November 9, 2009, - 11:08 am

Islamic Terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan & Cartoon of the Week

By Debbie Schlussel

Check out the cartoon below.  I’ve been saying it for years.

Everyone’s up in arms that Nidal Malik Hasan, the Islamic terrorist who murdered 13 American soldiers and wounded 30 others on U.S. soil, belonged to an extremist mosque where some of the 9/11 hijackers worshipped.  But I noted that mosque and that it was extremist, on Friday Morning, well before the Telegraph (which reported it Saturday).


Still, it makes no difference that he went to that mosque.  Do you think the extremism preached at that mosque is any different from the extremism preached at any other mosque in America?  And do you think the CIA or FBI watched the worshippers of that mosque at any time in the last 8 years since 9/11?  Think again.  Instead, President Bush was giving out awards with his-then Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham (whose wife is the President of Team Sarah)  to members of that mosque and others hand-picked by them.  It’s not about a particular mosque.  It’s about a particular religion.  And we refuse to face the facts.

And as I’ve repeatedly asked on this site, why the heck are we fighting jihadists over there, if we’re giving them carte blanche and promoting them over here?  And that’s why I love the cartoon above, by cartoonist Jim McCloskey, which I saw on Sean G’s site Religio-Political Talk.  Check out all of the great political cartoon’s he’s posted on the Fort Hood Muslim Massacre.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

14 Responses

I learned this morning that Nidal’ Hasan sat under the same imam at a mosque as 2 of the 911 hijackers.
[In a blog posting early Monday titled “Nidal Hassan Did the Right Thing,” Awlaki calls Hasan a “hero” and a “man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people.”

According to his site, Awlaki served as an imam in Denver, San Diego and Falls Church, Virginia.

The Associated Press reported Sunday that Major Hasan attended the Falls Church mosque when Awlaki was there…
He denied any knowledge of the hijacking plot and was never charged with any crime. After an intensive investigation by the FBI , Awlaki moved to Yemen.]

Coincidince? Why was nothing done on prevention? Because we have brilliantly deduced that it is more PC to go to mop up the blood and go to funerals (by shying away from the cancer that islam is) than to deal with it pro-actively.

As Debbie has noted on this site for years, it is no secret that hatred of the US, Israel and the west is the standard diet of mosque attendees in the US–all doing this under the protections of the US Constitution. We go out of our way to ignore the threat islam is–uh yes, until it is time to mop up the blood.

BB on November 9, 2009 at 11:39 am

We want to be in denial – until it happens again. After all, they must be different here. Various jihadist incidents in the US since 9/11 have put the lie to that comforting fantasy. Until America wakes up, its not really at war with Islamic terrorists who want to kill us all and change this country forever.

NormanF on November 9, 2009 at 11:59 am

We have a loooong way to go before begin to do anything about terrorist in this country or overseas. It starts at the top, with new leadership from the Whitehouse throughout the Congress and the Senate. We’ve been less than half stepping for far to long since Reagan ran the Whitehouse I’m surprised this country has lasted this long.

seahawker on November 9, 2009 at 12:15 pm

You are not going to have to wait long,, the backlash that the muzzies are fearing is coming, the next attack and it will come soon enough will make even the most PC/MC usefull idiot realize that you cannot make friends with the muzzies in our midst. Soon enough your going to see a new game called cowboys and muzzies played out in the streets, it will start in Europe and rapidly spread here.

Drakken on November 9, 2009 at 12:52 pm

This is the 2nd attack on our miltary on U.S. soil by muslims who were under investigation by FBI since Obama came to office.

JUNE 2, 2009
Military Recruiting Center Shooting Suspect Under FBI Investigation,2933,524139,00.html

Any of this sound familiar:
Recruiter Shooting Suspect Had Ties to Extremist Locations
Investigators Probing Attack to Determine Whether Shooting Suspect Acted Alone
JUNE 3, 2009

Duane on November 9, 2009 at 1:13 pm

I have questions:

1. How did this guy get a loaded gun inside the base?
2. Did he have help?
3. Who did he associate with?
4. When he emptied his apt. where did his stuff go (to whom)?
5. I saw the victims, was he selective about races he targeted?
6. What kind of animal shoots a pregnant women?
7. Why didn’t the GOP press for a postponement on the HC vote?

I’ll start with these.

Rick on November 9, 2009 at 1:37 pm

1. He was a Field Grade officer, a US citizen and getting ready to be deployed. If the US Military is not issuing weapons to on duty soldiers,(i’m not familiar with current regs.) he probably has a permit for a private weapon.

MK750 on November 9, 2009 at 2:29 pm


There’s nothing unusual about soldiers possessing personal firearms.

When I was stationed at Fort Hood, Texas, I had personal firearms, which when off duty, I usually carried in my personal vehicle, or stored in my quarters.

Fort Hood, Texas has a Rod and Gun Club, Military Police are assigned to Game Warden patrols, and soldiers and military retirees go hunting and fishing there.

That’s true of probably every military installation in the United States.

Of course, that was many years ago.

Thank you.

John Robert Mallernee on November 9, 2009 at 2:52 pm


Right now, what concerns me most of all is will our military casualties at Fort Hood, Texas be awarded the Purple Heart Medal, and will the civilian casualties at Fort Hood, Texas be awarded the Defense of Freedom Medal?

Clearly, their wounds were a direct result of enemy action during a time of war.

When carrying out his mission, Nidal Malik Hasan was a Muslim acting as a Jihadist in direct support of and in sympathy with Al Qaeda and Taliban military operations.

Further, because it was an enemy action, soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas should be entitled to receive Hostile Fire Pay, at least for the month of November 2009, and they should be authorized to wear their unit insignia on the right sleeve of their uniform.

Depending on individual merit, several soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas probably should be awarded the either/and/or the Silver Star Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Combat Medic Badge, and the Close Combat Badge.

The major hindrance to this will be misguided bureaucratic “political correctness”.

So, we should begin NOW to contact and exert pressure on our Congress and the Department of Defense to ensure these rightfully deserved military decorations are properly and promptly bestowed.

Thank you.

John Robert Mallernee on November 9, 2009 at 3:05 pm

Miss Schlussel:

I copied and posted that cartoon on my blog, giving you full credit, with a link to your web site.

Thank you.

John Robert Mallernee on November 9, 2009 at 3:15 pm


With all due respect, F#$k the medals! They’re not going to bring anybody back. We need to concern ourselves with the reality that we have traitors living among us. The best medals we could bestow upon these brave soldiers is that we put an end to this madness.

Regarding firearms, If anyone reading this is a soldier in a U.S. Military Base and you can carry a sidearm, do so now.

Excuse me for losing my cool, but jimminee crickets.


Rick on November 9, 2009 at 4:44 pm


Military decorations are important because they enhance a soldier’s career when he’s being considered for promotion, or a school, or an assignment.

When decorations are not awarded, the soldier whose deeds merited it is short changed and handicapped.

Also, when individual soldiers do receive recognition, it reflects positively on that soldier’s unit and his chain of command.

Yes, we do need to root out the traitors among us.

How do we do that when everything is governed by misguided “political correctness”?

Awarding proper combat decorations to those personnel who earned it will be an official acknowledgement of enemy action on the domestic front.

That, in itself, will give impetus to combatting terrorism on the homefront.

Thank you.

John Robert Mallernee on November 9, 2009 at 6:01 pm


Every year I do a tribute on 9/11. You may enjoy it or want to link every 9/11. I post it all day long and add to it throughout that day. So look for the new post every 9/11.

God Bless You Guys and Gals.



Papa Giorgio on November 10, 2009 at 12:19 am

A NY muslim group says it better than Obama or his DHS minion. They openly praise this islamist piece of scum while calling those he murdered and wounded terrorists.
Bob A.

Bob A. on November 10, 2009 at 2:20 pm

Leave a Reply for Rick

Click here to cancel reply.

* denotes required field