November 13, 2013, - 10:53 pm

VIDEO: When Muslim Beastesses Attack – “Jew Sh-t! Dirty Jew!”

By Debbie Schlussel

Unfortunately, the man in this video–while strong enough to videotape these Muslim hywonot (animals)–was too wimpy to press charges. Ignore the website link-whoring at the end of this video by a misguided idiot who believes in the pimping of Slobbert Spencer (whose most vehement jihad is against me, not Muslims, because I’m interfering with his business model and that of his plagiarist, scamming girlfriend, Scamela–who paid off Muslim straw buyers in her car loan fraud scheme).

muslimwomenattackislamiccrescent.jpg

More on the story:

A Canadian Jewish man was attacked and racially abused by two Muslim women at a popular coffee shop in Montreal earlier this month. The unidentified man, who was dining at Tim Horton’s cafe, filmed the attack on his phone. He reportedly asked the women what they thought of the proposed ban on religious clothing.










The two women, who have not been named, proceeded to physically attack the man. They grew increasingly irate when they spotted him filming the abuse. The younger women, who appeared to be in her late 20s, hurled antisemitic abuse him in Quebecois French.

She said: “Jewish s***. You’re Jewish s***. You insult veiled women. “You’re entire race can go f*** themselves. Dirty Jew.” She also called him a “racist”.

Um, what “race” is a Jew? I wonder How Sammy Davis, Jr. and the Queen of Sheba would answer that. (Not to mention, rapper Drake and actress Lisa Bonet, both Jews.)

The older women, who was wearing a black and blue hijab, also attacked the camera-holder with her handbag during the confrontation. According to reports, the non-religious Jewish man, who asked customers to call the police during the attack, did not press charges.

If you’re not gonna make them face the music, your filming of the transgressions loses its oomph. Don’t let these fugly Muslimas take your testicles away.

Remember, these are women in Canada, and the Muslim chicks in America ain’t no different. If you don’t press charge, they’ll keep attacking.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Print Friendly



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

31 Responses

How can you insult “veiled women” more than they already do themselves and their Satanic “religion”?

*Honour killings
*FGM
*Paedophile pre-arranged marriages
*Mu’tah
*The men dictate to them.
*Have to dress like an artic Ninja even in the heat of summer.
*Can’t drive (Saudi Arabia)
*Can’t go to school (Afghanistan)
*Can be beat with things thinner than a hairy, Mooooslim thumb.

It’s just Islam that is the stinker. A stinky “religion” with stinky followers. These beasts are a scourge.

Skunky on November 13, 2013 at 11:43 pm

    It is hard to have any respect for women who voluntarily wear slave rags. Islam views women a chattel property and subhuman. In the case of Muslimas, why should I argue with Islam? It is amusing to be called dirty by what is for all intents and purposes a barnyard animal.

    Worry01 on November 14, 2013 at 9:42 am

There’s been a disturbing trend of single and groups of the fairer sex engaging in more violent attacks against people. Even men. When they sense they can attack without fear of a counter attack, they really tee off. It’s sad that that’s the world we live in but if I have a situation like this one pop off on me I will defend myself. But then again, they’ve got a dog like way of sensing that in advance of actually attacking. The last thing in the world most decent men want to do is drill a woman in the jaw but that may be exactly what is warranted in some instances. Like the hajis running around messing with people, they need a wake up. Or rather a nite, nite.

samurai on November 13, 2013 at 11:48 pm

I have one thing to sat to the two moronic female Muslim scumbags:

Genesis 12:1-3.

JeffE on November 13, 2013 at 11:57 pm

Quebec wants to ban the wearing of religious clothing in public institutions.

If I never had to ever see an ugly hijab or burqa again, it would be all worth it.

These Muslimas make the case for secular dress far better than any one else. And if they don’t like the proposed ban, they’re free to leave Quebec. Or they can wear them at home.

NormanF on November 14, 2013 at 12:06 am

I saw four muslim men in sandals, full long robes and white caps piling out of a Toyota Tercel and go into a Jon’s market in North Hollywood. It looked like a clown car act but I’m sure it smelled to high holy Hell in that car.

DS_ROCKS! on November 14, 2013 at 12:38 am

    I understand how you feel. The only time I was ever afraid to get on the subway in Seoul was this time when this group of about 6-10 young men in traditional dress were waiting for a car nearby. We already stood out as foreigners & there was no hiding that my 6’2 in husband belonged to one of the American military bases around. I made sure to get into a car very far away, as though it would do any good. You really learn how it feels to be a potential target and get to think of what its like for them to be foreigners always being suspected of something.
    One thing I noticed right away & pointed out to my husband, there is one mosque in Korea & it is located just outside the main joint US ROK Base & it sits high on a hill. Its minarets sit still higher. They can probably see everything from there. I don’t think it was an accident.

    I know what you mean on November 14, 2013 at 4:42 pm

Gotta love it…. the religion of peace in action. They can’t even handle a basic question.

Russ on November 14, 2013 at 8:16 am

Hags in Hijabs.

Worry01 on November 14, 2013 at 9:32 am

I really hate to say this, but Quebec and the French there – as well as the English there – appear to have taken the same road as the MONTREAL CANADIENS.

Remember, in the 1950s – 1970s, the HABS were ferocious and had real leaders.

The present population appears to be descendents of Vichy – never met a confrontation to which surrender was not their first option.

BTW…Where were the Managers, Employees, and Patrons of TIM HORTON’S in preventing this assault?

http://www.spiritofcanada.com/veterans/stories/open.php?type=rca&target=wasASoldier

Oh, how sadly all of us have forgotten how to protect ourselves from despots and terrorism and to “MAN-UP” against those who want to do us harm and make us into dhimmi.

Dennis on November 14, 2013 at 9:54 am

    And there was a strong degree of support for the Vichy Government among French-
    Canadiens during World War II.

    Little Al on November 14, 2013 at 10:10 am

The guy taking the video is a real Frenchman–a total wimp.

I don’t believe in striking a woman but you start hitting me I will defend myself.

Also if you are nonreligious–you aren’t jewish. That’s like people who haven’t been to church since they were children calling themselves Catholic…umm no.

I would have asked the Muslimista where was her hijab ?? Ask her what would happen to her in a Muslim country if she struck a man and was not wearing a hijab ??

jimmyPx on November 14, 2013 at 10:08 am

Ah, Muslims. They can always be counted on to witness on behalf of their detractors. Enter this current incident as exhibit # somewhere in thousands. Got to love ‘em; they’re nothing if not tolerant. But I must be fair and acknowledge that they are not nothing. They are really quite something. They are unspeakably obscene.

The best anti-Islam argument starts with a look at Muslim behavior. Always predictable to be a display of rabid ignorance and the devil’s own hatred for anything that is not them. This, even in response to the innocuous provocation seen in the video.

They keep aiding us in seeing the threat they pose but instead of the gathering storm, we block our eyes as if the storm were radiant sunshine. How long will we be afforded the luxury?

lee of the lower case "l" on November 14, 2013 at 10:10 am

    lee

    You ask, “How long will we be afforded the luxury?”.

    NOT MUCH LONGER…WE ARE BROKE…GOTTA HAVE REAL MONEY TO BE ABLE TO FIGHT YOUR ENEMIES.

    Utilize John Naisbitt’s methodology – taken from the Allies in WW II – and scan all the news sources and the headlines, note the categories, and a picture will surface.

    “Prepare for the worst and hope for the best” is what an old boater friend used to say. I am trying to do that before time to do so has expired.

    Your points are on target – Bull’s Eyes.

    Dennis on November 14, 2013 at 11:24 am

      Dennis; Over the years I’ve learned much from reading VDH. Clearly, you have as well.

      L: Huh? If you’ve learned “much” from VDH, you clearly haven’t been paying attention. This so-called “historian” went on TV after 9/11, telling us about how most Muslims are peaceful, the hijackers hijacked their religion, Mohammed loved the Jews, and other BS. The guy is vacant and clueless. His columns and writings are stale regurgitations of stuff a gazillion people have already written about the obvious. What have you “learned” from that hack? DS

      lee of the lower case "l" on November 14, 2013 at 11:55 am

        Faux pas, for all to see:

        Debbie,I’ll admit to being stunned by this info you provide. Literally, stunned. I’m finding it difficult to respond further than that, except to say ” Thank you” for filling in crucial gaps in my view of VDH. What you tell me dwarfs the contribution the man has made to my edification in areas unrelated to the Islamic scourge.

        I respectfully yield to your superior knowledge and intellect that makes my own practically a laughing matter.

        lee of the lower case "l" on November 14, 2013 at 4:02 pm

          lee, don’t sweat it. Ten years ago I also used to think well of Hanson. Alas, he turned out to be a complete ignoramus. In fairness to him, though, he seems to have generally avoided columns about Islam and war since he proved to be utterly wrong. in the post-9/11 world.

          Now he blathers about immigration, apparently.

          skzion on November 14, 2013 at 8:44 pm

          sk: Thanks for that. I don’t mind a bit (to understate it) that you–specifically, you– would toss me a line.

          Bunches and bushels of thanks!

          lee of the lower case "l" on November 14, 2013 at 9:17 pm

        Huh? I love it when Debbie straightens out a rudderless ship of DEBATE. Well done.

        samurai on November 14, 2013 at 4:17 pm

Do any of you have an idea what will America be like in about 10 years ? It just seems this country is going downhill and will not be the same country many of us grew up in nor will opprtunties be the same to what we had.As I read about muslims along with acts of criminal activity aimed at non muslims.Is the Islam community intending to hold press releases condemning this latest criminal crime ?

Bobby on November 14, 2013 at 11:50 am

Muslim women R extremely aggressive, no matter their location…recently I stopped my car at red light, on a highway in lower galilee. The car on my left was driven by an Arab local woman in her 40’s, jockin I said to her:” U probably feel lucky not living in Saudi Arabia where U cannot drive…” She opened a Filthy “Mouth” on me, my Suage is cleaner….The Only logical excuse Muslim females may have, for their aggression is the fact, their husbands forces them to Share his “Gift” with the rival wives on same premises. ” Hei Fatma, U visit my Bed Sundays & Thursdays, …Mondays-Tuesdays-Wedenesdays & Saturdays, Jamila & Amina will get “his” blessings. Fridays are for God.

Simon on November 14, 2013 at 4:06 pm

    My question to you, Simon, is why you even engaged this concentration of evil. She’s not human. Why do you treat her as if she were?

    skzion on November 14, 2013 at 8:27 pm

The khazar jew and arab are the same animal

Elias on November 14, 2013 at 5:25 pm

    Elias, you idiot, you don’t even have your racism right. The so-called “Khazar Jew” couldn’t be further from the Arab ethnically.

    Back to Stormfront you cretin.

    skzion on November 14, 2013 at 8:25 pm

There is no reasoning with irrational people. Force or the threat of force is the only type of communication that can deter their actions.

Igor on November 14, 2013 at 6:11 pm

Debbie. what is your source of this victim being non-religious?
That he won’t press charges makes me believe he would be non-religious and also a schmuck for allowing these hijab hillbillies to get away with this nonsense.
The more they are allowed to skate on these incidents, the more brazen they will become. Cut them off NOW.
Shabbat Shalom.

Sanford D. Horn on November 15, 2013 at 12:12 am

Here’s a link to the Quebec “charter of values” and there’s also a bunch if other videos showing why there’s really no Canada like French Canada!!

http://nexusnow.info/forum/showthread.php?14955-Quebec-Politics-Charter-of-Quebec-Values-an-attack-on-freedom&p=93581

Clayton on November 15, 2013 at 1:23 am

And presumably, this guy was obviously doing some sort of personal investigative research on not only these two dumbass and jackass muslimah women, but the daily and average life of the typical muslim and how his and her behavior is, so this cameraman is doing somewhat anthropology by studying behavior of his fellow man. And I don’t know why this dude didn’t file charges against these women, they were the ones who started to attack this guy in a physical way, bro, you’re in Canada, and what you did is part of protected speech which is apart of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, your not in these muslimah women’s country of origin or lineage where you don’t stand a chance!

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on November 15, 2013 at 3:22 pm

A kike with nothing better to do imposes himself on two unknown women, minding their business and who plainly don’t want anything to do with him. He persists and gets a smacking. Well done, Muslim ladies! I wonder whether they straightened his nose out.

Fagin on November 15, 2013 at 5:58 pm

Really Mo ham head? Those two bitches are the filthy POS. Vile, violent and ugly people muslims are. Ticking time bombs ready to explode in rage with or without explosives. Those are your people, “Fagin”.

Karen on November 15, 2013 at 7:40 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field