May 21, 2006, - 1:51 pm

So, Two Saudi Men Walk Into a . . . School Bus . . .

By Debbie Schlussel
So, two Saudi men in their 20s walk onto a school bus by accident. Ri-i-i-i-ght. And they lie about where they are from. And it just so happens they are students at the University of Sami’s (Al-Arian) Followers. Oops, I mean, the University of South Florida. Coincidence? Accident? Sure.
Our favorite South Florida paper, The Tampa Trib, has two stories on Mana Saleh Almanajam and Shaker Mohsen (here and here).

saudisonschoolbus.jpg

Mana Saleh Almanajam & Shaker Mohsen Alsidran:

Coming to Your Kids’ School Bus?

Predictably, our friends at HAMAS-front group, CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations), explain it away:

Bedier [Ahmed Bedier, head of Tampa CAIR] called the court’s decision to revoke bail an overreaction and tied to the men being Arabic and Muslim.
“The only reason [this happened] is because of who they are, and that’s wrong,” he said.

And this one:

Ahmed Bedier, Tampa director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said the men likely meant no harm and that because “they were from Saudi Arabia, that escalated the situation.”
He blamed the incident on cultural differences.
“They didn’t differentiate between a school bus and public transportation,” he said.

Uh-huh. And that’s why the two not only lied about their nationality, but repeatedly changed their stories about what they were doing on the bus. Well, actually, that is a cultural difference. Unlike Islam, Christianity and Judaism do not preach taqiyah and takfir (two different types of deception of Infidels and non-believers). And they don’t send people to scout out the possibility of attacks on school buses or airports. This is the SECOND apparent dry run by Muslims in America, this week. More about the first, here.
So were these men proteges of terrorist Al-Arian and his legion of Tampa area Islamist followers, who still populate USF?
Thanks to many readers for sending us the articles and TV reports (especially those by Tampa Bay 10′s Valerie Boey–here and here). Note the different tone in coverage from the pro-Islamist St. Petersburg Times (which helped and supported terrorist Sami Al-Arian) vs. The Tampa Tribune (an objective paper).
***
A nice round-up by Michelle Malkin on this.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

11 Responses

Good thing they didn’t look like Timothy McVeigh!
9/11, THE U.S.S. COLE, KHOBAR TOWERS, THE U.S. EMBASSY BOMBINGS IN EAST AFRICA, THE 1993 WTC BOMBING, U.S. MARINES IN LEBANON–ALL THAT AND MANY OTHERS BY MUSLIMS AND ISLAMISTS, AND YOU FAR-LEFT WACKOS ARE STILL HOLDING ON TO TIMOTHY MCVEIGH. YOU WORRY ABOUT HIM AND THE REST OF US WILL WORRY ABOUT THE REAL THREAT.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

Dave Johnson on May 21, 2006 at 3:08 pm

“Unlike Islam, Christianity and Judaism do not preach taqiyah (deception of Infidels and non-believers)”
The above would only be relevent if these two Saudi men were Shias. Also if they are Shias they couldnt possibly be Al Qaeda or radical Salafists (all anti-shia)
At best they could be Hizbullah or Iranian agents.
Taqiyah as a concept originated/exists under Shitte Jurisprudence.
Were these two Saudi men Shias?
From Global Security:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/intro/islam-shiia.htm
Taqiyah is another practice condemned by the Sunni as cowardly and irreligious but encouraged by Shia Islam and also practiced by Alawis and Ismailis. A person resorts to taqiyah when he either hides his religion or disavows certain religious practices to escape danger from opponents of his beliefs. Taqiyah can also be practiced when not to do so would bring danger to the honor of the female members of a household or when a man could be made destitute as a result of his beliefs. Because of the persecution frequently experienced by Shia imams, particularly during the period of the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates, taqiyah has been continually reinforced.
ACTUALLY, SINCE SHIAS AND SUNNIS ARE WORKING TOGETHER (HEZBOLLAH IS TRAINING AL-QAEDA), THAT REALLY WOULD NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE. THERE HAVE BEEN SHIAS AT AL-QAEDA GATHERINGS THROUGHOUT LEBANON. AND, ANYWAY, MANY SUNNIS PRACTICE TAKFIR, A CORE PRINCIPLE OF WHICH IS TAQIYAH. A DISTINCTION WITHOUT MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

lawman on May 21, 2006 at 4:29 pm

Hi Deb,
It seems that the CAIR mobs are getting a bit more restless in your neck of the woods too. Apparently, they’ve been in-servicing the good people in Washtenaw county on how to behave like nice little Dhimmis and applaud them for succumbing to Sharia:
http://www.cair.com/default.asp?Page=articleView&id=2153&theType=NR

Bubbaman on May 21, 2006 at 10:21 pm

The students and driver had absolutely every right to be alarmed at the eerie presence of Islamic Arabs on the school bus — history has taught us that these cowardly worms often target young people, children, and buses filled with people.
Must we start arming the bus drivers with tasers, or other such weapons, in order to accomodate the socialist Liberal’s multicultural dystopia?

Freudianslippers on May 21, 2006 at 11:55 pm

Global Security: If that`s as far as your knowledge goes you had better change your blog name fast fast fast.
Your knowledge is much too shallow and your exposure is somewhat embarassing. But then sleeping with the daily kos can lead to derangement.
Here`s a little tip: Do some research on Mo`s words `War is deceit`. In a sense it is a muslim haiku. With some luck you might get to love Islam esp. the 186 ayats:
Justice Z S Lohat, Metropolitan Magistrate of Delhi gave a landmark verdict discharging Rajkumar Arya and Indra Sain Sharma on 31 July, 1986. I give below the operative portion from his judgement:
‘It is found that the Ayats are reproduced in the same form as are translated in the said ‘Quran Majeed’. In my opinion the writer by writing the above words has expressed his opinion or suggestion and at the most it can be branded as a fair criticism of what is contained in the holy book of Mohammedans’.. With due regard to the holy book of ‘Quran Majeed’, a close perusal of the Ayats shows that the same are harmful and teach hatred and are likely to create differences between Mohammedans on one hand and the remaining communities on the other.
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/Sundaram60315.htm

hutchrun on May 22, 2006 at 3:09 am

Ameristan? But i`d love some of those mossie kissers to get a taste of it then we see their bleeding hearts:
The Mohammedans brought murder and slaughter in their train, but until their arrival peace prevailed
Islamic imperialism knew no code of honor. The only rule of war they observed without fail was to fall down the helpless civil population after a decisive victory had been won on the battlefield. They sacked and burnt down villages and towns after the defenders had died fighting or had fled. The cows, the Brahmins and Buddhist Bhikshus invited their special attention in a mass murder of non-combatants. Their temples and shrines were their special targets in an orgy of pillage and destruction. Those that they did not kill, they captured and sold as slaves. The scene was described by Kanhadde Prabandha (1456 A.D) in the following words: “The conquering army burnt villages, devastated the land, plundered people’s wealth, took Brahmins and children and women of all classes captive, flogged with thongs of raw hide, carried a moving prison with it, and converted the prisoners into obsequious Turks.”
http://www.atributetohinduism.com/Islamic_Onslaught.htm

hutchrun on May 22, 2006 at 3:56 am

“AND, ANYWAY, SUNNIS PRACTICE TAKFIR, WHICH IS BASICALLY THE SAME AS TAQIYAH. A DISTINCTION WITHOUT MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE”
Though I am not an Islamic Scholar, Takfir is completely different from Taqiyah. Maybe you intended to use some other term?
NO, TAKFIRIS ARE EXTREMIST SUNNIS WHO ARE BASICALLY AL-QAEDA MEMBERS. THEIR DOCTRINE IS “Takfir wal Hijra”–EXCOMMUNICATION & EXILE. PART OF THEIR BEHAVIOR AND BELIEF SYSTEM IS TO UTILIZE TAQIYA TO DECEIVE THE INFIDELS AND NON-BELIEVERS. THEY ARE NOT SHI’ITES.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

lawman on May 22, 2006 at 8:14 am

Famous Sunni scholar, `Allamah Wahidu ‘z‑zaman Khan of Haydarabad (India) says: “Taqiyah is proved from the QurĂ­an, “except when you have to guard against them”; and ignorant people think that taqiyah is some?thing peculiar to the Shi’as, while it is allowed in the Sunni faith also at times.” [4]
Read all about it:
http://al-islam.org/taqiyah/1.htm

leavingtheleft on May 22, 2006 at 9:17 am

Doncha’ just love it when Muzlums try to wriggle out of the truth when someone else exposes them? They try to mince words, use semantics, blow smoke, leave out the facts, twist facts, lie, etc.
That’s part of their religion – to lie and deceive, and take advantage of the fact that the average Infidel doesn’t understand their cult.

Thee_Bruno on May 23, 2006 at 9:33 am

Sounds like you are describing Bill Clinton and most liberals, Thee_Bruno. I am surprised they haven’t hired Clinton as a PR flack.

Jeff_W on May 23, 2006 at 11:32 am

LOL, Jeff_W.
Yeah, Clinton must’ve attended a few madrassas while at Oxford.
BTW, Bill got tons of cash from Dubai trying to push through their ports deal, recently.

Thee_Bruno on May 23, 2006 at 11:50 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field