Newsistan’s resident pan-Islamist “reporter,” Gregg Krupa wrote a gushing article about how Muslims were going to win the majority in City Council elections and control the formerly majority-Polish Catholic city.
But I sat back to have the last laugh (for now) because–in my mind–Hamtramck is not yet Dar Al-Islam (“House of Islam” or Islamic land). I saw Mr. Krupa’s article–like most of what he writes–to be more wishful thinking for his vision of a future dhimmi state than reality. And I was right. (Krupa is one of the lapsed Polish Catholic liberals who takes orgasmic joy in the Islamicization of Michigan, and that’s his beat for the Detroit Newsistan, where he regularly prints phony “facts” to support that dream.)

hamtramckelectionprimary0808.jpg

(Graphic From the Detroit Free Press)

Yesterday, not only did half the Muslims running NOT get elected, but an incumbent Muslim–William Hood, Jr.–lost, defeated by three non-Muslims running. The other defeated Muslim, Abu Mahfuz, is publisher of the Muslim Bangladeshi newspaper. And even that did not help him coast to victory.
I knew that the only way Muslims would win a majority is if the many Muslim illegal aliens there who vote came out to vote, yet again, illegally. And that was a possibility. When concerned individuals challenged Muslim illegal aliens’ “right” to vote, there, the Justice Department pounced on them and the city. And, today in America, the good ‘ole Department of Justice, protects them from any challenges. You are a racist, violating their civil rights, if you do. Federal monitors have been posted at Hamtramckstan elections to watch you, not them.
A little history on Hamtramckstan, the Islamicization of–and accompanying violence against non-Muslims–I’ve written about frequently on this site. Hamtramck is a 2.2 square mile island of land surrounded by Detroit. It was historically a Polish Catholic city. My great-great-uncle Chaim had shoe stores there at the turn of the century (the last century), at which he and his employees spoke only Polish (my family is of Polish Jewish heritage).
But now, Hamtramckstan is swarming with Muslims, mostly illegal aliens. They are predominantly Muslims from Bangladesh, Yemen, Bosnia, Kosovo, and the states of the former Soviet Union. As readers will recall, Hamtramckstan became the first city in America to openly sanction the disturbing noise pollution known as the Muslim Call to Prayer at all hours of the day and night. When ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) was still the U.S. Customs Service, agents were investigating terrorist money-laundering charities there. But now, with the city teeming with Islamic extremists who are here illegally, it is sadly off-limits under ICE Special Agent in Charge Brian Moskowitz a/k/a “Abu Moskowitz”.
As I’ve also written on this site, a prominent Catholic church there is now a mosque, and Black non-Muslim students in Hamtramckstan’s public madrassas (schools) have been subject to violent attacks. Then, there’s the mysterious fire-bombing destruction of the Hindu Temple there. And don’t forget Ginnah Muhammad, the Muslim woman who is suing to wear her niqab (full face veil) in Hamtramckstan District Court.
So, a Muslim takeover of the Hamtramck City Council is not far away. But that day was not yesterday and won’t be in the general election in November. Yesterday, Muslims Hood and Abu Mahfuz lost, though Shahab Ahmed and Delawar Hussain did advance beyond the primary, along with 4 Infidels. Still even the infidels have become dhimmified in their quest to remain “in control” of their city. Councilman Robert Zwolak, who led the fight to ban the Call to Prayer, is now bending over backward to please Islamists.
Hamtramckstan will fall and probably soon. But for now, it is still Dar Al-Harb (“House of the Sword”–land that must be forcibly conquered by Islam through the sword).

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

7 Responses

I know it won’t happen, but the following is the only way to save our country.
BAN ISLAM IN THE US!
http://pedestrianinfidel.blogspot.com/2007/02/proposed-constitutional-amendment.html (ps: not my website or blog – just nearly only site that will publish my proposal)
A Proposed Constitutional Amendment
Background and justification to Amendment 28
Whereas Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing the same;
Whereas the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice oneís religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a ìreligious testî for participation in the body politic;
Whereas Islam includes a complete political and social structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supersedes any civil law and that Islam mandates that no secular or democratic institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;
Whereas Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and supplant all other religions and democratic institutions;
Whereas Saudi Arabia, the spiritual home of Islam does not permit the practice of any other religion on its soil and even ìmoderateî Muslims states such as Turkey and Malaysia actively suppress other religions;
Whereas Islam includes as its basic tenet the spread of the faith by any and all means necessary, including violent conquest of non-believers, and demands of its followers that they implement violent jihad (holy war) against those un-willing to convert or submit to Islam, including by deception and subversion of existing institutions;
Whereas on 9/11/2001 19 Muslim hijackers acting in the name of Islam killed 3,000 Americans, and numerous other acts of terrorism have been directed at the American people around the world;
Whereas representatives of Islam around the world including Osama Bin Laden (architect of 9/11), the government of Iran including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, HAMAS, Hezbollah, and other Islamic groups have declared jihad (war) on America, and regularly declare that America should cease to exist;
Whereas there is no organized Islamic opposition to violent proponents of Islam;
Therefore: Islam is not a religion, but a political ideology more akin to Fascism and totally in opposition to the ideals of freedom as described in the United States Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.
Be it resolved that the following Amendment to the Constitution be adopted:
Article I
The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion.
The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.
Article II
As representatives of Islam around the world have declared war, and committed acts of war, against the United States and its democratic allies around the world, Islam is hereby declared an enemy of the United States and its practice within the United States is now prohibited.
Article III
Immediately upon passage of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress. No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.
The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited. The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islamís history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.
The preaching or advocating of Islamic ideals of world domination, destruction of America and democratic institutions, jihad against Judaism, Christianity and other religions, and advocating the implementation of Sharia law shall in all cases be punishable by fines, imprisonment, deportation, and death as prescribed by Congress. Violent expressions of these and other Muslim goals, or the material support of those both in the United States and around the world who seek to advance these Islamic goals shall be punishable by death.
Muslims will be denied the opportunity to immigrate to the United States.
Article IV
Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as authorizing the discrimination against, of violence upon, nor repudiation of the individual rights of those Americans professing to be Muslim. The individual right of conscience is sacrosanct and the practice of Islam within the privacy of home and self is strictly protected to the extent that such individuals do not violate the prohibitions described in Article III.

robscottw on August 8, 2007 at 3:49 pm

robscottw,
I am an average American and although I may be slightly more informed than your average citizen, I feel I represent at least a good percentage of the population. You have 100% of my support with this amendment. I believe you’ve outlined it very well.
I too believe that our civilization is threatened by the islamists (or whatever you want to call them).
No other religion has the impact on our society like this one has and no one else is as destructive to our society.
This idea should be seriously introduced and discussed within our society.

TheAwakenedOne on August 8, 2007 at 4:39 pm

I love Hamtramck…..especially the girls, and the piwa!! I hope they can hold out for at least a few more years. It’s about time for a trip to Under the Eagle, Polish Village or Polonia. You’re not saying St. Florian is a mosque are you?!?!!? Sto lat Deb!!

Moe Larry on August 8, 2007 at 5:05 pm

Debbie -thank you for this excellent report on Hamtramck.

CarpeDiem on August 8, 2007 at 9:13 pm

Banning Islam will be the ultimate solution. In the meantime, some measures have to be taken, I posted them previously, here they are again.
And I will keep reposting them because I think they are the best responses to the problem of Islam and the Muslims in America.
————————————————
Several measures have to be taken to ensure the security of this nation:
1 – Put a limit on all kinds of visas. Entrance to the U.S.A. must be controlled. Legal Immigration shouldn’t be as easy as it is right now.
2 – Visas shouldn’t be easily granted to Muslims. And better if they are not granted at all to them. Let us be blunt here. Yes, the State Department with the help of the FBI/CIA can find out who is Muslim and who is not. Only non-Muslim Arabs living in Islamic country have the privilege of coming to America.
3 – All borders must be completely sealed.
4 – The Muslims living in this country have to be monitored and investigated, all of them. Those who are found related to terrorist organizations, those who overstayed their visas and those who committed crimes must be prosecuted and/or deported and stripped from their citizenship if they are “citizens.”
5 – Those Muslims who live in America and express hate towards this country must be asked to leave immediately, and be stripped from their citizenship.
6 – A system of street surveillance (CCTV) must be put in place all over the country, like Great Britain. Its sole purpose is monitoring, identifying the terrorists and, when possible, preventing terrorist acts.
7 – The citizens should not be afraid to be labeled “bigots,” “racists,” etc. If they feel, see or hear any suspicious activities, they should be applauded and rewarded for reporting them. There should be more encouragement from the government. Better be labeled “bigot” than being a coward and politically correct. Do not hand your country to the Muslims who, when in charge, will behead you.
8 – “Political Correctness” must be banned as a word and as an ACTION from these United States, i.e. that word must be as objectionable, as offensive, as vulgar as the “N” word.
9 – Any Media outlet that is trying to cover up or find excuses for the Islamic terrorists or for the Muslims living in this country who are attempting to abuse our system of government and our way of life, must be punished by changing the TV channel, not buying the newspaper, not visiting the website and not advertising in it.
10 – Do not vote for traitors.
In case you didn’t notice, we live in a different world where the Muslims are waging two wars on the West, through:
1 – Bloody Terrorism.
2 – Peaceful Terrorism.
Bloody Terrorism:
You know about it. The blood of the Infidels is shed everyday all over the Globe by “peaceful” Islam.
Peaceful Terrorism:
You read about it everyday on this blog. It happens everyday all over America. In your city and in your neighborhood.
The Muslims are using your laws and your Constitution against you.
They are trying to impose their way of life on you, with, unfortunately and sadly, the help of fifth columnists.
In case you didn’t notice, it is a matter of life or death. You do not have a third choice.
It is up to you, citizen of these United States.
The threat is real. Stop being delusional.

Independent Conservative on August 8, 2007 at 11:09 pm

Robscottw
On Hesperado (link below), there were suggested edits to the proposal you made. Did you endorse/incorporate them, or were there differences that you had with that?
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2007/06/new-amendment-to-constitution-re-islam.html
As I noted there, no politician will touch this with a 10 mile long bargepole, so the best approach to getting such a proposal off would be to pick a state where it’s most likely to have popular support (maybe OK, AL or UT) as well as unlikely to be overturned by a Federal or State Court (e.g. Ninth Circus Court jurisdiction wouldn’t apply). Get the requisite number of signatures for this proposition to be on the ballot, and put it on there.
The beauty of such an approach would be that unlike in the case of CAIR lawsuits, where they retreat whenever discovery issues threaten to expose uglier aspects of their dealings, in this case, pro-Islamic groups have no choice but to either confront the contents of this proposition, or risk allowing Islam to become illegal in the state in question. Also, assuming that none of the politicians support it, the media will be pretty much attacking very obscure people – I wouldn’t suggest that even JW associate with it. Even if there were next to no Muslims in the given state, CAIR would be loath to allow this to happen. So that would pretty much force a campaign, with pro-Islamic groups having to deny the assertions of the propositions, thereby inviting fence-sitters to verify them for themselves (granted that some PC types may swallow everything that the Mohammedans have to offer – hook, line and sinker), and put Islam under the sort of scrutiny that all of OPEC’s billions couldn’t snuff out. Not to mention that some talk shows – like Savage – are now questioning whether Islam deserves to be recognized as a religion: Savage, for instance, referenced an article by David Hollins in FaithFreedom, that takes certain statements from Mein Kamph, and compares them with Quranic verses, as well as certain hadiths from Bukhari and statements from Ibn Ishaq.
Finally, at the ballot box, let’s say it succeeds (after all, the launching pad from where this was born was carefully chosen), and gets challenged in court. Hopefully, it won’t get overturned by the state court in question, and may have to make its way up to SCOTUS. Now, assuming it is kicked up that far, the same scrutiny that was there during the election would be repeated during the court hearings. Now, while a lot of it may be under the radar – how many closely follow court cases? – chances are more likely than not that both the referandum itself, as well as the court hearings would be accompanied by major Muslim demonstrations as seen during the Danish cartoons: that alone will ensure that the story gets front page coverage. Finally, even if SCOTUS disagrees with it and turns it down, the damage that would have been done to Islam by such a chain of events would force a retreat of Muslims on everything – from dressing up as Muslims in school to footbasins in Minneapolis and Phoenix airports.
Only problem – the petitioners of such a move would have to be pretty brave, since they would be inviting death threats by doing this. Maybe some people well armed could try this.

Infidel Pride on August 9, 2007 at 3:25 am

Salam so this is what you say Debbie:
As readers will recall, Hamtramckstan became the first city in America to openly sanction the disturbing noise pollution known as the Muslim Call to Prayer at all hours of the day and night.
How about this lets ban church bells and see how that goes, those church bells are awful pesky and annoying, so I’m all for banning church bells in every city?

Muslim man on August 9, 2007 at 10:21 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field