November 13, 2011, - 9:09 pm

“All-American?”: Stars of TLC Muslim Show Embrace Khomeini Islamic Revolution, US Hostage-Taking in Iran

By Debbie Schlussel

I’ve already warned you (here and here) about “All-American Muslim,” the faux-reality propaganda show debuting tonight on TLC.  And I’ve told you that all of the participants are Lebanese Shi’ite Muslims who won’t condemn the Hezbollah terrorist group (that killed hundreds of Americans) and Ayatollah Khomeini and his Islamic revolution in Iran in which he directed the siege on the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and the holding of U.S. hostages in captivity for 444 days.  Now, the stars of this show, the Amen family, are openly embracing Khomeini’s revolution, saying it instilled pride in them and inspired them to wear the hijab and become more Islamically religious.  It’s truly disgusting and a sign of how comfortable these extremists have become in this country.

Even their friend, Detroit Free Press resident Muslim propagandist, Niraj Warikoo (a devout Muslim and confirmed fabricator), didn’t go to any pains to disguise their pride in the Khomeini revolution.  If you think they don’t want the same thing to happen here, you are on crack.

That’s apparent in the lives of the Amen sisters. They grew up in Dearborn in the 1980s during a religious revival among Lebanese Shias that developed after the Iranian revolution in 1979. Women who previously had not worn the hijab or attended mosques became attracted to Islam.

Amen’s mother, Lila Amen, started wearing a head scarf, which the young girls noticed and wanted to emulate.

“After the Iranian revolution, people were really being more consciously aware of Islam,” oldest sister Suehaila Amen, 32, explained. They began to learn about the faith.

“My mother and all my aunts were putting on the head scarf at the time, and I was trying to be like them, following in their footsteps. … Everyone else was doing it. We wanted to do it, too.”

Disgusting. Brave Americans, including my friend, U.S. Marine Kevin Hermening lost more than a year of their lives to these monsters. And these so-called “All-American Muslims” embrace and take pride in that. Very UN-AMERICAN.

That’s not to mention that their revered leader of the revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, advocated that Muslim men make sure to marry and have sex with young Muslim girls “before their first blood,” as in before their first period. Does that sound “All-American” to you? Only if you are a heterosexual version of Jerry Sandusky. But that’s exactly the point: this religion is a whole cult of heterosexual (and bi-sexual) Jerry Sanduskys, with no shame or criticism involved.

Don’t hold your breath for “All-American Muslim” to connect the dots. After all, that wouldn’t show them to be “All-American,” but, instead, what they really are: UN-AMERICAN.

It’s ironic that the show is on TLC, which stands for “The Learning Channel.” You’ll learn nothing from this show, except that TLC knows how to turn celluloid into fertilizer.  When Vladimir Lenin said the capitalists would sell their enemies the rope on which to hang the capitalists, it was the understatement of the year.

I don’t call it, “Dearbornistan” (the phrase I coined, but which has since been stolen by everyone) for nothin’.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

52 Responses

Yup. Just a different side of tonight’s Oscars gala in the UK.

Then you know our cultural elites see nothing wrong with giving Islamic propaganda airtime any more than it sees anything wrong with honoring an anti-Semite in her dotage.

Hey, let’s not connect the dots. Anyway, all of that stuff is ancient history, so who cares.

NormanF on November 13, 2011 at 9:14 pm

    Just when you think it can’t become any creepier…


    Excuse me while I lose my breakfast.

    As goes Israel, so goes the World. on November 14, 2011 at 11:39 am

      Fuck israel and your world…

      Amel on November 14, 2011 at 6:11 pm


        Genesis 12:1-3.

        JeffE on November 14, 2011 at 8:49 pm

        Sucks to be you… please take your anti-Semitism to Stormfront. Its not welcome on here!

        NormanF on November 14, 2011 at 10:11 pm

        Amel, you just made our point. Also, why not go back to Muslim lands, if they are so wonderful? Or, are you just a foul mouthed hypocrite like most Muslims? As for your sexual fantasy regarding Israel and the world, it is an impossibility. I think domesticated livestock would be more your speed.

        Worry01 on December 13, 2011 at 12:00 am

Debbie, right now as I’m typing this comment, I am watching the Patriots-Jets NFL football game instead of that propaganda “All-American Muslim”! And for these folks to embrace and carry the water for the late Khomeini is plain old disgusting and un-american as you mentioned DS, and don’t look for the FBI or CIA to investigate the Amen family for supporting hezbollah and Khomeini.

Plus that was a good article written by Niraj Warikoo (ironically he’s a devout muslim) despite him being a devout muslim had to do a little investigative work of the Amen family supporting a former terrorist who held some americans hostage for 444 days during the Iranian revolution in the late 1970s (I was born when Khomeini came to power in Iran when Carter overthrew the Shah)!

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on November 13, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    Sean, as much as I don’t like defending anti-Israel Jimmy Carter, he did NOT “overthrow” the Shah, the Iranians did that themselves.

    The Shah may have been pro-American and better than what came after him, but he was also an anti-Semitic, much hated despot who was thrown out by the Iranians.

    There’s no way the American people would have stood for an invasion of Iran and the horrific casualties we would have had to endure in order to prop up the shah’s regime against a radicalized angry Iranian population.

    Scott on November 13, 2011 at 10:42 pm

Absolutely disgusting. These vermin (ala “The Flying Imams”) are trying to use our own liberties and tolerance to shove their dealth-cult, perverted theologies and (sharia) laws down our throats.

We need more Americans to understand this dangerous nonsense like DS does. Posts like this make me have brain implosions because they make me so bloody angry.

Someone posted this in the past and it is so true:

“Muslim extremists want to destroy and blow up USA and the “moderate” Muslims want the extremists to destroy and blow up USA”.

Great! And our PC society just looooooves the Mooooslims. As Savage said, “The “nice” people of the world are gonna destroy us”!

(Oh and for those curious, here is the Jerry Sandusky Grand Jury Presentment. It’s graphic, so be prepared… )

Skunky on November 13, 2011 at 10:27 pm

Isn’t that nice. That vicious relic of the Dark Ages Ayatollah Khomeini and his evil, anti-American regime “inspired” these so-called “All-American” Arabs to embrace Islam. Unbelievable.

Any members of their families who are not American citizens and embrace enemies of the US(Iran) should be deported.

Scott on November 13, 2011 at 10:33 pm

You are disgusting. Nothing about blind patriotism is AMERICAN. Do not attack a whole culture based on the actions and beliefs of a few. To do so shows what you truly are: ignorant.

Miranda on November 13, 2011 at 10:34 pm

    Miranda, how many demonstrations and displays of outrage and anger have American Muslims shown toward the “extremist” terrorist Muslims who hate the US? The crickets I hear are very lud.

    Scott on November 13, 2011 at 10:49 pm

    I believe you MUST have meant to apply “few” to the ones that may NOT believe Khomeni was right. HA!

    texag57 on November 14, 2011 at 11:56 am

    The Sultan Knish wrote in his criticism of the show, Islam is a form of slavery.

    A woman can take off the hijab but her mind will never be truly free.

    They can depict themselves as being like us. So were the Nazis and the Communists.

    What’s depicted on “All American Muslim” is the opposite of reality. Namely, that they ALL believe in an extremist ideology.

    Get a frickin’ clue about who they are really are and stop spouting off your ignorance. Too many Americans don’t want to or don’t care – to educate themselves about today’s enemy and the threat it presents to our lives and our very freedom.

    NormanF on November 14, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    I would like to respond to the earlier comment about blind patriotism. Believing that Islam equals freedom is true ignorance. It is a religious/political movement and not about the actions of a few. It is about core beliefs. I will do everything within my power to preserve freedom for my children including standing up against the Islamization of America that TLC supports. That is my right and responsibility as an American.

    Francine on November 17, 2011 at 6:03 am

No Miranda, your the one who’s disgusting, you continue to live with you’re head in the sand like an ostrich and not see reality for what it is. Until more and more muslims denounce all islamic terrorism, I and all of us here and across this country will no longer have to be suspicious of them, until then we will continue to be vigilant and suspicious on some-to-most of them on their thinking and behavior, etc.

Scott, my fault, it wasn’t Carter who overthrew the Shah, it was the Iranians in Iran who wanted a islamic revolution to overthrow him. And yes the Shah had his flaws, mistakes, etc.

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on November 13, 2011 at 11:05 pm

Why ostriches keep their heads in the sand…

‘Those infidels who use the ‘moral equivalence argument’ to compare Islam with other religions need to examine their own subconscious psychological motives. They are not only attempting to delude others, but are in deep denial and trying to delude themselves. They are administering self-generated taqiyya as a tranquilizer to blot out reality.

The conscious part of the moral equivalence argument takes the form “Christians and Jews have committed atrocities such as the McVeigh, Breivik and King David Hotel bombings, so Christianity and Judaism are just the same as Islam. Therefore Islam poses no special threat.”

The fallacies are obvious: Christian and Jewish acts of terrorism are rare and infrequent; they are rejected by the majority of followers of the religions, go against the core teachings of the religions, and are committed by a few isolated loonies. In contrast, Islamic acts of terrorism are commonplace, are encouraged by the Koran and are supported, if not actually carried out, by a substantial proportion of Muslims.

The unconscious and self-deluding part of the moral equivalence argument is the refusal to face the fact that Islam is an intrisically violent totalitarian ideology that has infiltrated our civilization, and is bent on our conversion, subjugation or elimination. To acknowlege this would be deeply disturbing and well outside the comfort zone of most people (remember the popular enthusiasm for appeasement of Hitler and ‘Peace in Our Time’?) . So we reassure ourselves, by the moral equivalence argument, that Islam is just like other religions.

It’s far easier to stay in denial and regard Islam as being no more a threat to our lives and culture than the Quakers or Lubavitcher Hasidim. That way we don’t have to worry about the looming global clash of civizations, or think about the unpleasant courses of action that may be necessary to reduce the threat.

Moral equivalence is moral cowardice.

Crombouke on November 14, 2011 at 1:52 am

Gee, is TLC now going to produce a series of reality shows like “All American Catholics,” “All American Baptists,” All American Jews,” “All American Hindu” etc.? If they’re going to show Muslim propaganda, they really should give equal time to the other religions. As for me, I already don’t watch anything on TLC, so I won’t be watching this either.

DG in GA on November 14, 2011 at 9:19 am

    No, Islam has its privileges. Its followers can engage in all sorts of heinous acts, but that does not prevent its followers from claiming to be victims. Even if we are generous and allowed that only around 15% of Muslims would commit violence in the name of their religion, what does that tell us? Assuming that Muslims constitute roughly two billion people in the world, that would mean that there are at least three hundred million people willing to commit mayhem or other heinous acts in the name of Islam. Is that something that could even begin to match any other faith today? If a victim were aware of this, would they even let a Muslim through their door willingly? Why take a gamble on someone when there is no upside benefit, but rather a significant chance of harm?

    Worry01 on December 13, 2011 at 12:42 am

Debbie don’t waste your time on this farcocte show. You should be watching The Waking Dead instead. One of the main guys is a Jewish police officer who may have impregnated a married Gentile lady. I look forward to the triumphant on screen Bris if so.

A1 on November 14, 2011 at 10:13 am

To A1, even IF the lady was impregnated and the result is a boy there won’t be a Bris (triumphant or otherwise)… As the mother is a gentile the boy won’t be Jewish regardless of the fact that the babydaddy is Jewish… Judaism follows the maternal line!…

Eliezer on November 14, 2011 at 10:24 am

    Eliezer, A1 is the resident wise-acre here. I can’t speak for all but I know he confounds me most of the time. He has a running joke about DS and although I am not amused most of the time I give him credit for tenacity because he never gets tired of his own jokes. Ever.

    And even though I know what he meant, let me just gently correct his spelling of “farkakte”. Not that I am a busy-body spelling corrector (I hate those!) but so others could know what he said because the use of that word actually made me laugh.

    Skunky on November 14, 2011 at 12:55 pm

    Correct. Under Karaite and Reform reading though, the child would be deemed Jewish because the Torah says nothing about the mother. It always speaks of the son of, the son, of, etc. There is good reason to believe Jewish descent was once patrilineal as in other ancient cultures. The rabbis changed it since its nearly always easier to know the identity of the child’s mother. Hence today, the conversion of the mother is the only way to establish the Jewishness of the child.

    NormanF on November 14, 2011 at 2:02 pm

It is revolting that the American flag is used in that advertisement to form the face-covering element of the cloth cage that islam requires women to wear.

A symbol of freedom debased to a symbol of oppression.


Disgusted on November 14, 2011 at 10:44 am

I watched the show and a couple interesting things stood out. How the Amen family pondered if the groom was going to become Muslim, not the other way around and secondly, the dry (No alcohol) wedding reception. The whole wedding was do it “our way” or else!!! I feel sorry for the groom.To throw away his religion and upbring shows a lack of thought and if not cowardice!!

St. Stephen on November 14, 2011 at 12:12 pm

Hey Debbie, Cain was quoted in an interview with GQ as saying this about Muslims:

“”I have had one very well-known Muslim voice say to me directly that a majority of Muslims share the extremist views,” Cain said in an interview with GQ.”

Yup – is he starting to get it? I would be happy if your critcism of him affected his thinking.

We can only hope the PC Crowd doesn’t force him to retract it. Please Herman – no more flip-flopping!

If you say you are misconstrued again, please do us all a favor and don’t run for President. Go back as Debbie wrote, to deciding what toppings to put on pizza.

We need a man who has the courage of his convictions. That’s what we need in a President – who gets it that Islam is NOT the ROP, that they’re all extremists and that they’re UNAmerican.

‘Nuff said.

NormanF on November 14, 2011 at 1:20 pm

I believe your site is under attack by spiteful Muzzies. I have been redirected to Google about 5 times before I could to go to this comments section.

Won’t be long before someone on the show takes a swipe at Debbie on the show. I suppose Miss Hezbollah will make a guest appearance somewhere down the line. Somewhere we will be lectured how Tim McVeigh represents all terrorists and no Muslim has ever conducted terrorism. The beat goes on.

CaliforniaScreaming on November 14, 2011 at 1:37 pm

So how long will it be before their reality starts censoring our reality. All this was bound to start happening because from the Obamanation on down these people are moderates. Either there is something in our water or we are all smoking something. There is no other excuse for this collective stupidity. Thanks once again Debbie.

Naomi R on November 14, 2011 at 1:58 pm

It didn’t begin with Obama. Bush pandered to Islam after 9/11 and throughout his presidency. Obama simply continued the practice. Conservatives need to be honest and acknowledge that there are those on their side who get in bed with the devil as much as the Left does. Blindness to evil knows no partisan label or ideological allegiance.

NormanF on November 14, 2011 at 2:10 pm

well i think this is not only pathetic but also very judgemental. People like this disguist me and will soon see how it feels to be thrown under the bus. Im not even Muslim and im saying this. Everyone who sides with her too the minute christians or jews get discriminated against is the minute that all you people will start to feel guilt and stupid

Rachel on November 14, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    Huh? Jews and Christians haven’t committed acts of terrorism. They’re not trying to force others to live by their rules. And they don’t pretend be better than they are.

    That’s what Islam does. While insisting with we should pay undue deference to them they don’t return the courtesy. Why we should pander to these frauds is beyond me.

    Your post is an illustration that few people in this country truly grasp what Islam is all about.

    NormanF on November 14, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    Huh? Jews and Christians haven’t committed acts of terrorism. They’re not trying to force others to live by their rules. And they don’t pretend to be better than they are.

    That’s what Islam does. While insisting with we should pay undue deference to them they don’t return the courtesy. Why we should pander to these frauds is beyond me.

    Your post is an illustration that few people in this country truly grasp what Islam is all about.

    NormanF on November 14, 2011 at 2:51 pm

    Your self-pity is grotesque. It reminds me of the rapist claiming that their victim was a slut, and that they themselves are the true victim.

    Also, you might try actually reading the article before commenting. You will discover that people will take you more seriously, even if they do not agree with you. Your low-grade performance persuades no one, and actually makes your cause harder.

    Worry01 on November 14, 2011 at 6:25 pm

@Miranda. Take a look at what’s going on in Europe right now:
I don’t want mob riots and sharia law in the United States. Your culture or religion does not entitle you to committ crimes in free and democratic societies!

Kris on November 14, 2011 at 2:41 pm

Rachel, did you read the article that Debbie linked here, the Detroit Free Press writer interviewed this lady and her family and they support Khomeini, do you know who Ayatollah Khomeini was? Wake up and smell reality for a change and quit being apart of half the population in this country who are slackers, lazy, ignorant, naive and foolish on what’s really going on around them.

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on November 14, 2011 at 2:41 pm

I’ll say it again. Iran is an enemy of the US. It sponsors terrorism against the US. The Iranians stormed our embassy and took hostages, which is an act of war.

The Amen family’s support for Khomeini is support for an enemy of the US.

Any Amen family member who is not a citizen of the US and supports Khomeini should be deported back to Lebanon or whatever Islamic paradise from which they came.

Scott on November 14, 2011 at 3:41 pm

there is nothing american
about islam

all moslems are islamic
first AND lastly
there is no other consideration

sharia is law
the constitution is immaterial

the supreme being of all other religions
is the equivalent of excrement
the only “deity” that exists
is theirs

in spite of the fact that it is historically proven
that there is only one “satan”
there is only one “devil”
his name is allah

prestigio on November 14, 2011 at 4:55 pm

I smell some pigs around here…

Amel on November 14, 2011 at 6:19 pm

    Is this more of your cutting wit? Frankly, a hog in a yard would be of infinitely more value than you. If you are the best Islam can offer, it is a sad faith indeed.

    Worry01 on December 13, 2011 at 12:50 am

you smell moslems

prestigio on November 14, 2011 at 6:40 pm

it is never hate
to tell the truth

prestigio on November 14, 2011 at 7:27 pm

It’s threads like this that give the taqiyya-loving Mooooooslims head explosions! And I LOVE it.

Our word WILL get out. You are not tricking us.

Truth is truth and Americans should NEVER trust Islam! And all good countries as well.

Skunky on November 14, 2011 at 7:39 pm

I recall in 1979-1980 some really clever creative entrepreneur (sp??)came out with a roll of toilet paper in which each panel had the ayotolla’s portrait and the words “Wipe your can on the man from Iran”. I think it was a big seller.

joesixpack31 on November 15, 2011 at 1:50 am

TLC – Taqiyya Learning Channel

CornCoLeo on November 15, 2011 at 11:00 am

I believe Lenin also said the Capitalist would sell the rope on credit.

sg on November 15, 2011 at 7:28 pm

What is a Shit Muslim? …. oh, Shiite ….

thunderbolt on December 27, 2011 at 11:04 pm

Yet again another waste of the infinite space on the internet. Time magazine had Imam Khomeini (may God be pleased with him) on their front cover as “Man of the Year” and your worried about some citizens on a reality show? You seriously need to set your priorities straight.

Moussa on June 26, 2012 at 3:00 pm

Palestinian terrorists are rewriting history blotting Israel’s ancient history out of modern textbooks.So this research shows Israel history linked to five other ancient nations. Explore.
Counter Palestinians claims with this research. Pass it around. E-mail me. Have a nice day!
-Lujack Skylark

Historical connections are solidly made when we correlate Assyrian, Babylonian, Biblical, Cushite,Egyptian and Elamite cross references together showing where Israel’s history coincides with five other ancient nations.

The people who love Israel, those who like ancient history or some who are curious could find this history interesting.

The three key years are: 711 B.C., 653 B.C. and 586 B.C. These three dates help lock in the chronological order in this research as we close the gaps in this time period.

The year 711 B.C. is the actual year Assyrian king Sennacherib attacked Jerusalem in his first year as we shall witness. His reign did not start in 705 B.C. Babylon’s king Merodach-Baladan wrote Israel’s king Hezekiah letters in 711 B.C. Cushite/Ethiopian king Tirhakah soldiers marched against Assyrian king Sennacherib and the Lord destroyed 185,000 Assyrian soldiers outside Jerusalem. Elamite king Shutruk-Nahhunte tried to secure Merodach-Baladan on Babylon’s throne but he failed. Merodach-Baladan who had fled Assyrian king Sargon II in his later years now reigns 711-709 B.C. flees for a second time to Elam.

The year 653 B.C. The Assyrian king Ashur-Banipal destroys his brother king of Babylon Shamash-Shum-Ukin’s army. Elamite king Tammaritu II who joined Shamash-Shum-Ukin’s rebellion is also defeated. Egyptian king Psamtik I’s southern border with Cush is quiet since Cushite king Tanutamun died in 656 B.C. so Psamtik I in 653 B.C. declares independence from Assyria. The Assyrian king Ashur-Banipal sends no soldiers to fight Psamtik I. Egypt has won its freedom.

The year 586 B.C. is when Babylon’s king Nebuchadnezzer army storms Jerusalem and the Jews are now escorted to Babylon where they will remain until Cyrus the Persian wins victory over the Babylonians.

Assyrian kings: Tiglath-Pilesar III 753-735 B.C. Shalmaneser V 734-729 B.C. Sargon II 728-712 B.C. Sennacherib 711-688 B.C. Esarhaddon 687-676 B.C. Ashur-Banipal 675-633 B.C. Ashur-Etil-ilani 632-629 B.C. & his brother Sin-Shum-Ishkun fight against general Sin-Shum-Lishir in a bloody civil war. Ashur-Eitil-ilani is slain by his brother Sin-Shum-Ishkun only having one year of peace 628-627 B.C. Sin-Shum-Ishkun then reigns over Assyria 626-612 B.C. Ashur-Uballit II 611-605 B.C.

(Sennacherib’s reign actually began in Judah’s king Hezekiah’s 14th year 711 B.C. Jerusalem was his first priority. Merodach-Baladan wrote Hezekiah letters (Isaiah 39:1) hoping the Hebrews might form a military alliance with him some historians believe to fight the Assyrians. From Sennacherib’s reign backwards and forward Assyrian chronology is formulated.)

Babylonian kings: Merodach-Baladan 728-716 B.C. Sargon has control over Babylon 716-712 B.C. Merodach-Baladan fights Assyrian king Sennacherib 711-709 B.C. The Assyrians win victory and Sennacherib appoints Bel-Ibni to govern north Babylon 709-706 B.C. Ashur-Nadin-Shum 706-700 B.C. Sennacherib’s son taken prisoner by Elamite king Hallutush-Inshushinak 707-700 B.C. who appoints Nergal-Ushezib as Babylonian king in 700 B.C. Nergal-Ushezib is taken captive by the Assyrians.Babylonian king Mushezib-Marduk 700-695 B.C. unites forces with Elamite king Humban-Nimena 700-694B.C. against Assyrian king Sennacherib who destroys their army, yet the Babylonian chronicles state Humban-Nimena won the war stating Humban-Nimena died a natural death. Sennacherib completely destroys Babylon 695-687 B.C. Its inhabitants return when the city is rebuilt. Esarhaddon reigns over both Assyria and Babylon 687-675 B.C. Esarhaddon rebuilds Babylon. Shamash-Shum-Ukin 675-653 B.C. Kandalanu 653-632 B.C. Sin-Shum-Ishkun 632-626 B.C. has control over Babylon. Came to power in Assyria in 626 B.C. Loses Babylon to Nabopolassar in 626 B.C. Nabopolassar 626-605 B.C. reigns over Babylon. Nebuchadnezzer 605-562 B.C. reigns over Babylon.

Biblical Judean kings: Ahaz 741-725 B.C.(2 Kings 16:2) Hezekiah 725-696 B.C. (2 Kings 18:2) Manasseh 696-641 B.C. (2 Kings 21:1) Amon 641-639 B.C. (2 Kings 21:19) Josiah 639-608 B.C. (2 Kings 22:1) Jehoahaz 608 B.C. (2 Kings 23:31) Jehoiakim 608-597 B.C. (2 Kings 23:36) Jehoichin 597 B.C. (2 Kings 24:8) Zedekiah 597-586 B.C. (2 Kings 24:18) Israel kings: Pekah 758-738 B.C. (2 Kings 15:27) Hoshea 738-729 B.C.

Cushite kings: Piankhi 759-728 B.C. Shabaka 728-714 B.C. Shebitku 714-698 B.C. reigns over Egypt. Tirhakah 714-698 B.C. reigns over Ethiopia. (2 Kings 19:9) Tirhakah reigns over both Ethiopia and Egypt 698-672 B.C. Egyptian king Necho I 672-664 B.C. slain by Tanutamun who flees when the Assyrians invade Egypt, he resides in Ethiopia reigning there 664-656 B.C.

Egyptian kings: Necho I 672-664 B.C. Psamtik I 664-610 B.C. Necho II 610-595 B.C. Psamtik II 595-589 B.C. Apries (Hophra) 589-570 B.C.

Elamite kings: Humban-Nikash 750-725 B.C. Shutruk-Nahhunte II 725-707 B.C. Hallutush-Inshushinak 707-700 B.C. Kudur-Nahunte 700 B.C. Humban-Nimena 700-694 B.C. Humban-Haltash I 694-687 B.C. Humban-Haltash II 687-681 B.C. Urtaki 681-669 B.C. Tempt-Humban-Inshushinak 669-659 B.C. Elamite king Ummanigash 659-657 B.C. set upon the Elamite throne by Assyrian king Ashur-Banipal betrayed the Assyrian leader.Ummanigash is dethroned by Elamite king Tammaritu I 657-654 B.C. of Hidalu. Tammaritu I also becomes anti-Assyrian. He prepares to go to war against Ashur-banipal and prince Indabibi 655-654 B.C. defeats Tammaritu I’s army before it reaches the Assyrians. Elamite king Tammaritu II 654-653 B.C. slays Indabibi and rebels against the Assyrians and he is captured. Humban-Haltash III 653-649 B.C. Egyptian king Psamtik I in 653 B.C. declares independence from Assyria. Egypt is free from Assyrian rule. The Assyrians completely destroy Elam in Humban-Haltash’s III reign in 649 B.C.

Cushite king Piankhi 759-728 B.C. 21st year invades Egypt in 738 B.C. at the same time Israel’s king Hoshea in 738 B.C. assassinated Pekah. (2 Kings 15:30) Judah’s king Ahaz 741-725 B.C. had joined a military alliance with Assyrian king Tiglath-Pileser III in 740 B.C. (2 Kings 16:7) Assyrian historians recorded Tiglath-Pileser III 753-735 B.C. had witnessed Hoshea 738-729 B.C. becoming the Israel king. Assyrian king Shalmaneser V 734-729 B.C. then came up against Hoshea. (2 Kings 17:3-4) Cushite king Piankhi controlled Egypt and Osorkon IV (So) 740-725 B.C. was his vassal reigning in Egypt’s delta. Hoshea wanted So to help him wage a war against Shalmaneser V. (2 Kings 17:3-4) Hoshea’s plot is discovered and the Assyrians put an end to Hoshea’s kingdom as most of the population is carried off to Assyria. Judah’s king Hezekiah 725-696 B.C. invites those who escaped out of Assyria’s hands to turn to the Lord. (2 Chronicles 30:6) Osorkon IV later brings Sargon II 728-712 B.C. horses as tribute.

Assyrian king Sargon II 728-712 B.C. goes to war against Elamite king Humban-Nikash 750-725 B.C. and Babylon’s king Merodach-Baladan at Der in 727 B.C. The Elamites and Babylonians win victory. Sargon II then wars against the Egyptians and Ethiopians lead by Egyptian Cushite king Shabaka 728-714 B.C. Sargon II wins victory against Shabaka in 726 B.C. (Isaiah 20:1-5) Sargon II had skirmishes with Babylon’s king Merodach-Baladan 728-716 B.C. Merodach-Baladan becomes friends with Elamite king Shutruk-Nahunte 725-707 B.C. Sargon invades Babylon in 716 B.C. and Merodach-Baladan flees to Elam. Merodach-Baladan later in Assyrian king Sennacherib’s reign sent letters to Judah’s king Hezekiah 725-696 B.C. around 711 B.C. (2 Kings 20:12)

Assyrian king Sennacherib 711-688 B.C. 1st year 711 B.C. he attacks Israel in Hezekiah 725-696 B.C. in Hezekiah’s 14th year in 711 B.C. (2 Kings 18:13) ETHIOPIAN king Tirhakah did not do much to help Judah’s king Hezekiah.Tirhakah‘s army was defeated at Eltekeh. (2 Kings 19:9-10)It was the Lord who slew 185,000 Assyrians. (2 Kings 19:35) Elamite king Shutruk-Nahunte II 725-707 B.C. generals and staff officers are killed by Sennacherib’s army trying to place Merodach-Baladan back on the Babylonian throne 711-709 B.C. Merodach-Baladan flees again to Elam. Elamite king Hallutush-Inshushinak 707-700 B.C. makes poor judgement taking Sennacherib’s son Ashur-Nadin-Shum 706-700 B.C. as prisoner. Elamite kings: Hallutush-Inshushinak had fled his throne when he saw the Assyrian army coming. Kudur-Nahhunte briefly reigns over Elam in 700 B.C. Humban-Nimeana 700-694 B.C. army drove their chariots over dead soldiers to get away from the Assyrians. Humban-Nimeana suffers a stroke and the Assyrians win victory against the Elamites in Babylon. Elamite king Humban-Haltash I 694-687 B.C. tries restoring diplomatic relations with Assyria but he fails.

Assyrian king Esarhaddon 687-676 B.C. goes to war against EGYPTIAN king Tirhakah 698-672 B.C. and the Assyrians win victory. Esarhaddon takes Judah king Manasseh 696-641 B.C. as prisoner. (2 Chronicles 33:11) Elamite king Humban-Haltash II 687-681 B.C. goes about robbing, raping and pillaging while on his way to attack Sippar while Esarhaddon was fighting other enemies. Tirhakah rebels when Assyrian troops leave Egypt. Esarhaddon and Elamite king Urtaki 681-669 B.C. live in peace. Esarhaddon dies enroute to do battle again against Tirhakah.

Assyrian king Ashur-Banipal 675-633 B.C. defeats Tirhakah in 672 B.C. Tirhakah flees Memphis. Necho I 672-664 B.C. is placed upon the Egyptian throne. (Egyptian priest Manetho stated Necho I had an 8 year reign.) Elamite king Urtaki 681-669 B.C. receives grain from Ashur-Banipal during a famine striking Elam.Urtaki is ungrateful. Urtaki sees the Assyrians are having trouble with Egypt. Urtaki attacks Babylon in 669 B.C. The Assyrian army chases Urtaki and the Elamite king collapsed and died. Cushite king Tanutamun rebels against Assyria by invading Egypt’s delta slaying Necho I and Ashur-Banipal places Psamtik I 664-610 B.C. on the Egyptian throne as Tanutamun flees to Ethiopia reigning there 664-656 B.C. Ashur-Banipal sends soldiers to the King of Lydia and they defeat the Cimmerians in 663 B.C. Psamtik I expels Assyrian garrisons in Egypt’s delta 660-653 B.C. starting stirring up unrest while Ashur-Banipal is fighting Elamite king Tempt-Humban-Inshushinak and Psamtik I drives them completely out when the same year Babylon’s king Shamash-Shum-Ukin’s government falls in 653 B.C. Psamtik I declares Egypt totally independent in 653 B.C. Ashur-Banipal learns the King of Lydia had betrayed him by supporting Psamtik I and Ashur-Banipal lets the Cimmerians take over Lydia in 652 B.C.

Elamite king Tempt-Humban-Inshushinak 669-659 B.C. relatives do not want war. They flee to Ashur-Banipal’s royal court. Tempt-Humban-Inshushinak suffers a stroke in the 10th year he reigns. War erupts. An Assyrian soldier cuts off his head. Elamite king Ummanigash 659-657 B.C. betrays Assyrian king Ashur-banipal who set him upon the Elamite throne. Ummanigash joins Babylon’s king Shamash-Shum-Ukin rebellion against Assyria.Ummanigash is dethroned by Tammaritu I king of Hidalu 657-654 B.C. who is also anti-Assyrian and prepares to go to war against Ashur-banipal. Prince Indabibi 655-654 B.C. is pro-Assyrian in this Elamite civil war and he crushes Tammaritu I’s forces before they reach the Assyrians. Elamite king Tammaritu II 654-653 B.C. slays Indabibi. Tammaritu II rebels and he is hauled away to Assyria.

Assyrian king Ashur-Banipal’s brother Shamash-Shum-Ukin reigning over Babylon since 675-653 B.C. betrays him. Three Elamite kings had joined Shamash-Shum-Ukin’s army. The Assyrians take over Babylon in 653 B.C. Ashur-Banipal appoints Kandalanu as governor who reigns over Babylon 653-632 B.C. Egyptian king Psamtik I declares Egypt independent in 653 B.C. The Assyrians don’t respond and Egypt is free from Assyrian rule.

Assyrian king Ashur-Banipal defeats Elamite king Humban-Haltash III 653-649 B.C. The Assyrians destroy the Elamite nation. Ashur-Banipal is the Biblical Asnapper. He set the Elamite natives to colonize the cities of Samaria. (Ezra 4:9-10) Ashur-Banipal also let Judah’s king Manasseh return to Israel. Ashur-Banipal goes to war against the Arabs 649-646 B.C. The years 645-633 B.C. Ashur-Banipal’s records are silent.

Assyrian kings Ashur-Etil-ilani and Sin-Shum-Ishkun 632-629 B.C. fight a bloody civil war against Assyrian general Sin-Shum-Lishir which weakens Assyria. Ashur-Etil-ilani wins victory.Ashur-Etil-ilani is slain by his brother Sin-Shum-Ishkun having only one year of peace 628-627 B.C. Sin-Shum-Ishkun 626-612 B.C. fights Babylonian king Nabopolassar and the Babylonians and Cyaxares win victory. Sin-Shum-Ishkun dies in his burning palace. Assyrian general Ashur-Ballit II 611-605 B.C. army is saved at Charchemish when Egyptian troops lead by Necho II 610-595 B.C. join forces together.

Necho II was on his way to help the Assyrians when Judah’s king Josiah 639-608 B.C. tried stopping him and Josiah was slain. (2 Chronicles 35:20-26) Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzer 605-562 B.C. destroys the Assyrian nation in 605 B.C. Nebuchadnezzer 8th year he took Jehoichin captive in 597 B.C. (2 Kings 24:12) Nebuchadnezzer took over Jerusalem in 586 B.C. Zedekiah’s 11th year. (2 Kings 25:1-2) Egyptian king Psamtik II 595-589 B.C. fights the Nubians at the fourth cataract. Egyptian king Apries (Hophra) 589-570 B.C. sends troops to help Israel’s king Zedekiah 597-586 B.C. but Hophra’s troops flee Nebuchadnezzer’s forces. (Jeremiah 44:30) Hophra is killed by one of his generals.

Knowledge will become abundant in the days we live. (Daniel 12:3-4)

Lujack Skylark on August 10, 2012 at 1:57 am

Adsense is actually a really great program for those who maintain blogs, as blogs get updated
all the time and the Adsense possibilities are almost limitless.
But unfortunately not every request will get approved.

And then on March 20, the world’s largest paid
private blog network – BMR – announced that its
vast network had been almost entirely de-indexed by Google, causing
chaos in the internet marketing industries.

Google on June 19, 2014 at 10:31 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field