December 12, 2012, - 5:15 pm

Men, The New Women, Alert: Ya Think They’re Wearing Meggings in the Islamic World?

By Debbie Schlussel

As longtime readers know, one of the things I most lament in Western culture is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women. Blurring the gender roles is the death of the Western world. Not one matriarchy has ever lasted. And, then, malefactors like Islam come in to fill the void when there is a lack of masculinity. And, so, in that light, I ask: Ya think they’re wearing “Meggings” (skin-tight fashion Leggings for men) in Al-Qaeda or anywhere in the Muslim world?

meggings2>

meggings3

Not Sexy, Not Men

I’ve already written about the absurdity of “skinny jeans” for men. But this is worse. Um, I enjoy seeing the size and definition of your unit through your skintight pants as much as I enjoy seeing the same (otherwise known as an appendage of a camel’s feet) with regard to a woman’s genitals. As in, not so much. TMI, people. TMI. But apparently these meggings are “taking Manhattan by storm.” And while you might think this bizarre girlie fashion for men is just the domain of gay models and hairdressers, think again. Your daughters’ idols, like Justin Bieber, are embracing the trend and giving your kids the wrong idea about what’s masculine (and what isn’t). G-d help us.

Men’s tights, for so long the preserve of ballet dancers and runway models, are taking Manhattan by storm and could soon be seen on the street of Britain.

When trendsetters speculated what would be the defining men’s fashion movement to sweep New York this winter, few opted for the male legging.

But “Megging”, as the male legging is known, is now all the rage in sartorial circles. Celebrities such as Justin Bieber, Russell Brand and Lenny Kravitz have all been spotted wearing leggings, while fashion stores Uniqlo, Barneys and Nordstrom are selling tights for men.


The bad news is they are on their way to Britain: Uniqlo is already selling them on its British website, and their success in New York is seen as an indication they will also prove popular here.

They are expected to follow on from the trend for “skinny jeans” on men, which have become a staple of the British high street.

One proud “megger” is Mark Dorosz, 34, an English internet entrepreneur who lives on the Upper East Side in Manhattan.

“Male tights are so much more comfortable than skinny jeans,” he said. “I’ve always had good legs and it’s nice to show them off all year round.

Yes, I know that Joe Willie Namath once wore pantyhose (and did pantyhose ads) while in the NFL. But that was to keep warm. You don’t see him wearing them today, do you? Or even when he drunkenly told ESPN’s Suzy Kolber on the air that he wanted to kiss her. Wearing meggings is far more embarrassing than that.

The Muslim world is trying to destroy us, and our “men” are wearing meggings.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

106 Responses

Garbage like ‘meggings’ is acceptable, but religious jewelry isn’t.

Little Al on December 12, 2012 at 5:22 pm

D I S G U S T I N G !

Just lost my lunch…. No one wants to see THAT… just go away.

As goes, so goes... on December 12, 2012 at 5:22 pm

Wait til this catches on with the fat guys.

PitandPen on December 12, 2012 at 5:34 pm

The queer in the blue needs to lay off the bench press and get on the squats/deadlifts.

The other two queers need to get themselves a ham samich. Anorexia, just like skinnie jeans, doesn’t look good on men or women.

PitandPen on December 12, 2012 at 5:36 pm

Look at paintings of men, commoners and aristocrats, pants from the 1600′s to the early 1800′s, it basically looks like the same thing as ‘meggings’, just in duller colors. What does this have to do with masculinity?

Uwotm8 on December 12, 2012 at 5:37 pm

    You need a lesson in style dude. For one thing, meggins were not worn.

    Early 17th Century: http://web.ccsd.k12.wy.us/techcurr/social%20studies/images/pilman.jpg

    Worry01 on December 12, 2012 at 8:35 pm

      Moving further into the seventeenth century:

      http://www.yourdressmaker.com/shop/images/Jacket_14_aufm.jpg

      No meggings yet. Also, note the long coats. It is also important to realize that they were wearing knee britches. Those stockings were not worn up to the crotch.

      Worry01 on December 12, 2012 at 8:48 pm

        No, leggings were worn earlier, Early Middle Ages thru about 16th C. with tunics. Look at Renaissance and earlier paintings. It was older men and clerics who wore long robes prior to the Reformation which brought the idea of male modesty to the mainstream. And not all those leggings were dull colors for the upper classes. Looser, longer trousers with longer fitted coats came in as a compromise between modesty and the necessity of riding horseback and military readiness. These became the full knee length pants and stockings we see in paintings of the “puritans” and which remained in style until Beau Brummel introduced long straight pants with short coats and these were considered quite shocking and scandalous because they defined the entire leg and the coats did not cover the “critical” areas.

        Italkit on December 13, 2012 at 2:23 am

    Sigh.

    We just went through a major fashion fight in the school I teach at with our girls about leggings. Had to impose rules about the length of their shirts covering the contour-revealing clothing. A few had to be threatened with suspension for repeated violations, before they caved in and covered.

    I’m just not sure that I have the energy to go through this again, with the boys.

    LindaF on December 15, 2012 at 8:08 am

No, Muslim men don’t wear meggings, they wear dresses.

Debbie, you should google Conan O’Brien wearing jeggings. It is hysterical.

Karen on December 12, 2012 at 5:50 pm

I’m sorry but I’m not wearing that. Not under any circumstances.

Ghostwriter on December 12, 2012 at 5:53 pm

Me neither!

I do wear a warm bodysuit in the winter – but that’s just to keep warm.

This “meggings” trend – let’s just say its not my idea of male easy casual wear.

It doesn’t look very attractive on a man.

NormanF on December 12, 2012 at 6:35 pm

That’s why in NYC no one saved that Asian man when that insane Mooooslim pushed him into the train. Men have become as girly as girls. It’s off-putting. I also resent fake men like Manet Napolitano thinking she’s very manly. No, she’s just insanely annoying.

I hate that there are not manly men anymore. It’s disgusting. And DS is right. It’s not sexy (especially on that ugly beasts Mr. Katy Perry Russell Brand.)

You men better start taking your masculinity back. The women taking it are not worthy. America needs real men now more than ever.

Skunky on December 12, 2012 at 6:37 pm

    Skunky,

    No, that’s not why. NYC has long been a place where people don’t want to “get involved”. The 1964 Genovese rape and murder is an example of that.

    Scott on December 12, 2012 at 10:12 pm

      Can’t be both now could it Scott?

      You’re such a lazy thinker.

      Skunky on December 12, 2012 at 11:08 pm

        Skunky,

        You flatly stated “girliemanism” was the reason no one helped. Along with my point of the NYC don’t get involved mindset,maybe the attack happened so fast it took everyone by surprise.

        What’s your don’t want to get involved/girlieman ratio on your “both” theory?

        Scott on December 13, 2012 at 1:02 am

          Scott, you’re half a female I reckon. You act like one and ask silly questions like one.

          If you think for a second someone like myself did NOT think of the infamous Kitty Genovese case when I first heard about this case (and other similar ones) you’re on queerstreet.

          But this thread is on faggy, male Jeggings NOT Kitty Genovese. I reckon you can figure out what someone like me thinks of the KG case. Think about it.

          Skunky on December 13, 2012 at 7:41 am

      @Scott–

      Hate to break it to you, but that whole thing is a meme and urban myth that just won’t die. In fact, police received dozens of calls–but did not react until too late!

      In fact, the perp was brought down the next day by ordinary people who did get involved.

      You could look it up.

      Red Ryder on December 13, 2012 at 8:20 am

        Red Ryder, thanks for that info. I seem to recall what you said, but I forgot about it, thus doing my part to perpetuate the myth.

        skzion on December 13, 2012 at 12:23 pm

        Even back in the day, we on the left coast got that news filtered down. All I remember is neighbors with windows facing the crime did nothing despite her cries for help.

        Rochelle on December 13, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    Skunky,
    There are plenty of manly men in America, but if you live in a blue state you won’t see many. They are warriors, farmers, steel workers, firemen, cops (not TSA), border patrol, commercial fishermen, etc. They live where the probing lenses of media cameras do not. Don’t let the metro-sexuals of the media exclusively shape your world view. When it’s time to fight, you will see the manly men surface, and they will be running the show.

    Pete on December 13, 2012 at 9:33 am

Meggings? You know this could actually be a macho fashion trend. That is, if their model is Robin Hood and his merry band, as derived from Mel Brooks’s “Robin Hood: Men in Tights.” Of course, that was a comedy, not reality.

We’re men, we’re men in tights.
We roam around the forest looking for fights.
We’re men, we’re men in tights.
We rob from the rich and give to the poor, that’s right!
We may look like sissies, but watch what you say or else we’ll put out your lights!
We’re men, we’re men in tights,
Always on guard defending the people’s rights.

[Dance number, chorus line style]

We’re men, MANLY men, we’re men in tights. Yeah!
We roam around the forest looking for fights.
We’re men, we’re men in tights.
We rob from the rich and give to the poor, that’s right!
We may look like pansies, but don’t get us wrong or else we’ll put out your lights.
We’re men, we’re men in tights (TIGHT tights),
Always on guard defending the people’s rights.
When you’re in a fix just call for the men in tights!
We’re butch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtmbZnXSQ7k

Ralph Adamo on December 12, 2012 at 7:40 pm

You are talking about celebrities here, not average people. They seem to have to always live in their own world. No non-celebrity male would be caught wearing a Megging, their friends would laugh at them too hard!

Lee on December 12, 2012 at 8:11 pm

Just waiting for the day (not having to wait long) there are men’s lingerie at department stores. Like bra and panties for men. I always thought the Seinfeld episode of the mannzier was hilarious but never thought life would imitate art. Seems crossdressing will gain more traction nowadays.

Mario on December 12, 2012 at 8:24 pm

and it goes on past the mid 18th century: http://media.vam.ac.uk/vamembed/media/versions/uploads/images/2006aa1677_mens_formal_ensemble_about_1765_290x435.jpg

Worry01 on December 12, 2012 at 8:51 pm

The metrosexual look (Ryan Gosling in Crazy, Stupid, Love) really only plays in large urban centers, and then only among a very small claque.

Try wearing meggings in Lubbock, Buffalo, Green Bay, or Bakersfield!

adam on December 12, 2012 at 9:12 pm

Debbie,

You of all people should know better than equate your “girlieman” theory with Muslims filling some kind of void. It’s corrupt and/or incompetent politicians that are selling out our country, not men wearing silly looking clothes. You’ve posted NUMEROUS examples of politicians selling us out, then you post this kind of nonsense.

Our kids being influenced by pop idols wearing “gender bending” outfits? Where have you been? Ever heard of David Bowie, Mick Jagger, and a slew of other rock stars with their makeup and gender-bending clothing? Somehow most males managed to avoid wearing makeup and gender-bending clothing.

It’s highly unlikely these meggings will catch on with most men, but even if they somehow do, it would be in a toned-down form, just like previous radical fashion fads.

Scott on December 12, 2012 at 9:48 pm

    Scott, do you normally get so hysterical about this sort of thing? Are there wardrobe issues that you are sensitive about?

    Worry01 on December 12, 2012 at 10:52 pm

      Worry, Scott ALWAYS gets his knickers in a twist about silly Liberal issues. De Rigueur for him. *Yawn*

      Skunky on December 12, 2012 at 11:06 pm

        It might be a hormonal issue for him Skunky. Also, I have a new appreciation for seventeenth and eighteenth century fashion for males. There were no meggings, despite insinuations of one person. he he. The tricorner hat gave its wearer a purposeful look. It was something that spread rapidly from its point of origin in Switzerland after 1750. Knee britches looked rather comfortable as well.

        Ask Maximilien Marie Isidore de Robespierre: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-zzIeUIIiNtY/T1-FmGJdHKI/AAAAAAAAAwU/VmGQyOgE0co/s1600/Louis_Boilly_Robespierre.jpg

        Worry01 on December 13, 2012 at 12:44 am

          The

          The Frock Coat did hide a multitude of sins unlike this modern version.

          Rochelle on December 13, 2012 at 10:08 pm

      Now c’mon, Worry. Scott makes a worthwhile challenge, however pugnacious his tone.

      I have doubts as well about the causal argument here. Is Debbie really arguing that fashion is a cause? She does seem to.

      I don’t know if such stuff is relevant at all. But if it is, I suspect it is as an indicator of an underlying cause, not as a cause itself. Another such indicator would be the number of young, apparently straight young men walking around with Abercrombie & Fitch bags with topless male models on them. Good grief, how gay!

      I also regret Debbie’s penchant for using Muslim behavior as some kind of gold standard. Apropos that, what of all the muz with girlybrows?

      There clearly *is* a feminization of society brought about in part by a dedicated attack on masculinity. The issue is whether Debbie’s conception of masculinity is carefully drawn. So far as I can tell, she defaults to an idea that Muslim society is “masculine.” I’m not convinced that’s true.

      skzion on December 12, 2012 at 11:29 pm

        Skzion, @ the gym yesterday (and before I saw this column/thread) I had the dubious delight to watch an episode of “The Shahs Of Sunset”. I couldn’t help but notice that even the gay guy on the show “Reza” had a big moustache. I couldn’t help think about it was because of his Moooooslim background even thou’ he is gay (and he is very squishy…a trait I love in gay men but NOT straight men).

        And I saw some ugly waxed brows in the men. Too bad the captions were broken. I had no idea what the episode was about but I learned Iranians (females) have a more tacky style than Latinas (which is hard to beat, believe me…they own “tacky”…Dios mio!!!!).

        And one guy had a HUGE nose. In fact, it may have started the argument the two females had. That show is something else…but I was stuck on the guy with that moustache…I knew it was cultural and even thou’ ‘Reza’ is gay it makes him look at least more masculine than hetero metrosexuals today.

        Skunky on December 13, 2012 at 8:33 am

          So, Skunky, you seem to like the “clone” look. Very retro!

          skzion on December 13, 2012 at 12:36 pm

          Skzion, I don’t think I said what look I like (???). And it certainly isn’t a moustached one. I like goat-tees. A lot.

          But for clarity, I mentioned what I saw on SOS because I was shocked (but kinda not after the story on Mooooslim moustache transplants) that an Iranian who was gay would STILL sport a moustache when it’s hardly in vogue AND not very popular on gay men (at least the ones I see…but Pete is correct…I do live in a Blue state…).

          I do believe it has to do with his Moooooslim culture so I was adding that because it would bolster what DS said in this column and previous ones. And I did see the show before I saw this column.

          And I also want to add in the episode I watched the Persian Moooooslims were acting very un-Moooooslim like BUT I didn’t doubt for a second if the fundamentalist kind come and seize power these sorts wouldn’t fall in line. THAT also disturbed me.

          Skunky on December 13, 2012 at 3:43 pm

      Worry,

      I like your hysterical comment. My point stands. The Islamic threat to our country is coming from our political leadership selling us out. Money in the form of contributions from Arab and/or Islamic lobbyists,a growing Muslim population,political correctness,complacency, and incompetence is cause of the selling out.

      To get sidetracked and relate that threat with ugly clothing and androgenous rock stars risks taking the people’s eyes off the ball.

      Scott on December 13, 2012 at 1:17 am

        Scotty, define hysterical for us. It might be a good exercise for you to learn some word meanings.

        Worry01 on December 13, 2012 at 6:27 am

I am feeling so superior after seeing these “fellas” attired so nicely. Hayyyyy.
I have to differ on the opinion of camel digits. I am a huge fan of the innocent unaware breed of it.lol It did take me a while to stop wearing cargo pocket pants so often. Regular jeans just feel too natural to give up. Pajama pants in the evening, reclining at home. Like a hoodie at home, not out and about. Especially in stores or banks. Saw a couple guys duke it out one time in high school. The underdog pulled the hoodie over the favorites head, transforming it into a hockey fight. Underdog won, and won big. He actually showed mercy when he shoved the favorite to the ground, harmless and resigned. It was a simpler time.

samurai on December 12, 2012 at 9:49 pm

Debbie, I think it’s called a “moose knuckle”.
Anyway, it seems that these tights have been thrust upon the world by the homosexual fashionistas just to satisfy their homosexual fantasies/voyeurism. And looks like there are plenty of suckers who fell for the scheme.

Gino on December 12, 2012 at 9:52 pm

Ya..THATS gross.

Canadian Steve on December 12, 2012 at 10:32 pm

“The Muslim world is trying to destroy us, and our “men” are wearing meggings.”

That is one of the most profound statements ever to come from one of your columns. The Muslim world is trying to destroy us, and our “men” are wearing meggings. -

The Muslim world is trying to destroy us, and Obama has dressed our whole Nation in symbolic meggins.

Fish on December 12, 2012 at 11:16 pm

That’s silly, actually. I suggest you have a look at any painting from the Renaissance.

Laura Latini on December 13, 2012 at 2:42 am

I get a chubby whenever Skunky gets into a flame war with some liberal fooster

AnusPresley on December 13, 2012 at 3:29 am

Betty Friedan the founder of the feminist movement in America who said she was just a frustrated housewife in a comfortable gulag – came out in the 90′s she was a member of the Communist Party just doing her part to destroy the Judeo/Christian values and American culture of the Founders.

Islam is an opportunistic demonic force bent on another form of governance taking advantage with the ruse of mosques which are nothing more then Trojan horses for fomenting terrorism and treason against the USA.

But that is just the tip of the iceberg: got one question for anyone on this blog – do you know who Fabians (with logo of wolf in sheep’s clothing), Frankfurt School, Antonio Gramsci, Mattechine Society, Alinksi (who dedicated his book “Rules for Radicals to Lucifer), Committees of Correspondence are? Connect all the dots
All part of the Agenga to create an America so corrupt it stinks and to drive this culture in a direction designed to destroy it. If you don’t know all this you need to find out!

This is the most comprehensive, best movie I have seen pulling all this together. Watch it. Share it.
It should be mandatory viewing for every one subjected to government schools. Fat chance!
https://vimeo.com/52009124
if that is not working try this: https://vimeo.com/16647512

FRANCES LOUISE on December 13, 2012 at 6:00 am

Well if they get us it probably will have to do with the fact that stuff like this has become more important in people’s lives than anything real. When you’ve been at the top of the food chain too long it sometimes becomes impossible to imagine things being any other way. Unfortunately that lack of imagination is not shared on the other side. Their lack of imagination applies to men in tights, not to the uses of power and intimidation.

To put it plainly, they understand us and what is important about us much better than we understand them. What is important about us has increasingly become our illusions and we wear this like a sign around our necks to our peril and to the peril of everything we say we care about.

Frankz on December 13, 2012 at 8:29 am

I remember back when I was a little kid, being asked what I wanted to wear for Halloween. Being a nerd gamer kid, I said “Link” from the Legend of Zelda games. For those who don’t know, that would be a sort of Robin Hood green medieval costume. Anyway, my mother replied, “You’d have to wear tights….”

Screw that noise. I went as Darkwing Duck. (And that costume was actually pretty sick.)

Moral of the story: These dipsticks have less shame and common sense than a prepubescent nerd.

Brian R. on December 13, 2012 at 9:18 am

Where would you put the lock blade folding knife, wallet, car keys and leatherman tool?

Pete on December 13, 2012 at 9:22 am

    In his purse, naturally.

    herbster on December 13, 2012 at 10:31 am

      Don’t laugh, herbster, those Medieval and Renaissance dudes DID carry purses. Unfortunately I can’t find any examples online.

      Italkit on December 13, 2012 at 1:52 pm

      Purses for guys – nowadays called “fag bag”

      CornCoLeo on December 13, 2012 at 3:26 pm

        We called the medic field first aid bag (about the size of a purse with a shoulder strap) a “fag bag” in the Army way back in ’79 when I was in, so the name had to have originated in the Army much earlier.

        DS_ROCKS! on December 13, 2012 at 4:00 pm

Those damn Yankees wearing those meggings are easy prey for the scumbags of America. You cannot conceal a Baretta or a Ruger in those damn things.
Give me tactical pants or military pants anyday.

Confederate South on December 13, 2012 at 9:50 am

My first reaction is, OUCH! However, let’s take this one step further. Just wait until the Pentagon gets wind of this. These ballet tights will soon be made part of the uniform thanks to our new policy of pro-homosexuality in the military. We already have had a “Wedding” ceremony in the chapel at West Point, so soon we’ll see the groom and groom in matching tights. We live in a sick world.

herbster on December 13, 2012 at 10:38 am

An armed society is a POLITE society.

Confederate South on December 13, 2012 at 11:28 am

Sorry Debbie, these aren’t Meggings. They’re Feggings.

Sean M on December 13, 2012 at 12:31 pm

Leggings, meggings, or skinny jeans….NONE are a good look for men in the 21st century!

Melyssa on December 13, 2012 at 1:37 pm

    I totally agree.

    Italkit on December 13, 2012 at 1:53 pm

The emblem on “Girlieman’s” chest looks a lot like the Masonic square and compass with the big “G” in the middle.

CornCoLeo on December 13, 2012 at 3:31 pm

Hello Ladies and Gents I apologize for popping in unexpected and being off topic,but since 99 percent of you on this forum are Hebrews(except two black fools and one menopausal ,lonely,plastic yeast infected biatch-Skunky) I need to know where in Israel is grave or tomb of Salomon Morel,so I could travel there and with pleasure defecate on it.If you need more info about this POS-SOAB,link is below BTW I am a nephew one of his victim.Thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

ugly and Jew on December 13, 2012 at 5:54 pm

    Ugly & Mooooslim, it nourishes me that my posts give you fits.

    The more I learn about evil Islam, the more you’ll hate me.

    I wouldn’t have it any other way, Mooooslim pig!

    Skunky on December 13, 2012 at 6:12 pm

    Ugly and Mooooslim, you’re why I enjoy hearing of such things as Muslim kindergartens being bombed.

    skzion on December 13, 2012 at 6:35 pm

    Ugly and Mooooslim,

    I just love it when dimwitted retards like you come here and try to be clever. Let me clue your dumbass in on something. I wake up each and every day and love the fact that I can post stuff here that causes maggots like you heartburn. You run along now and go play hide the detonator with your other raghead buddies.

    Ken b on December 13, 2012 at 11:01 pm

    HA-HA Ugly & Mooooslim, Skunky made you LOOK LIKE A FOOL!!

    StinkyBird on December 15, 2012 at 1:41 pm

Picture all the males you know wearing them. What percentage of them DON”T look bizarre.

Rochelle on December 13, 2012 at 6:57 pm

This is what women get for making us look at yoga pants for the last fiver years.

petebone on December 13, 2012 at 8:50 pm

    pbone, haven’t I asked you nicely on several occasions to center yourself in your photo? Is this really too much to ask?

    skzion on December 13, 2012 at 10:22 pm

Is he carrying a roll of CERTS?

#1 Vato on December 13, 2012 at 9:34 pm

Real men do not wear meggings or skinny jeans. Nor do we carry murses. That only works with “men” like Brand, Kravitz, and Lauer.

Ken b on December 13, 2012 at 11:17 pm

Kanye was also wearing a leather skirt and leggings (calling them Meggings is even too manly for me) at that 12-12-12 concert! This is ridiculous and quite gross, but it caught our attention and fashion thrives off of the “shock” factor. What’s sad is that the people that came up with this ridiculous yet simple idea are going to be the ones laughing to the bank. Kind of makes me wonder if Kramer’s idea of the “bro” would ever take off.

This is as disgusting as the male thong!

Kershaw on December 14, 2012 at 2:03 am

I thought “Ugly” was a Polack. It’s usually “christians” who use the term “Hebrew.”

Italkit on December 14, 2012 at 6:12 am

Some of ya is comparing leggings worn in the 17th century and by Aristocrats and what not, BUT forget to say that Mens was Mens in dem days, no BS happening then. And they also didnt take baths back then neither. Those was different times, men was mens and womens was womens, no transgenders, no openly homosexuals, unless it was the immoral debauchery exception. Nowadays those lines have crossed over, under in and around mens want to be womens, womens wants to be mens, some want the best of both worlds, gays adopting little kids and raising them as gay, so does that mean that it is learned? Because they cant reproduce with each other. And if you a MAN, then you the bad guy because “how dare you be a man that loves womens” This new style should receive a warm welcome at DHS/ICE, where you can cut the homosexual tension with a knife!

MF Jones on December 14, 2012 at 9:40 am

    With customs leading the way…..LMFAO!!!!

    IceNoMore on December 17, 2012 at 4:36 pm

      Hey, Special Education, laughing at your own jokes, are we? Pathetic, but then again what can one expect from the immigration gene pool that fostered Deliverance and Broke Back Mountain?

      MF Jones on December 19, 2012 at 11:07 am

The Fashionistas are actually doing America a service because they want to introduce an item that perhaps will change the course of modern youth to where they are going. And by that I mean look at the youth of today with the pants falling down, halfway down to their drawers, walking the street with they pants falling down, uptown, downtown, with they pants falling down, and the little kid who sees that, perhaps sees the brother or the father, walking down the street with they pants falling down, what type of role model for them is that? So I choose to take the exception here on this one point, the “meggings” are beneficial in a society where many young men are walking around with they pants falling down. And also, as someone has alredy pointed out one cannot hide a Baretta Mac 10 in those stockings! Think of the benefit at the airport security checkpoint, no need for an time consuming xray before boarding a flight, the tight meggings show everything and one cannot hide anything in them

Rev. Umgana Kicqbouti on December 14, 2012 at 9:59 am

Utter Faggotry. Sorry that’s not PC.

Steve Epps on December 14, 2012 at 7:31 pm

As underwear – particularly thermal underwear – these things are perfectly acceptable. Always have been.

But as outerwear?

Er, what do you do for pockets? Throw a musette bag over your shoulder and call it a “murse”?

While we’re at it, why not “civilianize” ALICE gear so we can stylishly equip ourselves with ergonomic load-bearing elements that’re comfortable, functional, and look a helluva lot better than these “meggings”?

Tucci78 on December 15, 2012 at 8:04 am

sTitch is decidely pro leggings, allow me to tell you a story;

On the 28th of October 2012, two young city workers wore ill fitting female leggings to a fancy dress party in north London. These two individuals alongside another mutual friend have now tasked themselves with designing, manufacturing and selling male leggings to the fashion conscious Londoner.

Check out http://www.stitchleggings.com for further info

sTitch Leggings on June 26, 2013 at 2:42 pm

That is odd. I associate Bacheh-baazi with Muslims like yourself.

Worry01 on December 13, 2012 at 6:42 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field