March 3, 2014, - 4:42 pm
Oh, no. Liberal, intelligentsia “bible,” the pretentious New York Magazine, doesn’t like my critique of the Oscars. (The Oscars column in question is here.) In a nonsensical, unfunny (like Oscar hostatrix Ellen) “parody” of how the New York Times would have covered the Oscars and “12 Years a Slave” in 1853 (when there was still slavery), writer Jonathan Chait is upset that I pilloried the PC, race-obsessed Oscars. Scorned by the liberal faux-intellectuals? Uh-oh, whatever will I do?! One thing I can’t do is get the humorless liberal rag and Chait a sense of humor. It’s something ya either got . . . or you don’t (as in Mr. Chait’s case). Beyond fixing. Don’t forget that this is the mag that did pages and pages and pages of Obama lusting, issue after issue and declared Barry O “The First Jewish President.”
You see for the conniptive left, like New York Mag, the Oscars wasn’t left wing enough. They wish that the movies winning Oscars were Five Years a Knave (a/k/a “Our Savior, Obama”), ObamaCare Buyers Club, and Blue Statesmen.
No such luck. Hollywood propaganda is a little more subtle than that. Not by much, though.
I feel like I should give a proud Sally Field-esque acceptance speech at the New York Mag “accolades.” They hate me. They really hate me.
In this case that’s a badge of honor.
Tags: 12 Years a Slave, 2014 Academy Awards, Academy Awards, Jonathan Chait, Jonathan Chait Debbie Schlussel, Jonathan Chait New York Magazine, New York Magazine, New York Magazine Debbie Schlussel, Oscars