March 31, 2010, - 4:10 pm

Girlie-Man Nation: Western Women Don’t Want Masculinity & Why (Decade of the Palin)

By Debbie Schlussel

I’ve written about this many times over the last decade:  the feminization of America’s men and the butchification of America’s women.  We’ve done plenty of “Men-the New Women” alerts on this site.


Western Women Chose the More Effeminate of These Girlie-Men

In World War II, when droves of women went to work in factories as Rosie the Riveter while their men were abroad fighting Nazis, they knew it was only temporary.  When the REAL men came back, the women would return to being women.  It’s hardly news that now America’s men are the new women.  And vice versa.  Like I said, we’ve been noting that here for over a decade.

Saturday’s Wall Street Journal had a much publicized two-page feature, “Why Women Don’t Want Macho Men,” about studies consistently showing that women in relatively wealthy Western societies prefer men with feminine faces and features, while women in struggling societies prefer masculine men.  But the article should have been title, “Why Spoiled Western Women Don’t Want Men & Why They’d Rather Be Them.”

Count me out of that mix.  I looked at the photos of the feminine men and thought, “Blechhhh.”  As a red-blooded, American female, I prefer the ruggedly handsome, masculine-looking guy–who can fix things and protect me–any day of the week to the effeminate, gay-looking girlie-men these “sophisticated Western women” picked.  Sadly, according to these studies, many Western women prefer the feminized version.  But, to me, even the “masculine” version looks like a chick (see above).  Yuck.

The Journal doesn’t directly express the societal distinction here–that the women who prefer feminine men are Western and afflicted with feminism and female gender-based affirmative action–and, instead, calls them countries with “healthier” populations.  It ain’t got nothin’ to do with health.  Sorry, but men who spend a lot of time on their hair and have a basket of hair products aren’t men.  They’re girls stuck in men’s bodies.  That’s not healthy.

In fact, preferring effeminate men is, on the contrary, very unhealthy.  It’s a serious problem.  And it will result in the further decline of the West.  The society that is strongest and growing–Islam–embraces masculinity.  The societies that always die are matriarchies.  Name one martriarchy that’s survived and become a great, long-lasting civilization.  You can’t.  There aren’t any.  There was no Ceasar-ette.  No Alexandra the Great.  No General Pat-Tina.  Helen of Troy may have inspired mythical wars, but she didn’t lead them.  She was merely the lure for the male warriors, the booty . . . and the booty.  And there was no exfoliant or eye creams on their night stands, nor is there any–I’ll bet–in Mr. Bin Laden’s cave.  Neither of these parties, respectively, had or have the luxury of engaging in this kind of be-like-women, sensitive man stupidity.

The European women who were part of these studies (along with Americans) have already lost their countries and their continents.  Marriage is over in their societies.  They are single motherhood nations (which we are fast becoming, a la Bristol Palin syndrome).  The only masculine men in their societies are named Mohammed and are fast taking over.  Preferring girlie-men is a fast track to the death of a society, the death of civilization.  L’Oreal Moisturizer for Men won’t save the world when a homicide bomber is about to press the detonator.

But who’s surprised by this?  Not me.  After decades of Oprah daily telling America’s women that men suck;  after decades of Hollywood telling America that most men and fathers are mere sperm donors who are chumps, absentee, and deadbeats;  with female writing staffs on hit shows, like “Mad Men,” revising history and lying to us about men even back when they actually were men;  with the fashion forces that be putting men into women’s clothes, like “skinny jeans,” “pink” . . . er, MAN-genta, and male corsets;  with the rapid death of male habits like hunting being replaced with unisex hobbies like gaming from home and remaining on the couch; after hardware stores like Home Depot and Lowe’s selling pink toolkits and urging women to do the repairs they once relied on men to do;  with female football coaches for high school boys raised by single mothers;  with even the so-called “traditional family values conservatives” embracing alpha male breadwinner husbands like Sarah Palin and Michelle Fraudkin (with their effeminate, estrogen-doused Mr. Mom wives-with-a-penis trailing behind like “cute” accessories, their detached testicles tightly in a jar somewhere in the distance), just like the “conservatives” in Europe–even less feminine than the butchy Michelle Obama, because at least her emasculated hubby who takes her orders and ire is the PINO (President In Name Only);  with “conservative hero” Palin and her daughter Bristol telling their anti-male hero Oprah (as they recently did) that the illegitimate, out-of-wedlock man and single mother doesn’t need a man in her life–are we really surprised that this dangerous influence of keeping men down, male-bashing, and slowly “phasing men out” has taken hold in a way that renders the male gender irrelevant?


I’d say that it seems the only “man” some of these women want is Obama.  Instead of relying on their husbands to pay for their healthcare, they relied on Obama and mostly male Democrats who voted for ObamaCare, to give it to them.  So, they don’t need a man.  But on the other side of the ideological divide, conservatives are embracing feminism in the Palins, etc., too.  Even the conservative “males” are feminine–Sean Hannity and National Review Editor Rich Lowry, who gives the effeminate males, pictured above, a run for their girlie-man money.  The words “macho,” “masculine,” and “masculinity” are oil to their water.  And I’ll bet you’ll use a lot of fingers counting the hair products and skin creams in their bathrooms.

Our society–from all angles–has bowed to the wiles of dead curmudgeon, Betty Friedan, and live one, Gloria Steinem.  Whether it’s Hollywood’s output, embrace of Mr. Moms and girlie-men even on the right, and the hardware stores’ pink tools, we’ve lost the appreciation for all that is male.

They’ve done these things, and we’ve followed suit, eating up their feminist baloney every step of the way.

And we’re supposed to be surprised that Western women choose girlie male faces and characteristics in men?

It’s not news.  But it’s definitely a bad thing.

And it’s the burly, stubbly-faced male that’s gonna be able to drag you from a burning building.  Not the guy who looks like Leonardo DiCaprio, Ryan Secrest, or Ricky Martin.

A matriarchy isn’t the only society that doesn’t survive.  A Girlie-Man Nation doesn’t, either.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

146 Responses

Many years ago the company I worked for installed “feminals” which were special urinals for the skirt wearing employees.

The Big Cow on March 31, 2010 at 4:26 pm

DS, if any girlie-men are reading your blog, they’re gonna cry and shave their legs right about now. 😉

Graty Slapchop on March 31, 2010 at 5:09 pm

And there are other strange-looking men on the National Review site; i won’t mention names, but just check their photos. Some of them really look weird.

This has been going on at least since the 60s and the women’s liberation movement, the strong welfare woman, making boys in school second-class citizens (e.g. Dr. Christina Summers’ work), and so on, all the malarkey and exaggeration about so-called date-rape, the nonsense about how many women get raped during the Superbowl, etc.

However, there is quite likely a more nefarious aspect to this survey. As we know, there is an ever-growing Muslim influence at the WSJ. It is to the Muslims’ advantage to encourage a trend where American men and women will not want to marry and/or have more children, and thus make it easier for the Muslims to take over. I wouldn’t be surprised if parts of the study are a little exaggerated in order to foster, and give impetus to this goal. Men who read the article might be encouraged to ‘get with it’ and continue to act more feminine, and thus weaken American manhood and the family structure even further.

Little Al on March 31, 2010 at 5:10 pm

Great Debbie,now I have to stop using my dry skin cream on my hands and arms.

My hands are in water all day and get dry and cracked,especially in the winter.Ouch.

Guess I’ll have to be a manly man and do things in a manly way.

ebayer on March 31, 2010 at 5:19 pm

I blame the romantic comedies in both the movies and TV. In those things they have guys acting like Chandler from that sitcom Friends. We need more Joeys and less Chandlers in this country!

Oscar on March 31, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    blame the romantic comedies in both the movies and TV. In those things they have guys acting like Chandler from that sitcom Friends. We need more Joeys and less Chandlers in this country!

    Oscar on March 31, 2010 at 5:28 pm


    Do yah think??

    Shy Guy on April 1, 2010 at 12:49 am

      OK, that was one time! And Joey did it for the money!

      Oscar on April 1, 2010 at 8:25 am

And then, of course the most grotesque thing — the celebration of homosexuals, the kowtowing of psychiatrists to the political pressure of homosexuals and their supporters, the psychiatric profession deciding that homosexuality is no longer a disease, etc. And now, of course, the elites (I don’t hear the Republicans complaining very much) are weakening our military even more with their continued and increased pandering to these disturbed people.

Little Al on March 31, 2010 at 5:38 pm

Kar, the point being that unless western men start to “man up”,that’s exactly the kind of men that will replace them.

ebayer on March 31, 2010 at 5:40 pm

“But, to me, even the “masculine” version looks like a chick Yuck”

And both versions would make f-ugly chicks.

Lee Martinez on March 31, 2010 at 5:46 pm

Hence the term SNAG:

Sensitive New Age Guy.


Sam Adams on March 31, 2010 at 6:07 pm

Deborah, blame it on the soy, which creates those god awful man boobs!

Bob Porrazzo on March 31, 2010 at 6:50 pm

1 Timothy 2:12-14
“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.”

1 corinthians 11:3
“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.”

1 corinthians 11:8-9
“For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man.
Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.”

Ephesians 5:22-24
“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.”

Christopher Nelson on March 31, 2010 at 6:54 pm

    a-man, christopher.

    howardroark on April 1, 2010 at 1:44 pm

All Jews……

goyim on March 31, 2010 at 8:31 pm

Debbie would make an outstanding sociologist. Very insightful points in Deb’s post. The funny thing also is that while society at large is trained to choose pictures of effeminate males, those that actually prefer to pair-off with a man, vote with their primary sexual organs and increasingly turn to inter-racial partners who traditionally eschew feminization.

DS_ROCKS! on March 31, 2010 at 8:56 pm

    You mean they turn to the ones in prison? Those that are most vulnerable to Islamic Imamic prosyletization? Thought that’s what you’re saying.

    Jimmy on April 1, 2010 at 2:38 pm

Debbie, all you have to do is look at who is running the republican party.. two woman …palin and bachmann.

Apophis on March 31, 2010 at 9:48 pm

Bob, I agree about the soy as a factor. For the past ten years I have witnessed the population of soy kids skyrocket. The males are the extremely creepy ones because collage age men look like they are 12. The girls on the other hand are very mature looking women for their ages. As far as finding a girl to marry this is a problem, but I have found that women still have a natural drive towards the manly alpha male for strictly sex… but those years are behind me now that I want to commit to a family life. It frustrates me to no end seeing and knowing beautiful intelligent mature women on the side of a soy kid in the end because I know it has everything to do with power in the end. Women of Soy want the power and to dominate…. except on certain nights of the year when the submissive girlie man allows his girl/wife to have an alpha man for a night or a weekend at her request when she wants.

P.S. My only phobia in the world is the fear of male soy kids which creepy me out to the point I cannot walk on the same side of the street as them. I have a fear of female soy kids because they look 20-23 by age 13 or 14; it’s sad and frightening when you have to card a lady before dating her.

Soyphobia on March 31, 2010 at 9:49 pm

I don’t think being a man is based on looks.
I think it’s sad that so-called research like this continues to make believe that it is.

CJ on March 31, 2010 at 10:39 pm

Who eats the soy?

DS_ROCKS! on March 31, 2010 at 10:43 pm

most women want a real man,not a metro sexual.
most fasion magazines are run by a gay majority of employees.
it seems that if you want a real man these days you have to go to a dyke lesbian bar.

raul gomez on March 31, 2010 at 11:01 pm

“gay-looking girlie-men”?
Google gay+bear, not all gays are girlie men.

Pete Bone

Pete Bone on March 31, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    sorry pete, but the fact that a man is gay automatically makes him a girlie-man, despite any outer macho appearances.

    please deduct 50 points from your man-score (if you have any points left).

    howardroark on April 1, 2010 at 1:48 pm

      Not to worry, I’ve got enough to spare.
      Maybe you’d like to borrow a few…little boy.
      Pete Bone

      Pete Bone on April 2, 2010 at 10:17 pm

“the feminization of America’s men and the butchification of America’s women. We’ve done plenty of “Men-the New Women” alerts on this site.”

Your’re posting like a great Xena Culture Warrior, Debbie. Smack all those effeminite Obama lovers good. 🙂

dorsano on March 31, 2010 at 11:36 pm

Maybe some of the preferences of the women have something to do with the nerdy or smart well to be guys being better money makers than say, a city cop. Fireman makes about $50,000 avg. Administrator for some tech firm makes $200,000. But what does the woman and the rich guy she’s married to do when their house is on fire or broken into? Hmmm, call the alpha male. Who does everyone want in the military? The articulate feelings oriented guy? No, the marksman who might dip some snuff on occassion. Lady I work for married a, shall we say, a guy whose belief system is rooted more in being a pacifist. Who does she want to be escorted to a prisoners door? Not him, from what I’ve seen.
I agree totally about the point of the muzzies appreciating the more male male. Not everything they do is illogical.

Joe on March 31, 2010 at 11:47 pm

    Uh, no,….they simply merely purchase a new house. Why do for yourself when you can get others do to the work for you–motto of theirs, and could be applicable in their situation, especially if their income matches it.

    OR they….were nerdysmart enough to have purchased enough insurance along the way so that their house will be up running again.
    Or else they find someone to sue for their problems….usually successful in todays day and age.

    Jimmy on April 1, 2010 at 2:41 pm

it started with the Ken doll. Madison avenue, Hollywood and the MSM ran with that image of sexy.

I don’t always agree with you Debbie, but I salute you for your resistance to conformity.

Johnny at Work on April 1, 2010 at 1:18 am

I wear a beard. No one will ever accuse me of looking “feminine.”


NormanF on April 1, 2010 at 1:57 am

Another writer taking her personal preferences and making them political!

Women are eternally telling us how men should be and every time that “insight” is only extrapolated from erotic fantasies rooted in romance stories.
You tell us quite clearly what you think is typical manly behavior but fail to give us ways in which that might benefit the men from whom you expect it: Go do rough work! Stop caring about your appearance! Take it like a man!
And exactly what do we get out of being like that – other than gradually braking our backs while earning pennies and being bossed around by (usually female) clerks?

“Take it like a man” is just another way of saying “Let me hurt you and you had better not complain or you won’t be a man or even a human in my eyes”.

Like I’m going to let you tell me what qualifies me to be a man?! If I want to take ballet class wearing a pink tutu then I’m still way more of a man than any pathetic puppet who does what YOU demand of him.

[sarcasm] Now go and be a real woman and stop talking about topics for men such as politics, society and warfare. Instead, go and cook something or do some chores and shut up. [/sarcasm]

aHuman on April 1, 2010 at 4:24 am

    thanks for providing the “don’t” example, aHuman…

    howardroark on April 1, 2010 at 1:53 pm

      At least he doesnt fantasize about shaking guys hands. Actually made a point, obviously over some heads. Of course, maybe if he got a charge shaking another man’s hand (for a little longer than most) it’d be okay.

      Just sayin’ dog. Just sayin’.

      Jimmy on April 1, 2010 at 3:25 pm

    Oh my my my……..about the only original thinking post here today. And a cumudgeon one at that…hmm.

    How about you include Rush, who’s reaalllly “knows” women, right? He’s been married 3 times going on wifey 4, used viagra, and has a real good track record with women, right? Just like another “real” man, manly man, loves tats, fishin’, motorcycles and all………JESSE JAMES? Is that an ideal man? Jesse dont wear no stinkin’ eyeliner. And TIGER WOODS….masculine manly sport like Golf. TIGER & JESSE REALLY KNOW HOW TO TREAT THE LADIES, RIGHT? They don’t wear no corsets and no pink stuff. Real masculine role models there.


    WHEN…IS DS GOING TO WRITE SOME MORE ON/ABOUT freedom concerts, Hannity’s involvement…etc.
    QUESTION: was that all you had? Nothing more/else to continue??
    Last week YOU SAID, there’d be more to follow in comming days, which would mean…now.
    People have to be respectful and allow for religious observances for most of this week, so this is justa reminder.

    ALSO, for DS…why did you include MICHELLE MALKIN in Palin’s feminized husband? SUPPOSEDLY, MR. MALKIN is a surgeon, physician, something along those lines. Last I heard he was not a Mr. Mommy. Certainly’s smarter than Toddy.
    Unless you have information to the contrary. That’s….not polite. A doctor is well within the realms of respectable careers for men, right?

    J: Wrong. He’s not a doctor. He’s Mr. Mom to Fraudkin. Wake up. She’s the man in that family. DS

    Jimmy on April 1, 2010 at 2:54 pm

My suggestion is that every man ought to own and wear a “murse.” (male purse). I futher suggest this one (or one like it):

This high fashion “man bag” comes in three appealing colors, and is the ideal accessory to match your XD-9 and/or Glock auto pistol.

Michael on April 1, 2010 at 6:45 am

    I agree totally! I’ve found the Versipack to be a little more covert -–room for a visible copy of the NYT, WAPO or some designer water…

    Paul D. on April 1, 2010 at 8:08 am

    My suggestion is that every man ought to own and wear a “murse.” (male purse).

    Michael on April 1, 2010 at 6:45 am


    It’s a European shoulder bag. Don’cha know?!?!


    Shy Guy on April 1, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    sorry mike, that’s 10 points off your man-score for your suggestion…

    howardroark on April 1, 2010 at 1:40 pm

    I prefer a 1 Baretta 2 Ruger 3 Sig Sauer.
    Definitely no shoulder pistol. That’s Hollywood bullshit.
    Hollywood stars are not trained the Jeff Cooper way.

    Patrick on November 6, 2010 at 9:05 pm

Michael, you need a woman who can skin a moose? How long have you been single?

david on April 1, 2010 at 7:18 am

Please also don’t forget that many women in Western society are on birth control – which has been known to change who a woman is attracted to. Once women have come off the pill, they realize they aren’t attracted to their spoouse. Very scary.

C on April 1, 2010 at 9:12 am

Debbie this has been going on for a long time at least through the eyes of television producers. How many TV shows do you recall that made men look like drooling morons, constantly at odds with women who are portrayed as always brighter, quicker on the uptake, better at fixing anything and less afraid of things that go bump in the night. It’s one of the main reasons I refused to watch “Everyone loves Raymond”, because Ray was show to be an incompetent boob who needed his mommy and was mocked by his daddy. Even commercials today follow the same theme. Men are stoopid, women and children are so much more intelligent.

kenny komodo on April 1, 2010 at 10:47 am

I was not a Mr Mom per say. I was a Digital Dad for two years when I got laid off and my then wife’s carrer took off.( I did manage to free-lance and generate income AND be home with kids-It was an agreed to It takes a REAL man to be a dad and -help raise the kids. But I think the METRO SEXUAL concept is more of the PUSSIFICATION of the american male more so than being a stay at home dad.

ward on April 1, 2010 at 11:43 am

    I was a D/H in the late eighties when I was discharged from the Air Force and my wife was still active duty.
    She was a Tech Sgt. stationed at Hickam AB,Honolulu.

    We had a son while there and she continued to work full time and I was a full time student and had a part time job as a shipyard electrician on Pearl Harbor.

    We brought our kid to the sitter during the day and one of us would pick him up in the PM.

    We shared the cooking and laundry duties as well as caring for the newborn.
    Breastfeeding was exclusively her job and she would express her milk for feedings at the sitters.

    I never felt emasculated in any way and actually felt very virile and I was in the best shape of my life.

    I had a domesticated life with the wife,but we also had friends and activities outside the home were I could assert myself and she would follow my lead.

    D/H is pronounced…D slant H
    Which stood for “dependent husband”

    ebayer on April 1, 2010 at 12:24 pm

      ebayer, you pitched in under work circumstances beyond the control of you and your wife… and you went to school and worked part time… your behavior was that of a good husband and father.

      add some bonus points to your man-score, sir.

      howardroark on April 1, 2010 at 1:58 pm

the worst is shaking a feminized guys’ hand… like a limp fish and i can’t let go of their creepy, manicured hands fast enough…

** piss shivers just thinking about it **

on the other hand (no pun intended), there’s nothing more reassuring than shaking a man’s hand where you can feel some solid, natural, God-given strength. i especially like shaking my german colleagues’ hands where you get the extra elbow pump.

howardroark on April 1, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    Oh, you like shaking a strong man’s hand huh? No…that’s not homoerotic. ‘course not.
    m-m-m. Shakin’ another man’s hand that’s real strong and liking it and then telling eveyrone–
    Keep your fantasies to yourself regarding handshaking, huh.
    Wouldn’t you rather put your hand on an attractive woman’s hand, like on a date? Yes? No?
    Made DS’s article point, more ways than one.

    Jimmy on April 1, 2010 at 2:58 pm

      relax jimmy, just an observation as an example of feminized men. any associated “fanstasies” are from your own psyche.

      howardroark on April 5, 2010 at 7:10 pm

It’s funny, just yesterday I was watching an episode of “The Rifleman” with my mother and complained that we don’t see men on tv anymore that LOOK like men. Chuck Connors looked like a man should look, and I’m sorry there aren’t more like him today.

KerryB on April 1, 2010 at 2:02 pm

Oh, Debbie. Now I am confused. I always liked men in the middle somewhere. I don’t really find a guy who looks like a swatch of shag carpeting attractive, but I don’t think a guy who spends more time on his eyebrows than I do is, either. So, can I qualify as feminine without being a “feminist”?

And truth be told, I have yet to find a guy who knows his way around a hammer or an engine and likes to do laundry (but who does?).

The main thing is, I like to think of myself as feminist – a woman who likes being feminine. There are times to stand beside your man, and times to stand behind him. A good man is what is imperative. Hopefully it will be a man who is not searching for his mother more than a wife.

Sarah Leah Lawent on April 1, 2010 at 2:11 pm

On the subject of being a man, a person who I respect recently gave a sermon to a group of pastors on this subject. You can see a clip of it here: Man Up

JohnH on April 1, 2010 at 2:30 pm

I should have said a man I respect.

JohnH on April 1, 2010 at 2:31 pm

“Bob, I agree about the soy as a factor. For the past ten years I have witnessed the population of soy kids skyrocket. The males are the extremely creepy ones because collage age men look like they are 12. The girls on the other hand are very mature looking women for their ages. As far as finding a girl to marry this is a problem, but I have found that women still have a natural drive towards the manly alpha male for strictly sex… but those years are behind me now that I want to commit to a family life. It frustrates me to no end seeing and knowing beautiful intelligent mature women on the side of a soy kid in the end because I know it has everything to do with power in the end. Women of Soy want the power and to dominate…. except on certain nights of the year when the submissive girlie man allows his girl/wife to have an alpha man for a night or a weekend at her request when she wants.

P.S. My only phobia in the world is the fear of male soy kids which creepy me out to the point I cannot walk on the same side of the street as them. I have a fear of female soy kids because they look 20-23 by age 13 or 14; it’s sad and frightening when you have to card a lady before dating her.

Soyphobia on March 31, 2010 at 9:49 pm”

Thanks for your insight into this.

Bob Porrazzo on April 1, 2010 at 2:53 pm

These would be the “metrosexual” males you describe. They use tanning/”bronzing” lotions to enhance their outdorsiness. Yuck. They should mate with the likes Rachel Maddow.

IndyLinda on April 1, 2010 at 3:09 pm

Is that Hillary Swank? (Boys Don’t Cry).

Julian on April 1, 2010 at 3:12 pm

How exactly is rapin’ and abusin’ kids and women a masculine trait? Debbie, you’re a hot tomato but you are wrong about the muslims glorifying masculinity. They are more into exploiting and dominating. The toughest guys I’ve known were almost uniformly nice and fair men.

PD: Who said rape and child abuse are “masculine”? Not me. In fact, the men who perpetrate that kind of violence are some of the most unmasculine, cowardly males there are. DS

Pauly D on April 1, 2010 at 3:44 pm

Ok Debbie. Jesse James will soon be available.

Men respect him.

Women are his sperm dumpsters.

The Unmedicated American Voter on April 1, 2010 at 4:01 pm


    With Jesse,you know going into it who he is and what he stands for…So,you can’t bitch when he does what he wants regardless of what anyone else thinks.

    ebayer on April 1, 2010 at 5:56 pm

The most important thing about being a man is supporting a family actually which in itself is not always fun or glamorous and does have it’s risks . Go back to the first story in the bible. Even the country songs that women sing about their father the thing they love the most about their father is that they worked hard to support a family and didn’t want handouts.

Also a man that stands for principles and doesn’t feel he is bad for using his analytical skills. Many men have a disorderly love of women then they love women so much they will do anything including violating basic moral’s and principles.

Being TOO MACHO though is not a good trait. Our founding fathers Abraham and Issac when they were outnumbered going to a land lied about their wife as not to be killed. A man BEING TOO MACHO and not thinking much of his own life is also A FALSE TYPE OF MASCULINITY IN MY OPINION as real religion is about life not death and while a man should protect his family when it sounds there is a snoop around he shouldn’t put himself in an impossible situation where he likely get killed because in the end THIS DOESN’T REALLY HELP HIS WIFE. That may be why ABRAHAM didn’t fight here and lied about his beautiful wife because he felt well if they kill him how does this help his wife in the end. It is false machoism.

I agree though most women today seem to want men that will do their bidding and have no backbone regardless of what the woman does and these men will become like a woman to make the women happy. The society has done a great job brainwashing women that any man that stands for something is an abuser and a controller when the reality is the opposite.

Islam though seems to attract the overly macho type that has no brains and can’t work with other men and Judaism and Christianity attract the overly self centered emotional women that also usually hate other women who aren’t like them. I guess in those two extreme’s Islam has the advandage but real men are balanced to some degree and can beat the overly fake macho man that has no brain and no love and fear of G-d or anything.

adam on April 1, 2010 at 8:26 pm

Depends on who you ask. Nobody asked me. I’m with Deb. I always preferred a guy who can fix things, do things and generally be a good guy rather than a poor immitation of a girl. Unfortunately, the good guys are few and in great demand. As far as youngsters go, the hockey players I know are doing just fine with the girls I know so, again, it depends on who you ask and how you ask. Me … I’m looking for John Wayne’s reincarnation.

rachelle on April 1, 2010 at 11:46 pm

I love you. I love your writing style, your sense of humor, your determination, your fighting spirit and grit. Must I then shun you because you’re a woman, for fear that I may be perceived by you or others to be less than a man, because I heed the council of a woman? Aren’t matriarchies from the mothers line, and are not Jews determined by their mothers heritage? That matriarchy seems to have survived several thousands years and not faded. I agree that masculinity in men is good and necessary, that the generosity of women will forever amaze me, but aren’t some traits of women admirable and worthy of distinction?

mark hammond on April 2, 2010 at 3:22 am

It’s funny. I have observed Jewish Ashkenazi men for years and among the Sephardic Jews, they are known as “Morries”. Morrie, give me this, or Morrie give me that. The Sephardics tend to have Latin temperaments because of their North African background and their women are known to be hot blooded. DS, maybe you should look at some of these old world types of man, instead of the American Metrosexual Republican.

Daniel on April 2, 2010 at 6:35 am

Maybe there’s something wrong with my eyes, but not only can I not tell the difference between the two side-by-side photos displayed in this article, but neither of them appears to be a MAN or a WOMAN. They both look like 17 year old BOYS with skin problems.

Daniel H on April 2, 2010 at 2:48 pm

This article must be a joke. Women want something in the middle. Most women I know who married nice, middle of the road guys are all still married, those that married alpha’s and wimps are divorced. Period. I don’t want a man like my father. He didn’t do ANYTHING but work. My mothher did everything else and worked. It was the same with all my friends’ fathers. The one thing I’ve noticed about Gen X & Gen Y men is that they are MUCH better fathers than fathers of yore. They are more involved, more caring, more balanced and if that means “effeminate” then I’ll take an effeminte man over a masculine one any day. My husband is a fantastic father, supportive husband, CO-provider, co-housecleaner and kid raiser who cares about my success and happiness as much as I care about his. He’s not some biblical dominant throw back you seem to think women need. I lived in Saudi Arabia for 15 years and if thats your idea of masculinity then GO LIVE THERE. Enjoy.

Delilah on April 2, 2010 at 4:01 pm

To all who criticize Debbie, just think how bitter you’d be if you were single and 41!

Debbuh on April 4, 2010 at 8:14 pm

The total and complete b/s thing is Michelle Malkin and her husband Jesse, the house husband.

I am sure Phyllis Schafley hardly approves, but we never hear about that.

The other complete b/s thing is Laura Ingraham, the single mother of 2 kids. Suddenly that’s supposed to be ok, although Hannity, Coulter and the rest of the wingnut loons would chastize any other woman, but mostly those on The Left, for doing the same.

Or we have behind door number 2 the complete hypocrisy of Sarah Palin. She surrounds herself with that black witch doctor minister who produced a scathing documentary on California devil religions, highlighting Scientology, And who is Palin all involved with? Greta van Sustern and her husband, big Scientologists.

The hypocrisy is just too much with these phonies. The b/s is so deep you literally need hip boots.

Theodosa on April 4, 2010 at 9:15 pm

Well, women begged for SNAGs (Sensitive New Age Guys) who would emote with them, play therapist and listen, ad nauseam, to every complaint. And now that women have got men like this, they’re not happy. But part of the reason why they wanted SNAGs, is that they wanted men they could control, men who would just hand over their paychecks without ever asking for anything in return.

The genesis of this problem lies in the fact that women never know what they want. One day it’s this, the next it’s that, and in between those days, they can’t make up their minds. And when they get what they want, they’re still not happy.

Couple that with the excessive amount of power women have been given, thanks to state-supported feminism, anti-male family courts, rampant misandry in the media, and well, is it any wonder why men no longer want to get married? Any wonder why they no longer want to raise families, or invest in society?

Indeed, it’s a wonder why, living in a society that treats men as eunuchs and views them as basically worthless, why I haven’t just given up and relegated myself to the couch playing video games all day.

Deb is right. Matriarchal societies do not survive over the long haul. And they cause serious problems – just look at Africa to see what I mean. There, matriarchal societies are common, and they usually result in endless tribal warfare, kids born into poverty, and out of wedlock, and young men who have no meaningful role models because the role models are either dead, or trying to kill other men in their communities.

Many men I know in North America are getting fed up with selfish women who act as if they were entitled to absolutely anything just because of their sex. These same men, myself included, are either looking at emigrating to foreign countries, or seriously contemplating it. Even at the cost of a drop in living standards.

Neither North America nor the West generally can afford such an outcome. If they allow it, without offering men any kind of stake in society, or incentives to stay, then the West as a whole is in for a much, much bigger problem than a Muslim takeover. I would say that that problem is about five years away from reaching the West’s doorstep, if it isn’t already here.

All I can say is, keep doing what you’re doing, ladies. Keep listening to your radical feminist sisters. Keep treating men like dirt. Hope you like poverty and a poor standard of living, because that’s all that you will have once you’ve met your goal of rendering men irrelevant.

Steve on April 5, 2010 at 11:27 pm

In addition to reading ‘The Gender Agenda’, and being familiar with books like ‘The Women Racket’ it is no wonder more EU women are pairing up with dusky middle Eastern men whom they consider more manly, and EU men are pairing up with more dusky Asian women whom they consider more feminine.
What Debbie points out is not innocent accident. I imagine it is heavily funded and enforced on the culture. A boy like I was fort plus years ago, would go back to the 1960s or 50s when Boys Clubs and such really were for boys. Now instead we have a child (not son or daughter) parent (not ma or pa)= sexually neutral blah language or media slang posing as good grammar. I only found her site by accident and it has been worth my while.

Terry D. on June 2, 2010 at 9:23 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field