November 13, 2008, - 1:56 am

EXCLUSIVE: Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama’s Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions

By Debbie Schlussel
**** Copyright 2008, Must Cite Debbie Schlussel and link to DebbieSchlussel.com ****
*** SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATES ***
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.
But the release of Obama’s draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama’s claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.

obamaselectiveserviceregist.jpg

Obamaselectiveserviceprinto.jpg
The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show that questions about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our next Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of limitations on the matter. If it is not his, then it’s proof positive that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective Service as required by law. By law, he was required to register and was legally able to do so until the age of 26.
But the Selective Service System registration (”SSS Form 1″) and accompanying computer print-out (”SSS Print-out), below, released by the Selective Service show the following oddities and irregularities, all of which indicate the document was created in 2008 and backdated:
* Document Location Number Indicates Obama Selective Service Form was Created in 2008
First, there is the Document Location Number (DLN) on the form. In the upper right hand corner of the Selective Service form SSS Form 1, there is the standard Bates-stamped DLN, in this case “0897080632,” which I’ve labeled as “A” on both the SSS Form and the computer printout document. On the form, it reflects a 2008 creation, but on the printout, an extra eight was added in front of the number to make it look like it is from 1980, when it was actually created in 2008.
As the retired federal agent notes:

Having worked for the Federal Government for several decades, I know that the standardization of DLNs have the first two digits of the DLN representing the year of issue. That would mean that this DLN was issued in 2008. The DLN on the computer screen printout is the exact same number, except an 8 has been added to make it look like it is from 1980 and give it a 1980 DLN number. And 1980 is the year Senator/President Elect Obama is said to have timely registered. So, why does the machine-stamped DLN reflect this year (2008) and the DLN in the database (which was manually input) reflect a “corrected” DLN year of 1980? Were all the DLNs issued in 1980 erroneously marked with a 2008 DLN year or does the Selective Service use a different DLN system then the rest of the Federal Government? Or was the SSS Form 1 actually processed in 2008 and not 1980?

It’s quite a “coincidence” . . . that is, if you believe in coincidences, especially in this case.
Far more likely is that someone made up a fake Selective Service registration to cover Obama’s lack of having done so, and that the person stamping the form forgot (or was unable to) change the year to “80″ instead of the current “08″. They either forgot to fake the DLN number or couldn’t do so.
And guess where the Selective Service registrations are marked and recorded? Lucky for Obama, it’s his native Chicago. From an article entitled, “Post Office Registration Process”, on the Selective Service website:

When a young man reaches 18 he can go to any of the 35,000 post offices nationwide to register with Selective Service. There he completes a simple registration card and mails it to the Selective Service System. This begins a multi-step process which results in the man’s registration.
Each week approximately 6,000 completed registration cards are sent to the Selective Service System’s Data Management System (DMC) near Chicago, Ill. At the DMC these cards are grouped into manageable quantities. Each card is then microfilmed and stamped with a sequential document locator number. The processed microfilm is reviewed to account for all documents and to ensure that the film quality is within strict standards. After microfilming, the cards are keyed and then verified by a different data transcriber.

The Document Locator Number (DLN) is an automatic function (Selective Service record-keeping, specifically the DLN is described on pages 7-8 of this Federal Register document), with the first two digits comprising the year, and it was not changed to “08″ in error. So if the form was filed and processed in 1980, how did it get a 2008 DLN?!
* Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form
On the SSS Form 1, in the lower left hand corner is the form number (SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form, labeled as “B“. On this particular Form 1, it clearly shows the month as “FEB” (February), and the year is either “80″ or “90″. The retired federal agent investigated further:

Magnification of the form both physically (with a 10x glass) or with different image software does not reflect a clear cut result of either a “80″ or a “90″.

But, checking the history of SSS Form 1 (see http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=198002-3240-001#), it’s apparent that in February 1980, the Selective Service agency withdrew a “Request for a new OMB control number” for SSS Form 1 (see also, here)–meaning the agency canceled its previous request for a new form, and one was never issued in “FEB 1980″.
Since under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (Dec. 11, 1980), codified in part at Subchapter I of Chapter 35 of Title 44 a federal agency can not use a form not approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget), it’s nearly impossible for Senator/President-Elect Obama’s SSS Form 1 to be dated “Feb 1980.” And since that makes it almost certainly dated “Feb 1990,” then how could Barack Obama sign it and the postal clerk stamp it almost ten (10) years before its issue?! Simply not possible.
The lower right hand corner reflects that the Obama SSS form 1 was approved by OMB with an approval number of 19??0002, labeled as “C“. The double question marks (??) reflect digits that are not completely clear.
* Barack Obama’s Signature is Dated After Postal Stamp Certifying His Signature
Barack H. Obama signed the SSS Form 1’s “Today’s date” as July 30, 1980, labeled “D“. But the Postal Stamp reflects the PREVIOUS day’s date of July 29, 1980, labeled “E“. Yes, Obama could have mistakenly written the wrong date, but it is rare and much more unlikely for someone to put a future date than a past date. (Also note how Barry made such a “cute” peace sign with the “b” inside the “O” of his signature. Touching.)
* Postal Stamp is Incorrect, Discontinued in 1970
Then, there is the question as to whether the Postal Stamp is real. The “postmark” stamp–labeled “E“–is hard to read, but it is clear that at the bottom is “USPO” which stands typically for United States Post Office. However, current “postmark” validator, registry, or round dater stamps (item 570 per the Postal Operations Manual) shows “USPS” for United States Postal Service. The change from Post Office to Postal Service occurred on August 12, 1970, when President Nixon signed into law the most comprehensive postal legislation since the founding of the Republic–Public Law 91-375. The new Postal Service officially began operations on July 1, 1971.
Why was an old, obsolete postmark round dater stamp used almost ten (10) years after the fact to validate a legal document . . . that just happened to be Barack Obama’s suspicious Selective Service registration form?
* Form Shows Barack Obama didn’t have ID
The SSS Form 1 states “NO ID”, labeled “F“. Since that’s the case, then how did the Hawaiian postal clerk know that the submitter was really Barack H. Obama, who may have been on summer break from attending Occidental College in California. How would they determine whether the registrant was truly registering and not a relative, friend, or other imposter?
* The Selective Service Data Mgt. Center Stonewalled for Almost a Year on Obama Registration, Until Right Before the Election.
The retired federal agent who FOIA’d Barack Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form notes:

Early this year, when I first started questioning whether Obama registered I was told:

Sir: There may be an error in his file or many other reasons why his registration cannot be confirmed on-line. However, I did confirm with our Data Management Center that he is, indeed, registered with the Selective Service System, in compliance with Federal law.
Sincerely,
Janice L. Hughes/SSS

Then, they suddenly found the record on September 9, 2008 (prior to my October 13, 2008 request), and stated that his record was filed on September 4, 1980. Did they temporarily change the date on the computer database?
On the previous FOIA response, they stated that it was filed on September 4, 1980. In my second request I mentioned that Obama could not have filed it in Hawaii on September 4, 1980 as he was attending Occidental College in California, the classes of which commenced August 24, 1980.

* Other Questions: Missing Selective Service Number, FOIA Response Dated Prior to FOIA Request, Missing Printout Page
Where is Obama’s Selective Service number (61-1125539-1) on the card?
And the retired federal agent notes that the Selective Service Data Management Center prepared its response to his FOIA request prior to the request having been made:

The last transaction date is 09/04/80 [DS: labeled "G"], but the date of the printout is 09/09/08 [DS: labeled "H"]. My FOIA was dated October 13 so why did they prepare the printout BEFORE I submitted my FOIA? I gave them no “heads up” that I was sending it. In fact it was not mailed until late October–around the 25th.
Also, notice the printout was page 1 of 2 [DS: labeled "I"].

Hmmm . . . where is the other page, and what’s on it?
A lot of questions here. And a lot of huge hints that this government-released, official Barack Obama Selective Service registration was faked. Either he signed the fake backdated document, or someone else faked his signature and he never registered for the draft (and lied about it).
Which is it?
It’s incredible that our impending Commander-in-Chief either didn’t register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently.
The documents indicate it’s one or the other.
*** UPDATE: Here’s another irregularity that points to fraud, as spotted by reader Joyce:

My husband printed the information provided on your web site regarding Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration discrepancies. I noticed that the DLN number in upper right corner (labeled “A“) has only ten (10) digits with the first two being 08 , but the DLN number shown on the computer screen printout has eleven (11) digits with the first two being 80. It clearly indicates that the “8″ was added at the beginning of the DLN number, in order to appear that it was issued in 1980 and wasn’t simply a reversal of the first two digits as the retired federal agent noted. This in itself appears questionable. I would think there is a standard number of digits in all DLN numbers.

**** UPDATE #2, 11/14/08: Retired Federal Agent Source Reveals Himself:

The recently retired federal agent has requested that I disclose his identity so that there is no question as to the source of the information.
His name is Stephen Coffman. He retired last year from the position of the Resident Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Galveston, Texas office. He has over 32 years of government service and has held a Secret or higher security clearance for the majority of those years.
He filed the FOIA with Selective Service and has the original letter and the attachments. He first notified the Selective Service of his findings and they ignored the questions.
He can be reached via email at retirediceagent@sbcglobal.net.

UPDATE #3, 11/17/08: Some Obamapologists are claiming this is a fake and want to see evidence that retired agent Coffman actually got these documents from the Selective Service System Data Management Center. Below are scans of the letter and envelope that accompanied Barack Obama’s fraudulent registration for the draft (I’ve cropped the blank white space):

coffmansssltr.jpg

coffmansssenv.jpg

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
Print This Post Print This Post


222 Responses

NO, bdybldr, that was not his area code. 201 is a New Jersey area code and his was in the mid-west. I also tried to use the first five digits as a zip code since it was just above his name and address and just below the postal scanning line. I didn’t think it was but I had to try and those five digits did not come up as a zip code. Grasping at straws!!

FedMom on November 21, 2008 at 1:40 pm

Must be coincidence then. Maybe the formats are different for each state (just a guess) but I didn’t register in 90 which is the first 2 digits of my DLN(?). I actually registered in 89.

bdybldr on November 21, 2008 at 1:57 pm

This is an amazing find and another mystery around BO. Everyone assumes that Obama got his financial aid from the US, but there is a suggestion that his actual aid came from overseas arranged by one of his backers. If this is the case he would not have had to get a loan from the government and would not have needed to show a draft card. This can also explain why no records from his schools can be located as they too may indicate his status and his overseas connections. I find it extremely hard to believe that a guy who flunked out of college on his first try would then be eligible for a loan or scholarship at a major university and how did he get in there with his grades? If it were you or me we would have been rejected or at the least have to prove we were academically eligible through completion of summer school or an extended learning semester before acceptance. Personally, I believe Obama is not what people believe he is. There are far too many unanswered questions about his past life as a child and young man. There are also a lot of questions surrounding his religion, his associations, his mentors, and his rise to power because this is what it’s about “power”. His selection of a VP who also by the way never revealed his medical records and he has had two brain aneurysms. He also exhibits classic signs of damage by his responses to questions like his interview with Katie Couric on the depression when he indicated the president came on TV to talk to the nation. Biden also had to get out of the last presidential race because he was found to have plagiarized a speech. This is really sad people. We have a President we can’t trust and a vice-president whoís impaired and if anything happens to them Pelosi will be President. I cannot imagine why anyone would have voted for this pair without looking into their pasts and questioning what “change” really meant.

LACE on November 21, 2008 at 2:50 pm

    Many voting machines in many states were “new” and came from Venezuela. All that is needed is the source code and one could write for every 10 votes for McCain, five go to Obama. Easy as that. He might not have even won the Election.

    Mike Smith on November 15, 2009 at 9:28 pm

There is an interesting story with an audio link on The Right Side Of Life website. Some radio show called to the Kenyan embassy and talked the ambassador and in the midst of the conversation the ambassador started talking about the monument that is in the works at the site of Obama’s birthplace in Kenya which he says is already a tourist attraction.

MIDDLE CLASS GUY on November 21, 2008 at 4:41 pm

Thank you Debbie for all your hard work! I have been researching Obama’s lack of information and documentation for months. Below are some great sites. For those who can’t swallow the Obamaid and and want to do something this crisis here you go:
http://www.peoplespassions.org/
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/
http://www.rallycongress.com/
http://www.democratic-disaster.com/index.php
http://www.drudgereport.com/
there is a place for anonymous tips here as well as numerous contacts)
http://www.grassfire.org/111/petition.asp?PID=18842186&NID=1
(Obama Nation resistance Movement)

VoiceOReason on November 21, 2008 at 10:15 pm

I’m wondering if there is some confusion about the DLN# versus the SSS#. The SSS# does start with the birth year. The DLN# seems to be linked to the registration year. Also, the form above is a Registration Form, not a Registration Acknowledgement or Draft Card. This might help clear up what appears to be contradictory information. Just a thought.

Linda on November 22, 2008 at 1:19 am

Just wondering if there are any posters here who registered around the same time as BHO and can get their copy for comparison. It would be even better if you were able to get someone who registered in Hawaii at during the same time. It seems to me that somehow someone should be able to obtain a registration within a few days of BHO from HI to for comparison

gonavy_40 on November 22, 2008 at 9:54 am

Here is the link to the radio station that has the audio referred to by LACE above. Slide the audio button to the time 12:15 to listen to a Kenyan Ambassador admit that Obama was born in Kenya:
http://my.wrif.com/mim/?p=916#comment-2129
I have shared this with Phil Berg, as well.

YMR in MS. on November 22, 2008 at 10:37 am

Great work, Debbie. I doubt that NObama created the fake document or signed it. He has his ACORN thugs handling his illegal activity.
What will it do to our military if the commander in chief failed to register for the draft and then created a fake document to cover it up?

dougfromupland on November 26, 2008 at 3:55 pm

Why wouldn’t Obama had to register for Selective Service in 1980?
From the FACTCHECK.org website:
ìWhen Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdomís dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.ës children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.î
From the SSS.gov website:
http://www.sss.gov/FSaliens.htm
“U.S. non-citizens and dual nationals are required by law to register with the Selective Service System.* Most are also liable for induction into the U.S. Armed Forces if there is a draft. They would also be eligible for any deferments, postponements, and exemptions available to all other registrants.
However, some aliens and dual nationals would be exempt from induction into the military if there is a draft, depending on their country of origin and other factors. Some of these exemptions are shown below:
* An alien who has lived in the U.S. for less than one year is exempt from induction.
* A dual national whose other country of nationality has an agreement with the U.S. which specifically provides for an exemption is exempt from induction.”
Did the Bancroft Treaty between the USA and the UK exempt Obama from registering for the Selective Service?

StephenCoffman on November 27, 2008 at 1:03 am

Let’s say it’s absolutely proven Obama never registered for Selective Service. PLEASE, I need to know what laws will make him ineligible for service in the Executive Branch? Which laws will make it illegal for him to be president if he never registered for Selective Service?

Carmen on November 27, 2008 at 2:31 am

Carmen, the US Constitution says at Art. I Sec. 4:
“The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Now the question would be if “it’s absolutely proven Obama never registered for Selective Service” what would be the crime?
Please look at 50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.
http://www.sss.gov/PDFs/MSSA-2003.pdf
It provides that anyone required to register, but does not is subject to a fine of $10,000.00 (now $250,000.00) and up to 5 years in prison or both. However, the statute of limitations for failure to register expired on the person who refused to registers 31st birthday.
However, a new crime is committed if a false or altered registration certificate is made or possessed. This new crime has a new statute of limitation beginning on the last date a person made or possessed a false or altered registration certificate.
ì(b) [Registration Certificate, Alterations, False Identification] Any person (1) who
knowingly transfers or delivers to another, for the purpose of aiding or abetting the
making of any false identification or representation, any registration certificate, alien’s certificate of nonresidence, or any other certificate issued pursuant to or prescribed by the provisions of this title (sections 451 to 471a of this Appendix), or rules or regulations promulgated hereunder; or (2) who, with intent that it be used for any purpose of false identification or representation, has in his possession any such certificate not duly issued to him; or (3) who forges, alters, knowingly destroys, knowingly mutilates, or in any manner changes any such certificate or any notation duly and validly inscribed thereon; or (4) who, with intent that it be used for any purpose of false identification or representation, photographs, prints, or in any manner makes or executes any engraving, photograph, print, or impression in the likeness of any such certificate, or any colorable imitation thereof; or (5) who has in his possession any certificate purporting to be a certificate issued pursuant to this title (said sections), or rules and regulations promulgated hereunder, which he knows to be falsely made, reproduced, forged, counterfeited, or altered; or (6) who knowingly violates or evades any of the provisions of this title (said sections) or rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto relating to the issuance, transfer, or possession of such certificate, shall, upon conviction, be fined not to exceed $10,000 or be imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.î
If the Selective Service registration provided to me by the Selective Service under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request is determined beyond a reasonable doubt to be false, forged, or altered, then those who did the act or those who furthered the act are equally guilty.
18 USC 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.
Now there is a lot of derogatory statements made about conspiracy theories as if a conspiracy is something unlikely to occur and is ridiculed. But in all actuality, a conspiracy is where two or more people commit or contribute to the committing of a crime. And the crime does not need to be committed.
For example, you have three guys sitting around drinking beer. One of them suggests that they rob the beer joint across the state line tomorrow. They all voice that it sounds like a good idea. They continue to drink their beer, but one of the three goes and legally rents a ìget away car.î The robbery of the beer joint never occurs because the wife of one reports the conversation to the police. So is there a crime? Yes, the crime of conspiracy has been committed because they agreed to do the crime and one of them did something to further the crime.
Now in the instance situation, even if Senator Obama did not fill out the form, but merely provided any of the information that was put on the form (i.e. the telephone number) knowing that a false, forged, or altered registration form was going to be made, then he would be equally as guilty as the forger.
Now would the crime of conspiracy to defraud the United States (or one of its agencies) rise to the level of ìbribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Well, if the false, forged, or altered registration was done in agreement that one or more Selective Service officials would remain in office after Senator Obama became President, then it would clearly be bribery. Absent the bribery aspect is the falsification, forgery, or alteration of the registration sufficient to qualify for ìhigh crimes and misdemeanors?î
Well, it would be a felony (as a rule of thumb, any offense that carries a punishment greater than one year is a felony. A misdemeanor is an offense with a punishment of less than one year.).
Are all felonies ìhigh crimesî? Good question, but as usual a lot of good questions have not been answered by the courts. However, impeachment proceedings were instituted against President Nixon on the ALLEGATION (no conviction) of ìObstruction of Justice.î
So Congress could start impeachment proceedings against Obama without any convictions. Will they do it? Who knows.
Besides the allegations of falsification, forgery, and/or alteration of the Selective Service form, there would also be the allegation as to why Obama did not register in 1980 as required.
If Obama was claiming Kenyan or other foreign citizenry as an exemption (no formal action required, just not register) then that would be a disavowing of any US Citizenry.
This ties the Selective Service registration issue in with the college transcripts issue and the birth certificate issue. If the birth certificate shows foreign birth, he may not be eligible to hold the office of Presidency. If he claimed foreign citizenry on his college transcripts, that would be a very good reason for him to not release the transcripts.
In August 2008, the Obama/Biden released Bidenís Selective Service file which showed that Biden received the same number of deferments as VP Chaney.
http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/aggregator.php?entry=577417
But not one word on Senator Obamaís registration even though there were questions posted on his own website by me:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stephencoffman/gGxskJ
Who knows what will happen?
Sorry about the length of this response.

StephenCoffman on November 27, 2008 at 10:37 am

Stephen,
Is it not also put of the penalty that if you fail to register that you can never hold a job in the Executive branch of the federal Government? Isn’t the presidency a job in the federal Government even though it is an elected position?
Ken

MIDDLE CLASS GUY on November 27, 2008 at 12:44 pm

BHO’s left-handed autographs in the photo (http://tinyurl.com/5nvnyk) resemble his 02/12/07 stmt. of candidacy signature (http://tinyurl.com/6l5jqq) but are dissimilar to his SS registration signature (http://tinyurl.com/5t2gf4). Besides all the questions Debbie legitimately raises, there are two other facts about BHO’s life around the time of the supposed registration which both answers some of the questions, and raises others.
The following comments are from this webpage: http://tinyurl.com/6agk4f
“LOS ANGELES – Barack Obama’s interest in political activism took root at Occidental College, a small liberal arts institution in this city’s hilly Eagle Rock section.
“He was barely 18 when he arrived in 1979, a kid from Hawaii who still called himself Barry.”
. . .
“Obama spent just two years at Occidental.”
From the above information, BHO went by the name Barry during his 1979 to 1981 sojourn in the Los Angeles area. But his SSS card is signed Barack H. Obama in July, 1980 !!! Unless he flew back to Hawaii for the summer, he couldn’t have mailed this registration from Honolulu. BHO has never spoken of one or more trips back to Hawaii for time with his mother’s family so that possibility seems pretty implausible.

TONAhistory on November 28, 2008 at 12:13 pm

I am about the same age as Obama. If someone will explain to me how to find my record online, I’ll be glad to check to see if these theories hold up. I would love to be able to prove that this guy forged something.

Fomerobamista on December 14, 2008 at 10:01 pm

You may already know this: The Soetoro divorce papers (PDF) says Barry (?) and sister Maya were legally adopted.
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/obamas-parents-divorce-decree-stanley-ann-soetoro-lolo-soetoro-child-custody-obama-indonesian-obama-not-natural-born-citizen-obama-born-in-kenya/
Faulty selective service registration card – fake and wrong date?
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html
About non Ôø? registered sss registration Selective Service
Became Barack 12/1?/1980
Andy Martin:
http://www.rightsidenews.com/200811012436/editorial/state-of-hawaii-backs-andy-martin-in-obama-birth-certificate-battle.html
Good work on the Hawaii victory. How did they know Frank Marshall Davies was the biological father?
Was it on the birth certificate? Could this be more deception?
God is trying to change the world; we are going the wrong way.
He has solutions to religious and secular world problems we created by ignoring His wisdom.
I expect to be the president because of what God has spoken into my life and the things that I have seen to transform this world.
God Bless You,
Marie Devine
3023 Montgall Ave
Kansas City, MO 64128-1527 USA
marie-devine@divine-way.com
http://www.divine-way.com
God has solutions to world problems we created by ignoring His wisdom.

MarieDevine on January 18, 2009 at 9:04 pm

Stephen and or Debbie,
Perhaps we have a friend in Patrick Fitzgerald. You have friends in DOJ. Is he or someone on his staff one of them? He seems to be even handed about who he prosecutes. Perhaps this fits in with his investigation. It seems pretty clear a crime has been committed.

MIDDLE CLASS GUY on January 28, 2009 at 3:27 pm

Debbie, I created a webpage with the evidences and testimonies in your website. I sent the information by regular mail to US Attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald and emailed the website information to others. This is a call for removal from office and impeachment if needed. Barack Obama was sent advance notice 3 days earlier (2-8-09 after 10 PM.) You have a powerful site. Bloggers are important to freedom and justice. Spread my website to House of Representatives and to all because he can bring this nation down with a financial stimulus plan easier than sharing national secrets.
http://www.divine-way.com/forgery_evidences_sss_reg_colb_birth_cert_for_obama_impeachment.html

MarieDevine on February 12, 2009 at 10:15 am

Today, Orly Taitz at defendourfreedoms.us has posted that you want all references to Debbie Schlussel removed from her discussion of the Obama SS Registration issue. Why is this? Are you distancing yourself from Mr. Coffman and his claims regarding these documents? Have you concluded (as some other sites have) that Coffman has tampered with these documents?
[HD: THAT'S NOT CORRECT. ORLY TAITZ IS A COMPLETE LIAR AND A THIEF. I ASKED HER TO REMOVE MY COPYRIGHTED WORK, WHICH SHE RIPPED OFF AND POSTED IN ITS ENTIRETY ON HER SITE WITHOUT MY PERMISSION, IN SOME CASES EVEN REMOVING MY NAME. INSTEAD OF ABIDING BY MY DEMAND, SHE KEPT MY COPYRIGHTED WORK ON HER SITE AND REMOVED MY NAME. THAT'S FLAT OUT THEFT. SHE ALSO LIED ABOUT STEPHEN COFFMAN AND CLAIMED HE WAS HER INVESTIGATOR, WHEN HE HAD NO CONNECTION WITH HER. THE WOMAN IS A LIAR, A THIEF, AND A COMPLETE NUTJOB. I INSISTED THAT SHE REMOVE MY COPYRIGHTED WORK FROM HER SITE. SHE REFUSED AND STARTED SCREAMING AT ME, AND CONTINUED WITH HER LIES. SHE ALSO REMOVED MY NAME FROM THE REST OF MY WORK SHE STOLE. STEPHEN COFFMAN CONTACTED HER AND ASKED HER TO STOP LYING ABOUT HIM AND STEALING MY COPYRIGHTED WORK.
I AM CONSIDERING SUING HER AND WILL DEFINITELY COMPLAIN ABOUT HER TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR AND ASSOCIATED AUTHORITIES. STEPHEN COFFMAN IS ENTIRELY CREDIBLE AND DIDN'T TAMPER WITH A THING. IT'S ORLY TAITZ WHO IS THE MOST DISHONEST WOMAN I'VE EVER HAD CONTACT WITH IN MY LIFE. IF THIS IS A LAWYER, SHE HAS A FOOL FOR A CLIENT. AND THAT CLIENT HAS AN IDIOT AND A FRAUD AS A LAWYER. DS]

HistorianDude on March 27, 2009 at 4:28 pm

Someone else may have suggested this, but what about requesting the form for the DLN just before his and just after his?
Say, 8089 709 0629 and 8089 709 0635
Compare these two and see how they appear. You might be told that these DLNs are not valid, so then ask for 089 709 0629 and 089 709 0635 and see what you get.

Salavtore on June 5, 2009 at 1:23 am

In order to receive Federal Financial Aid, he would have had to prove SS registration—unless he was not legally required to register…ie he was a “foreign student”.

Indentured Servant Girl on November 15, 2009 at 5:09 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field