July 28, 2008, - 2:41 pm

Your “Homeland Security” $$$s @ Work: Is It Just Me . . .

By Debbie Schlussel
. . . Or is there something seriously wrong with the fact that the Department of Homeland Security just announced an increase of millions of dollars in grants for “anti-terror programs” to illegal alien “sanctuary cities” New York, Houston, and San Francisco?
Um, the number one “anti-terror program” is the enforcement of immigration laws, the violation of which is how any number of Islamic terrorists get into and remain in this country.
If we truly meant business–and we truly do NOT–we would tell these cities that if you remain a sanctuary city, you don’t get the Homeland Security money.



Michael “Serpenthead”/”Mr. Burns” Chertoff

Continues to Aid & Abet Illegal Aliens

Since most of the millions in DHS grants the cities get is pork money that doesn’t go to counter-terror measures and enforcement, anyway, it would not endanger those cities. And since the money goes to pork and BS expenditures, you can bet that the withholding of millions of these funds would lead to a whole lot less cities declaring themselves sanctuaries for illegal aliens.
Not only should these cities NOT get increases in Homeland Security money, they shouldn’t get ANY of the money at all.
But that’s not the way the fraudulently-named Department of Homeland Security works. It’s not about our homeland and it’s not about security.
It’s about the five “P”s: Politics, Pandering, PC, and the Peter Principle. Period.
The Serpenthead (Michael Chertoff) continues his slither.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Responses

I totally agree: no compliance, no money.

undaunted on July 28, 2008 at 3:23 pm

And their forecasting increased terror risk for the next 12 months is the same thing. Bureacucratic cover-your-a**’. They are not doing their job re sanctuary cities, and going after all the Muslim terrorists you have written about, so they come up with this to justify their existence.

c f on July 28, 2008 at 4:09 pm

So Michael “Jerkoff” has struck again huh? Is there ANYONE in the entire Executive Branch more deserving of being taken out, flogged and then tared, feathered and lit? I sure can’t think of anyone.
BTW, instead of sending the sanctuary cities (like San Francisco & Sacramento) money, how about sending in Federal Marshals to arrest the Mayor, Police Chief etc. for obstruction of justice? I’ve already told the Mayor of Sacramento to her face I hope she ends up in jail for her actions.

BillBowen on July 28, 2008 at 4:43 pm

Posted by: BillBowen at July 28, 2008 04:43 PM
I fully agree that many local governments with sanctuary cities should be taken over, jail the officers, then hold new elections. To me, the fraud part like where the City of Los Angeles have written policy, prohibiting officers from questioning a person’s illegal status is BS. Then after years of having their heads up their colons, and crime increases, they request hundreds of millions in federal aid to illegal gangs. The next part would be jail ACLU lawyers that purposely impede illegal immigration laws. Lastly, to quickly remove federal judges that legislate, and make their own law from the bench.

Jackson Pearson on July 28, 2008 at 10:22 pm

Why don’t you guys ever get real for one moment: the war on terror is being brought to you by the same folks that brought you the war on drugs.
The whole effort has been reduced to a big public employment boondoggle and the proof is that the government allows new security hires to be unionized.
As a note, the Democrats don’t think security is necessary the are great followers of Sageman who believes that a good sales job will get Jihadis here to just quit.

taffy on July 31, 2008 at 6:54 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field